[Ädel, Annelie. 2014. Selecting quantitative data for qualitative analysis: A case study connecting a lexicogrammatical pattern to rhetorical moves. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 16: 68–80.10.1016/j.jeap.2014.09.001]Search in Google Scholar
[Advanced Learner English Corpus (ALEC). Corpus compiled in 2013.]Search in Google Scholar
[Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad and Edward Finegan. 1999. Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Harlow: Longman.]Search in Google Scholar
[Biber, Douglas and Randi Reppen. 1998. Comparing native and learner perspectives on English grammar: A study of complement clauses. In S. Granger (ed.). Learner English on computer, 145–158. London: Longman.10.4324/9781315841342-11]Search in Google Scholar
[British Academic Written English (BAWE). Corpus compiled at the Universities of Warwick, Reading and Oxford Brookes in 2004–2007. http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/al/research/collect/bawe/]Search in Google Scholar
[Fox, John and Jangman Hong. 2009. Effect displays in R for multinomial and proportional-odds logit models: Extensions to the effects Package. Journal of Statistical Software, 32 (1): 1–24. URL: http://www.jstatsoft.org/v32/i01.10.18637/jss.v032.i01]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Groom, Nicholas. 2005. Pattern and meaning across genres and disciplines: An exploratory study. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 4 (3): 257–277.10.1016/j.jeap.2005.03.002]Search in Google Scholar
[Herriman, Jennifer. 2013. The extraposition of clausal subjects in English and Swedish. In K. Aijmer and B. Altenberg (eds.). Advances in corpus-based contrastive linguistics: Studies in honor of Stig Johansson, 233–260. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/scl.54.13her]Search in Google Scholar
[Herriman, Jennifer. 2000. Extraposition in English: A study of the interaction between the matrix predicate and the type of extraposed clause. English Studies 81 (6): 582–599.10.1076/enst.81.6.582.9180]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Heuboeck, Alois, Jasper Holmes and Hilary Nesi. 2008. The BAWE corpus manual. Available online from http://www.reading.ac.uk/internal/appling/bawe/BAWE.documentation.pdf, accessed on March 21, 2014.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hewings, Martin and Ann Hewings. 2002. “It is interesting to note that…”: A comparative study of anticipatory ‘it’ in student and published writing. English for Specific Purposes 21 (4): 367–383.10.1016/S0889-4906(01)00016-3]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Huddleston, Rodney D. and Geoffrey K. Pullum. 2002. The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781316423530]Search in Google Scholar
[Hunston, Susan and Gill Francis. 2000. Pattern grammar: A corpus-driven approach to the lexical grammar of English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/scl.4]Search in Google Scholar
[Hyland, Ken. 1996. Talking to the academy: Forms of hedging in science research articles. Written Communication 13 (2): 251–281.10.1177/0741088396013002004]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Hyland, Ken. 2008a. Persuasion, interaction and the construction of knowledge: Representing self and others in research writing. International Journal of English Studies 8 (2): 1–23.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hyland, Ken. 2008b. Academic clusters: Text patterning in published and postgraduate writing. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 18 (1): 41–62.10.1111/j.1473-4192.2008.00178.x]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Kaltenböck, Günter. 2005. It-extraposition in English: A functional view. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 10 (2): 119–159.10.1075/ijcl.10.2.02kal]Search in Google Scholar
[Larsson, Tove. 2016. The introductory it pattern in academic writing by nonnative-speaker students, native-speaker students and published writers: A corpus-based study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Department of English, Uppsala University, Sweden.10.1016/j.esp.2017.06.001]Search in Google Scholar
[Larsson, Tove. 2017. A functional classification of the introductory it pattern: Investigating academic writing by non-native speaker and native-speaker students. English for Specific Purposes 48: 57–70.10.1016/j.esp.2017.06.001]Search in Google Scholar
[Larsson, Tove. Forthcoming. A syntactic analysis of the introductory it pattern in non-native-speaker and native-speaker student writing. In M. Mahlberg and V. Wiegand (eds.). Corpus linguistics, context and culture. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.]Search in Google Scholar
[Mair, Christian. 1990. Infinitival complement clauses in English: A study of syntax in discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Michaelis, Laura A. and Knud Lambrecht. 1994. On nominal extraposition: A constructional analysis. In K. E. Moore, D. A. Peterson and C. Wentum (eds.). Proceedings of the twentieth annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society: General session dedicated to the contributions of Charles J. Fillmore, 362–373. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.10.3765/bls.v20i1.1457]Search in Google Scholar
[Michigan Corpus of Upper-level Student Papers (MICUSP). Ann Arbor, MI: The Regents of the University of Michigan. Corpus compiled at the University of Michigan in 2009. http://micusp.elicorpora.info/about-micusp]Search in Google Scholar
[Miller, Philip H. 2001. Discourse constraints on (non)extraposition from subject in English. Linguistics 39 (4): 683–701.10.1515/ling.2001.028]Search in Google Scholar
[Mindt, Ilka. 2011. Adjective complementation: An empirical analysis of adjectives followed by that-clauses. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/scl.42]Search in Google Scholar
[Mukherjee, Joybrato. 2006. Corpus linguistics and English reference grammars. In A. Kehoe and A. Renouf (eds.). The changing face of corpus linguistics, 337–354. Amsterdam: Rodopi.10.1163/9789401201797_023]Search in Google Scholar
[Peacock, Matthew. 2011. A comparative study of introductory it in research articles across eight disciplines. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 16 (1): 72–100.10.1075/ijcl.16.1.04pea]Search in Google Scholar
[Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech and Jan Svartvik. 1985. A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London, UK: Longman.]Search in Google Scholar
[R Core Team. 2017. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Available at: https://www.R-project.org/.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ramhöj, Rickard. 2016. On clausal subjects and extraposition in the history of English. PhD dissertation: University of Gothenburg, 2016. Gothenburg.]Search in Google Scholar
[Römer, Ute. 2009. The inseparability of lexis and grammar: Corpus linguistic perspectives. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 7 (1): 140–162.10.1075/arcl.7.06rom]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Römer, Ute and Matthew B. O’Donnell. 2011. From student hard drive to web corpus (part 1): The design, compilation and genre classification of the Michigan Corpus of Upper-level Student Papers (MICUSP). Corpora 6 (2): 159–177.10.3366/cor.2011.0011]Search in Google Scholar
[Scott, Mike. 2012. WordSmith Tools version 6 [Computer software]. Liverpool: Lexical Analysis Software.]Search in Google Scholar
[Thompson, Paul. 2009. Shared disciplinary norms and individual traits in the writing of British undergraduates. In M. Gotti (ed.). Commonality and individuality in academic discourse, 53–82. Bern: Peter Lang.]Search in Google Scholar
[Zhang, Guiping. 2015. It is suggested that…or it is better to…? Forms and meanings of subject it-extraposition in academic and popular writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 20: 1–13.10.1016/j.jeap.2015.02.004]Search in Google Scholar