Accès libre

Is there a correlation between form and function? A syntactic and functional investigation of the introductory it pattern in student writing

   | 11 avr. 2018
À propos de cet article

Citez

Ädel, Annelie. 2014. Selecting quantitative data for qualitative analysis: A case study connecting a lexicogrammatical pattern to rhetorical moves. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 16: 68–80.10.1016/j.jeap.2014.09.001Search in Google Scholar

Advanced Learner English Corpus (ALEC). Corpus compiled in 2013.Search in Google Scholar

Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad and Edward Finegan. 1999. Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Harlow: Longman.Search in Google Scholar

Biber, Douglas and Randi Reppen. 1998. Comparing native and learner perspectives on English grammar: A study of complement clauses. In S. Granger (ed.). Learner English on computer, 145–158. London: Longman.10.4324/9781315841342-11Search in Google Scholar

British Academic Written English (BAWE). Corpus compiled at the Universities of Warwick, Reading and Oxford Brookes in 2004–2007. http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/al/research/collect/bawe/Search in Google Scholar

Fox, John and Jangman Hong. 2009. Effect displays in R for multinomial and proportional-odds logit models: Extensions to the effects Package. Journal of Statistical Software, 32 (1): 1–24. URL: http://www.jstatsoft.org/v32/i01.10.18637/jss.v032.i01Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Groom, Nicholas. 2005. Pattern and meaning across genres and disciplines: An exploratory study. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 4 (3): 257–277.10.1016/j.jeap.2005.03.002Search in Google Scholar

Herriman, Jennifer. 2013. The extraposition of clausal subjects in English and Swedish. In K. Aijmer and B. Altenberg (eds.). Advances in corpus-based contrastive linguistics: Studies in honor of Stig Johansson, 233–260. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/scl.54.13herSearch in Google Scholar

Herriman, Jennifer. 2000. Extraposition in English: A study of the interaction between the matrix predicate and the type of extraposed clause. English Studies 81 (6): 582–599.10.1076/enst.81.6.582.9180Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Heuboeck, Alois, Jasper Holmes and Hilary Nesi. 2008. The BAWE corpus manual. Available online from http://www.reading.ac.uk/internal/appling/bawe/BAWE.documentation.pdf, accessed on March 21, 2014.Search in Google Scholar

Hewings, Martin and Ann Hewings. 2002. “It is interesting to note that…”: A comparative study of anticipatory ‘it’ in student and published writing. English for Specific Purposes 21 (4): 367–383.10.1016/S0889-4906(01)00016-3Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Huddleston, Rodney D. and Geoffrey K. Pullum. 2002. The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781316423530Search in Google Scholar

Hunston, Susan and Gill Francis. 2000. Pattern grammar: A corpus-driven approach to the lexical grammar of English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/scl.4Search in Google Scholar

Hyland, Ken. 1996. Talking to the academy: Forms of hedging in science research articles. Written Communication 13 (2): 251–281.10.1177/0741088396013002004Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Hyland, Ken. 2008a. Persuasion, interaction and the construction of knowledge: Representing self and others in research writing. International Journal of English Studies 8 (2): 1–23.Search in Google Scholar

Hyland, Ken. 2008b. Academic clusters: Text patterning in published and postgraduate writing. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 18 (1): 41–62.10.1111/j.1473-4192.2008.00178.xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

Kaltenböck, Günter. 2005. It-extraposition in English: A functional view. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 10 (2): 119–159.10.1075/ijcl.10.2.02kalSearch in Google Scholar

Larsson, Tove. 2016. The introductory it pattern in academic writing by nonnative-speaker students, native-speaker students and published writers: A corpus-based study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Department of English, Uppsala University, Sweden.10.1016/j.esp.2017.06.001Search in Google Scholar

Larsson, Tove. 2017. A functional classification of the introductory it pattern: Investigating academic writing by non-native speaker and native-speaker students. English for Specific Purposes 48: 57–70.10.1016/j.esp.2017.06.001Search in Google Scholar

Larsson, Tove. Forthcoming. A syntactic analysis of the introductory it pattern in non-native-speaker and native-speaker student writing. In M. Mahlberg and V. Wiegand (eds.). Corpus linguistics, context and culture. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Search in Google Scholar

Mair, Christian. 1990. Infinitival complement clauses in English: A study of syntax in discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Michaelis, Laura A. and Knud Lambrecht. 1994. On nominal extraposition: A constructional analysis. In K. E. Moore, D. A. Peterson and C. Wentum (eds.). Proceedings of the twentieth annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society: General session dedicated to the contributions of Charles J. Fillmore, 362–373. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.10.3765/bls.v20i1.1457Search in Google Scholar

Michigan Corpus of Upper-level Student Papers (MICUSP). Ann Arbor, MI: The Regents of the University of Michigan. Corpus compiled at the University of Michigan in 2009. http://micusp.elicorpora.info/about-micuspSearch in Google Scholar

Miller, Philip H. 2001. Discourse constraints on (non)extraposition from subject in English. Linguistics 39 (4): 683–701.10.1515/ling.2001.028Search in Google Scholar

Mindt, Ilka. 2011. Adjective complementation: An empirical analysis of adjectives followed by that-clauses. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/scl.42Search in Google Scholar

Mukherjee, Joybrato. 2006. Corpus linguistics and English reference grammars. In A. Kehoe and A. Renouf (eds.). The changing face of corpus linguistics, 337–354. Amsterdam: Rodopi.10.1163/9789401201797_023Search in Google Scholar

Peacock, Matthew. 2011. A comparative study of introductory it in research articles across eight disciplines. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 16 (1): 72–100.10.1075/ijcl.16.1.04peaSearch in Google Scholar

Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech and Jan Svartvik. 1985. A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London, UK: Longman.Search in Google Scholar

R Core Team. 2017. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Available at: https://www.R-project.org/.Search in Google Scholar

Ramhöj, Rickard. 2016. On clausal subjects and extraposition in the history of English. PhD dissertation: University of Gothenburg, 2016. Gothenburg.Search in Google Scholar

Römer, Ute. 2009. The inseparability of lexis and grammar: Corpus linguistic perspectives. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 7 (1): 140–162.10.1075/arcl.7.06romOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

Römer, Ute and Matthew B. O’Donnell. 2011. From student hard drive to web corpus (part 1): The design, compilation and genre classification of the Michigan Corpus of Upper-level Student Papers (MICUSP). Corpora 6 (2): 159–177.10.3366/cor.2011.0011Search in Google Scholar

Scott, Mike. 2012. WordSmith Tools version 6 [Computer software]. Liverpool: Lexical Analysis Software.Search in Google Scholar

Thompson, Paul. 2009. Shared disciplinary norms and individual traits in the writing of British undergraduates. In M. Gotti (ed.). Commonality and individuality in academic discourse, 53–82. Bern: Peter Lang.Search in Google Scholar

Zhang, Guiping. 2015. It is suggested that…or it is better to…? Forms and meanings of subject it-extraposition in academic and popular writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 20: 1–13.10.1016/j.jeap.2015.02.004Search in Google Scholar