[Alcamo J. et al. 2005. Millennium ecosystem assessment: Ecosystems and human well-being. Island Press, Washington, DC. http://www.maweb.org/en/Framework.aspx. Accessed 26 September 2014.]Search in Google Scholar
[Barros A., Gonnet J., Pickering C. 2013. Impacts of informal trails on vegetation and soils in the highest protected area in the Southern Hemisphere. Journal of Environmental Management, 127, 50–60.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bateman I.J., Carson R.T., Day B., Hanemann M., Hanleys N., Hett T., Jones-Lee M., Loomes G., Mourato S., Ozdemiroglu E., Pearce D., Sugden R., Swanson J. 2002. Economic valuation with stated preference techniques: a manual. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK.10.4337/9781781009727]Search in Google Scholar
[Bernath K., Roschewitz A. 2008. Recreational benefits of urban forests: Explaining visitors‘ willingness to pay in the kontext of the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Environmental Management, 89, 155–166.]Search in Google Scholar
[Blaha P. 2010. The results of the monitoring and their practical application – Liberec Region. Ochrana přírody, Special issue.]Search in Google Scholar
[Busch M., La Notte A., Laporte V., Erhard M. 2012. Potentials of quantitative and qualitative approaches to assessing ecosystem services. Ecological Indicators, 20, 89–103.10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.11.010]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Butler R.W. 1980. The concept of a atourist area cycle of evolution: Implications for management of resources. Canadian Geographer-Geographe Canadien, 24 (1), 5–12.10.1111/j.1541-0064.1980.tb00970.x]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[City Pisek Forests, Ltd. 2016. Profil společnosti. [Company Profile]. http://www.lmpisek.cz/o-nasi-spolecnosti/profil-spolecnosti. Accessed 30 September 2016.]Search in Google Scholar
[Daldeniz B., Hampton M.P. 2013. Dive tourism and local communities: Active participation or subject to impacts? Case studies from malaysia. International Journal of Tourism Research, 15 (5), 507–520.]Search in Google Scholar
[Früh W. 1991. Inhaltsanalyse: Teorie und Praxis. Ölschläger, Munchen.]Search in Google Scholar
[Glover D. 2010. Valuing the environment. Economics for a sustainable future. International Development Research Centre, Ottawa.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gökovali U., Bahar O. 2006. Contribution of tourism to economic growth: A panel data approach. Anatolia, 17 (2), 155–167.]Search in Google Scholar
[Haines-Young R., Potschin M. 2010. Proposal for a Common International Classification of Ecosystem Goods and Services (CICES) for Integrated Environmental and Economic Accounting (V1). 21st March 2010. Report to the European Environment Agency. http://unstats.un.org/unsd/envaccounting/ceea/meetings/UNCEEA-5-7-Bk1.pdf. Accessed 26 September 2014.]Search in Google Scholar
[Haines-Young R., Potschin M. 2013. Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services (CICES): Consultation on Version 4, August-December 2012. Report to the European Environment Agency, http://cices.eu/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/CICESV43_RevisedFinal_Report_29012013.pdf. Accessed 26 September 2014.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hakim A. R., Subanti S., Hambunan M. 2011. Economic valuation of nature-based tourism object in Rawapening, Indonesia. An application of travel cost and contingent valuation method. Journal of Sustainable Development, 4 (2), 91–101.10.5539/jsd.v4n2p91]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Hall C.M., Frost W. 2009. Introduction: The making of the national parks concept. In: Tourism and national parks: International perspectives on development, histories and change (eds.: W. Frost, C.M. Hall). Routledge, London, 3–15.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hardin G. 1968. The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162 (3859), 1243–1248.]Search in Google Scholar
[Harris J. 2005. Environmental and natural resource economics. A conterporary approach. Houghton Mifflin, Boston.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hlaváčková P., Březina D. 2016. Economic evaluation of the recreational use of forests: A case study of the Training Forest Enterprise Masaryk Forest Křtiny. Journal of Forest Science, 62 (9), 389–398.10.17221/30/2016-JFS]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Hlaváčková P., Březina D., Meňházová J. 2015. Selected results of survey focused on the economic assessment of forest ecosystem services. Journal of Forest Science, 61 (7), 282–290.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hlaváčková P., Šafařík D. 2013. Methodological bases of quantifying the importance of recreational functions of forests in the local economy – presentation of the project. In: Financovanie 2013 Lesy-Drevo. Technická univerzita vo Zvolene, Zvolen, 125–131.