[Baumgartner, H. and J.E.M. Steenkamp. 2001. “Response Styles in Marketing Research: A Cross-National Investigation.” Journal of Marketing Research 38: 143-156. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.38.2.143.18840.10.1509/jmkr.38.2.143.18840]Search in Google Scholar
[Belson, W.A. 1966. “Effects of Reversing Presentation Order of Verbal Rating Scales.” Journal of Advertising Research 6: 30-37.]Search in Google Scholar
[Carp, F.M. 1974. “Position Effects on Interview Responses.” Journal of Gerontology 29: 581-587. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geronj/29.5.581.10.1093/geronj/29.5.5814853701]Search in Google Scholar
[Chan, J.C. 1991. “Response-Order Effect in Likert-Type Scales.” Educational and Psychological Measurement 51: 531-540. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0013164491513002.10.1177/0013164491513002]Search in Google Scholar
[Christian, L.M., D.A. Dillman, and J.D. Smyth. 2008. “The Effects of Mode and Format on Answers to Scalar Questions in Telephone and Web Surveys.” In Advances in Telephone Survey Methodology, edited by J.M. Lepkowski, C. Tucker, J.M. Brick, E.D. De Leeuw, L. Japec, P.J. Lavrakas,M.W.Link, R.L. Sangster, 250-275.New Jersey: JohnWiley&Sons, Inc.10.1002/9780470173404.ch12]Search in Google Scholar
[Dillman, D.A., T.L. Brown, J.E. Carlson, E.H. Carpenter, F.O. Lorenz, R. Mason, J. Saltiel, and R.L. Songster. 1995. “Effects of Category Order on Answers in Mail and Telephone Surveys.” Rural Sociology 60: 674-687. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j. 1549-0831.1995.tb00600.x.10.1111/j.1549-0831.1995.tb00600.x]Search in Google Scholar
[He, L., T. Yan, F. Keusch and S. Han. 2014. “The impact of question and scale characteristics on scale direction effect.” In Proccedings of the AAPOR 69th Annual Conference, Anaheim, California, May 15-18. Available at: http://www.aapor.org/AAPOR_Main/media/AnnualMeetingProceedings/2014/Session-J-6-2-He-Y.pdf (accessed January 2017).]Search in Google Scholar
[Kalton, G., M. Collins, and L. Brook. 1978. “Experiments in Wording Opinion Questions.” Applied Statistics, 149-161. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2346942.10.2307/2346942]Search in Google Scholar
[Kieruj, N.D. and G. Moors. 2010. “Variations in Response Style Behavior by Response Scale Format in Attitude Research.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research 22: 320-342. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edq001.10.1093/ijpor/edq001]Search in Google Scholar
[Kieruj, N.D. and G. Moors. 2013. “Response Style Behavior: Question Format Dependent or Personal Style?” Quality & Quantity 47: 193-211. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11135-011-9511-4.10.1007/s11135-011-9511-4]Search in Google Scholar
[Krebs, D. and J.H.P. Hoffmeyer-Zlotnik. 2010. “Positive First or Negative First?: Effects of the Order of Answering Categories on Response Behavior.” Methodology: European Journal of Research Methods for the Behavioral and Social Sciences 6: 118-127. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1614-2241/a000013.10.1027/1614-2241/a000013]Search in Google Scholar
[Krosnick, J.A. 1991. “Response Strategies for Coping with the Cognitive Demands of Attitude Measures in Surveys.” Applied Cognitive Psychology 5: 213-236. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acp.2350050305.10.1002/acp.2350050305]Search in Google Scholar
[Krosnick, J.A. and S. Presser. 2010. “Question and Questionnaire Design.” In Handbook of Survey Research, Second Edition, edited by P.V. Marsden and J.D. Wright, 263-314. United Kingdom: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.]Search in Google Scholar
[Liu, M., F.G. Conrad, and S. Lee. 2016. “Comparing Acquiescent and Extreme Response Styles in Face-to-Face and Web Surveys.” Quality & Quantity. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11135-016-0320-7.10.1007/s11135-016-0320-7]Search in Google Scholar
[Liu, M., S. Lee, and F.G. Conrad. 2015. “Comparing Extreme Response Styles between Agree-Disagree and Item-Specific Scales.” Public Opinion Quarterly 79: 952-975. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfv034.10.1093/poq/nfv034]Search in Google Scholar
