[Andaluz, J. (2011). Validity of the “Principle of Maximum Product Differentiation” in a unionized mixed-duopoly. Journal of Economics, 102 (2), 123–136.10.1007/s00712-010-0175-7]Search in Google Scholar
[Armingeon, K. (2006). Trade Unions and Industrial Relations in Post-Communist Nations. A comparison with established democracies. University of Berne, Department of Political Science, Paper for the Conference of Europeanists, Chicago.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bárcena-Ruiz, J.C., Garzón, M.B. (2009). Relocation and public ownership of firms. Journal of the Japanese and International Economics, 23, 71–85.10.1016/j.jjie.2009.01.002]Search in Google Scholar
[Booth, A.L. (1995). The Economics of the Trade Union. Cambridge Univ. Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Brander, J.A., Spencer, B.J. (1988). Unionized oligopoly and international trade policy. Journal of International Economics, 24, 217–234.10.1016/0022-1996(88)90035-9]Search in Google Scholar
[Brown, J.N., Ashenfelter, O. (1986). Testing the efficiency of employment contracts. The Journal of Political Economy, 94 (3), S40–S87.10.1086/261399]Search in Google Scholar
[Buccella, D. (2011). Corrigendum to “The strategic choice of union oligopoly bargaining agenda” [Int. J. Ind. Organ. 17 (1999) 1029–1040]. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 29, 690–693.]Search in Google Scholar
[Buccella, D., Fanti, L. (2015). On the Strategic Choice of Union-Oligopoly Bargaining Agenda: Further Results. Economics Research International, article ID 530890, 1–7.10.1155/2015/530890]Search in Google Scholar
[Bughin, J. (1999). The strategic choice of union–oligopoly bargaining agenda. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 17, 1029–1040.10.1016/S0167-7187(97)00071-4]Search in Google Scholar
[Choi, K. (2012). Price and quantity competition in a unionised mixed duopoly: the cases of substitutes and complements. Australian Economic Papers, 51 (1), 2–22.10.1111/j.1467-8454.2012.00419.x]Search in Google Scholar
[De Fraja, G. (1993). Unions and wages in public and private firms: a game-theoretic analysis. Oxford Economic Papers, 45, 457–469.10.1093/oxfordjournals.oep.a042102]Search in Google Scholar
[De Fraja, G., Delbono, F. (1987). Oligopoly, Public Firm and Welfare Maximization: A Game Theoretic Analysis. Giornale degli Economisti e Annali di Economia, 46, 417–435.]Search in Google Scholar
[De Fraja, G., Delbono, F. (1989). Alternative strategies of a public enterprise in oligopoly. Oxford Economic Papers, 41 (2), 302–311.10.1093/oxfordjournals.oep.a041896]Search in Google Scholar
[De Fraja, G., Delbono, F. (1990). Game theoretic models of mixed oligopoly. Journal of Economic Surveys, 4, 1–17.10.1111/j.1467-6419.1990.tb00077.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Dowrick, S., Spencer, B.J. (1994). Union attitudes to labor-saving innovation: when are unions luddites? Journal of Labor Economics, 12, 316–344.10.1086/298359]Search in Google Scholar
[Estrin, S. (2008). Privatization impacts in transition economies. In: Steven N. Durlauf, Lawrence E. Blume (eds.), The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Second Edition. Palgrave Macmillan. Available at: http://www.dictionaryofeconomics.com/article?id=pde2008_P000342. DOI: 10.1057/9780230226203.1344.10.1057/978-1-349-95121-5_2547-1]Search in Google Scholar
[Fanti, L. (2014). When do Firms and Unions agree on a Monopoly Union or an Efficient Bargaining Arrangement? Discussion Paper no. 181. Department of Economics and Management, University of Pisa.]Search in Google Scholar
