Different Approaches in Uncertainty Evaluation for Measurement of Complex Surfaces Using Coordinate Measuring Machine

[1] International Organization for Standardization. (1998). Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS) – Inspection by measurement of workpieces and measuring equipment – Part 1: Decision rules for proving conformance or non-conformance with specifications. ISO 14253-1.Search in Google Scholar

[2] Trapet, E., Savio, E., De Chiffre, L. (2004). New advances in traceability of CMMs for almost the entire range of industrial dimensional metrology needs. CIRP Annals - Manufacturing Technology, 53, 433–438.10.1016/S0007-8506(07)60733-1Search in Google Scholar

[3] Acko, B., Mccarthy, M., Haertig, F., Buchmeister, B. (2012). Standards for testing freeform measurement capability of optical and tactile coordinate measuring machines. Measurement Science & Technology, 23 (9), 094013.10.1088/0957-0233/23/9/094013Search in Google Scholar

[4] Wilhelma, R.G., Hockena, R., Schwenkeb, H. (2001). Task specific uncertainty in coordinate measurement. CIRP Annals - Manufacturing Technology, 50, 553-563.10.1016/S0007-8506(07)62995-3Search in Google Scholar

[5] International Organization for Standardization. (2004). Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS) – Coordinate measuring machines (CMM): Technique for determining the uncertainty of measurement – Part 3: Use of calibrated workpieces or standards. ISO/TS 15530-3.Search in Google Scholar

[6] International Organization for Standardization. (2008). Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS) – Coordinate measuring machines (CMM): Technique for determining the uncertainty of measurement – Part 4: Evaluating task-specific measurement uncertainty using simulation. ISO/TS 15530-4.Search in Google Scholar

[7] Savio, E., De Chiffre, L. (2003). Validation of calibration procedures for freeform parts on CMMs. In International Topical Conference on Precision Engineering, Micro Technology, Measurement Techniques and Equipment (EUSPEN), 19-20 May 2003, Aachen, Germany, 539-542.Search in Google Scholar

[8] Savio, E., De Chiffre, L. (2002). An artefact for traceable freeform measurements on coordinate measuring machines. Precision Engineering, 26, 58-68.10.1016/S0141-6359(01)00098-8Search in Google Scholar

[9] Savio, E., Hansen, H.N., De Chiffre, L. (2002). Approaches to the calibration of freeform artefacts on coordinate measuring machines. CIRP Annals - Manufacturing Technology, 51, 433–436.10.1016/S0007-8506(07)61554-6Search in Google Scholar

[10] Barini, E.M., Tosello, G., De Chiffre, L. (2010). Uncertainty analysis of point-by-point sampling complex surfaces using touch probe CMMs: DOE for complex surfaces verification with CMM. Precision Engineering, 34, 16-19.10.1016/j.precisioneng.2009.06.009Search in Google Scholar

[11] Flack, D. (2011). Good Practice Guide No. 42 - CMM Verification. NPL Good Measurement Practice. Teddington, England: National Physical Laboratory.Search in Google Scholar

[12] Acko, B., Sluban, B., Tasic, T., Brezovnik, S. (2014). Performance metrics for testing statistical calculations in interlaboratory comparisons. Advances in Production Engineering & Management, 9 (1), 44-52.10.14743/apem2014.1.175Search in Google Scholar

[13] Crepinsek-Lipus, L., Matus, M., Acko, B. (2013), Optimization of calibrating HeNe laser interferometers by sample-period simulation. International Journal of Simulation Modeling, 12 (3), 154-163.10.2507/IJSIMM12(3)2.231Search in Google Scholar

[14] Rodger, G., Flack, D., McCarthy, M. (2007). A Review of Industrial Capabilities to Measure Free-Form Surfaces. NPL Report DEPC – EM 014. Teddington, England: National Physical Laboratory.Search in Google Scholar

[15] Feautrier, D., Bourdet, P. (1997). Form error assessment: Error separation method for the calibration of free-form surfaces by means of co-ordinate measuring machines. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting- American Society for Precision Engineering. ASPE, 16, 82-85.Search in Google Scholar

[16] Piratelli-Filho, A., Di Giacomo, B. (2003). CMM uncertainty analysis with factorial design. Precision Engineering, 27, 283–288.10.1016/S0141-6359(03)00035-7Search in Google Scholar

[17] Feng, C.J., Saal, A.L, Salsbury, J.G., Ness, A.R., Lin, G.C.S. (2007) Design and analysis of experiments in CMM measurement uncertainty study. Precision Engineering, 31, 94-101.10.1016/j.precisioneng.2006.03.003Search in Google Scholar

[18] Feng, C.X., Wang, X. (2002). Subset selection in predictive modeling of CMM digitization uncertainty. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 21, 419-439.10.1016/S0278-6125(02)80049-8Search in Google Scholar

[19] Sun, A., Anand, S., Tang, J. (2002). Comprehensive design of experiments based framework for optimal CMM inspection and uncertainty analysis of form tolerances. International Journal of Production Research, 40, 2097–2123.10.1080/00207540210128224Search in Google Scholar

[20] Peace, S.G. (1993). Taguchi Methods: A Hands-On Approach. Adison-Wesley.Search in Google Scholar

[21] International Organization for Standardization. (1995). GUM - Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement.Search in Google Scholar

[22] Vrba, I. (2013) Uncertainty estimation for coordinate measuring machines using for complef surfaces measurement. Unpublished doctorial dissertation. Slovak Technical University, Bratislava, Slovakia.Search in Google Scholar

[23] Tasic, T., Acko, B. (2011). Integration of a laser interferometer and a CMM into a measurement system for measuring internal dimensions. Measurement, 44 (2), 426-433.10.1016/j.measurement.2010.11.002Search in Google Scholar