[Agamben, Giorgio. 1999. Potencialities. Stanford: Stanford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Aristotle. 1995. The Complete Works of Aristotle. The Revised Oxford Translation, ed. by J. Barnes. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bacciagaluppi, Guido. 1995. Kochen-Specker theorem in the modal interpretation of quantum mechanics. International Journal of Theoretical Physics 34: 1205–16.10.1007/BF00676230]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Bacciagaluppi, Guido. 1996. Topics in the Modal Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. Doctoral dissertation. Cambridge: University of Cambridge.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bacciagaluppi, Guido; and Dickson, Michael. 1997. Dynamics for density operator interpretations of quantum theory. Preprint. (quant-ph/arXiv:quantph/9711048)]Search in Google Scholar
[Barrett, Jeffrey. 2011. Everett’s pure wave mechanics and the notion of worlds. European Journal for Philosophy of Science 1: 277–302.10.1007/s13194-011-0023-9]Search in Google Scholar
[Barrett, Jeffrey. 2016. Quantum worlds. Principia 20: 45–60.10.5007/1808-1711.2016v20n1p45]Search in Google Scholar
[Bohr, Niels. 1928. The quantum postulate and the recent development of atomic theory. Nature 121: 580–90.10.1038/121580a0]Search in Google Scholar
[Bohr, Niles. 1934. Atomic Theory and the Description of Nature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bokulich, Peter; and Bokulich, Alisa. 2005. Niels Bohr’s generalization of classical mechanics. Foundations of Physics 35: 347–71.10.1007/s10701-004-1979-5]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Bub, Jeffrey. 1992. Quantum mechanics without the projection postulate. Foundations of Physics 22: 737–54.10.1007/BF01889676]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Cohen-Tannoudji, Claude; Diu, Bernard; and Laloë, Frank. 1977. Quantum Mechanics. John Wiley and Sons, London.]Search in Google Scholar
[da Costa, Newton; and de Ronde, Christian. 2013. The paraconsistent logic of quantum superpositions. Foundations of Physics 43: 845–58.10.1007/s10701-013-9721-9]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Dawin, Richard; and Thébault, Karim. 2015. Many worlds: incoherent or decoherent? Synthese 192: 1559–80.10.1007/s11229-014-0650-8]Search in Google Scholar
[de Ronde, Christian. 2016a. ‘Probabilistic knowledge’ as ‘objective knowledge’ in quantum mechanics: potential immanent powers instead of actual properties. In Probing the Meaning of Quantum Mechanics: Superpositions, Semantics, Dynamics and Identity, ed. by D. Aerts, C. de Ronde, H. Freytes and R. Giuntini. Singapore: World Scientific, 141–78.]Search in Google Scholar
[de Ronde, Christian. 2016b. Representational realism, closed theories and the quantum to classical limit. In Quantum Structural Studies, ed. by R. E. Kastner, J. Jeknic-Dugic and G. Jaroszkiewicz. Singapore: World Scientific, 105–36.]Search in Google Scholar
[de Ronde, Christian. 2016c. Hilbert space quantum mechanics is contextual. (Reply to R. B. Griffiths.) Cadernos de História e Filosofia da Ciencia 2(1), Série 4: 131–60.]Search in Google Scholar
[de Ronde, Christian. 2016d. Quantum superpositions and the representation of physical reality beyond measurement outcomes and mathematical structures. Foundations of Science, accepted for publication. DOI: 10.1007/s10699-017-9541-z.10.1007/s10699-017-9541-z]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[de Ronde, Christian; Freytes, Hector; and Domenech, Graciela. 2014. Interpreting the modal Kochen-Specker theorem: possibility and many worlds in quantum mechanics. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 45: 11–8.10.1016/j.shpsb.2013.10.003]Search in Google Scholar
[DeWitt, Brice; and Graham, Neill. 1973. The Many-Worlds Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dickson, Michael. 1998. Quantum Chance and Nonlocality: Probability and Nonlocality in the Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dieks, Dennis. 1988. The formalism of quantum theory: an objective description of reality. Annalen der Physik 7: 174–90.10.1002/andp.19885000304]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Dieks, Dennis. 2007. Probability in the modal interpretation of quantum mechanics. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 38: 292–10.10.1016/j.shpsb.2006.05.005]Search in Google Scholar
[Dieks, Dennis. 2010. Quantum mechanics, chance and modality. Philosophica 82: 117–37.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dijksterhuis, Eduard Jan. 1986. The Mechanisation of the Worldpicture: Pythagoras to Newton. Princeton: Princeton University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dirac, Paul. 1974. The Principles of Quantum Mechanics. 4th Edition. London: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Domenech, Graciela; Freytes, Hector; and de Ronde, Christian. 2006. Scopes and limits of modality in quantum mechanics. Annalen der Physik 15: 853–60.10.1002/andp.200610217]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Dorato, Mauro. 2006. Properties and dispositions: some metaphysical remarks on quantum ontology. Proceedings of the AIP 844: 139–57.10.1063/1.2219359]Search in Google Scholar
[Dorato, Mauro. 2011. Do dispositions and propensities have a role in the ontology of quantum mechanics? Some critical remarks. In Probabilities, Causes, and Propensities in Physics, ed. by M. Suárez. Synthese Library, Dordrecht: Springer, 197–218.]Search in Google Scholar
[Everett, Hugh. 1957. On the Foundations of Quantum Mechanics. Doctoral dissertation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Everett, Hugh. 1973. The theory of the universal wave function. In The Many-Worlds Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics, ed. by DeWitt and Graham. Princeton: Princeton University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Fine, Arthur. 1986. The Shaky Game. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ghirardi, Giancarlo; Rimini, Alberto; and Weber, Tulio. 1986. Unified dynamics for microscopic and macroscopic systems. Physical Review D 34(2): 470–91.10.1103/PhysRevD.34.470]Search in Google Scholar
