[Albertazzi, L. (Ed.). (2000). Meaning and cognition: A multidisciplinary approach. John Benjamins Publishing.10.1075/celcr.2]Search in Google Scholar
[Altmann, G.T.M. (2006). History of Psycholinguistics. in K. Brown (ed). The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics (2nd edition). Elsevier.10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/04157-2]Search in Google Scholar
[Austin, J.L. (1979). Philosophical papers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/019283021X.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Austin, J.L. (1962). Sense and Sensibilia. (Warnock, ed.), Oxford: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Beaty, R.E., Silvia, P.J., & Benedek, M. (2017). Brain networks underlying novel metaphor production. Brain and Cognition, 111, 163-170.10.1016/j.bandc.2016.12.004]Search in Google Scholar
[Baker, C.L., & McCarthy, J.J. (Eds). (1981). The logical problem of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Beeman, M.J., & Chiarello, C. (1998). Complementary right-and left-hemisphere language comprehension. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 7(1), 2-8.10.1111/1467-8721.ep11521805]Search in Google Scholar
[Borg, E. (2007). Minimalism versus contextualism in semantics (pp. 339-359). Oxford: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Beeman, M., Friedman, R.B., Grafman, J., Perez, E., Diamond, S., & Lindsay, M.B. (1994). Summation priming and coarse semantic coding in the right hemisphere. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 6, 26-45.10.1162/jocn.1994.6.1.26]Search in Google Scholar
[Blumenthal, A.L. (1987). The emergence of psycholinguistics. Synthese, 72, 313–323.10.1007/BF00413749]Search in Google Scholar
[Bloomfield, L. (1914). Introduction to the study of language. New York: Henry Holt and Company.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bottini, G., Corcoran, R., Sterzi, R., Paulesu, E., Schenone, P., Scarpa, P., Frackowiak, R.S.J., & Frith, C.D. (1994). The role of the right hemisphere in the interpretation of figurative aspects of language: A positron emission tomography activation study. Brain, 117, 1241–1253.10.1093/brain/117.6.1241]Search in Google Scholar
[Brown, R. (1973). A first language: The early stages. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.10.4159/harvard.9780674732469]Search in Google Scholar
[Brownell, H.H., Potter, H.H., Bihrle, A.M., & Gardner, H. (1986). Inference deficits in right brain-damaged patients. Brain and Language, 29, 310–321.10.1016/0093-934X(86)90022-2]Search in Google Scholar
[Buswell, G.T. (1922). Fundamental reading habits: A study of their development. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bransford, J.D., & Johnson, M.K. (1972). Contextual prerequisites for understanding: Some investigations of comprehension and recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 717-726.10.1016/S0022-5371(72)80006-9]Search in Google Scholar
[Cardillo, E.R., Watson, C., & Chatterjee, A. (2016). Stimulus needs are a moving target: 240 additional matched literal and metaphorical sentences for testing neural hypotheses about metaphor. Behavior research methods, 1-13.]Search in Google Scholar
[Catania, A.C. (1998). The taxonomy of verbal behavior. In: K.A. Lattal, & M. Perone (Eds), Handbook of research methods in human operant behavior (pp. 405–433). New York: Plenum.]Search in Google Scholar
[Caplan, R., & Dapretto, M. (2001). Making sense during conversation: An fMRI study. NeuroReport, 12, 3625–3632.10.1097/00001756-200111160-00050]Search in Google Scholar
[Cappelen, H., & LePore, E. (2005). Quotation, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2012 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2012/entries/quotation/>.]Search in Google Scholar
[Cattell, J. (1886). The time it takes to see and name objects. Mind, 11, 63–65.10.1093/mind/os-XI.41.63]Search in Google Scholar
[Delbrück, B. (1901). Grundfragen der Sprachforschung; mit rücksicht auf W. Wundt’s Sprachpsychologie. Strassburg: Trabner.10.1515/9783111457642]Search in Google Scholar
[Dronkers, N.F. (1996). A new brain region for coordinating speech articulation. Nature, 384 (6605), 159.10.1038/384159a0]Search in Google Scholar
[Elmer, S. (2016). Broca Pars Triangularis Constitutes a “Hub” of the Language-Control Network during Simultaneous Language Translation. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 10.10.3389/fnhum.2016.00491]Search in Google Scholar
[Eviatar, Z., & Just., M.A. (2006). Brain correlates of discourse processing: An fMRI investigation of irony and conventional metaphor comprehension. Neurpsychologia, 44, 2348-2359.10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.05.007]Search in Google Scholar
