[1. Benedek T, Gyöngyösi M, Benedek I. Multislice computed tomographic coronary angiography for quantitative assessment of culprit lesions in acute coronary syndromes. Can J Cardiol. 2013;29:364-371.10.1016/j.cjca.2012.11.00423333164]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Chatzizisis YS, George E, Cai T, et al. Accuracy and reproducibility of automated, standardized coronary transluminal attenuation gradient measurements. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014;30:1181-1189.10.1007/s10554-014-0446-4410474724839136]Search in Google Scholar
[3. König A, Klauss V. Virtual histology. Heart. 2007;93:977-982.10.1136/hrt.2007.116384199439117502324]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Terashima M, Kaneda H, Suzuki T. The Role of Optical Coherence Tomography in Coronary Intervention. The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine. 2012;27:1-12.10.3904/kjim.2012.27.1.1329597522403493]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Wongpraparut N, Yalamanchili V, Pasnoori V, et al. Thirty-month outcome after fractional flow reserve-guided versus conventional multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol. 2005;96:877-884.10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.05.04016188509]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Fearon WF, Tonino PA, De Bruyne B, Siebert U, Pijls NH; FAME Study Investigators. Rationale and design of the Fractional Flow Reserve versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation (FAME) study. Am Heart J. 2007;154:632-636.10.1016/j.ahj.2007.06.01217892983]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Tonino PA, De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, et al. Fractional Flow Reserve versus Angiography for Guiding Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:213-224.10.1056/NEJMoa080761119144937]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Berger A, Botman KJ, MacCarthy PA, et al. Long-term clinical outcome after fractional flow reserve-guided percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;46:438-442.10.1016/j.jacc.2005.04.04116053955]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Motoyama S, Masayoshi S, Harigaya H, et al. Computed tomographic angiography characteristics of atherosclerotic plaques subsequently resulting in acute coronary syndrome. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;54:49-57.10.1016/j.jacc.2009.02.06819555840]Search in Google Scholar
[10. Jakó B, Benedek T, Suciu Zs, Benedek I. High Calcium Score Predicts Severity of the Culprit Lesions in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes. Acta Medica Marisiensis. 2014;59:298-301.]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Ferrante G, Presbitero P, Whitbourn R, Barlis P. Current applications of optical coherence tomography for coronary intervention. Int J Cardiol. 2013;165:7-16.10.1016/j.ijcard.2012.02.01322405134]Search in Google Scholar
[12. Maurovich-Horvat P, Schlett CL, Alkadhi H, et al. The napkin-ring sign indicates advanced atherosclerotic lesions in coronary CT angiography. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012;5:1243-1252.10.1016/j.jcmg.2012.03.01923236975]Search in Google Scholar
[13. Diaz-Zamudio M, Dey D, Schuhbaeck A, et al. Automated Quantitative Plaque Burden from Coronary CT Angiography Noninvasively Predicts Hemodynamic Significance by using Fractional Flow Reserve in Intermediate Coronary Lesions. Radiology. 2015;276:408-415.10.1148/radiol.2015141648457816125897475]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Ko BS, Wong DT, Cameron JD, et al. 320-row CT coronary angiography predicts freedom from revascularisation and acts as a gatekeeper to defer invasive angiography in stable coronary artery disease: a fractional flow reserve-correlated study. Eur Radiol. 2014;24:738-747.10.1007/s00330-013-3059-824217643]Search in Google Scholar
[15. Danad I, Raijmakers PG, Knaapen P. Diagnosing coronary artery disease with hybrid PET/CT: It takes two to tango. J Nucl Cardiol. 2013;20:874-890.10.1007/s12350-013-9753-823842709]Search in Google Scholar
[16. Meijboom WB, Meijs MF, Schuijf JD, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography: a prospective, multicenter, multivendor study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;52:2135-2144.10.1016/j.jacc.2008.08.05819095130]Search in Google Scholar
[17. Stuijfzand WJ, Danad I, Raijmakers PG, et al. Additional value of transluminal attenuation gradient in CT angiography to predict hemodynamic significance of coronary artery stenosis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014;7:374-386.10.1016/j.jcmg.2013.12.013437865124631509]Search in Google Scholar
[18. Li M1, Zhang J, Pan J, Lu Z. Obstructive coronary artery disease: reverse attenuation gradient sign at CT indicates distal retrograde flow – a useful sign for differentiating chronic total occlusion from subtotal occlusion. Radiology. 2013;266:766-772.10.1148/radiol.1212129423220898]Search in Google Scholar
[19. Nakanishi R, Matsumoto S, Alani A, et al. Diagnostic performance of transluminal attenuation gradient and fractional flow reserve by coronary computed tomographic angiography (FFR(CT)) compared to invasive FFR: a sub-group analysis from the DISCOVER-FLOW and DeFACTO studies. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;31:1251-1259.10.1007/s10554-015-0666-225904402]Search in Google Scholar
[20. Ko BS, Wong DT, Nørgaard BL, et al. Diagnostic Performance of Transluminal Attenuation Gradient and Noninvasive Fractional Flow Reserve Derived from 320–Detector Row CT Angiography to Diagnose Hemodynamically Significant Coronary Stenosis: An NXT Substudy. Radiology. 2016;279:75-83.10.1148/radiol.201515038326444662]Search in Google Scholar
[21. Choi JH, Min JK, Labounty TM, et al. Intracoronary transluminal attenuation gradient in coronary CT angiography for determining coronary artery stenosis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011;4:1149-1157.10.1016/j.jcmg.2011.09.00622093264]Search in Google Scholar
[22. Wong DT, Ko BS, Cameron JD, et al. Transluminal attenuation gradient in coronary computed tomography angiography is a novel noninvasive approach to the identification of functionally significant coronary artery stenosis: a comparison with fractional flow reserve. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61:1271-1279.10.1016/j.jacc.2012.12.02923414792]Search in Google Scholar