[Act No 140/1961 Sb., the Criminal Code, as amended.]Search in Google Scholar
[Act No 141/1961 Sb., Code of Criminal Procedure, as amended.]Search in Google Scholar
[Act No 280/2009 Sb., the Tax Code, as amended.]Search in Google Scholar
[Act No 292/2012 Sb., on special judicial proceedings, as amended by Act No 87/2015 Sb.]Search in Google Scholar
[Act No 589/1992 Sb., on social security, as amended.]Search in Google Scholar
[Act No 592/1992 Sb., on health insurance premiums, as amended.]Search in Google Scholar
[Act No 90/2012 Sb., Business Corporations Act.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bydlinski, F. (1991). Juristische Methodenlehre und Rechtsbegriff. 2nd edition. Vienna, New York: Springer-Verlag.10.1007/978-3-7091-6705-2]Search in Google Scholar
[Criminal Record of Legal Entities. Available at https://eservice-po.rejtr.justice.cz/public/odsouzeni.]Search in Google Scholar
[European Convention on Human Rights (Communication of the Federal Minister of Foreign Affairs No 209/1992 Sb. on the European Convention on Human Rights, as amended by Protocols Nos 3, 5 and 8).]Search in Google Scholar
[Explanatory Memorandum to the Business Corporations Act.]Search in Google Scholar
[Explanatory Memorandum to the Criminal Code, commentary on Sections 12 and 13.]Search in Google Scholar
[Jelínek, J. (2013). Trestní odpovědnost právnických osob v České republice – bilance a perspektivy. Prague: Leges.]Search in Google Scholar
[Jelínek, J. (2015). K přechodu trestní odpovědnosti právní osoby na právního nástupce. Bulletin advokacie, (5), 21–25.]Search in Google Scholar
[Judgment of the Constitutional Court of the Czech Republic of 17 December, 1997, file no. Pl. ÚS 33/97.]Search in Google Scholar
[Judgment of the Constitutional Court of the Czech Republic of 5 September, 2012, file no. II ÚS 3/10.]Search in Google Scholar
[Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 25 August, 1987, Application No 9912/82, Lutz v. Germany.]Search in Google Scholar
[Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 25 May, 1993, Application No 14307/88, Kokkinakis v. Greece.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kratochvíl, V. (2015). Případ, trestný čin, společenská škodlivost a vina v trestním právu (o zásadě subsidiarity trochu jinak). Právní rozhledy, (7), 537–559.]Search in Google Scholar
[Melzer, F. (2011). Metodologie nalézání práva: úvod do právní argumentace. 2nd ed. Prague: C. H. Beck.]Search in Google Scholar
[Opinion of the Supreme Court of 30 January, 2013, file no. Tpjn 301/2012.]Search in Google Scholar
[Opinion of the Supreme Court of the Czech Republic of 24 November, 2015, file no. 4 Afs 210/2014.]Search in Google Scholar
[Opinion of the Supreme Court of the Czech Republic, file no. 301/2012.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pokorná, J. (2009). Obchodní zákoník: komentář. Prague: Wolters Kluwer ČR.]Search in Google Scholar
[Resolution of the Supreme Administrative Court of the Czech Republic of 28 April, 2011, file no. 1 Afs 1/2011.]Search in Google Scholar
[Resolution of the Supreme Court of the Czech Republic of 16 February, 2011, file no. 8 Tdo 112/2011.]Search in Google Scholar
[Resolution of the Supreme Court of the Czech Republic of 24 November, 2015, file no. 8 Tdo 627/2015.]Search in Google Scholar
[Šámal, P. et al. (2012). Trestní odpovědnost právnických osob: komentář. Prague: C. H. Beck.]Search in Google Scholar
[Stehlík, O. (2016). Nucené zrušení společnosti s.r.o. po rekodifikaci. Wolters Kluwer ČR.]Search in Google Scholar
[Štenglová, I., Dědič, J., Tomsa, M. et al. (2014). Základy obchodního práva. Prague: Leges. Tax Code.]Search in Google Scholar
[Winterová, A., Macková, A. (2015). Civilní právo procesní. Část druhá. Prague: Leges.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wintr, J. (2013). Metody a zásady interpretace práva. Prague: Auditorium.]Search in Google Scholar
