[Abelin, Åsa (1999). Phonesthemes in Swedish. In Proceedings of XIV International Conference of Phonetic Sciences 99. 1333–1336. Berkeley University of California. http://www.ling.gu.se/~abelin/ArtikelnICPhS.pdf (last access 16/08/13).]Search in Google Scholar
[Abramova, Ekaterina, Raquel Fernandes, & Frederico Sangati (2013). Automatic labeling of phonesthemic senses. Proceedings of the 35th Annual Cognitive Science Meeting 2013.http://staff.science.uva.nl/~raquel/papers/2013/phonesthemes_cogsci2013.pdf. (last access 05/01/2014).]Search in Google Scholar
[Ahlner, Felix & Jordan Zlatev (2010). Cross modal iconicity: A Cognitive Semiotic Approach to Sound Symbolism. Sign Systems Studies 38: 298–348.]Search in Google Scholar
[Albrespit, Jean (2007). Montrer, cacher: la référence construite par les néologismes. L'envers du décor, 47e Congrès de la SAES, 54–73, Avignon.]Search in Google Scholar
[Allan, Kathryn (2011). Using OED data as evidence for researching semantic change. Allan, Kathryn & Justinya Robinson, eds. Current Methods in Historical Semantics. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter, 17–40.10.1515/9783110252903.17]Search in Google Scholar
[Argoud, Line (2008). Les ‘mots en bl-’ du lexique anglais: étude de la structuration des données dans une optique lexico-cognitive. [bl- words in the English lexicon: lexical-cognitive corpus analysis]. Lexis 2: 43–76.]Search in Google Scholar
[Argoud, Line (2010). Réalité des idéophones anglais (phonesthèmes): propositions dans le cadre d’une approche de linguistique cognitive [the reality of English phonesthemes]. E-rea, Revue d'études sur le monde anglophone. http://erea.revues.org/1301. (last access 16/08/13).]Search in Google Scholar
[Ayto, John (1999). 20thCentury Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bat-El, Outi (2006). Blend. Brown, E. Keith, ed. Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, 2nd edition. Oxford: Elsevier, 2.66–70.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bauer, Laurie (1983). English Word Formation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139165846]Search in Google Scholar
[Benczes, Réka (2010). Setting limits in the production and use of metaphorical and metonymical compounds. Onysko, Alexander & Sascha Michel, eds. Cognitive Perspectives on Word Formation. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter, 219–242.10.1515/9783110223606.217]Search in Google Scholar
[Bergen, Benjamin K. (2004). The psychological reality of phonaesthemes. Language 80.2 : 291–311.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bergen, Benjamin K. (2010). Phonesthemes: Frequency and psychological reality. Paper given at the Emory University Conference workshop. Sound Symbolism: Challenging the Arbitrariness of Language. 26-27 March 2010. http://psychology.emory.edu/soundsymbolismworkshop2010/Bergen_SoundSymbolism_2010.pdf. (last access 16/08/13).]Search in Google Scholar
[Bolinger, Dwight L. (1950). Rime, assonance and morpheme analysis. Word 6.2: 117–136.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bolinger, Dwight L. (1965). Forms of English: Accent, Morpheme, Order. Isamu Abe & Tetsuya Kanekiyo, eds. Cambridge & Tokyo: Harvard University Press & Hokuou.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bottineau, Didier (2008). The submorphemic conjecture in English: towards a distributed model of the cognitive dynamics of submorphemes. Lexis 2: 19–42.]Search in Google Scholar
[Boussidan, Armelle, Eyal Sagi, & Sabine Ploux (2009). Phonaesthemic and Etymological effects on the Distribution of Senses in Statistical Models of Semantics. Proceedings of the 34th Cognitive Science Annual Meeting 2009, 36–40.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bragdon, Janice (2008). Blends. Manuscript, University of Florida, Gainesville.]Search in Google Scholar
[De Cuypere, Ludovic (2008). Limiting the iconic: from the metatheoretical foundations to the creative possibilities of iconicity in language. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/ill.6]Search in Google Scholar
[Drellishak, Scott (2006). Statistical techniques for detecting and validating phonesthemes. LSA Annual Meeting. Anaheim, CA.]Search in Google Scholar
[Fill, Alwin (2004). Remotivation and reinterpretation. Booij, Geert, Christian Lehmann & Joachim Mugdan, eds. Morphologie: ein internationales Handbuch zur Flexion und Wortbuildung. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter, 1615–1625.]Search in Google Scholar
