Accès libre

Collaborative Relationships Among Couples: Frames of Interaction During Everyday Household Activities

À propos de cet article

Citez

Arcidiacono, F. (2007). Studying the practice of cooperation and collaboration within an international research project on the everyday lives of families. Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science, 41 (2), 139-153.10.1007/s12124-007-9016-9Search in Google Scholar

Arcidiacono, F. (2010). The ethnographic observation of the everyday life in Italy: Collaborative interactions among working couples. In C.L. Goossens (Ed.), Family Life: Roles, Bonds, and Impact (pp. 99-118). New York, NY: Nova Science Publishers.Search in Google Scholar

Arcidiacono, F. (2015). Argumentation and reflexivity. In G. Marsico, R. Andrisano- Ruggieri, & S. Salvatore (Eds.), Reflexivity and Psychology (pp. 196-193). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Arcidiacono, F., Baucal, A., & Budjevac, N. (2011). Doing qualitative research: The analysis of talk-in-interaction. In A. Baucal, F. Arcidiacono, & N. Budjevac (Eds.), Studying interaction in different contexts: A qualitative view (pp. 17-45). Belgrade: Institute of Psychology.Search in Google Scholar

Arcidiacono, F., Klein, W., Izquierdo, C., & Bradbury, T.N. (2010). Modalita interattive nella divisione del lavoro domestico: uno studio etnografico su famiglie italiane e statunitensi [Interactional modalities within the division of household labor: An ethnographic study among Italian and US families]. Rivista di Psicolinguistica Applicata, 10 (1-2), 85-105.Search in Google Scholar

Arcidiacono, F. & Pontecorvo, C. (2004). Piu metodi per la pluridimensionalita della vita familiare [Diverse methods for a multidimensional study of family life]. Ricerche di Psicologia, 27 (3), 103-118.Search in Google Scholar

Arcidiacono, F. & Pontecorvo, C. (2010a). Where and how family members spend time at home? A quantitative analysis of the observational tracking on the everyday lives of Italian families. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, 4 (2), 113-129.10.5172/mra.2010.4.2.113Search in Google Scholar

Arcidiacono, F. & Pontecorvo, C. (2010b). The discursive construction of the fathers’ positioning within family participation frameworks. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 25 (4), 449-472.10.1007/s10212-010-0024-7Search in Google Scholar

Arcidiacono, F., Pontecorvo, C., & Greco Morasso, S. (2009). Family conversations: The relevance of context in evaluating argumentation. Studies in Communication Sciences, 9 (2), 79-92.Search in Google Scholar

Becker, G.S. (1981). A Treatise on the Family. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Benveniste, E. (1966). Problèmes de linguistique générale [Problems of general linguistics]. Paris: Gallimard.Search in Google Scholar

Bova, A. & Arcidiacono, F. (2013). Invoking the authority of feelings as a strategic maneuver in family mealtime conversations. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 23 (3), 206-224.10.1002/casp.2113Search in Google Scholar

Bova, A. & Arcidiacono, F. (2014). “You must eat the salad because it is nutritious”. Argumentative strategies adopted by parents and children in food-related discussions at mealtimes. Appetite, 73 (1), 81-94.Search in Google Scholar

Bova, A. & Arcidiacono, F. (2015). Beyond conflicts. Origin and types of issues leading to argumentative discussions during family mealtimes. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict, 3 (2), 263-288.10.1075/jlac.3.2.02bovSearch in Google Scholar

Bradbury, T.N. (Ed.) (1998). The Developmental Course of Marital Dysfunction. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511527814Search in Google Scholar

Bradbury, T.N. & Karney, B.R. (1993). Longitudinal study of marital interaction and dysfunction: Review and analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 13 (1), 15-27.10.1016/0272-7358(93)90005-7Search in Google Scholar

Christensen, K. (1988). Women and Home-Based Work: The Unspoken Contract. New York, NY: Holt.Search in Google Scholar

Coltrane, S. (2000). Research on household labor: Modeling and measuring the social embeddedness of routine family work. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62 (4), 1208-1233.10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.01208.xSearch in Google Scholar

Couper-Kuhlen, E. & Etelamaki, M. (2014). On divisions of labor in request and offer environments. In P. Drew & E. Couper-Kuhlen (Eds.), Requesting in Social Interaction (pp. 115-144). Amsterdam: Benjamins.Search in Google Scholar

Des Rivieres-Pigeon, C. (2002). Division of domestic work and psychological distress 1 year after childbirth: A comparison between France, Quebec and Italy. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 12 (6), 397-409.10.1002/casp.697Search in Google Scholar

de Vaus, D. (Ed.) (2009). Family-work balance. Special issue. Journal of Family Studies, 15 (2), 118-187.Search in Google Scholar

Dunlap, E., Golub, A., & Benoit, E. (2010). The invisible partners: Cohabiting males as ‘caring daddies’ in inner-city ‘mother-only’ households. In C.L. Goossens (Ed.), Family Life: Roles, Bonds, and Impact (pp. 33-54). New York, NY: Nova Science Publishers.Search in Google Scholar

Emigh, R.J. (2000). The gender division of labour: The case of Tuscan smallholders. Continuity and Change, 15 (1), 117-137.10.1017/S0268416099003501Search in Google Scholar

Goodnow, J.J. (1988). Children’s household work: Its nature and functions. Psychological Bulletin, 103 (1), 5-26.10.1037/0033-2909.103.1.5Search in Google Scholar

