Accès libre

Site preference and electronic structure of Mn2RhZ (Z = Al, Ga, In, Si, Ge, Sn, Sb): a theoretical study

À propos de cet article

Citez

Fig. 1

The calculated spin-projected total and partial DOS plots for (a) Mn2RhAl, (b) Mn2RhGa, (c) Mn2RhIn, (d) Mn2RhSi, (e) Mn2RhGe, (f) Mn2RhSn, and (g) Mn2RhSb.
The calculated spin-projected total and partial DOS plots for (a) Mn2RhAl, (b) Mn2RhGa, (c) Mn2RhIn, (d) Mn2RhSi, (e) Mn2RhGe, (f) Mn2RhSn, and (g) Mn2RhSb.

Fig. 2

The calculated total DOS of Mn2RhZ (Z = Al, Ga, In, Si, Ge, Sn, Sb).
The calculated total DOS of Mn2RhZ (Z = Al, Ga, In, Si, Ge, Sn, Sb).

Fig. 3

The calculated band structure plots for (a) Mn2RhAl, (b) Mn2RhSi, and (c) Mn2RhSb.
The calculated band structure plots for (a) Mn2RhAl, (b) Mn2RhSi, and (c) Mn2RhSb.

Fig. 4

The calculated total magnetic moments as functions of the Mn2RhZ (Z = Al, Ge, Sb) Heusler alloys.
The calculated total magnetic moments as functions of the Mn2RhZ (Z = Al, Ge, Sb) Heusler alloys.

Fig. 5

Total energy difference D Etotal = Etotal(c/a) – Etotal(c/a = 1) between cubic (c/a = 1) and tetragonally-distorted phases, calculated as a function of c/a ratio along the constant volume for Mn2RhAl Heusler alloy.
Total energy difference D Etotal = Etotal(c/a) – Etotal(c/a = 1) between cubic (c/a = 1) and tetragonally-distorted phases, calculated as a function of c/a ratio along the constant volume for Mn2RhAl Heusler alloy.

The calculated equilibrium lattice constants, gap width, the calculated total and partial magnetic moments for the Mn2CrZ (Z = Al, Ga, In, Si, Ge, Sn and Sb) alloys.

Compounda [Å]Gap width [eV]mtotalB]mMn(A)B]mMn(B)B]mRhB]mZB]
Mn2RhAl5.800.202.00–1.563.180.380.00
Mn2RhGa5.822.02–1.643.300.360.00
Mn2RhIn6.101.61–2.623.840.380.04
Mn2RhSi5.730.173.00–0.503.160.320.02
Mn2RhGe5.790.163.00–0.583.240.340.00
Mn2RhSn6.010.113.00–0.803.460.320.00
Mn2RhSb6.020.414.000.143.520.360.00
eISSN:
2083-134X
Langue:
Anglais