[Glynn, Dylan (2010). Corpus-driven Cognitive semantics. Introduction to the field. Glynn Dylan & Kerstin Fischer, eds. Quantitative Methods in Cognitive Semantics. Corpusdriven approaches. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 1–42.]Search in Google Scholar
[Glynn, Dylan (2014a). Correspondence analysis. An exploratory technique for identifying usage patterns. Glynn, Dylan & Justyna A. Robinson, eds. Corpus Methods for Semantics. Quantitative Studies in Polysemy and Synonymy. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 133–179.10.1075/hcp.43.17gly]Search in Google Scholar
[Glynn, Dylan (2014b). Techniques and tools. Corpus methods and statistics for semantics. Glynn, Dylan & Justyna A. Robinson, eds. Corpus Methods for Semantics. Quantitative Studies in Polysemy and Synonymy. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 307–341.10.1075/hcp.43.12gly]Search in Google Scholar
[Gries, Stefan (2004). Isn’t that fantabulous? How similarity motivates intentional morphological blends in English. Achard, Michel & Suzanne Kemmer, eds. Language, Culture, and Mind. Stanford, CA: CSLI, 415–428.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hock, Hans Heinrich, & Brian Joseph (2009). Language History, Language Change and Language Relationship: An Introduction to Historical and Comparative Linguistics. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter. Reprint [1996].10.1515/9783110214307]Search in Google Scholar
[Joseph, Brian (1997). On the linguistics of marginality: the centrality of the periphery. Chicago Linguistic Society Language Arts & Disciplines. http://www.ling.ohio-state.edu/~bjoseph/publications/1997onth.pdf. (last access 16/08/13).]Search in Google Scholar
[Katamba, Francis (2005). English Words. London: Routledge. 2nd edition. Reprint [1994].]Search in Google Scholar
[Kaisse, Ellen M. (2005). Word Formation and Phonology. Štekauer, Pavol & Rochelle Lieber, eds. Handbook of Word Formation. Dordrecht: Springer, 25–47.10.1007/1-4020-3596-9_2]Search in Google Scholar
[Kelly, Michael H. (1998). To brunch or to brench: Some aspects of blend structure. Linguistics 36.3: 579-590.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kemmer, Suzanne (2003). Schemas and lexical blends. Cuyckens, Hubert, Thomas Berg, René Dirven & Klaus-Uwe Panther, eds. Motivation in Language: Studies in Honour of Günther Radden. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 69–97.10.1075/cilt.243.08kem]Search in Google Scholar
[Kilgariff Adam, & Pavel Rychly. Sketch Engine, Lexical Computing Limited. https://the.sketchengine.co.uk/auth/corpora/.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lehrer, Adrienne (2007). Blendalicious. Munat, Judith, ed. Lexical Creativity, Texts and Contexts. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 115–133.10.1075/sfsl.58.16leh]Search in Google Scholar
[Luce, Paul A. & David B. Pisoni (1998). Recognizing spoken words: The neighborhood activation model. Ear and Hearing 19 : 1–36.]Search in Google Scholar
[Marchand, Hans (1969). The Categories and Types of Present-Day English Word-Formation, A Synchronic-Diachronic Approach. 2nd edition. München: C.H. Beck’sche Verlagsbuchhandlung.]Search in Google Scholar
[Martin, Andrew (2007). The Evolving Lexicon. PhD dissertation UCLA. Manuscript. http://www.linguistics.ucla.edu/general/dissertations/martin_dissertationucla2007.pdf. (last access 16/08/13).]Search in Google Scholar
[Miller, D. Gary (2010). Language Change and Linguistic Theory. 2 vols. Oxford: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Miller, D. Gary (2014). Lexicogenesis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199689880.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Ohala, John (1997). Sound Symbolism. Seoul International Conference on Linguistics (SICOL) 4: 98–103.]Search in Google Scholar
[Onysko, Alexander, & Sascha Michel (2010). Unravelling the cognitive in word formation. Onysko, Alexander, & Sascha Michel, eds. Cognitive Perspectives on Word Formation. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter, 1–25.]Search in Google Scholar
[Otis, Katya, & Eyal Sagi (2008). Phonaesthemes: A corpora-based analysis. Love, Bradley, C., Ken McRae, & Vladimir M. Sloutsky, eds. Proceedings of the 30th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. 65-70 Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society, 65–70.]Search in Google Scholar
[Philps, Dennis (2008a). Submorphemic iconicity in the lexicon: a diachronic approach to English ‘gn’ words. Lexis 2: 125–139.10.4000/lexis.728]Search in Google Scholar
