1. bookVolume 10 (2017): Edition 1 (June 2017)
Détails du magazine
License
Format
Magazine
eISSN
1338-4309
ISSN
1337-9038
Première parution
03 Aug 2009
Périodicité
2 fois par an
Langues
Anglais
access type Accès libre

Performance Management: How the Swedish Administration of Transportation for the Disabled Succeeded. A Case Study of Transportation Service for the Disabled, the Municipality of Gothenburg

Publié en ligne: 08 Jul 2017
Volume & Edition: Volume 10 (2017) - Edition 1 (June 2017)
Pages: 141 - 175
Détails du magazine
License
Format
Magazine
eISSN
1338-4309
ISSN
1337-9038
Première parution
03 Aug 2009
Périodicité
2 fois par an
Langues
Anglais
Abstract

Management by objectives (known also as performance management) has been perceived as a promising steering method in the public sector since the beginning of the 1990s (Smith 1993, 1995; Kravchuk and Schack 1996; Ballantine et al. 1998; Ferreira and Otley 2009Verbeeten 2008). However, working out operative goals of public organizations seem to be a challenge because major objectives formulated by politicians are oft en unclear and difficult to measure (Rombach 1991; Lundquist 1992; Gray and Jenkins 1995; Lapsley 1999). It is known that public organizations’ services like school, health care, welfare care, collective transportation, infrastructure and cultural services are usually unprofitable. The Transportation Service for the Disabled in the Municipality of Gothenburg is an exception. It fulfilled most objectives and achieved a profit of 7,890,000 SEK for 2013, while the planned one was scheduled at 5,000,000 SEK. Maybe performance management used as the steering model caused that result but the criticism targeting management by objectives suggests that this method hardly can explain such a positive result. Brorström et al. (2005) and Grönlund and Modell (2006) argue that in Sweden management by objectives is usually used in combination with other control models. The purpose of this study is to describe and explain why the Transportation Service for the Disabled succeeded in 2013 and to provide practitioners nationally and internationally with some pragmatic ideas how to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of public services. We ask three sub-questions: How were the operative goals created within the Transportation Service for the Disabled? How were the operative goals followed up? What can be learned from this case study? The research is based on the analysis of state regulations, internal policy documents, reports and interviews with key respondents. The study shows that the performance management systems (PMS) in combination with a new organizational culture based on SMART solutions, mutual cooperation among staff, with local politicians and other stakeholders resulted in the increase of efficiency and even partly effectiveness. However, these findings deserve further research if there are other public administrations that succeeded because of using PMS and friendly organizational culture.

Keywords

Almqvist, Roland. 2006. New Public Management: Om konkurensutsättning, kontrakt och kontroll. Malmö: Liber.Search in Google Scholar

Ballantine, Joan, Stan Brignall and Sven Modell. 1998. “Performance Measurement and Management in Public Health Services: A Comparison of U.K. and Swedish Practice.” Management Accounting Research 9, 71–94.Search in Google Scholar

Bovaird, Tony and Elke Löffler. 2002. “Moving from Excellence Models of Local Service Delivery to Benchmarking ‘Good Local Governance’.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 68, 9–24.Search in Google Scholar

Boyne, George and Julian Gould-Williams. 2003. “Planning and Performance in Public Organizations.” Public Management Review 5(1), 115–132.Search in Google Scholar

Broadbent, Jane and Richard Laughlin. 2009. “Performance Management Systems: A Conceptual Model.” Management Accounting Research 20, 283–295.Search in Google Scholar

Brorström, Björn, Anders Haglund and Rolf Solli. 2005. Förvaltningsekonomi. Lund: Studentlitteratur.Search in Google Scholar

Carlin, Tyrone M. 2004. “Output-Based Management and the Management of Performance: Insights from the Victorian Experience.” Management Accounting Research 15, 267–283.Search in Google Scholar

Denters, Bas and Lawrence E. Rose (eds). 2005. Comparing Local Governance: Trends and Developments. New York, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1007/978-0-230-21242-8Search in Google Scholar

Drucker, Peter F. 1955. The Practice of Management. London: Heinemann.Search in Google Scholar

Ehrenberg, Rudolph H. and Ronald J. Stupak. 1994. “Total Quality Management: Its Relationship to Administrative Theory and Organizational Behavior in the Public Sector.” Public Administration Quarterly 18(1), 75–98.Search in Google Scholar