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ivanov S.H., Webster C. 2013. Tourism‘s contribution to economic growth: A global analysis for the first decade of the millennium. Tourism Economics, 19 (3), 477–508.10.5367/te.2013.0211]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Katircioglu S.T. 2009. Revisiting the tourism-led-growth hypothesis for Turkey using the bounds test and Johansen approach for cointegration. Tourism Management, 30 (1), 17–20.10.1016/j.tourman.2008.04.004]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Kos J. 2010. The results of the moitoring and their use in practice – Podyjí National Park Ochrana přírody, Special issue.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lew A.A. 2011. Tourism‘s role in the global economy. Tourism Geographies, 13 (1), 148–151.10.1080/14616688.2010.531046]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Lück M. 2008. The Encyclopaedia of Tourism and Recreation in Marine Environments. Wallingford, UK; CAB International, Cambridge, MA.10.1079/9781845933500.0000]Search in Google Scholar
[Marzano M., Dandy N. 2012. Recreationist behaviour in forests and the disturbance of wildlife. Biodiversity and Conservation, 21 (11), 2967–2986.10.1007/s10531-012-0350-y]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Mayor K., Scot S., Tol R.S.J. 2007. Comparing the travel cost method and the contingent valuation method: An application on convergent validity theory to the recreational value of Irish forest. Working Paper. The Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI), Dublin.]Search in Google Scholar
[Meuser M., Nagel U. 1991. Experteninterviews – vielfach erprobt, wenig bedacht. In: Qualitativ-empirische Sozialforschung (eds.: D. Garz, K. Kraimer). Springer, Opladen, 441–471.]Search in Google Scholar
[Newsome D. 2014. Appropriate policy development and research needs in response to adventure racing in protected areas. Biological Conservation, 171, 259–269.]Search in Google Scholar
[Oian H. 2013. Wilderness tourism and the moralities of commitment: Hunting and angling as modes of engaging with the natures and animals of rural landscapes in Norway. Journal of Rural Studies, 32, 177–185.10.1016/j.jrurstud.2013.05.004]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Seják J. et al. 2010. The evaluation of functions and services of ecosystems of the Czech Republic. Univerzita J. E. Purkyně v Ústí nad Labem, Ústí nad Labem.]Search in Google Scholar
[Seják J., Dejmal I. et al. 2003. The evaluation and valuation of habitats of the Czech Republic. Český ekologický ústav, Praha.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sharpley R. 2002. Tourism and development – A vehicle for evelopment? In: Tourism and development. Concepts and issues (eds.: R. Sharpley, D.J. Telfer). Channel View Publications, Clevedon, 11–34.]Search in Google Scholar
[Soukopová J., Bakoš E., Doleželová M., Kaplanová B., Kulhavý V., Neshybová J. 2011. Environmental Economics. Masaryk University, Brno.]Search in Google Scholar
[Šálka J., Trenčiansky M., Bahula P., Balážová E. 2008. Environmental economics. Technická univerzita vo Zvolene, Zvolen.]Search in Google Scholar
[Šišák L. 1993. Willingness to pay potentially as a method of valuing the importance of social aspects of forest functions. Lesnictví – Forestry, 93 (3), 151–160.]Search in Google Scholar
[Šišák L., Pulkrab K. 2008. The assessment of the societal socio-economic importance of forest functions. Česká zemědělská univerzita v Praze, Praha.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tang C.F., Abosedra S. 2014. The impacts of tourism, energy consumption and political instability on economic growth in the MENA countries. Energy Policy, 68, 458–464.10.1016/j.enpol.2014.01.004]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Telfer D.J. 2002. The evolution of tourism and development theory. In: Tourism and development. Concepts and issues (eds.: R. Sharpley, D.J. Telfer). Channel View Publications, Clevedon, 35–80.]Search in Google Scholar
[Thomas F., Kapoor A., Marshall P. 2013. Tourism development and behavioural changes: evidences from Ratanakiri province, Kingdom of Cambodia. Journal of Tourism and Cultural Change, 11 (3), 208–219.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tutka J., Kovalčík M. 2008. Estimating the value of the recreational forest functions in Slovakia through the contingent valuation method and the travel cost method. Lesnický časopis – Forestry Journal, 54 (1), 99–107.]Search in Google Scholar
[Verbič M., Slabe-Erker R. 2009. An econometric analysis of willingness-to-pay for sustainable development: A case study of the Volčji Potok landscape area. Ecological Economics, 68, 1316–1328.10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.09.002]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Vyskot et al. 2003. Quantification and evaluation of forest functions in the Czech Republic. Ministerstvo životního prostředí ČR, Praha.]Search in Google Scholar
[Weaver D.B. 2001. The Encyclopedia of ecotourism. CABI Publishing, New York.10.1079/9780851993683.0000]Search in Google Scholar
[Williams S. 2000. Tourism geography. Routledge, London.]Search in Google Scholar
[Zandersen M., Tol R.S.J. 2009. A meta-analysis of forest recreation values in Europe. Journal of Forest Economics, 15, 109–130.10.1016/j.jfe.2008.03.006]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar