[1. Aktaruzzaman, M. (2014). Community perception towards integrating vocational elements in open and distance learning in Bangladesh. Peer reviewed paper presented at the Australian Association for Research in Education Conference, Brisbane 2014. Published in conference proceedings.]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Anderson, A. (2010). Learning e-Learning: The restructuring of student’s beliefs and assumptions about learning. International Journal of E-Learning, 9(4), 435-461.]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Archer, E., Chetty, Y., & Prinsloo, P. (2014). Benchmarking the habits and behaviours of successful students: A case study of academic-business collaboration. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(1). Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/161710.19173/irrodl.v15i1.1617]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Arts, B., & van Tatenhove, J. (2004). Policy and power: A conceptual framework between the ‘old’ and ‘new’ policy idioms. Policy Sciences, 37(3-4), 339-356.10.1007/s11077-005-0156-9]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Baruque, L. B., & Melo, R. N. (2004). Learning theory and instructional design using learning objects. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 13(4), 343-370.]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Caspi, A., & Gorsky, P. (2006). Instructional dialogue: distance education students’ dialogic behavior. Studies in Higher Education, 31(6), 735-752. Routledge.10.1080/03075070601007963]Search in Google Scholar
[7. DeSanctis, G., & Poole, M. S. (1994). Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use: Adaptive structuration theory. Organisation Science, 5(2), 121-147.10.1287/orsc.5.2.121]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Dillahunt, T., Wang, B., & Teasley, S. (2014). Democratizing higher education: Exploring MOOC use among those who cannot afford a formal education. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(5). Retrieved on January 20, 2014 from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/184110.19173/irrodl.v15i5.1841]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Downes, S. (2007). What connectivism is? [Blog post]. Retrieved from http://halfanhour.blogspot.co.uk/2007/02/what-connectivism-is.html]Search in Google Scholar
[10. Ertmer, P. A., & Newby, T. J. (1993). Behaviorism, Cognitivism, Constructivism: Comparing Critical Features from a Design Perspective. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 6(4), 50-57. Retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1937-8327.1993.tb00605.x/abstract10.1111/j.1937-8327.1993.tb00605.x]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Findlay, P. (2007). Library Research Methods Divinity Graduate Students. Retrieved on June 30, 2014 from http://library.mcmaster.ca/instruction/divgrad07.pdf]Search in Google Scholar
[12. Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Berkeley: University of California Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[13. Gokool-Ramdoo, S. (2009). Policy deficit in distance education: A transactional distance. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 10(4). Retrieved on August 10, 2014 from http://irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/702/134410.19173/irrodl.v10i4.702]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Gorsky, P., & Caspi, A. (2005a). A critical analysis of transactional distance theory. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 6(1), 1-11.]Search in Google Scholar
[15. Gorsky, P., & Caspi, A. (2005b). Dialogue: A theoretical framework for distance education instructional system. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(2), 137-144.10.1111/j.1467-8535.2005.00448.x]Search in Google Scholar
[16. Gorsky, P., Caspi, A., & Chajut, E. (2008). The theory of instructional dialogue: Toward a unified theory of instructional design. In Zheng. R & Pixy-Ferris. S. (Eds.), Understanding online instructional modelling: Theories and practices. Hershey, PA: Idea Group, Inc.]Search in Google Scholar
[17. Gourley, B., & Lane, A. (2009). Re‐invigorating openness at The Open University: the role of Open Educational Resources. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 24(1), 57-65. doi: 10.1080/0268051080262784510.1080/02680510802627845]Search in Google Scholar
[18. Gulati, S. (2008). Technology-enhanced learning in developing nations: A review. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 9(1). Retrieved from http://irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/477/101110.19173/irrodl.v9i1.477]Search in Google Scholar
[19. Halperin, R., & Backhouse, J. (2007). Using structuration theory in IS research: Operationalising key constructs. Paper presented at the 28th International Conference on Information Systems, Montreal, Canada.]Search in Google Scholar
[20. Heeks, R. (2008). ICT4D 2.0: The Next Phase of Applying ICT for International Development. Computer, 41(6), 26-33. doi: 10.1109/mc.2008.19210.1109/MC.2008.192]Search in Google Scholar
[21. HL WIKI International (2014). Research Methods. Retrieved on June 30, 2014 from http://hlwiki.slais.ubc.ca/index.php/Research_methods]Search in Google Scholar