[Mingay, D.J. and M.T. Greenwell. 1989. “Memory Bias and Response-Order Effects.” Journal of Official Statistics 5: 253-263.]Search in Google Scholar
[Moors, G. 2003. “Diagnosing Response Style Behavior by Means of a Latent-Class Factor Approach. Socio-Demographic Correlates of Gender Role Attitudes and Perceptions of Ethnic Discrimination Reexamined.” Quality and Quantity 37: 277-302. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1024472110002.10.1023/A:1024472110002]Search in Google Scholar
[Moors, G. 2008. “Exploring the Effect of a Middle Response Category on Response Style in Attitude Measurement.” Quality & Quantity 42: 779-794. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11135-006-9067-x.10.1007/s11135-006-9067-x279897520084107]Search in Google Scholar
[Moors, G., N.D. Kieruj, and J.K. Vermunt. 2014. “The Effect of Labeling and Numbering of Response Scales on the Likelihood of Response Bias.” Sociological Methodology 44: 369-399. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0081175013516114.10.1177/0081175013516114]Search in Google Scholar
[Morren, M., J.P.T.M. Gelissen, and J.K. Vermunt. 2011. “Dealing With Extreme Response Style In Cross-Cultural Research: A Restricted Latent Class Factor Analysis Approach: Extreme Response Style In Cross-Cultural Research.” Sociological Methodology 41: 13-47. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9531.2011.01238.x.10.1111/j.1467-9531.2011.01238.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Paulhus, D.L. 1991. “Measurement and Control of Response Bias.” Measures of Personality and Social Psychological Attitudes. Volume 1 in Measures of Social Psychological Attitudes Series. Available at: http://doi.apa.org/psycinfo/1991-97206-001.10.1016/B978-0-12-590241-0.50006-X]Search in Google Scholar
[Revilla, M.A., W.E. Saris, and J.A. Krosnick. 2013. “Choosing the Number of Categories in Agree-Disagree Scales.” Sociological Methods & Research 43: 73-97. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0049124113509605.10.1177/0049124113509605]Search in Google Scholar
[Salzberger, T. and M. Koller. 2013. “Towards a New Paradigm of Measurement in Marketing.” Journal of Business Research 66: 1307-1317.10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.02.030]Search in Google Scholar
[Saris, W.E. and I.N. Gallhofer. 2007. “Estimation of the Effects of Measurement Characteristics on the Quality of Survey Questions.” In Design, Evaluation, and Analysis of Questionnaires for Survey Research, edited by W.E. Saris and I.N. Gallhofer, 237-253. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.10.1002/9780470165195.ch12]Search in Google Scholar
[Stapleton, C. 2013. “The Smart (phone)Way to Collect Survey Data.” Survey Practice 6(2).10.29115/SP-2013-0011]Search in Google Scholar
[Tourangeau, R., M.P. Couper, and F.G. Conrad. 2004. “Spacing, Position, and Order Interpretive Heuristics for Visual Features of Survey Questions.” Public Opinion Quarterly 68: 368-393. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfh035.10.1093/poq/nfh035]Search in Google Scholar
[Tourangeau, R., M.P. Couper, and F.G. Conrad. 2007. “Color, Labels, and Interpretive Heuristics for Response Scales.” Public Opinion Quarterly 71: 91-112. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfl046.10.1093/poq/nfl046]Search in Google Scholar
[Tversky, A. and D. Kahneman. 1974. “Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.” Science 185: 1124-1131. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.185.4157.1124.10.1126/science.185.4157.112417835457]Search in Google Scholar
[Vermunt, J.K. and J. Magidson. 2013. Technical guide for Latent GOLD 5.0: Basic, advanced, and syntax. Belmont, MA: Statistical Innovations Inc. ]Search in Google Scholar
[Yan, T. and F. Keusch. 2015. “The Effects of the Direction of Rating Scales on Survey Responses in a Telephone Survey.” Public Opinion Quarterly 79: 145-165. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfu062. 10.1093/poq/nfu062]Search in Google Scholar