[AAPOR 2011. Standard Definitions: Final Dispositions of Case Codes and Outcome Rates for Surveys. (7th edition). The American Association for Public Opinion Research. Available at: http://www.aapor.org/AM/Template.cfm?Section=Standard _Definitions2& Template=/CM/ContentDisplay.cfm& ContentID=3156 (accessed December 2013).]Search in Google Scholar
[Andridge, R.R. and R.J. Little. 2011. “Proxy Pattern-Mixture Analysis for Survey Nonresponse.” Journal of Official Statistics 27: 153-180.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bethlehem, J., F. Cobben, and B. Schouten. 2011. Handbook of Nonresponse in Household Surveys. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.10.1002/9780470891056]Search in Google Scholar
[Biemer, P.P. and L.E. Lyberg. 2003. Introduction to Survey Quality. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.10.1002/0471458740]Search in Google Scholar
[Bijl, R. and A. Verweij. 2012. Measuring and Monitoring Immigrant Integration in Europe: Integration Policies and Monitoring Efforts in 17 European Countries, 2012-8.]Search in Google Scholar
[Den Haag: SCP. Available at: http://www.scp.nl/english/Publications/ Publications_by_year/Publications_2012/Measuring_and_monitoring_immigrant_ integration_in_Europe (accessed June 2013).]Search in Google Scholar
[CBS-Statline. Available at: http://statline.cbs.nl/StatWeb/publication/?VW= T& DM=SLNL& PA=37325& D1=a& D2=0& D3=0& D4=0& D5=0-4,137,152,220,237 & D6=0,4,9, (l-1),l& HD=130605-0936& HDR=G2,G1,G3,T& STB=G4,G5 (accessed December 2013).]Search in Google Scholar
[Couper, P. 2005. “Technology Trends in Survey Data Collection.” Social Science Computer Review 23: 486-501. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0894439305278972.10.1177/0894439305278972]Search in Google Scholar
[Dagevos, J. and R. Schellingerhout. 2003. “Sociaal-culturele integratie. Contacten, cultuur en orientatie op de eigen groep.” In Rapportage minderheden, edited by J. Dagevos, M. Gijsberts, and v. C. Praag, 317-362. [In Dutch: Socio-Cultural integration. Contacts, culture and focus on the own ethnic group]. Den Haag: SCP. Available at: http://www. scp.nl/Publicaties/Alle_publicaties/Publicaties_2003/Rapportage_minderheden_2003 (accessed December 2012).]Search in Google Scholar
[De Leeuw, E.D. 2005. “To Mix or not to Mix Data Collection Modes in Surveys.” Journal of Official Statistics 21: 233-255.]Search in Google Scholar
[De Leeuw, E.D., D.A. Dillman, and J.J. Hox. 2008. “Mixed-Mode Surveys: When and Why.” In International Handbook Of Survey Methodology, edited by E.D. de Leeuw, J.J. Hox, and D.A. Dillman, 299-316. New York: Taylor and Francis Group.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dempster, A.P., N.M. Laird, and D.B. Rubin. 1977. “Maximum Likelihood from Incomplete Data via the EMAlgorithm.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. SeriesB (Methodological) 39: 1-38.10.1111/j.2517-6161.1977.tb01600.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Dillman, D.A. 2007. Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method (2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dillman, D.A. and L.M. Christian. 2005. “Survey Mode as a Source of Instability in Responses Across Surveys.” Field Methods 17: 30-52. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/ 1525822X04269550.10.1177/1525822X04269550]Search in Google Scholar
[Feskens, R.C.W. 2009. Difficult Groups in Survey Research and the Development of Tailor-made Approach Strategies. Den Haag/Utrecht: Statistics Netherlands and Kappelhof: Face-to-Face or Sequential Mixed-Mode 27 Utrecht University. Available at: http://www.cbs.nl/NR/rdonlyres/8F317AA9-1074- 4BF7-84EB-015D013DBB80/0/2009x11feskenspub.pdf (accessed October 2011).]Search in Google Scholar
[Feskens, R.C.W., J. Kappelhof, J. Dagevos, and I.A.L Stoop. 2010. Minderheden in de mixed-mode? Een inventarisatie van voor- en nadelen van het inzetten van verschillende dataverzamelingsmethoden onder niet-westerse migranten. SCP-special 57. [In Dutch: Ethnic minorities in the mixed mode? An inventory of the advantages and disadvantages of employing different data collection methods among non-Western migrant] Den Haag: SCP. Available at: http://www.scp.nl/Publicaties/Alle_publicaties/ Publicaties_2010/Minderheden_in_de_mixed_mode (accessed December 2014).]Search in Google Scholar
[Gijsberts, M. and J. Iedema. 2011. “Opleidingsniveau van niet-schoolgaanden en leerprestaties in het basisonderwijs.” In Jaarrapport Integratie 2011, edited by M. Gijsberts, W. Huijnk, and J. Dagevos, 76-99. [In Dutch: Education level of persons who do not attend school and educational attainment in primary school]. Den Haag: SCP. (2012-3). Available at: http://www.scp.nl/Publicaties/Alle_publicaties/ Publicaties_2012/Jaarrapport_integratie_2011 (accessed December 2014).]Search in Google Scholar