Goodnow, J.J. (1989). Work in households: An overview and three studies. In D. Ironmonger (Ed.), Households Work (pp. 38-58). Sydney: Allen & Unwin.Search in Google Scholar

Goodnow, J.J. & Delaney, S. (1989). Children’s household work: Task differences, styles of assignment, and links to family relationships. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 10 (2), 209-225.10.1016/0193-3973(89)90005-1Search in Google Scholar

Goodwin, C. (2006). Retrospective and prospective orientation in the construction of argumentative moves. Text & Talk, 26 (4-5), 443-461.10.1515/TEXT.2006.018Search in Google Scholar

Goodwin, M.H. (2006). Participation, affect, and trajectory in family directive/ response sequences. Text & Talk, 26 (4-5), 515-543.10.1515/TEXT.2006.021Search in Google Scholar

Hochschild, A. (1997). Work Becomes Home and Home Becomes Work. New York, NY: Metropolitan Books.Search in Google Scholar

Hochschild, A. & Machung, A. (1989). The Second Shift: Working Parents and the Revolution at Home. New York, NY: Viking.Search in Google Scholar

Hollway, W. (1984). Gender difference and the production of subjectivity. In J. Henriques, W. Hollway, C. Urwin, L. Venn, & V. Walkerdine (Eds.), Changing the subject: Psychology, social regulation and subjectivity (pp. 227-263). London: Methuen.Search in Google Scholar

Jefferson, G. (2004). Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In G.H. Lerner (Ed.), Conversation Analysis: Studies from the first generation (pp. 13-31). Philadelphia, PA: Benjamins.Search in Google Scholar

Johnson, M.D., Cohan, C.L., Davila, J., Lawrence, E., Rogge, R. D., Karney, B.R., Sullivan, K.T., & Bradbury, T.N. (2005). Problem-solving skills and affective expressions as predictors of change in marital satisfaction. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73 (1), 15-27.10.1037/0022-006X.73.1.15Search in Google Scholar

Klein, W., Izquierdo, C., & Bradbury, T.N. (2004). Working relationships: Communicative patterns and strategies among couples in everyday life (Working Paper n. 28). Los Angeles, CA: UCLA Center on Everyday Lives of Families.Search in Google Scholar

Klein, W., Izquierdo, C., Bradbury, T.N., & Arcidiacono, F. (2005). Collaboration and conflict: Insights into the division of household labor among working couples in the United States and Italy (Working Paper n. 36). Los Angeles, CA: UCLA Center on Everyday Lives of Families.Search in Google Scholar

Lerner, G.H. (1995). Turn design and the organization of participation in instructional activities. Discourse Processes, 19 (1), 111-131.10.1080/01638539109544907Search in Google Scholar

Oropeza-Escobar, M. (2011). Framing and collaboration in storytelling events: Forgetfulness, reflexivity and word search. Pragmatics, 21 (2), 213-230.10.1075/prag.21.2.03oroSearch in Google Scholar

Pasch, L.A. & Bradbury, T.N. (1998). Social support, conflict, and the development of marital dysfunction. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66 (2), 219-230.10.1037/0022-006X.66.2.219Search in Google Scholar

Pomerantz, A. (1984). Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In M.J. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversational Analysis (pp. 57-101). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Pontecorvo, C. & Arcidiacono, F. (2014). Social interactions in families and schools as contexts for the development of spaces of thinking. In T. Zittoun & A. Iannaccone (Eds.), Activity of Thinking in Social Spaces (pp. 83-97). New York, NY: Nova Science Publishers.Search in Google Scholar

Riedinger, K. (2012). Family connections: Family conversations in informal learning environments. Childhood Education, 88 (2), 125-127.10.1080/00094056.2012.662136Search in Google Scholar

Rigotti, E. & Greco Morasso, S. (2011). Comparing the Argumentum Model of Topics to other contemporary approaches to argument schemes: The procedural and material components. Argumentation, 24 (4), 489-512.Search in Google Scholar

Rossi, G. (2012). Bilateral and unilateral requests: The use of imperatives and Mi X? interrogatives in Italian. Discourse Processes, 49 (9), 426-458.10.1080/0163853X.2012.684136Search in Google Scholar

Salvatore, S. & Valsiner, J. (2009). Idiographic Science on its Way: Towards Making Sense of Psychology. In S. Salvatore, J. Valsiner, S. Strout, & J. Clegg (Eds.), Yearbook of Idiographic Science. Volume 2 (pp. 9-19). Rome: Firera & Liuzzo Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Schmidt, J. A. (2000). Daily Stressors in Families (Working Paper). Chicago, IL: Sloan Foundation.Search in Google Scholar

Sidnell, J. (2010). Conversation Analysis: An Introduction. Chichester: Wiley- Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Stemplewska-Zakowicz, K., Zalewski, B., Suszek, H., Kobylinska, D., & Szymczyk, B. (2014). The discursive mind model. Psychology of Language and Communication, 18 (1), 1-21.10.2478/plc-2014-0001Search in Google Scholar

Wong, J. (2000). Repetition in conversation: A look at “first and second sayings”. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 33 (4), 407-424.10.1207/S15327973RLSI3304_03Search in Google Scholar

Zinken, J. & Borek, A. (2012). Working side by side? Interaction and interview data in research on household conflicts. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 9 (2), 99-113.10.1080/14780880903342295Search in Google Scholar

eISSN:
2083-8506
Langue:
Anglais
Périodicité:
Volume Open
Sujets de la revue:
Social Sciences, Psychology, Applied Psychology