[Heisenberg, Werner. 1927. Üeber den anschaulichen Inhalt der quantentheoretischen Kinematik and Mechanik. Zeitschrift fuÜr Physik 43: 172–98. English translation in Wheeler and Zurek 1983: 62–84.10.1007/BF01397280]Search in Google Scholar
[Heisenberg, Werner. 1958. Physics and Philosophy. London: George Allen and Unwin Ltd.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hilgevoord, Jan; and Uffink, Joos. 2001. The uncertainty principle. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2001 Edition), ed. by E. N. Zalta. URL: http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2001/entries/qt-uncertainty/.]Search in Google Scholar
[Howard, Don. 2004. Who invented the ‘Copenhagen interpretation’? A study in mythology. Philosophy of Science 71: 669–82.10.1086/425941]Search in Google Scholar
[Jammer, Max. 1966. The Conceptual Development of Quantum Mechanics. New York: McGraw Hill.]Search in Google Scholar
[Jansson, Lina. 2016. Everettian quantum mechanics and physical probability: against the principle of ‘state supervenience’. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 53: 45–53.10.1016/j.shpsb.2015.12.002]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Jones, Sheilla. 2008. The Quantum Ten. A Story Of Passion Tragedy Ambition And Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kastner, Ruth. 2014. ‘Einselection’ of pointer observables: the new H-theorem? Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 48: 56–8.10.1016/j.shpsb.2014.06.004]Search in Google Scholar
[Margenau, Henri. 1954. Advantages and disadvantages of various interpretations of the quantum theory. Physics Today 7: 6–13.10.1063/1.3061432]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Maxwell, Nicholas. 1988. Quantum propensiton theory: a testable resolution to the wave/particle dilemma. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 39: 1–50.10.1093/bjps/39.1.1]Search in Google Scholar
[Melamed, Yitzhak. 2013. Spinoza’s Metaphysics and Thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195394054.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Nadler, Steven. 2013. Baruch Spinoza. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. (Fall 2013 Edition), ed. by Edward N. Zalta. forthcoming URL: http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2013/entries/spinoza/.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pauli, Wolfgang; and Jung, Carl Gustav. 2001. Atom and Archetype. The Pauli/Jung Letters 1932-1958. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Piron, Constantin. 1976. Foundations of Quantum Physics. Massachusetts: W.A. Benjamin Inc.10.1007/978-94-010-1440-3_7]Search in Google Scholar
[Piron, Constantin. 1981. Ideal measurements and probability in quantum mechanics. Erkenntnis 16: 397–401.10.1007/BF00211379]Search in Google Scholar
[Piron, Constantin. 1983. Le realisme en physique quantique: une approche selon Aristote. In The Concept of Physical Reality. Proceedings of a conference organized by the Interdisciplinary Research Group, Athens: University of Athens.]Search in Google Scholar
[Popper, Karl. 1982. Quantum Theory and the Schism in Physics. New Jersey: Rowman and Littlefield.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sakurai, Jun; and Napolitano, Jim. 2010. Modern Quantum Mechanics. London: Addison-Wesley.]Search in Google Scholar
[Schrödinger, Erwin. 1935. The present situation in quantum mechanics. Naturwiss 23: 807. Translated to English in Quantum Theory and Measurement, ed. by J. A. Wheeler and W. H. Zurek. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1983.]Search in Google Scholar
[Smets, Sonja. 2005. The modes of physical properties in the logical foundations of physics. Logic and Logical Philosophy 14: 37–53.10.12775/LLP.2005.004]Search in Google Scholar
[Suárez, Mauricio. 2004. Quantum selections, propensities, and the problem of measurement. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 55: 219–55.10.1093/bjps/55.2.219]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Suárez, Mauricio. 2007. Quantum propensities. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 38: 418–38.10.1016/j.shpsb.2006.12.003]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Van Fraassen, Bas. 1991. Quantum Mechanics: An Empiricist View. Oxford: Clarendon.10.1093/0198239807.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Verelst, Karin; and Coecke, Bob. 1999. Early Greek thought and perspectives for the interpretation of quantum mechanics: preliminaries to an ontological approach. In The Blue Book of Einstein Meets Magritte, ed. by D. Aerts. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 163–96.]Search in Google Scholar
[Vermaas, Pieter. 1997. A no-go theorem for joint property ascriptions in modal interpretations of quantum mechanics. Physical Review Letters 78: 2033.10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.2033]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Vermaas, Pieter. 1997. A Philosophers Understanding of Quantum Mechanics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Vermaas, Pieter; and Dieks, Dennis. 1995. The modal interpretation of quantum mechanics and its generalization to density operators. Foundations of Physics 25: 145–58.10.1007/BF02054662]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Von Neumann, John. 1996. Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics. 12th edition. Princeton: Princeton University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wheeler, John; and Zurek, Wojcieck (eds). 1983. Theory and Measurement. Princeton: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400854554]Search in Google Scholar