[22. Jonassen, D., Davidson, M., Collins, M., Campbell, J., & Haag, B. (1995). Constructivism and Computer-Mediated Communication in Distance Education. American Journal of Distance Education, 9(2), 7-26. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/08923649509526885#.VrSkxU8u9T410.1080/08923649509526885]Search in Google Scholar
[23. Jones, M. R., & Karsten, H. (2008). Giddens’s structuration theory and information systems research. MIS Quarterly, 32(1), 127-157.10.2307/25148831]Search in Google Scholar
[24. Kop, R., & Hill, A. (2008). Connectivism: Learning theory of the future or vestige of the past? The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 9(3). Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/523/1103]Search in Google Scholar
[25. Mahmud, A. (2006). Bringing Information Technology to Rural Bangladesh by Boat. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation Access to Learning Award Recipient 2005. Washington: Library & Information Resources. Available at http://www.clir.org/pubs/reports/reports/pub136/pub136.pdf]Search in Google Scholar
[26. Moore, M.G. (1993). Theory of transactional distance. In D. Keegan (Ed.), Theoretical principles of distance education. London: Routledge.]Search in Google Scholar
[27. Moore, M., & Kearsley, G. (2005). Distance Education - A systems view. CA: Wadsworth.]Search in Google Scholar
[28. Orlikowski, W. J. (2000). Using technology and constituting structures: A practice lens for studying technology in organisations. Organisation Science, 11(4), 404-428.10.1287/orsc.11.4.404.14600]Search in Google Scholar
[29. Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.]Search in Google Scholar
[30. Rashid, B., & Rahman, R. (2010). Strategic Intervention of ODL in Bangladesh. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 11(4), 93-108.]Search in Google Scholar
[31. Rodriguez, O. (2012). MOOCs and the AI-Stanford like Courses: two successful and distinct course formats for massive open online courses. European Journal of Open, Distance, and ELearning, 2012(I). Retrieved on March 10, 2015 from http://www.eurodl.org/materials/contrib/2012/Rodriguez.pdf]Search in Google Scholar
[32. Saba, F., & Shearer, R. L. (1994). Verifying key theoretical concepts in a dynamic model of distance education. The American Journal of Distance Education, 8(1), 36-59.10.1080/08923649409526844]Search in Google Scholar
[33. Sein, M. K. (2005). Paradigms of ICT in development. IFIP 9.4, Abuja, Nigeria.]Search in Google Scholar
[34. Sein, M. K., & Harindranth, G. (2004). Conceptualizing the ICT artefact: Toward understanding the role of ICT in national development. Information Society, 20(1), 15-24. 10.1080/01972240490269942]Search in Google Scholar
[35. Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. New York: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[36. Shearer, R. L. (2009). Transactional distance and dialogue in online learning. Paper presented at the 26th annual conference on distance teaching and learning, 2009. The University of Wisconsin. Retrieved from http://www.uwex.edu/disted/conference]Search in Google Scholar
[37. Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A Learning Theory for the Digital Age. International Journal of Educational Technology & Distance Learning, 2(1). Retrieved October 10, 2014, from http://www.itdl.org/Journal/Jan_05/article01.htm]Search in Google Scholar
[38. Simpson, O. (2013). Student retention in distance education: are we failing our students? Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 28(2), 105-119. doi: 10.1080/02680513.2013.84736310.1080/02680513.2013.847363]Search in Google Scholar
[39. Subotzky, G., & Prinsloo, P. (2011). Turning the tide: a socio-critical model and framework for improving student success in open distance learning at the University of South Africa. Distance Education, 32(2), 177-193. doi: 10.1080/01587919.2011.58484610.1080/01587919.2011.584846]Search in Google Scholar
[40. van Tatenhove, J., Arts, B., & Leroy, P. (Eds.) (2000). Political Modernisation and the Environment: The Renewal of Environmental Policy Arrangements. Dordrecht, Boston, London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.10.1007/978-94-015-9524-7]Search in Google Scholar
[41. Tinio, V. L. (2004). ICT in Education. In UNDP-APDIP (Eds.), The e-ASEAN Task Force e- Primer Series. Retrieved from http://www.unapcict.org/ecohub/resources/]Search in Google Scholar
[42. Tresman, S. (2002). Towards a Strategy for Improved Student Retention in Programmes of Open, Distance Education: A Case Study from the Open University UK. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 3(1).10.19173/irrodl.v3i1.75]Search in Google Scholar
[43. Unwin, T. (2009). ICT4D: Information and communication technologies for development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[44. Walsham, G. (2002). Cross-cultural software production and use: A structurational analysis. MIS Quarterly, 26(4), 359-380.10.2307/4132313]Search in Google Scholar
[45. Wheeler-Brooks, J. (2009). Structuration theory and critical consciousness: potential applications for social work practice. Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare, 36(1), 123-140.]Search in Google Scholar
[46. Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.).Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.]Search in Google Scholar