[DOMAGAŁA, J. (2015): Vasil Gluchman’s ethics of social consequences and the professional ethics of a Polish Police Officer. In: Ethics & Bioethics (in Central Europe), 5(1–2), pp. 115–119.]Search in Google Scholar
[DUBIEL-ZIELIŃSKA, P. (2013): “Ethics of social consequences” and “Ethics of Development” as Theories belonging to Stream of Ethics of Act. In: Ethics & Bioethics (in Central Europe), 3(3–4), pp. 173–188.]Search in Google Scholar
[DUBIEL-ZIELIŃSKA, P. (2015): Consequentialist and non-consequentialist overtones of the Code of ethics of an academic staff member in light of ethics of social consequences. In: Ethics & Bioethics (in Central Europe), 5(1–2), pp. 105–113.]Search in Google Scholar
[DUBIEL-ZIELIŃSKA, P. (2016): Moral dilemmas in professions of public trust and the assumptions of ethics of social consequences. In: Ethics & Bioethics (in Central Europe), 6(1–2), pp. 19–32.10.1515/ebce-2016-0001]Search in Google Scholar
[GLUCHMAN, V. (2000): Utilitarizmus G. E. Moora [G. E. Moore’s utilitarianism]. In: G. E. Moore: Etika [Ethics], trans. and ed. by V. Gluchman & M. Gluchmanová. Prešov: LIM, pp. 9–23.]Search in Google Scholar
[GLUCHMAN, V. (2001): Teória správneho v etike sociálnych dôsledkov [Theory of right in ethics of social consequences]. In: Filosofický časopis, 49(4), pp. 633–654.]Search in Google Scholar
[GLUCHMAN, V. (2003): Human being and morality in ethics of social consequences. Lewiston, NY: Edwin Mellen Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[GLUCHMAN, V. (2007): Human dignity and non-utilitarian consequentialist “Ethics of social consequences”. In: H. Tepe & S. Voss (eds.): The proceedings of the twenty-first world congress of philosophy, vol. 1 Ethics. Ankara: Philosophical Society of Turkey, pp. 159–165.]Search in Google Scholar
[GLUCHMAN, V. (2009): Dignity and human dignity as methodological basis of bioethics. In: V. Gluchman (ed.): Bioethics in Central Europe: Methodology and Education. Prešov: FF PU, pp. 73–86.]Search in Google Scholar
[GLUCHMAN, V. (2012): Ethics of social consequences – methodology of bioethics education. In: Ethics & Bioethics (in Central Europe), 2(1–2), pp. 16–27.]Search in Google Scholar
[GLUCHMAN, V. (2016): Disaster issues in non-utilitarian consequentialism. In: Human Affairs, 26(1), pp. 52–62.10.1515/humaff-2016-0007]Search in Google Scholar
[GLUCHMAN, V. (2017): Nature of dignity and human dignity. In: Human Affairs, 27(2), pp. 131–144.10.1515/humaff-2017-0012]Search in Google Scholar
[GLUCHMANOVÁ, M. (2013): The Teacher as a Moral Agent: Humanity and Human Dignity in the Teaching Profession. In: V. Gluchman (ed.): Morality: Reasoning on Different Approaches. Amsterdam & New York: Rodopi, pp. 141–160.10.1163/9789401209816_012]Search in Google Scholar
[GRZYBEK, G. (2011): Etika sociálnych dôsledkov a etika vývoja [Ethics of social consequences and development ethics]. In: V. Gluchman et al.: Hodnoty v etike sociálnych dôsledkov [Values in ethics of social consequences]. Prešov: Grafotlač, pp. 186–190.]Search in Google Scholar
[JACKSON, F. (1991): Decision-Theoretic Consequentialism and the Nearest and Dearest Objection. In: Ethics, 101(3), pp. 461–482.10.1086/293312]Search in Google Scholar
[JEMELKA, P. (2017): Ethics of social consequences and its bioethical aspects as reflected in potential criticism. In: V. Gluchman (ed.): 16th International Conference on “Ethical Thinking – Past & Present” (ETPP 2016/16). Prešov: FF PU, pp. 109–119.]Search in Google Scholar
[KALAJTZIDIS, J. (2011): Problematika mravných subjektov v etike sociálnych dôsledkov [Moral agents’ issues in ethics of social consequences]. In: V. Gluchman et al.: Hodnoty v etike sociálnych dôsledkov [Values in ethics of social consequences]. Prešov: Grafotlač, pp. 86–121.]Search in Google Scholar
[KALAJTZIDIS, J. (2012): Etika sociálnych dôsledkov a hospodárska etika (so zameraním na finančný sektor) [Ethics of social consequences and business ethics]. Brno: Tribun EU.]Search in Google Scholar
[KALAJTZIDIS, J. (2013): Ethics of social consequences as a contemporary consequentialist theory. In: Ethics & Bioethics (in Central Europe), 3(3–4), pp. 159–171.]Search in Google Scholar
[KIŠŠ, I. (2011): Zápas o morálne hodnoty vo filozofickej etike Vasila Gluchmana [Struggle for moral values in Vasil Gluchman’s philosophical ethics]. In: V. Gluchman et al.: Hodnoty v etike sociálnych dôsledkov [Values in ethics of social consequences]. Prešov: Grafotlač, pp. 9–23.]Search in Google Scholar
