<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>The submitted article focuses on a detailed explanation of the average and range method (Automotive Industry Action Group, Measurement System Analysis approach) and of the honest Gauge Repeatability and Reproducibility method (Evaluating the Measurement Process approach). The measured data (thickness of plastic parts) were evaluated by both methods and their results were compared on the basis of numerical evaluation. Both methods were additionally compared and their advantages and disadvantages were discussed. One difference between both methods is the calculation of variation components. The AIAG method calculates the variation components based on standard deviation (then a sum of variation components does not give 100 %) and the honest GRR study calculates the variation components based on variance, where the sum of all variation components (part to part variation, EV &amp; AV) gives the total variation of 100 %. Acceptance of both methods among the professional society, future use, and acceptance by manufacturing industry were also discussed. Nowadays, the AIAG is the leading method in the industry.</p></abstract>

The submitted article focuses on a detailed explanation of the average and range method (Automotive Industry Action Group, Measurement System Analysis approach) and of the honest Gauge Repeatability and Reproducibility method (Evaluating the Measurement Process approach). The measured data (thickness of plastic parts) were evaluated by both methods and their results were compared on the basis of numerical evaluation. Both methods were additionally compared and their advantages and disadvantages were discussed. One difference between both methods is the calculation of variation components. The AIAG method calculates the variation components based on standard deviation (then a sum of variation components does not give 100 %) and the honest GRR study calculates the variation components based on variance, where the sum of all variation components (part to part variation, EV & AV) gives the total variation of 100 %. Acceptance of both methods among the professional society, future use, and acceptance by manufacturing industry were also discussed. Nowadays, the AIAG is the leading method in the industry.

Measurement System Analyses – Gauge Repeatability and Reproducibility Methods

Department of Machining, Assembly and Engineering Metrology, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering

Department of Quality Management, Faculty of Metallurgy and Material Engineering

Measurement Science Review

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

The submitted article focuses on a detailed explanation of the average and range method (Automotive Industry Action Group, Measurement System Analysis...

Measurement System Analyses – Gauge Repeatability and Reproducibility Methods

Publié en ligne: 07 mars 2018

Pages: 20 - 27

Reçu: 10 oct. 2017

Accepté: 14 févr. 2018

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/msr-2018-0004

Mots clés
GRR study approach, the average and range method, the honest GRR study

© 2018 Lenka Cepova et al., published by De Gruyter Open

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Measurement System Analyses – Gauge Repeatability and Reproducibility Methods

Publié en ligne: 07 mars 2018

Pages: 20 - 27

Reçu: 10 oct. 2017

Accepté: 14 févr. 2018

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/msr-2018-0004

Mots clésGRR study approach, the average and range method, the honest GRR study

© 2018 Lenka Cepova et al., published by De Gruyter Open

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Mots clés
GRR study approach, the average and range method, the honest GRR study