[Graham, J.W., A.E. Olchowski, and T.D. Gilreath. 2007. “How Many Imputations are Really Needed? Some Practical Clarifications of Multiple Imputation Theory.” Prevention Science 8: 206-213. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11121-007-0070-9.10.1007/s11121-007-0070-9]Search in Google Scholar
[Groves, R.M. 1989. Survey Costs and Survey Errors. New York: Wiley.10.1002/0471725277]Search in Google Scholar
[Groves, R.M. and M.P. Couper. 1998. Nonresponse in Household Interview Surveys. New York: Wiley. Groves, R.M. and E. Peytcheva. 2008. “The Impact of Nonresponse Rates on Nonresponse Bias.” Public Opinion Quarterly 72: 167-189. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/poq/ nfn011.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kappelhof, J.W.S. 2010. Op maat gemaakt? Een evaluatie van enkele respons verbeterende maatregelen onder Nederlanders van niet-westerse afkomst. [In Dutch: An evaluation of several response enhancing measures among Dutch of non-Western origin]. Den Haag: SCP. (SCP-special 53). Available at: http://www.scp.nl/Publicaties/ Alle_publicaties/Publicaties_2010/Op_maat_gemaakt (accessed December 2014).]Search in Google Scholar
[Kappelhof, J.W.S. 2014. “The Effect of Different Survey Designs on Nonresponse in Surveys Among Non-Western Minorities in The Netherlands.” Survey Research Methods 8: 81-98. Available at: http://www.surveymethods.org (accessed December 2014).]Search in Google Scholar
[Kemper, F. 1998. “Gezocht: Marokkanen. Methodische problemen bij het verwerven en interviewen van allochtone respondenten.” [In Dutch: Wanted: Moroccans. Methodological problems with obtaining response and interviewing respondents of foreign origin]. Migrantenstudies 1: 43-57.]Search in Google Scholar
[Korte, K. and J. Dagevos. 2011. Survey Integratie Minderheden 2011. Verantwoording van de opzet en uitvoering van een survey onder Turkse, Marokkaanse, Surinaamse en Antilliaanse Nederlanders en een autochtone vergelijkingsgroep. [In Dutch: Survey on the Integration of Minorities 2011. Report on the design and implementation of the survey among Turkish, Moroccan, Surinamese, Antillean Dutch and a mainstream Dutch reference group]. Den Haag: SCP.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kreuter, F. 2013. Improving Surveys with Paradata. Analytic Uses of Process Information. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 28 Journal of Official Statistics Little, R.J. and D.B. Rubin. 2002. Statistical Analysis With Missing Data. New York: John Wiley & Sons.10.1002/9781118596869.ch1]Search in Google Scholar
[Maitland, A., C. Casas-Cordero, and F. Kreuter. 2009. “An Evaluation of Nonresponse Bias Using Paradata from a Health Survey.” In: Proceedings of the Section on Government Statistics: American Statistical Association, Joint Statistical Meetings, 2009. 370-378. Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association. Available at: http:// www.amstat.org/sections/SRMS/proceedings/y2009/Files/303004.pdf (accessed December 2014).]Search in Google Scholar
[Moorman, P.G., B. Newman, R.C. Millikan, C.K.J. Tse, and D.P. Sandler. 1999. “Participation rates in a Case-control Study: The Impact of Age, Race, and Race of Interviewer.” Annals of epidemiology 9: 188-195. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ S1047-2797(98)00057-X.10.1016/S1047-2797(98)00057-X]Search in Google Scholar
[Reep, C. 2003. Moeilijk Waarneembare Groepen. Een inventarisatie. [In Dutch: Hard to survey populations: An inventory]. Voorburg/Heerlen: CBS. (H1568-03-s00).]Search in Google Scholar
[Rubin, D.B. 1987. Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.10.1002/9780470316696]Search in Google Scholar
[Schmeets, H. 2005. “De leefsituatie van allochtonen.” In Enquêteonderzoek onder allochtonen. Problemen en oplossingen, edited by H. Schmeets en and R. van der Bie, 169-176. [In Dutch: The living conditions of Dutch of foreign origin]. Voorburg/Heerlen: CBS.]Search in Google Scholar
[Schothorst, Y. 2002. “Onderzoek onder allochtonen: wat mag, wat moet en wat kan?” In: Interviewen in de multiculturele samenleving. Problemen en oplossingen, edited by H. Houtkoop en and J. Veenman, 101-116. [In Dutch: Survey research among Dutch of foreign origin: What may be done, what has to be done and what is possible?]. Assen: Koninklijke Van Gorcum.]Search in Google Scholar
