Accès libre

Comparative Analysis of National Approaches to Military Capability Planning

   | 20 juil. 2017
À propos de cet article

Citez

[1] JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF (ed.). Joint Publication 5-0: Joint Operation Planning. Washington, D.C.: Joint Chiefs of Staff, 2011, 1 v. (loose-leaf). Chapter III. Available at: http://www.dtic.mil/doctrine/new_pubs/jp5_0.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

[2] EUROPEAN DEFENCE AGENCY (ed.). Future Trends from the Capability Development Plan. European Defence Agency. Brussels, Belgium, 2008. Available also at: http://www.eda.europa.eu/docs/documents/Brochure_CDP.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

[3] NATO STO (ed.). RTO-MP-SAS-081 - Analytical Support to Defence Transformation: Analytic Implications of the NATO Defence Planning Process. Paris, France: CSO, 2010, p. 9 - 18. ISBN 978-92-837-0116-3. Available also at: https://www.cso.nato.int/pubs/rdp.asp?RDP=RTO-MP-SAS-081Search in Google Scholar

[4] NATO STO (ed.). Cost Efficiency Implications of International Cooperation: Final Report of Task Group SAS-090. Neuilly-sur-Seine, Francie: NATO Science and Technology Organization, 2015, p. E-1. ISBN 978-92-837-0219-1. Available also at: https://www.cso.nato.int/Pubs/rdp.asp?RDP=STO-TR-SAS-090Search in Google Scholar

[5] SHAPE/ACT (ed.). BI-SC Agreed Capability Codes and Capability Statements. SHAPE/CPPCAMFCR/JM/281143. Mons, Belgium, 2011.Search in Google Scholar

[6] SHAPE/ACT (ed.). Bi-SC Capability Hierarchy. SH/PLANS/JCAP/FCP/15-310118. Mons, Belgium, 2015.Search in Google Scholar