Evans, James R. 2004. “An Exploratory Study of Performance Measurement Systems and Relationships with Performance Results.” Journal of Operations Management 22, 219–232.Search in Google Scholar

Ferreira, Aldónio and David Otley. 2009. “The Design and Use of Performance Management Systems: An Extended Framework for Analysis.” Management Accounting Research 20, 263–282.Search in Google Scholar

Färdtjänstnämndens budget of 2013 (Transportation Service Board’s Budget by 2013). Available at http://www5.goteborg.se/prod/Intraservice/Namndhandlingar/SamrumPortal.nsf/5AC9F2837E8D4BC4C1257A9F00252278/$File/Bilaga_Forslag_till_budget_2013.pdf?OpenElement (last accessed 14 September 2015).Search in Google Scholar

Färdtjänstnämndens uppföljningsrapporter. 2013 (Transportation service follow-up reports of the Board of 2013). Available at http://www5.goteborg.se/prod/Intraservice/Namndhandlingar/SamrumPortal.nsf/F24B88FFD1383341C1257B5000260DFA/$File/Uppfoljningsrapport_1_2013.pdf?OpenElement (last accessed 14 September 2015).Search in Google Scholar

Färdtjänstnämnden: Årsrapport. 2013 (Transportation Service Board: Annual Report 2013). Available at http://www5.goteborg.se/prod/Intraservice/Namndhandlingar/SamrumPortal.nsf/D606144B645C4416C1257C71004F8FF6/$File/Arsrapport%202013.pdf?OpenElement (last accessed 14 September 2015).Search in Google Scholar

Goddard, Andrew. 2010. “Contemporary Public Sector Accounting Research: An International Comparison of Journal Papers.” The British Accounting Review 42, 75–87.Search in Google Scholar

Gray, Andrew and Bill Jenkins. 1995. “From Public Administration to Public Management; Reassessing a Revolution.” Public Administration 7(3), 75–99.Search in Google Scholar

Grönlund, Anders and Sven Modell. 2006. Effektivitet och styrning i statliga myndigheter [Efficiency and control of State authorities]. Lund: Studentlitteratur.Search in Google Scholar

Halachmi, Arie. 2005. “Performance Measurement is only One Way of Managing Performance.” International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management 54(7), 502–516. Available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/17410400510622197.10.1108/17410400510622197Search in Google Scholar

Hyndman, Noel and Ron Eden. 2000. “A Study of the Coordination of Mission, Objectives and Targets in UK Executive Agencies.” Management Accounting Research 11, 175–191.Search in Google Scholar

Hyndman, Noel and Ron Eden. 2001. “Rational Management, Performance Targets and Executive Agencies: Views from Agency Chief Executives in Northern Ireland.” Public Administration 79(3), 579–598.Search in Google Scholar

Hällstén, Freddy and Stefan Tengblad (ed.). 2006. Medarbetarskap i praktiken. Lund: Studentlitteratur.Search in Google Scholar

Isgrove, Robert and Anoop Patel. 1993. “Quality Progress in UK Social Services Departments: An Exploratory Study.” International Journal of Public Sector Management 6(6), 55–66.Search in Google Scholar

Johansson, Bertil and Britt Johansson. 1994. Att styra eller inte styra. En kritisk granskning av den svenska grundskolans förändrade styrning med inriktning mot planeringsdokument. Lund: Pedagogiska Institutionen.Search in Google Scholar

Johanson, Ulf and Matti. Skoog. 2007. Verksamhetsstyrning, för förändring, förbättring och utveckling. Malmö: Liber.Search in Google Scholar

Kaplan, Robert S. and David P. Norton. 1996. The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action. Boston: Harvard Business Review Press.Search in Google Scholar

Kommunallagen (KL) (Local Government Act) 1991:900.Search in Google Scholar

Kravchuk, Robert S. and Roland W. Schack. 1996. “Designing Effective Performance Measurement Systems under the Government Performance and Results Act of 1993.” Public Administration Review 56(4), 348–358.Search in Google Scholar

Lag om färdtjänsten (SFS 1997:736) [Act on Transportation for the Disabled].Search in Google Scholar

Lag om kollektivtrafik (SFS 2010:1065) [Act on Public Transport].Search in Google Scholar

Lag om riksfärdtjänsten (SFS 1997:735) [Act on National Transportation for the Disabled].Search in Google Scholar

Lapsley, Irvine. 1999. “Accounting and the New Public Management: Instruments of Substantive Efficiency or a Rationalizing Modernity?” Financial Accountability and Management 15(3–4), 201–207.Search in Google Scholar

