[Alavi, M. and D. E. Leidner. 2001. “Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Systems: Conceptual Foundations and Research Issues.” MIS Quarterly 25(1), 107–136.]Search in Google Scholar
[Allee, V. 2003. The Future of Knowledge: Increasing Prosperity Through Value Networks. Amsterdam et al.: Routledge.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ammons, D. N. and D. J. Roenigk. 2015. “Performance Management in Local Government: Is Practice Influenced by Doctrine?” Public Performance & Management Review 38(3), 514–541.]Search in Google Scholar
[Andriessen, D. G. 2008. “Stuffor Love? How Metaphors Direct our Efforts to Manage Knowledge in Organizations.” Knowledge Management Research & Practice 6(1), 5–12.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bolisani, E. and M. Handzic (eds). 2015. Advances in Knowledge Management: Celebrating Twenty Years of Research and Practice. Heidelberg: Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-09501-1]Search in Google Scholar
[Burford, S. and S. Ferguson. 2009. “Managing Knowledge by Intention: The Role of Standards, Frameworks and Models.” Actkm Online Journal of Knowledge Management 5(1), 3–14.]Search in Google Scholar
[Cong, X. and K. V. Pandya. 2003. “Issues of Knowledge Management in the Public Sector.” Academic Conferences Limited, http://www.ejkm.com/issue/download.html?idArticle=17 (accessed June 1, 2017).]Search in Google Scholar
[Deming, W. E. 1986. Out of the Crisis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Center for Advanced Engineering Study.]Search in Google Scholar
[Deming, W. E. 1993. The New Economics for Industry, Government, Education. Cambridge, MA: MIT Center for Advanced Engineering Study.]Search in Google Scholar
[Edwards, J. S. 2015. “Knowledge Management Concepts and Models.” In Bolisani, E. and Handzic, M. (eds.). Advances in Knowledge Management: Celebrating Twenty Years of Research and Practice. Heidelberg: Springer, 25–44.]Search in Google Scholar
[Farzin, M. R. et al. 2014. “A Survey of Critical Success Factors for Strategic Knowledge Management Implementation: Applications for Service Sector.” Procedia: Social and Behavioural Sciences 109, 595–599.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ferguson, S. 2006. “AS 5037–2005: Knowledge Management Blueprint for Australian Organisations?” The Australian Library Journal 55(3), 196–209.]Search in Google Scholar
[Firestone, J. M. and M. W. McElroy. 2003. Key Issues in the New Knowledge Management. Amsterdam et al.: Routledge.10.1016/B978-0-7506-7655-7.50008-0]Search in Google Scholar
[Frischmann, B. M, M. J. Madison and K. J. Strandburg (eds). 2014. Governing Knowledge Commons. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199972036.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Gatarik, E. 2014. “The Many Faces of ‘Innovation Ecosystems’: Investigating and Reflecting the Ecology of Decision-Making as Core of the Topic.” IFKAD 2014, 1887–1906.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gatarik, E. and R. Born. 2012. “The Practice of Network Economics as a Competitive Advantage of Regions and Societies.” IFKAD – KCWS 2012, 2143–2166.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gatarik, E. and R. Born. 2015. “Managing Network Economies: The Competitive Advantage of Commons as Ecosystems of Innovation.” Journal of Organisational Transformation and Social Change 12(3), 287–307.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gatarik, E. and R. Born. (forthcoming). “Innovating for Organisational Resilience: An Epistemological Investigation into Business Continuity Practice in an Austrian SME.” Journal of Organisational Transformation and Social Change VOL.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gödel, K. 1931. “Über formal unentscheidbare Sätze der Principia Mathematica und verwandter Systeme I.” Monatsheft e für Mathematik und Physik 38(1), 173–198.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hamel, G. 2012. What Matters Now: How to Win in a World of Relentless Change, Ferocious Competition and Unstoppable Innovation. Hoboken: Wiley.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hammer, M. and J. Champy. 1993. Reengineering the Corporation: Manifesto for Business Revolution. New York: Harper Collins.10.1016/S0007-6813(05)80064-3]Search in Google Scholar
[Hammerschmid, G., S. Van de Walle and V. Stimac. 2013. “Internal and External Use of Performance Information in Public Organizations: Results from an International Survey.” Public Money & Management 33(4), 261–268.]Search in Google Scholar
[Handzic, M. A. 2015. “Descriptive Analysis of Knowledge Management Research: Period from 1997 to 2012.” In Bolisani, E. and Handzic, M. (eds.). Advances in Knowledge Management: Celebrating Twenty Years of Research and Practice. Heidelberg: Springer, 45–66.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hasan, H. M. 2004. Bottling Fog: Conjuring up the Australian KM Standard. Research Online. University of Wollongong. Available online at: http://ro.uow.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1360&context=commpapers (accessed June 1, 2017).]Search in Google Scholar
