Publié en ligne: 15 avr. 2016
Pages: 314 - 330
Reçu: 10 déc. 2014
Accepté: 24 sept. 2015
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ethemes-2015-0018
Mots clés
© 2016
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.
Different destinies of particular countries and nonexistence of warranted economic and social prosperity are explained by two paradigms: geographical and institutional one. Geographical paradigm insists upon the significance of physical geography, climate, ecology, that shape technology and individual behaviour. Institutional paradigm attributes the central role of institutions which promote investment in human, physical capital and technology. These two approaches have their roots in: 1. Traditional society theory (Theory of Asiatic mode of production): differences in traditional societies of each country explain their different growth rates and level of economic development, and 2. World system theory: only countries that escaped colonial status have a chance to develop.