Lemieux-Charles, Louise, Wendy McGuire, François Champagne, Jan Barnsley, Donald Cole and Claude Sicotte. 2003. “The Use of Multilevel Performance Indicators in Managing Performance in Health Care Organizations.” Management Decision 41(8), 760–770.Search in Google Scholar

Lindgren, Lena. 2008. Utvärderingsmonstret. Kvalitets- och resultatmätning i den offentliga sektorn. Lund: Studentlitteratur.Search in Google Scholar

Lundquist, Lennart. 1992. Förvaltning, Stat, och samhälle. Lund: Studentlitteratur.Search in Google Scholar

MacPherson, Malcolm. 2001. “Performance Measurement in Not-for-Profit and Public Sector Organization.” Measuring Business Excellence 5(2), 13–17.Search in Google Scholar

Modell, Sven. 2004. “Performance Measurement Myths in the Public Sector: A Research Note.” Financial Accountability & Management 20(1), 39–55.Search in Google Scholar

Otley, David. 1999. “Performance Management: A Framework for Management Control Systems Research.” Management Accounting Research 10, 363–382.Search in Google Scholar

Ouchi, William G. 1977. “The Relationship between Organizational Structure and Organizational Control.” Administrative Science Quarterly 22, 95–112.Search in Google Scholar

Peng, Tzu-Ju, Stephen Piken and Göran Roos. 2007. “Intellectual Capital and Performance Indicators: Taiwanese Healthcare Sector.” Journal of Intellectual Capital 8(3), 538–556.Search in Google Scholar

Politiska inriktningsmål, 2013. [Policy orientation, 2013].Search in Google Scholar

Rombach, Björn. 1991. Det går inte att styra med mål. Lund: Studentlitteratur.Search in Google Scholar

Shah, Anwar and Sana Shah. 2006. “The New Vision of Local Governance and the Evolving Roles of Local Governments.” In Anwar Shah (ed.). Local Governance in Developing Countries: Public Sector Governance and Accountability Series. Washington DC: The World Bank, 1–46.Search in Google Scholar

Smith, Peter. 1993. “Outcome-Related Performance Indicators and Organizational Control in the Public Sector.” British Journal of Management 4(3), 135–151.Search in Google Scholar

Smith, Peter. 1995. “Performance Indicators and Outcome in the Public Sector.” Public Money and Management 15(4), 13–16.Search in Google Scholar

Stevens, Philip, Lucy Stokes and Mary O’Mahony. 2006. “Metrics, Targets and Performance.” National Institute Economic Review 197(1), 80–92.Search in Google Scholar

Så här styrs staden. 2008. (In this way, the city is steered, 2008). Available at http://www4.goteborg.se/prod/sk/ledarsida/dalis2.nsf/vyFilArkiv/sa_styrs_staden.pdf/$file/sa_styrs_staden.pdf (last accessed 13 April 2014).Search in Google Scholar

Trafikförsörjnings program 2013–2015 för färdtjänst och riksfärdtjänst. Göteborgs Stad. [Traffic Maintenance Programs for Special Transportation and National Mobility, 2013–2015. The Municipality of Gothenburg].Search in Google Scholar

Vakkuri, Jarmo and Pentti Meklin. 2003. “The Impact of Culture on the Use of Performance Measurement Information in the University Setting.” Management Decision 41(8), 751–759.Search in Google Scholar

Verbeeten, Frank H. M. 2008. “Performance Management Practices in Public Sector Organizations: Impact on Performance.” Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 21(3), 427–454.Search in Google Scholar

Walle van de, Steven. 2008. “Comparing the Performance of the National Public Sectors: Conceptual Problems.” International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management 57(4), 329–338.Search in Google Scholar

Wang, XiaoHu and Evan Berman. 2001. “Hypotheses about Performance Measurement in Counties: Findings from a Survey.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 11(3), 403–428.Search in Google Scholar

Yrkande (S, V, MP) Policy inriktningsmål, 2013 [Claim (S, V, MP) Policy orientation, 2013].Search in Google Scholar

Zineldin, Mosad. 2006. “The Quality of Health Care and Patient Satisfaction: An Exploratory Investigation of the 5Qs Model at Some Egyptian and Jordanian Medical Clinics.” International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance 19(1), 60–92.Search in Google Scholar

Articles recommandés par Trend MD

Planifiez votre conférence à distance avec Sciendo