[1. Finn AV, Nakano M, Narula J, Kolodgie FD, Virmani R. Concept of vulnerable/unstable plaque. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2010;30:1282-1292. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.108.179739.10.1161/ATVBAHA.108.17973920554950]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Stone GW1, Maehara A, Lansky AJ, et al. A prospective natural-history study of coronary atherosclerosis. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:226-235. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1002358.10.1056/NEJMoa100235821247313]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Bentzon JF, Otsuka F, Virmani R, Falk E. Mechanisms of plaque formation and rupture. Circ Res. 2014;114:1852-1866. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.114.302721.10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.114.30272124902970]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Tian J, Ren X, Vergallo R, et al. Distinct morphological features of ruptured culprit plaque for acute coronary events compared to those with silent rupture and thin-cap fibroatheroma: a combined optical coherence tomography and intravascular ultrasound study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63:2209-2216. http://www.ajronline.org/doi/abs/10.2214/AJR.14.13760.10.1016/j.jacc.2014.01.06124632266]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Nighoghossian N1, Derex L, Douek P. The vulnerable carotid artery plaque: current imaging methods and new perspectives. Stroke. 2005;36:2764-2772. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000190895.51934.43.10.1161/01.STR.0000190895.51934.4316282537]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Dave T, Ezhilan J, Vasnawala H, Somani V. Plaque regression and plaque stabilisation in cardiovascular diseases. Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2013;17:983-989. doi: 10.4103/2230-8210.122604.10.4103/2230-8210.122604387271624381872]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Bittencourt MS, Cerci RJ. Statin effects on atherosclerotic plaques: regression or healing? BMC Medicine. 2015;13:260. doi:10.1186/s12916-015-0499-9.10.1186/s12916-015-0499-9459902526449405]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Yia-Hertualla S, Fog Bentzon J, Daemen M, et al. Stabilization of atherosclerotic plaques: an update. Eur Heart J. 2013; 34:3251-3258. doi: 10.1093/eurheart/eht301.]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Naghavi M, Libby P, Falk E, et al. From vulnerable plaque to vulnerable patient: a call for new definitions and risk assessment strategies: Part I. Circulation. 2003;108:1664-1672. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000087480.94275.97.10.1161/01.CIR.0000087480.94275.9714530185]Search in Google Scholar
[10. Dalager MG, Bøttcher M, Thygesen J, Andersen G, Bøtker HE. Different Plaque Composition and Progression in Patients with Stable and Unstable Coronary Syndromes Evaluated by Cardiac CT. BioMed Research International. 2015;2015:401357. doi:10.1155/2015/401357.10.1155/2015/401357453832326339610]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Waxman S, Ishibashi F, Muller JE. Detection and Treatment of Vulnerable Plaques and Vulnerable Patients. Novel Approaches to Prevention of Coronary Events. Circulation. 2006;114:2390-2411. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.540013.10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.54001317130356]Search in Google Scholar
[12. Thomsen C, Abdulla J. Characteristics of high-risk coronary plaques identified by computed tomographic angiography and associated prognosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016;17:120-129. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jev325.10.1093/ehjci/jev325488289626690951]Search in Google Scholar
[13. Motoyama S, Masayoshi S, Harigaya H, et al. Computed tomographic angiography characteristics of atherosclerotic plaques subsequently resulting in acute coronary syndrome. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;54:49-57. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.02.068.10.1016/j.jacc.2009.02.06819555840]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Nakazato R, Otake H. Konishi A, et al. Atherosclerotic plaque characterization by CT angiography for identification of high-risk coronary artery lesions: a comparison to optical coherence tomography. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;16:373-379. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jeu188.10.1093/ehjci/jeu18825246503]Search in Google Scholar
[15. Benedek T, Gyöngyösi M, Benedek I. Multislice Computed Tomographic Coronary Angiography for Quantitative Assessment of Culprit Lesions in Acute Coronary Syndromes. Can J Cardiol. 2013;29:364-371. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2012.11.004.10.1016/j.cjca.2012.11.00423333164]Search in Google Scholar
[16. Choi G, Lee JM, Kim HJ, et al. Coronary Artery Axial Plaque Stress and its Relationship With Lesion Geometry: Application of Computational Fluid Dynamics to Coronary CT Angiography. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;8:1156-1166. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2015.04.024.10.1016/j.jcmg.2015.04.02426363834]Search in Google Scholar
[17. Park JB, Choi G, Chun EJ, et al. Computational fluid dynamic measures of wall shear stress are related to coronary lesion characteristics. Heart. 2016;102:1655-1661. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2016-309299.10.1136/heartjnl-2016-30929927302987]Search in Google Scholar
[18. Wentzel JJ, Chatzizisis YS, Gijsen FJ, Giannoglou GD, Feldman CL, Stone PH. Endothelial shear stress in the evolution of coronary atherosclerotic plaque and vascular remodelling: current understanding and remaining questions. Cardiovasc Res. 2012;96:234-243. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvs217.10.1093/cvr/cvs21722752349]Search in Google Scholar
[19. Benedek T, Mester A, Benedek A, Rat N, Opincariu D, Chițu M. Assessment of Coronary Plaque Vulnerability in Acute Coronary Syndromes using Optical Coherence Tomography or Intravascular Ultrasound. A systematic Review. Journal of Cardiovascular Emergencies. 2016;2(4):173-184. doi: 10.1515/jce-2016-0028.10.1515/jce-2016-0028]Search in Google Scholar
[20. White SJ, Newby AC, Johnson TW. Endothelial erosion of plaques as a substrate for coronary thrombosis. Thromb Haemost. 2016;115:509-519. doi: 10.1160/TH15-09-0765.10.1160/th15-09-076526791872]Search in Google Scholar
[21. Nasu K, Tsuchikane E, Katoh O, et al. Accuracy of in vivo coronary plaque morphology assessment: a validation study of in vivo virtual histology compared with in vitro histopathology. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;47:2405-2412. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.02.044.10.1016/j.jacc.2006.02.04416781367]Search in Google Scholar