Review. Approaches for Health Technology Assessment in Europe: Situational Analysis

1. INAHTA.org[Internet]. New York: International Network of Agencies for Health Technology Assessment; 2013 [updated 2014 Sep; cited 2016 Oct1 0 ] . Availablefrom: http://www.inahta.org/hta-tools-resources/.Search in Google Scholar

2. HTAi.org[Internet]. Montreal: HTA Glossary; 2013 [updated 2013 Jul; cited 2015]. Available from: http://www.htai.org/website-tools/searchhtais-web-site.html.Search in Google Scholar

3. EUnet HTA.eu[Internet]. Rome: European network for Health Technology Assessment; 2014 [updated 2015 Мay; cited 2015]. Available from: http://www.eunethta.eu/about-us/faq.Search in Google Scholar

4. Battista RN. Towardsaparadigm for technology assessment. The scientific basis of health services. BMJGlob Health. 1996;312(7036):11-8.Search in Google Scholar

5. Menon D, Marshal D. The internationalization of health technology assessment. Int JTechnol Assess Health Care. 1996;12(1):45-51.10.1017/S0266462300009375Search in Google Scholar

6. Goodman CS. Introduction to health technology assessment. Bethesda (MD): National Library of Medicine (US); 2004.Search in Google Scholar

7. Brooks H, Bowers R. The assessment of technology. Science. 1970;222(2):13-20.Search in Google Scholar

8. Daddario EQ. Statement, US Congress House of Representatives, Committee on Science and Astronautics. Technology assessment. Subcommittee on Science, Research and Development. Washington: 90th Congress, 1st session (1967). p. 9-13.Search in Google Scholar

9. Princeton.edu[Internet].Washington (DC):Office of technology assessment legacy; 2014 [updated 2014 Oct; cited 2015 Jan]. Available from: http://www.wws.princeton.edu/ota/.Search in Google Scholar

10. Princeton.edu[Internet]. New York: Office of technology assessment legacy; 2014 [updated 2014 Dec; cited 2015 Feb]. Available from: http://www.wws.princeton.edu/ota/ns20/hough_f.html.Search in Google Scholar

11. Grigorov E, Vaseva V, Getov I. Applied pharmacoeconomics - methodology, structuring and conducting of pharmacoeconomical studies, Journal of Intern Sci Publ: Economy & Business, 2013; 7 ( 1 ):540-551.Search in Google Scholar

12. SBU.se[Internet]. Helsinki: Swedish Agency for Health Technology Assessment and Assessment of Social Services; 2014 [updated 2015 Jan; cited 2 0 1 5 Dec] . Availablefrom: http://www.sbu.se/www/Sub Page.asp?Cat ID=27&Page ID=132.Search in Google Scholar

13. SBU.se[Internet]. Helsinki: Swedish Agency for Health Technology Assessment and Assessment of Social Services; 2014 [updated 2014 Aug; cited 2 0 1 5 Jan] . Availablefrom: http://www.sbu.se/www/Sub Page.asp?Cat ID=27&Page ID=273.Search in Google Scholar

14. health.gov.au[Internet]. Sydney: Australian Government; 2014 [updated 2014 Jul 7; cited 2015 Mar]. About the PBS. Available from: http://www.health.gov.au/internet/wcms/publishing.nsf/Content/About+the+PBS-1.Search in Google Scholar

15. Johannesson M. The Australian guidelines forsubsidisationofpharmaceuticals . Pharmacoeconomics. 1992;2(5):355-62.10.2165/00019053-199202050-0000310147048Search in Google Scholar

16. Nice.org.uk[Internet]. London: National Institute for Clinical Excellence; 2014 [updated 2015 Jan, cited 2015 Dec].Aguide to NICE.Available from: http://www.nice.org.uk/guidance.Search in Google Scholar

17. Iqwig.de[internet]. Frankfurt: Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care. The Institute; 2014 [updated 2015 Feb, cited 2015 Sept].Available from: https://www.iqwig.de/en/about-us/responsibilities-and-objectives-of-ifwig.2946.html.Search in Google Scholar

18. bundesgesundheitsministerium.de[Internet]. Frankfurt: Bundesministerium fur Gesundheit; 2014 [updated 2014 Aug; cited 2015 Jan]. Newsletter des Bundesministerium fur Gesundheit. Ulla Schmidt in den USA. Health Policy and Health Economics in Germany. Available from: http://www.bmg.bund.de/cln_040/nn_617002/EN/Health/health-policy-5-6-06.html.Search in Google Scholar

19.Vekov T, Hristov G, Dzhambazov S. Health technology assessment. 1st ed. Sofia: Bulgarian Cardiac Institute; 2014.Search in Google Scholar

20. Mears R,Taylor R, Littlejohns P, Dillon A. Review of international health technology assessment. London: National Institute for Clinical Excellence; 2000.Search in Google Scholar

21. Martelli F, La Torre G, Di Ghionno E, Staniscia T, Neroni M, Cicchetti A. Health technology assessment agencies: an international overview of organizational aspects. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2007;23(4):414-24.10.1017/S026646230707064X17937828Search in Google Scholar

22. has-sante.fr[Internet]. Paris: Haute Autorite de Sante. Presentation de la HAS. Saint-Denis La Plaine, Haute Autorite de Sante; 2008 [updated 2010 Sept; cited 2011Oct].Available from: http://www.has-sante.fr/portail/jcms/c_452559/presentation-de-la-has.Search in Google Scholar

23. has-sante.fr[Internet]. Paris: Haute Autorite de Sante. Rapport d'activite; 2007 [updated 2006 Dec; cited 2015 Jul 9]. Available from: http://www.has-sante.fr.Search in Google Scholar

24. Garrido MV. Health technology assessment and health policy-making in Europe. Current status, challenges, and potential. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office Europe; 2008.Search in Google Scholar

25.VekovТ, Dzhambazov S, Grigorov E, Kolev J. Analytical model for assessment of the pharmaeconomical evidences offered in the process of price formation and reimbursement of medicinal products. Med Man Health Policy. 2014;45(4):3-12.Search in Google Scholar