Reading input flooding versus listening input flooding: Can they boost speaking skill?

Alanen, R. (1995). Input enhancement and rule presentation in second language acquisition. In R. Schmidt (Ed.), Attention and awareness in foreign language acquisition (pp. 259-302). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii.Search in Google Scholar

Best, J., & Kahn, J.V. (2006). Research in education (tenth ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.Search in Google Scholar

Bowden, C., Latham King, C. & Hudson, J. (2008). American English files. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Bygate, M. (1999). Task as context for the framing, reframing, and unframing of language. System, 27, 33-48. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(98)00048-710.1016/S0346-251X(98)00048-7Search in Google Scholar

Bygate, M. (2001). Effects of task repetition on the structure and control of oral language. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (Eds.). Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning and testing (pp. 37-53). London: Longman.Search in Google Scholar

Brown, H. D. (2001). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy (2nded.). New York, NY: Longman.Search in Google Scholar

Cohen, J. W. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nded.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Search in Google Scholar

D’Ely, R. (2006). A focus on learners’ metacognitive process: The importance of the strategic planning, repetition, strategic planning plus repetition and strategic planning for repetition on L2 oral performance (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Santa Catarina University, Brazil.Search in Google Scholar

Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Evelyn, S., & Marije, M. (2014). An exploratory study into trade-off effects on complexity, accuracy, and fluency on young learners’ oral task repetition. TESL Canada Journal, 30(4), 23-48.Search in Google Scholar

Ferrari, S. (2012).A longitudinal study of complexity, accuracy, and fluency variation in second language development. In A. Housen, F. Kuiken, & I. Vedder (Eds.), Dimension ofL2 performance and proficiency: Complexity, accuracy, and fluency in SLA (pp. 227-297). Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Search in Google Scholar

Francis, S. (2003). Input flooding and the acquisition of the Spanish verbs ser and estar for beginning level adult learners (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), Purdue University, Lafayette, Indiana.Search in Google Scholar

Gass, S. (1997). Input, interaction, and the second language learner. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Search in Google Scholar

Hernandez, T.A. (2008). The effect of explicit instruction and input flood on students’ use of discourse markers on a simulated oral proficiency interview. Hispania, 91, 665-75.Search in Google Scholar

Izumi, S. (2002). Output, and input enhancement, and the noticing hypothesis: An experimental study of ESL relativization. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24,541-577. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1017/S027226310200402310.1017/S0272263102004023Search in Google Scholar

Jourdenais, R., Ota, M., Stauffer, S., Boyson, B., & Daughty, C.J. (1995). Does textual enhancement promote noticing? In R. Schmidt (Ed.). Attention and awareness in foreign language learning (pp, 183-216). Honolulu, Hawai'i: University of Hawai'i Press.Search in Google Scholar

Kim, Y., & Tracy-Ventura, N. (2013). The role of task repetition in L2 performance development: What needs to be repeated during task-based instruction? System, 44(3), 829-840. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2013.08.00510.1016/j.system.2013.08.005Search in Google Scholar

Krashen, S. (1994).The pleasure hypothesis. In J. Alatis (Ed.), Georgetown University Roundtable on Language and Linguistics (pp. 299-322). Washington: Georgetown University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Lee, S.K. (2007). Effects of textual enhancement and topic formality on Korean EFL students’ reading comprehension and learning of passive form. Language Learning, 57, 87-118. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2007.00400.x10.1111/j.1467-9922.2007.00400.xSearch in Google Scholar

Lee, J.F. (2002). The incidental acquisition of Spanish future morphology through reading in a second language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24(1), 55- 80.10.1017/S0272263102001031Search in Google Scholar

Leow, R.P., Egi, T., Nuevo, A.M., &Tsai, Y.-C. (2003).The roles of textual enhancement and type of linguistic item in adult L2 learners’ comprehension and intake. Applied Language Learning, 13, 1-16.Search in Google Scholar