[Ferstl, E.C., & Von Cramon, D.Y. (2001). The role of coherence and cohesion in text comprehension: An event-related fMRI study. Cognitive Brain Research, 11, 325–340.10.1016/S0926-6410(01)00007-6]Search in Google Scholar
[Frege, G. (1879). Concept script, a formal language of pure thought modelled upon that of arithmetic. In: J. Van Heijenoort (ed.) From Frege to Gödel: A Source Book in Mathematical Logic: 1879-1931. Cambridge (Mass.): Harvard University Press, 1967.]Search in Google Scholar
[Frege, G. (1948 [1892]), Sense and reference. The philosophical review, 57(3), 209-230.10.2307/2181485]Search in Google Scholar
[Freud, S. (1975). The psychopathology of everyday life (Trans. A. Tyson). Harmondsworth, UK:Penguin (originally published 1901).]Search in Google Scholar
[Gallagher, S. (2016). On the limits of finding human identity in the brain. Modern Believing, 57(2), 121-130.10.3828/mb.2016.10]Search in Google Scholar
[Gallagher, H.L., & Frith, C.D. (2003). Functional imaging of ‘theory of mind’. Trends in Cognitive Neuroscience, 7, 77–83.10.1016/S1364-6613(02)00025-6]Search in Google Scholar
[Gallagher, S., & Hutto, D. (2008). Understanding others through primary interaction and narrative practice. The shared mind: Perspectives on intersubjectivity, 12, 17-38.10.1075/celcr.12.04gal]Search in Google Scholar
[Gernsbacher, M.A. (1990) Language comprehension as structure building. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.10.21236/ADA221854]Search in Google Scholar
[Giora, R. (1997). Understanding figurative and literal language: The graded salience hypothesis. Cognitive Linguistics, 7, 183–206.10.1515/cogl.1997.8.3.183]Search in Google Scholar
[Grice, H.P. (1991). Studies in the Way of Words. Harvard University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Huey, E.B. (1908). The psychology and pedagogy of reading. New York: Macmillan.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hutto, D.D. (2012). Folk psychological narratives: The sociocultural basis of understanding reasons. MIT Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[King, J., & Stanley, J. (2005). Semantics, pragmatics, and the role of semantic content. Semantics versus pragmatics, 111-164.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199251520.003.0005]Search in Google Scholar
[Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model. Psychological Review, 95, 163–182.10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.163]Search in Google Scholar
[Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). The metaphorical structure of the human conceptual system. Cognitive science, 4(2), 195-208.10.1207/s15516709cog0402_4]Search in Google Scholar
[Lenneberg, E.H. (1967). Biological foundations of language. New York: Wiley.]Search in Google Scholar
[Levelt, W. (2014). A history of psycholinguistics: The pre-Chomskyan era. Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Maguire, E.A., Frith, C.D., & Morris, R.G.M. (1999). The functional neuroanatomy of comprehension and memory: The importance of prior knowledge. Brain, 122, 1839–1850.10.1093/brain/122.10.1839]Search in Google Scholar
[Mason, R.A., & Just, M.A. (2004). How the brain processes causal inferences in text: A theoretical account of generation and integration component processes utilizing both cerebral hemispheres. Psychological Science, 15, 1–7.10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.01501001.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Mason, R.A., & Just, M.A. (2006). Neuroimaging contributions to the understanding of discourse processes. Handbook of psycholinguistics, 799.10.1016/B978-012369374-7/50020-1]Search in Google Scholar
[Minsky, M. (Ed.) (1968). Semantic information processing. Cambridge, MA: MIT.]Search in Google Scholar
[Murphy, G.L., & Medin, D.L. (1985). The role of theories in conceptual coherence. Psychological review, 92(3), 289.10.1037/0033-295X.92.3.289]Search in Google Scholar
[Quillian, M.R. (1968). Semantic memory. In: M. Minksy (Ed.), Semantic information processing. Cambridge, MA; MIT Press, 227–270.]Search in Google Scholar
[Myers, J.L., & O’Brien, E.J. (1998). Accessing the discourse representation during reading. Discourse Processes, 26, 131–157.10.1080/01638539809545042]Search in Google Scholar
[Myers, J.L., Shinjo, M., & Duffy, S.A. (1987). Degree of causal relatedness and memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 26(4), 453-465.10.1016/0749-596X(87)90101-X]Search in Google Scholar
[Reber, A.S. (1987). The rise and (surprisingly rapid) fall of psycholinguistics. Synthese, 72: 325-339.]Search in Google Scholar