[Fanti, L. (2015). Union-Firm Bargaining Agenda: Right-to-Manage or Efficient Bargaining? Economics Bulletin, 35 (2), 936–948.]Search in Google Scholar
[Fanti, L., Buccella, D. (2015). Bargaining agenda, timing, and entry. MPRA Working Paper Series no. 64089.]Search in Google Scholar
[Fanti, L., Buccella, D. (2016a). Bargaining Agenda and Entry in a Unionised Model with Network Effects. Italian Economic Journal, 2 (1), 91–121.10.1007/s40797-015-0026-3]Search in Google Scholar
[Fanti, L., Buccella, D. (2016b). Manager-union bargaining agenda under monopoly and with network effects Managerial and Decision Economics. Published online in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com). DOI: 10.1002/mde.2809.10.1002/mde.2809]Search in Google Scholar
[Foster, N.A., Henry, S.G.B., Trinder, C. (1984). Public and private sector pay: a partly disaggregated study. National Institute Economic Review, 107, 63–73.10.1177/002795018410700108]Search in Google Scholar
[Hamh, H. (2013). Look at Poland and South Korea – they saved themselves through public sector reforms. The World Bank: Opinion – November 18, 2013. Available at: http://www.worldbank.org/en/news/opinion/2013/11/18/croatia-and-the-example-of-poland-and-s-korea.]Search in Google Scholar
[Haskel, J., Szymanski, S. (1993). Privatization, Liberalization, Wages and Employment: Theory and Evidence for the UK. Economica, 60, 161–182.10.2307/2554587]Search in Google Scholar
[Ishida, J., Matsushima, N. (2009). Should Civil Servants be Restricted in Wage Bargaining? A Mixed-duopoly Approach. Journal of Public Economics, 93, 634–646.10.1016/j.jpubeco.2008.11.004]Search in Google Scholar
[Kuruvilla, S., Das, S., Kwon, H., Kwon, S. (2002). Trade Union Growth and Decline in Asia. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 40, 431–461.10.1111/1467-8543.00242]Search in Google Scholar
[Manning, A. (1987a). An Integration of Trade Union Models in a Sequential Bargaining Framework. The Economic Journal, 97, 121–139.10.2307/2233326]Search in Google Scholar
[Manning, A. (1987b). Collective Bargaining Institutions and Efficiency. European Economic Review, 31, 168–176.10.1016/0014-2921(87)90028-6]Search in Google Scholar
[McDonald, I.M., Solow, R.M. (1981). Wage bargaining and employment. American Economic Review, 71 (5), 896–908.]Search in Google Scholar
[Mezzetti, C., Dinopoulos, E. (1991). Domestic unionization and import competition. Journal of International Economics, 31, 79–100.10.1016/0022-1996(91)90057-D]Search in Google Scholar
[Nickell, S.J., Andrews, M. (1983). Unions real wages and employment in Britain 1951–1979. Oxford Economic Papers, 35, 183–206, Supplement.10.1093/oxfordjournals.oep.a041610]Search in Google Scholar
[OECD (2010). Policy Brief on Corporate Governance of State-Owned Enterprises in Asia. OECD Publishing.]Search in Google Scholar
[OECD (2014). The Size and Sectoral Distribution of SOEs in OECD and Partner Countries. OECD Publishing.10.1787/9789264215610-en]Search in Google Scholar
[Pencavel, J.H. (1984). The trade-off between wages and employment in trade union objectives. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 99, 215–231.10.2307/1885523]Search in Google Scholar
[Pencavel, J.H. (1985). Wages and employment under trade unionism: microeconomic models and macroeconomic applications. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 87, 197–225.10.2307/3439822]Search in Google Scholar
[Schneider, F., Bartel, R. (1989). Gemeinewirtschaft versus Privatwirtschaft. Ein Effizienzvergleich. Vienna: Manz.]Search in Google Scholar
[Zhao, L. (2001). Unionization, vertical markets, and the outsourcing of multinationals. Journal of International Economics, 55, 187–202.10.1016/S0022-1996(01)00090-3]Search in Google Scholar