Overstreet, M. (1998). Textual enhancement and content familiarity: The focus of learner attention. Spanish Applied Linguistics, 2, 229-259.Search in Google Scholar

Radwan, A. (2005). The effectiveness of explicit attention to form in language learning. System, 33, 69-87. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2004.06.00710.1016/j.system.2004.06.007Search in Google Scholar

Rashtchi, M., & Gharanli, L. (2010). Noticing through input enhancement: Does it affect learning of the conditionals? Journal of Language and Translation, 1(1), 19-27.Search in Google Scholar

Reinders, H., & Ellis, R. (2009). The effects of two types of input to intake and the acquisition of implicit and explicit knowledge. In R. Ellis, S. Loewen, C. Elder, R. Erlam, J. Phlip, & H. Reinders (Eds.), Implicit and explicit knowledge in second language learning, testing and teaching (pp.281-302). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Search in Google Scholar

Rikhtegar, O., &Gholami, J. (2015). The effect of pre-verses post-presentation input flooding via reading on the young EFL learners’ acquisition of simple past tense. English Language Teaching, 8(3), 80-88. DOI:10.5539/elt.v8n3p8010.5539/elt.v8n3p80Search in Google Scholar

Schmidt, R. W. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 129-158.10.1093/applin/11.2.129Search in Google Scholar

Sharwood Smith, M. (1993). Input enhancement in structured SLA: Theoretical Bases. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 154-179.Search in Google Scholar

Shook, D.J. (1999). What foreign language recalls reveal about the input-to-intake phenomenon? Applied Language Learning, 10, 39-76.Search in Google Scholar

Simard, D. (2009). Differential effects of textual enhancement formats on intake. System, 37(1), 124-135. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2008.06.00510.1016/j.system.2008.06.005Search in Google Scholar

Skehan, P. (1998). A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Skehan, P. (2009). Modelling second language performance: Integrating complexity, accuracy, fluency, and lexis. Applied linguistics, 30(4), 510-532. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp04710.1093/applin/amp047Search in Google Scholar

Skehan, P., & Foster, P. (2001). Cognition and tasks. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 183-207). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Spada, N. (1997). Form-focused instruction and second language acquisition: Review of classroom and laboratory research. Language Teaching, 30, 73-87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S026144480001279910.1017/S0261444800012799Search in Google Scholar

Tabatabaei, O.,& Yakhabi, M. (2009). The effect of comprehensible input and comprehensible output on the accuracy and complexity of Iranian EFL learner’s oral speech. The Journal of Applied Linguistics, 2, 218-248.Search in Google Scholar

Trahey, M., & White, L. (1993). Positive evidence and preemption in the second language classroom. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 181-204. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S027226310001195510.1017/S0272263100011955Search in Google Scholar

VanPatten, B., Williams, J., & Rott, S. (2004). Form-meaning connections in second language acquisition. In B. VanPatten, J. Williams, S. Rott, & M. Overstreet (Eds.), Form-meaning connections in second language acquisition (pp. 1-26). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.10.4324/9781410610607Search in Google Scholar

Vercelloti, M. (2012). Complexity, accuracy, and fluency as properties of language performance: The development of the multiple subsystems over time and in relation to each other. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Pittsburgh, NY.Search in Google Scholar

Wagner-Gough, J., & Hatch, E. (1975). The importance of input in second language acquisition studies. Language Learning 25 (2), 297-308. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-1770.1975.tb00248.x10.1111/j.1467-1770.1975.tb00248.xSearch in Google Scholar

White, P. (2015). The effects of input-based instructions on the acquisition of Spanish accusative clitics. Hispania, 98(2), 264-284.10.1353/hpn.2015.0032Search in Google Scholar

Wong, W. (2003). Textual enhancement and simplified input: Effects on L2 comprehension and acquisition of non-meaningful grammatical form. Applied Language Learning, 13(2), 109-132.Search in Google Scholar

Wong, W. (2005). Input enhancement: From theory and research to the classroom. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Search in Google Scholar