[Hess, C. and E. Ostrom (eds). 2007. Understanding Knowledge as a Commons: From Theory to Practice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 41–81.]Search in Google Scholar
[Klimovský, D. et al. 2014. “Inter-Municipal Cooperation in Lithuania and Slovakia: Does Size Structure Matter?” Lex Localis: Journal of Local Self-Government 12(3), 643–658.]Search in Google Scholar
[Martin, J. and A. Spano. 2015. “From Performance Management to Strategic Local Government Leadership: Lessons from Different Cultural Settings.” Public Money & Management 35(4), 303–309.]Search in Google Scholar
[Matejova, L. et al. 2015. “Political Business Cycle in Local Government: Case Study of Czech Municipalities.” In Matejova, L. and Spalkova, D. (eds.). Proceedings of the 19thInternational Conference: Current Trends in Public Sector Research. Brno: Masarykova Univerzita, 142–148.]Search in Google Scholar
[Nam, T. and T. A. Pardo. 2011. “Conceptualizing Smart City with Dimensions of Technology, People, and Institutions.” In Proceedings of the 12thAnnual International Conference on Digital Government Research. Also available at: https://inta-aivn.org/images/cc/Urbanism/background%20documents/dgo_2011_smartcity.pdf (accessed June 1, 2017).10.1145/2037556.2037602]Search in Google Scholar
[Němec, J., B. Mikušová Meričková and M. Svidroňová. 2015a. “Co-Creation in Local Public Services Delivery Innovation: Slovak Experience.” Lex Localis: Journal of Local Self-Government 13(3), 521–535.]Search in Google Scholar
[Němec, J., B. Mikušová Meričková and M. Svidroňová. 2015b. “Social Innovations in Public Services: Co-Creation in Slovakia.” In Schoburgh, E. and Ryan, R. (eds.). Sborník z mezinárodního vědeckého semináře: Current Trends in Public Sector Research Xix. Brno: Ekonomicko, Správní Fakulta, 273–281.]Search in Google Scholar
[Nielsen, P. A. 2014. “Learning from Performance Feedback: Performance Information, Aspiration Levels, and Managerial Priorities.” Public Administration 92(1), 142–160.]Search in Google Scholar
[Nonaka, I. and H. Takeuchi. 1995. The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.10.1016/0024-6301(96)81509-3]Search in Google Scholar
[Nowak, M. and R. Highfield. 2011. Supercooperators: Altruism, Evolution, and Why We Need Each Other to Succeed. New York: Simon and Schuster.]Search in Google Scholar
[Osono, E., N. Shimizu and H. Takeuchi. 2008. Extreme Toyota: Radical Contradictions that Drive Success at the World’s Best Manufacturer. Hoboken: Wiley.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ostrom, E. 2009. “Beyond Markets and States: Polycentric Governance of Complex Economic Systems” Nobel Prize lecture. Stockholm, Sweden: Nobel Media, 8 December 2009.]Search in Google Scholar
[Plaček, M., F. Ochrana and M. Půček. 2015. “Benchmarking in Czech Higher Education: The Case of Schools of Economics.” Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 37(4), 374–384.]Search in Google Scholar
[Plaček, M., M. Půček and F. Ochrana. 2016. “Political Business Cycle in the Czech Republic: Case of Municipalities.” Prague Economic Papers 25(3), 304–320.]Search in Google Scholar
[Plaček, M., M. Schmidt, F. Ochrana et al. 2016. “Impact of Selected Factors regarding the Efficiency of Public Procurement (The Case of the Czech Republic) with an Emphasis on Decentralization.” Ekonomický Časopis 64(1), 22–36.]Search in Google Scholar
[Polanyi, M. 1966. The Tacit Dimension. Gloucester, MA: Peter Smith.]Search in Google Scholar
[Prusak, L. 2001. “Where did Knowledge Management Come from?” IBM Systems Journal 40(4), 1002–1007.]Search in Google Scholar
[Rifk in, J. 2014. The Zero Marginal Cost Society: The Internet of Things, the Collaborative Commons, and the Eclipse of Capitalism. New York: Macmillan.]Search in Google Scholar
[Simon, H. A. 1947. Administrative Behavior: A Study of the Decision-making Processes in Administrative Organization. New York: Macmillan.]Search in Google Scholar
[Špaček, D. 2015. “Quality Management in the Czech Public Administration.” In Vries, M. and Nemec, J. (eds.). Implementation of New Public Management Tools: Experiences from Transition and Emerging Countries. Bruxelles: Bruylant, 285–304.]Search in Google Scholar
[Špaček, D. 2016. “Knowledge Management in Public Administration and Research in the Czech Republic: Preliminary Findings.” In Matějová, L. and Špalková, D. (eds.). Proceedings of the 20thInternational Conference Current Trends in Public Sector Research. Brno: Ekonomicko-správní fakulta, 94–101.]Search in Google Scholar
[Spender, J. C. 2015. “Knowledge Management: Origins, History, and Development.” In Bolisani, E. and Handzic, M. (eds.). Advances in Knowledge Management: Celebrating Twenty Years of Research and Practice. Heidelberg: Springer, 3–24.]Search in Google Scholar
[Taylor, F. W. 1919. The Principles of Scientific Management. New York: Harper & Brothers.]Search in Google Scholar
[Weick, K. E. and K. M. Sutcliffe. 2015. Managing the Unexpected: Sustained Performance in a Complex World. Hoboken: Wiley.10.1002/9781119175834]Search in Google Scholar
[Wittgenstein, L. 1953. Philosophical Investigations. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.]Search in Google Scholar