[Philps, Dennis (2008b). From mouth to eye. Smith, Andrew D., Kenny Smith, & Ramon Ferreri Cancho, eds. The Evolution of Language. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing, 251–258.10.1142/9789812776129_0032]Search in Google Scholar
[Pinker, Stephen (2008). The Stuff of Thought: Language as a Window into Human Nature, London: Penguin.]Search in Google Scholar
[Plag, Ingo (2003). Word-Formation in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ploux, Sabine, Armelle Boussidan, & Hyungsuk Ji (2010). The Semantic Atlas: an interactive model of lexical representation. Proceedings of the seventh conference of International Language Resources and Evaluation, Valletta, Malta. N. Calzolari, Nicoletta, Khalid Choukri, Bente Maegaard, Joseph Mariani, Jan Odjik, Stelios Piperidis, Mike Rosner, & Daniel Tapias, eds., European Language Resources Association (ELRA).]Search in Google Scholar
[Ploux, Sabine. The Semantic Atlas. Institut des Sciences Cognitives, CNRS - University Lyon 1 - UMR 5015. http://dico.isc.cnrs.fr/dico/en/search. (last access January 2014).]Search in Google Scholar
[Pound, Louise (1914). Blends, their relation to English word formation. Anglistische Forschungen 42: 1–58.]Search in Google Scholar
[Quinion, Michael (1996). Through The Blenderhttp://www.worldwidewords.org/articles/blend.htm. (last access 16/08/13).]Search in Google Scholar
[Reay, Irene Elizabeth (2009). Sound symbolism. Allan, Keith, ed. Concise Encyclopedia of Semantics. Oxford: Elsevier, 893-901. Reprint [1994].]Search in Google Scholar
[Renouf, Antoinette (2013). A finer definition of neology English: the life-cycle of a word. In Hasselgard, Hilde, Jarle Ebeling & Signe Oksefjell Ebeling (eds.), Corpus Perspectives on Patterns of Lexis, 177–208. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/scl.57.14ren]Search in Google Scholar
[Smith, Chris (nd). Tracking historical semantic shift in fl- monomorphemes in the OED. MS.]Search in Google Scholar
[Štekauer, Pavol & Rochelle Lieber, eds. (2005). Handbook of Word-Formation. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/1-4020-3596-9]Search in Google Scholar
[Szymanek, Bogdan (2005). The latest trends in English word-formation. Štekauer, Pavol & Rochelle Lieber, eds. Handbook of Word-Formation. Dordrecht: Springer, 429-448.10.1007/1-4020-3596-9_17]Search in Google Scholar
[Tournier, Jean (2007). Introduction descriptive à la lexicogénétique de l’anglais contemporain. Paris & Geneva: Champion-Slatkine. Reprint [1985].]Search in Google Scholar
[Turney, Peter D., & Patrick Pantel (2010). From frequency to meaning: Vector Space Models of semantics. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 37 : 141–188.]Search in Google Scholar
[Umbreit, Birgit (2010). Does love come from to love or to love from love? Why lexical motivation has to be regarded as bidirectional. Cognitive Perspectives on Word Formation, Onysko, Alexander, & Sascha Michel (eds.), 301–333. Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110223606.301]Search in Google Scholar
[Veale, Tony & Cristina Butnariu (2010). Harvesting and understanding on-line neologisms. Onysko, Alexander, & Sascha Michel, eds. Cognitive Perspectives on Word Formation,. Berlin & New York: Walter de Gruyter, 399-420.10.1515/9783110223606.399]Search in Google Scholar
[Waugh, Linda R. (1979). On the sound shape of language. Jakobson, Roman & Linda R. Waugh, eds. The Sound Shape of Language. Bloomington, Ind. & London: Indiana University Press & Harvester, 198-214.]Search in Google Scholar
[Waugh, Linda R. (1994). Degrees of iconicity. Journal of Pragmatics 22 : 55–70.]Search in Google Scholar
[The Oxford English Dictionary (2013) online subscription version, 3rd edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press. http://www.oed.com/ (last access 2/01/2014).]Search in Google Scholar
[Oxford English Corpus (2013) provided by Sketch Engine. Oxford: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[McMillan Dictionary online (2009-2013). McMillan Publishers Limited. http://www.macmillandictionary.com/.]Search in Google Scholar
[Merriam-Webster online Dictionary (2014). Encyclopedia Britannica Company. http://www.merriam-webster.com/.]Search in Google Scholar
[Concise Oxford English Dictionary online (2013). Oxford: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Urban Dictionary online (1999-2014). http://www.urbandictionary.com/.]Search in Google Scholar
