Construction mediation and its hybridization: the case of the Hong Kong construction industry
et
22 juin 2017
À propos de cet article
Catégorie d'article: Research Article
Publié en ligne: 22 juin 2017
Pages: 1528 - 1536
Reçu: 15 déc. 2016
Accepté: 10 mai 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/otmcj-2016-0015
Mots clés
© 2017 Pui-Lam Ng et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.
In view of the sophisticated nature of construction disputes, specialized dispute resolution mechanisms are of pivotal importance to the satisfactory settlement between disputing parties. Among the various construction dispute resolution mechanisms, mediation has been increasingly gaining recognition and acceptance. Its hybrid, namely mediation–arbitration (med-arb), has also emerged and has started receiving attention and appreciation. With special reference to the construction industry practice in Hong Kong, a commentary on the respective merits and demerits of construction mediation and construction med-arb, as well as the ways forward, are presented in this article.