[Recanati, F. (2005). Literalism and contextualism: Some varieties. In: G. Preyer and G. Peter (eds.), Contextualism in philosophy: Knowledge, meaning, and truth. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 171-196.]Search in Google Scholar
[Reboul A. & Moeschler J. (1998), Pragmatique du discours. De l’interprétation de l’énoncé à l’interprétation du discours, Paris, Armand Colin (U linguistique).]Search in Google Scholar
[Reichle, E.D. & Mason, R.A. (2006). The neural signatures of causal inferences: A preliminary computational account of brain-imaging and behavioral data. In: F. Schmalhofer, & C.A. Perfetti (Eds), Higher level language processes in the brain: Inference and comprehension processes. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.]Search in Google Scholar
[Robertson, D.A., Gernsbacher, M.A., Guidotti, S.J., Robertson, R.R.W., Irwin, W., Mock, B.J., & Campana, M.E. (2000). Functional neuroanatomy of the cognitive process of mapping during discourse comprehension. Psychological Science, 11, 255–260.10.1111/1467-9280.00251]Search in Google Scholar
[Russell, B. (2009). The philosophy of logical atomism. Routledge.10.4324/9780203864777]Search in Google Scholar
[Russell, B. (2005). On denoting. Mind, 114(456), 873-887.10.1093/mind/fzi873]Search in Google Scholar
[Searle, J.R. (1985). Expression and meaning: Studies in the theory of speech acts. Cambridge University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Searle, J.R. (1965). What is a Speech Act?. England: Penguin books.]Search in Google Scholar
[Searle, J.R. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language (Vol. 626). Cambridge university press.10.1017/CBO9781139173438]Search in Google Scholar
[Schmidt, G.L., & Seger, C.A. (2009). Neural correlates of metaphor processing: the roles of figurativeness, familiarity and difficulty. Brain and cognition, 71(3), 375-386.10.1016/j.bandc.2009.06.001]Search in Google Scholar
[Skinner, B.F. (1983). Verbal Behavior, 1957. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sperber, D., Wilson, D., (1986). Relevance: Communication and cognition (Vol. 142). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Stanley, J., & Gendler Szabó, Z. (2000). On quantifier domain restriction. Mind & Language, 15(2-3), 219-261.10.1111/1468-0017.00130]Search in Google Scholar
[St George, M., Kutas, M., Martinez, A., & Sereno, M.I. (1999). Semantic integration in reading: engagement of the right hemisphere during discourse processing. Brain, 122(7), 1317-1325.10.1093/brain/122.7.1317]Search in Google Scholar
[Tinker, M.A. (1936). Reliability and validity of eye-movement measures of reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 19, 732–746.10.1037/h0060561]Search in Google Scholar
[Tomitch, L.M.B., Just, M.A., & Newman, S.D. (2004). Main idea identification: a functional imaging study of a complex language comprehension process. In C. Rodrigues, & L.M.B. Tomitch (Eds.), Linguagem e o Cérebro Humano: Contribuições multidisciplinares (pp. 167-175). ATMED editora, Portoalegre.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tremblay, P., & Dick, A.S. (2016). Broca and Wernicke are dead, or moving past the classic model of language neurobiology. Brain and Language, 162, 60-71.10.1016/j.bandl.2016.08.004]Search in Google Scholar
[Thompson, H.E., Henshall, L., & Jefferies, E. (2016). The role of the right hemisphere in semantic control: A case-series comparison of right and left hemisphere stroke. Neuropsychologia, 85, 44-61.10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.02.030]Search in Google Scholar
[Van Dijk, T., Kintsch, T., (1983). Strategies of Discourse Comprehension. New York: Academic Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Xu, J., Kemeny, S., Park, G., Frattali, C., & Braun, A. (2005). Language in context: Emergent features of word, sentence, and narrative comprehension. NeuroImage, 25, 1002–1015.10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.12.013]Search in Google Scholar
[Winograd, T. (1972). Understanding natural language. Cognitive Psychology, 3, 1–191.10.1016/0010-0285(72)90002-3]Search in Google Scholar
[Wittgenstein, L. (1921). Tractatus logico-philosophicus (Trans, D.F. Pears & B.F. McGuinness, 1961). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wittgenstein, L. (1999). Philosophical investigations, trans. GEM Anscombe. New York: The Macmillan Company.]Search in Google Scholar
[Zhang, Y., Fan, L., Caspers, S., Heim, S., Song, M., Liu, C. et al. (2017). Cross-cultural consistency and diversity in intrinsic functional organization of Broca's Region. NeuroImage, 150, 177-190.10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.02.042]Search in Google Scholar
