1. bookVolume 18 (2018): Edition 1 (February 2018)
Détails du magazine
License
Format
Magazine
eISSN
1335-8871
Première parution
07 Mar 2008
Périodicité
6 fois par an
Langues
Anglais
Accès libre

Measurement System Analyses – Gauge Repeatability and Reproducibility Methods

Publié en ligne: 07 Mar 2018
Volume & Edition: Volume 18 (2018) - Edition 1 (February 2018)
Pages: 20 - 27
Reçu: 10 Oct 2017
Accepté: 14 Feb 2018
Détails du magazine
License
Format
Magazine
eISSN
1335-8871
Première parution
07 Mar 2008
Périodicité
6 fois par an
Langues
Anglais

[1] Hart, R.F., Hart, K.M. (1994). The evaluation of a measurement system. Production and Inventory Journal, Fourth Quarter, 22-26.Search in Google Scholar

[2] Antony, G.V., Knowles, G. (2000). A practical methodology for analyzing and improving the measurement system. Quality Assurance, 3 (3), 59-75.Search in Google Scholar

[3] International Automotive Task Force. (2016). Automotive quality management system standard. 4th Edition. IATF16949:2016.Search in Google Scholar

[4] Chrysler Corporation, Ford Motor Company, General Motors Corporation (AIAG). (1998). Quality System Requirements. 3rd Edition. QS-9000.Search in Google Scholar

[5] Chrysler Corporation, Ford Motor Company, General Motors Corporation (AIAG). (2008). Advanced Product Quality Planning and Control Plan (APQP), Second Edition. AIAG.Search in Google Scholar

[6] Hermans, J.E., Liu, Y. (2013). Quality management in the new product development: A PPAP approach. Quality – Innovation - Prosperity, 17 (2).10.12776/qip.v17i2.150Search in Google Scholar

[7] Chrysler Corporation, Ford Motor Company, General Motors Corporation (AIAG). (2010). MSA - Measurement Systems Analysis (MSA), Fourth Edition. AIAG.Search in Google Scholar

[8] Wheeler, D.J. (2006). EMP III - Evaluating the Measurement Process & Using Imperfect Data. SPC PRESS (Statistical Process Control).Search in Google Scholar

[9] Verband der Automobileindustrie e.V. (2011). VDA 5 – Vhodnost kontrolních procesů, 2. vydanie. Praha, ČR: Česká společnost pro jakost.Search in Google Scholar

[10] Klaput, P. (2014). Methodical approach to measurement system analyses. Dissertation Thesis, VŠB - Technical University of Ostrava, Faculty of Metallurgy and Materials Engineering. (in Czech)Search in Google Scholar

[11] Dietrich, E., Schulze, A. (2003). Eignungsnachweis von Prüfprozessen. Carl Hanser Verlag.Search in Google Scholar

[12] Kazerouni, A.M. (2009). Design and analyses of gauge R&R studies: Making decision based on ANOVA method. International Journal of Mechanical, Aerospace, Industrial, Mechatronic and Manufacturing Engineering, 3 (4).Search in Google Scholar

[13] Throne, J.L. (2008). Understanding Thermoforming. Carl Hanser Verlag.Search in Google Scholar

[14] Rolls-Royce (2013). Measurement System Analyses : How-to Guide. Version 6.1. Rolls-Royce plc., 53.Search in Google Scholar

[15] Healy, S., Wallace, M. (2011). Gage repeatability and reproducibility methodologies suitable for complex test systems in semi-conductor manufacturing. In Six Sigma Project and Personal Experiences. InTech.Search in Google Scholar

[16] Minitab. (2010). Minitab guideline of methods and formulas. Version 16.1.1.0. Minitab Inc.Search in Google Scholar

[17] Knowles, G., Vickers, G., Anthony, J. (2003). Implementing evaluation of the measurement process in an automotive manufacturer: A case study. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 19 (5), 397-410.10.1002/qre.533Search in Google Scholar

[18] Dusharme, D. (2011). An Interview with Donald J. Wheeler. Quality Digest, May 2011.Search in Google Scholar

[19] Stamm, S. (2013). A comparison of gauge repeatability and reproducibility methods. Dissertation Thesis, Indiana State University, USA.Search in Google Scholar

[20] Pandiripalli, B. (2010). Repeatability and reproducibility studies: A comparison of techniques. Thesis, Wichita State University, USA.Search in Google Scholar

[21] SAS Institute. (2013). SAS/QC 13.1 : User’s Guide. Cary, NC, USA: SAS Institute Inc.Search in Google Scholar

[22] BPI Consulting, LLC. (2014). Evaluating the Measurement Process - Part 1.Search in Google Scholar

[23] Wheeler, D.J. (2009). An honest gauge R&R study (rev.). In ASQ/ASA Fall Technical Conference, Manuscript No. 189.Search in Google Scholar

[24] Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. Western electric rules. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Western_electric_rules.svg.Search in Google Scholar

[25] Wachs, S. How can an OC curve be used to manage the risk of undetected special causes?http://www.integral-concepts.com/docs/.Search in Google Scholar

[26] Wheeler, D.J. (2016). Good data, bad data, and process behaviour charts.http://asq.org/statistics/2003/01/good-data-bad-data-and-process-behavior-charts.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

[27] Ermer, S.D. (2016). Improved gage R&R measurement studies. Quality Progress, March 2006, 77-79.Search in Google Scholar

[28] Dietrich, E. (2011). Wo liegen die Unterschiede? Vergleich von MSA and VDA Band 5. QZ, 56 (6), 30-34. http://vda-qmc.de/fileadmin/redakteur/presse/QZ6_11_Vergleich_von_MSA_und_VDA_Band_5.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

[29] Standards Department VW. (2012). Capability of measuring processes (Consideration of measuring uncertainty in test processes). Standard VW 10119.Search in Google Scholar

[30] Krolczyk, J., Krolczyk, G., Legutko, S., Napiorkowski, J., Hloch, S., Foltys, J., Tama, E. (2015). Material flow optimization – a case study in automotive industry. Tehnički vjesnik – Technical Gazette, 22 (6), 1447-1456.Search in Google Scholar

[31] Nieslony, P., Krolczyk, G.M., Wojciechowski, S., Chudy, R., Zak, K., Maruda, R.W. (2018). Surface quality and topographic inspection of variable compliance part after precise turning. Applied Surface Science, 434, 91-101.10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.10.158Search in Google Scholar

Articles recommandés par Trend MD

Planifiez votre conférence à distance avec Sciendo