[KOMENSKÁ, K. (2016): Bioetické reflexie pohrôm a katastrof – nové výzvy pre súčasnú etiku [Bioethical reflection of disasters and catastrophes – new challenges for contemporary ethics]. In: Filosofický časopis, 64(5), pp. 773–782.]Search in Google Scholar
[KUŘE, J. (2011): Subjektivní a objektivní moment v etice sociálních důsledků [Subjective and objective aspect in ethics of social consequences]. In: V. Gluchman et al.: Hodnoty v etike sociálnych dôsledkov [Values in ethics of social consequences]. Prešov: Grafotlač, pp. 24–36.]Search in Google Scholar
[MISSERI, L. (2014): Gluchman y su ética socio-consecuencialista. In: V. Gluchman: Dignidad y consecuencias: ensayos de una ética socio-consecuencialista, 1a ed. Mar del Plata: Kazak Ediciones, pp. 5–17.]Search in Google Scholar
[MOORE G. E. (2000): Principia Ethica, ed. by T. Baldwin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[MOORE, G. E. (2005): Ethics, ed. by W. H. Shaw. Oxford: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[MÜNZ, T. (2002): Etika sociálnych dôsledkov Vasila Gluchmana [Vasil Gluchman’s ethics of social consequences]. In: Filozofia, 52(2), pp. 276–283.]Search in Google Scholar
[NAVRÁTILOVÁ, D. (2011): Limity etiky sociálnych dôsledkov v kontexte súčasného etického myslenia [Limits of ethics of social consequences in context of contemporary ethical thinking]. In: V. Gluchman et al.: Hodnoty v etike sociálnych dôsledkov [Values in ethics of social consequences]. Prešov: Grafotlač, pp. 37–45.]Search in Google Scholar
[PETTIT, P. (1988): The Consequentialist Can Recognise Rights. In: The Philosophical Quarterly, 38(150), pp. 42–55.10.2307/2220266]Search in Google Scholar
[PETTIT, P. (1989): Consequentialism and Respect for Persons. In: Ethics, 100(1), pp. 116–126.10.1086/293149]Search in Google Scholar
[PETTIT, P. (1991): Consequentialism. In: P. Singer (ed.): A Companion to Ethics. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, pp. 230–240.]Search in Google Scholar
[PETTIT, P. (1994): Consequentialism and Moral Psychology. In: International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 2(1), pp. 1–17.10.1080/09672559408570780]Search in Google Scholar
[PETTIT, P. (1997): The Consequentialist Perspective. In: M. Baron, P. Pettit & M. Slote: Three Methods of Ethics. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 92–174.10.1002/9781394266593.ch2]Search in Google Scholar
[PERSSON, I. (2008): A Consequentialist Distinction between What We Ought to Do and Ought to Try. In: Utilitas, 20(3), pp. 348–355.10.1017/S0953820808003191]Search in Google Scholar
[SACHDEV, K. N. (2015): Normative analysis of human dignity among professionals. In: Ethics & Bioethics (in Central Europe), 5(3–4), pp. 205–210.]Search in Google Scholar
[SEN, A. (1982): Rights and Agency. In: Philosophy & Public Affairs, 11(1), pp. 3–39.]Search in Google Scholar
[SEN, A. (1983): Evaluator Relativity and Consequential Evaluation. In: Philosophy & Public Affairs, 12(2), pp. 113–132.]Search in Google Scholar
[SEN, A. (1993): Utilitarianism and Welfarism. In: P. Pettit (ed.): Consequentialism. Aldershot & Brookfield: Dartmount, pp. 15–41.]Search in Google Scholar
[SIMUT, C. C. (2011): Essentials of Catholic Radicalism: An Introduction to the Lay Theology of Vito Mancuso. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.]Search in Google Scholar
[SIMUT, C. C. (2016): Staying young today: Vito Mancuso’s Hegelian theology through the lens of Vasil Gluchman’s ethics of social consequences. In: Ethics & Bioethics (in Central Europe), 6(1–2), pp. 5–17.10.1515/ebce-2016-0002]Search in Google Scholar
[SLOTE, M. (1985): Common-Sense Morality and Consequentialism. London & Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.]Search in Google Scholar
[SLOTE, M. (1989): Beyond Optimizing: A Study of Rational Choice. Cambridge, MA & London: Harvard University Press.10.4159/harvard.9780674434417]Search in Google Scholar
[SLOTE, M. (1993): Satisficing Consequentialism. In: P. Pettit (ed.): Consequentialism. Aldershot & Brookfield: Dartmount, pp. 351–375.]Search in Google Scholar
[ŠVAŇA, L. (2015): War, terrorism, justice and ethics of social consequences. In: Ethics & Bioethics (in Central Europe), 5(3–4), pp. 211–225.]Search in Google Scholar
[ŠVAŇA, L. (2016): On two modern hybrid forms of consequentialism. In: Ethics & Bioethics (in Central Europe), 6, (3–4), pp. 157–166.10.1515/ebce-2016-0014]Search in Google Scholar
[ZIMMERMAN, M. J. (2006): Is Moral Obligation Objective or Subjective? In: Utilitas, 18(4), pp. 329–361.]Search in Google Scholar