[Schouten, B. and F. Cobben. 2007. R-Indexes for the Comparison of Different Fieldwork Strategies and Data Collection Modes. Voorburg/Heerlen: CBS. (Discussion Paper 07002). Available at: http://www.risq-project.eu/papers/schouten-cobben-2007-a.pdf (accessed December 2013).]Search in Google Scholar
[Schouten, B.F. and F. Cobben. 2008. An Empirical Validation of R-Indicators. Voorburg/Heerlen: CBS. (Discussion Paper 08006) Available at: http://www. risq-project.eu/papers/cobben-schouten-2008-a.pdf (accessed December 2013).]Search in Google Scholar
[Schouten,B. F. Cobben, and J. Bethlehem. 2009. “Indicators of Representativeness of Survey Nonresponse.” Survey Methodology 35: 101-113. Available at: http://www.risq-project. eu/papers/schouten-cobben-bethlehem-2009.pdf (accessed December 2013).]Search in Google Scholar
[Schouten, B. J. Bethlehem, K. Beullens, Ø. Kleven, G. Loosveldt, A. Luiten, K. Rutar, N. Shlomo, and C. Skinner. 2012. “Evaluating, Comparing, Monitoring, and Improving Representativity of Survey Response Through R-Indicators and Partial R-Indicators.” International Statistical Review 80: 382-399. Available at: http://onlinelibrary.wiley. com/doi/10.1111/j.1751-5823.2012.00189.x/abstract (accessed December 2013).10.1111/j.1751-5823.2012.00189.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Schouten, B., N. Shlomo, and C. Skinner. 2011. “Indicators for Monitoring and Improving Representativity of Response.” Journal of Official Statistics 27: 231-253.]Search in Google Scholar
[Shlomo, N., C. Skinner, B. Schouten, T. Carolina, and M. Morren. 2009. Partial Indicators for Representative Response. Rep. No. RISQ deliverable 4. version 2. Available at: http:// www.risq-project.eu/papers/RISQ-Deliverable-4-V2.pdf (accessed December 2013). Kappelhof: Face-to-Face or Sequential Mixed-Mode 29 Singer, E. 2002. “The Use of Incentives to Reduce Nonresponse in Household Surveys.” In Survey Nonresponse, edited by R.M. Groves, D. Dillman, J.L. Eltinge, and R.J.A. Little, 163-177. New York: John Wiley & Sons.]Search in Google Scholar
[Singer, E., J. Van Hoewyk, N. Gebler, T. Raghunathan, and K. McGonagle. 1999. “The Effect of Incentives on Response Rates in Interviewer-Mediated Surveys.” Journal of Official Statistics 15: 217-230.]Search in Google Scholar
[Singer, E., J. Van Hoewyk, and M.P. Maher. 2000. “Experiments With Incentives in Telephone Surveys.” Public Opinion Quarterly 64: 171-188. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1086/317761.10.1086/31776110984332]Search in Google Scholar
[Smulders, M. 2011. Onderzoeksverantwoording Survey Integratie Minderheden 2011 [In Dutch: research description on the Survey on the Integration of Minorities 2011]. Dongen: GFK Panel Services Benelux B.V. Stoop, I.A.L. 2005. The Hunt for the Last Respondent: Nonresponse in Sample Surveys. Den Haag: SCP.]Search in Google Scholar
[Särndal, C.-E. 2011. “Three Factors to Signal Non Response Bias With Applications to Categorical Auxiliary Variables.” International Statistical Review 79: 233-254. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-5823.2011.00142.x.10.1111/j.1751-5823.2011.00142.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Särndal, C.-E., and S. Lundström. 2010. “Design for Estimation: Identifying Auxiliary Vectors to Reduce Nonresponse Bias.” Survey Methodology 36: 131-144.]Search in Google Scholar
[Van Ingen, E., J. De Haan, and M. Duimel. 2007. Achterstand en afstand. Digitale vaardigheden van lager opgeleiden, ouderen, allochtonen en inactieven. [In Dutch: Lagging behind. Digital skills of lower educated, elderly, foreign origin and inactive persons]. Den Haag: SCP. (SCP- 2007/24).]Search in Google Scholar
[Veenman, J. 2002. “Interviewen in multicultureel Nederland.” In Interviewen in de multiculturele samenleving. Problemen en oplossingen, edited by H. Houtkoop en and J.]Search in Google Scholar
[Veenman, 1-19. [In Dutch: Interviewing in the multi-cultural Netherlands]. Assen: Koninklijke Van Gorcum.]Search in Google Scholar
[Voogt, R.J.J. and W.E. Saris. 2005. “Mixed Mode Designs: Finding the Balance Between Nonresponse Bias and Mode Effects.” Journal of Official Statistics 21: 367-387.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wagner, J. 2008. Adaptive Survey Design to Reduce Nonresponse Bias, Michigan: University of Michigan. Available at: http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/ 60831/1/jameswag_1.pdf (accessed December 2014).]Search in Google Scholar
[Wagner, J. 2010. “The Fraction of Missing Information as a Tool for Monitoring the Quality of Survey Data.” Public Opinion Quarterly 74: 223-243. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfq007.10.1093/poq/nfq007]Search in Google Scholar
