Modern Instruments for Evidence-Gathering in Criminal Matters Across EU

[1] Stanin, M. The Contemporary Countries in the Conditions of Migratory Multiculturalism. In: „Economic, Social and Administrative Approaches to the Knowledge - based Organization. Conference Proceedings 2“, ISBN 978-973-153-274-5, Land Forces Academy ”Nicolae Balchesku", Sibiu, Romania, 2017, pp. 201- 205.10.1515/kbo-2017-0114Search in Google Scholar

[2] Кръстева, Н., В. Кръстев. Интеграция на лицата с бежански или хуманитарен статут в България чрез образование. Сб. „Влияние на миграционните процеси върху геополитиката, икономиката и публичната сфера“, УИ „Н. Рилски“, Благоевград, ISBN 978-954-00-0083-1, 2016, с. 67- 79.Search in Google Scholar

[3] Marin, N. Disproportionate Migration Pressure as a Challenge for the National Security of the Republic of Bulgaria. In: “Economic, Social and Administrative Approaches to the Knowledge - based Organization. Conference Proceedings 2”, Land Forces Academy ”Nicolae Balchesku", Sibiu, Romania, 2016, p. 134.10.1515/kbo-2016-0061Search in Google Scholar

[4] Signed in Strasbourg, 20.04.1959.Search in Google Scholar

[5] Girginov, A., Voynova, R. Bulgarian-English Handbook on International Judicial Cooperation in Criminal Matters, Sofia, Нова звезда, София, ISBN 978-619-198-068-0, 2017.Search in Google Scholar

[6] OJ L 239, 22.9.2000, pp. 19- 62.10.1016/S0010-7824(00)00131-1Search in Google Scholar

[7] Funaut, C. The Schengen Treaties and European Police Co-operation. In: European Journal of Crime Criminal Law and Criminal Justice, Vol. 1, № 1 (1993), p. 37.Search in Google Scholar

[8] OJ C 197, 12.7.2000, pp. 3- 23.10.1007/s001740070067Search in Google Scholar

[9] The mutual recognition principle was developed in several EU working programmes - the Programme of measures to implement the principle of mutual recognition of decisions in criminal matters of 2000, the Hague Programme of 2004 and the Stockholm Programme of 2009. It is stipulated in Article 82 (1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the EU, OJ C 83/47 of 30.3.2010.Search in Google Scholar

[10] Klimek, L. Free Movement of Evidence in Criminal Matters in the EU. In: The Lawyer Quarterly 4 (2012), pp. 250- 290.Search in Google Scholar

[11] OJ L 190, 18.7.2002, p.1.10.1622/1059-8405(2002)018[0190:E]2.0.CO;2Search in Google Scholar

[12] OJ L 196, 2.8.2003, pp. 45- 55.10.1007/s11837-003-0209-5Search in Google Scholar

[13] OJ L 350, 30.12.2008, pp.72 - 92. No longer in force. Date of end of validity: 21.02.2016.10.1088/2058-7058/21/02/20Search in Google Scholar

[14] Murphy, Cian C. The European Evidence Warrant: Mutual Recognition and Mutual (Dis)Trust?, Social Science Research Network, Issue 3 (2010), pp.1- 25.Search in Google Scholar

[15] OJ L 130, 1.5.2014, pp. 1- 36.10.5840/enviroethics201436213Search in Google Scholar

[16] By April 2018, 20 Member States, including the United Kingdom, have transposed the Directive 2014/41/EU and the other 5 Member States are in the process of transposition.Search in Google Scholar

[17] Winter, B. L. European investigation order for obtaining evidence in the criminal proceedings, In: ZIS 9/2010, pp. 580- 589.Search in Google Scholar

[18] Farries, A. The European Investigation Order: stepping forward with care. In: New Journal of European Criminal Law, Issue 1 (2010), pp. 425- 432.Search in Google Scholar

[19] Raimundas, J., Zajančkauskienė J. Movement of Evidence in the European Union: Challenges for the European Investigation Order, In: Baltic Journal of Law & Politics, Volume 9, Issue 2 (2016), pp. 56- 84.Search in Google Scholar

[20] Belfiore, R. The European Investigation Order in Criminal Matters: Developments in Evidence-gathering across the EU. In: European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice, Issue 17 (2009), pp. 1- 22.Search in Google Scholar