Egalitarian Sexism: A Kantian Framework for Assessing the Cultural Evolution of Marriage (I)

ARIS, R. (1965): History of Political Thought in Germany, 1789–1815. London: Frank Cass and Co.Search in Google Scholar

BENBOW, H. M. (2006): The Woman Should Reign and the Man Govern: Gendering Kant’s Body Politic. In: Melbourne Journal of Politics, 30, pp. 80–97.Search in Google Scholar

CASH, M. (2002): Distancing Kantian Ethics and Politics from Kant’s Views on Women. In: Minerva, 6, pp. 103–150.Search in Google Scholar

DENIS, L. (2001): From Friendship to Marriage: Revising Kant. In: Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 63(1), pp. 1–28.10.1111/j.1933-1592.2001.tb00090.xSearch in Google Scholar

DERANTY, J.-P. (2000): The Son of Civil Society: Tensions in Hegel’s Account of Womanhood. In: Philosophical Forum, 31(2), pp. 145–162.10.1111/0031-806X.00033Search in Google Scholar

FELDMAN, S. (1998): Some Problems with Ecofeminism. Presented at the 20th World Congress of Philosophy [online]. [Retrieved June 3, 2017]. Available at: http://www.bu.edu/wcp/Papers/Envi/EnviFeld.htm10.5840/wcp20-paideia199822391Search in Google Scholar

FINLAY, V. (1999): Law aside, concubine still a popular accessory. In: South China Morning Post, Agenda Section, November 28, p. 2.Search in Google Scholar

GANGAVANE, D. (2004): Kant on Femininity. In: Indian Philosophical Quarterly, 31, pp. 359–376.Search in Google Scholar

HERMAN, B. (1993): Could It Be Worth Thinking About Kant on Sex and Marriage? In: L. M. Anthony & Ch. Witt (eds.): A Mind of One’s Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press), pp. 49–67.Search in Google Scholar

KANT, I. (1930): Lectures on Ethics, trans. by L. Infield. London: Methuen.Search in Google Scholar

KANT, I. (1959): Foundations of the Metaphysics of Morals, trans. by L. W. Beck. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.Search in Google Scholar

KANT, I. (1960): Observations on the Feeling of the Beautiful and the Sublime, trans. by J. T. Goldthwait. Berkeley: University of California Press.Search in Google Scholar

KANT, I. (1974): Anthropology from a Pragmatic Point of View, trans. by M. J. Gregor. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.10.1007/978-94-010-2018-3Search in Google Scholar

KANT, I. (1991a): On the Common Saying: “This May be True in Theory, but it does not Apply in Practice”, trans. by H. B. Nisbet. In: H. Reiss (ed.): Kant: Political Writings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 61–92.10.1017/CBO9780511809620.006Search in Google Scholar

KANT, I. (1991b): The Metaphysics of Morals, trans. by M. Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

KANT, I. (1997): Lectures on Ethics, trans. by P. Heath. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781107049512Search in Google Scholar

KANT, I. (2009): Religion within the Bounds of Bare Reason, trans. by W. S. Pluhar. Indianapolis: Hackett.Search in Google Scholar

KLEINGELD, P. (1992–1993): The Problematic Status of Gender-Neutral Language in the History of Philosophy: The Case of Kant. In: Philosophical Forum, 24, pp. 134–150.Search in Google Scholar

KLINKE, W. (1952): Kant for Everyman, trans. by M. Bullock. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Search in Google Scholar

KUEHN, M. (2001): Kant: A Biography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781107050433Search in Google Scholar

LAURENTIIS, A. de (2000): Kant’s Shameful Proposition: A Hegel-Inspired Criticism of Kant’s Theory of Domestic Right. In: International Philosophical Quarterly, 40(3), pp. 297–312.10.5840/ipq200040313Search in Google Scholar

MENDUS, S. (1992): Kant: An Honest but Narrow-Minded Bourgeois? In: H. Williams (ed.): Essays on Kant’s Political Philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 166–190.Search in Google Scholar

MIKKOLA, M. (2011): Kant on Moral Agency and Sexism. In: Kantian Review, 16(1), pp. 89–111.10.1017/S1369415410000014Search in Google Scholar

MOSSER, K. (1999): Kant and Feminism. In: Kant-Studien, 90, pp. 322–353.10.1515/kant.1999.90.3.322Search in Google Scholar

NUSSBAUM, M. (1994): Feminists and Philosophy. In: New York Review of Books, 41(17), pp. 59–63.Search in Google Scholar

PALMQUIST, S. R. (2003): The Waters of Love: A course of introductory lectures on love, sexuality, marriage, and friendship. Hong Kong: Philopsychy Press.Search in Google Scholar

PALMQUIST, S. R. (2017): Egalitarian Sexism: Kant’s Defense of Monogamy and its Implications for the Future Evolution of Marriage (II). In: Ethics & Bioethics (in Central Europe), 7(3–4) (forthcoming).10.1515/ebce-2017-0018Search in Google Scholar

PATEMAN, C. (1988): The Sexual Contract. Cambridge: Polity Press.Search in Google Scholar

SCHOTT, R. M. (1998): Kant. In: A. M. Jaggar (ed.): A Companion to Feminist Philosophy. Cambridge: Blackwell, pp. 39–48.Search in Google Scholar

SCHRÖDER, H. (1997): Kant’s Patriarchal Order. In: R. M. Schott (ed.): Feminist Interpretations of Immanuel Kant. University Park: Pennsylvania State Press, pp. 275–296.Search in Google Scholar

SEDGWICK, S. (1990): Can Kant’s Ethics Survive the Feminist Critique? In: Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 71, pp. 60–79.Search in Google Scholar

SOBLE, A. (2003): Kant and Sexual Perversion. In: The Monist, 86(1), pp. 55–109.10.5840/monist20038614Search in Google Scholar

WILSON, D. (2004): Kant and the Marriage Right. In: Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 85(1), pp. 103-123.10.1111/j.1468-0114.2004.00190.xSearch in Google Scholar

WILSON, H. L. (1998): Kant’s Evolutionary Theory of Marriage. In: J. Kneller & S. Axinn (eds.): Autonomy and Community: Readings in Contemporary Kantian Social Philosophy. New York: SUNY Press, pp. 283–306.Search in Google Scholar

ZWEIG, A. (1993): Kant and the Family. In: D. Myers (ed.): Rational Matters. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, pp. 289–305.Search in Google Scholar