[Abedi, J. (2002). A latent‑variable modeling approach to assessing reliability and validity of a creativity instrument. Creativity Research Journal, 14, 267-276.10.1207/S15326934CRJ1402_12]Search in Google Scholar
[Akaike, H. (1974). A new look at the statistical model identification. IEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 19, 716-23.10.1109/TAC.1974.1100705]Search in Google Scholar
[Baer, J. (1991). Generality of creativity across performance domains. Creativity Research Journal, 4, 23-39.10.1080/10400419109534371]Search in Google Scholar
[Bentler, P.M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238-46.10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238]Search in Google Scholar
[Byrne, B. M. (1998). Structural equation modeling with LISREL, PRELIS, and SIMPLIS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.]Search in Google Scholar
[Chand O'Neal, I., Schulz Begle, A., Runco, M. A. (2014, August). The Effects of Arts Integrated Instruction on Ideational Behavior in 4th and 5th Grade Students. Presentation at the 122nd Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.10.1037/e550952014-001]Search in Google Scholar
[Chen, N., Roth, R. K. & Todhunter, J. E. (in press). I can do it! The effect of belief in stable luck on employee creativity. Business Creativity and the Creative Economy.]Search in Google Scholar
[Cheung, G. W. & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 233-255.10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5]Search in Google Scholar
[Cropley, D. & Cropley, A. (2012). A psychological taxonomy of organizational innovation: Resolving the paradoxes. Creativity Research Journal, 24, 29-40.10.1080/10400419.2012.649234]Search in Google Scholar
[DaVia Rubenstein, L., McCoach, D. & Siegle, D. (2013). Teaching for Creativity Scales: An instrument to examine teachers’ perceptions of factors that allow for the teaching of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 25, 324‑334.10.1080/10400419.2013.813807]Search in Google Scholar
[Finney, S. J. & Davis, S. L. (2003, April). Examining the invariance of the achievement goal questionnaire across gender. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.]Search in Google Scholar
[Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5, 444-454.10.1037/h0063487]Search in Google Scholar
[Guilford, J. P. (1968). Creativity, intelligence and their educational implications. San Diego, CA: Knapp.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hocevar, D. (1979a). A comparison of statistical infrequency and subjective judgment as criteria in the measurement of originality. Journal of Personality Assessment, 43, 297-299.10.1207/s15327752jpa4303_13]Search in Google Scholar
[Hocevar, D. (1979b). Ideational fluency as a confounding factor in the measurement of originality. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 191-196.10.1037/0022-0663.71.2.191]Search in Google Scholar
[Hocevar, D. (1980). Intelligence, divergent thinking, and creativity. Intelligence, 4, 25-40.10.1016/0160-2896(80)90004-5]Search in Google Scholar
[Holland, J. L. (1961). Creative and academic performance among talented adolescents. Journal of Educational Psychology, 53, 132-143.10.1037/h0040758]Search in Google Scholar
[Hong, E., Milgram, R. M. & Gorsky, H. (1959). Original Thinking as a Predictor of Creative Performance in Young Children. Roeper Review, 18, 147-4910.1080/02783199509553720]Search in Google Scholar
[Johnson, D., Runco, M. A. & Raina, M. K. (2003). Parents and teachers’ implicit theories of children’s creativity: A cross-cultural perspective. Creativity Research Journal, 14, 427-438.]Search in Google Scholar
[MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W. & Sugawara, H. M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1, 130-149.10.1037/1082-989X.1.2.130]Search in Google Scholar
[Milgram, R. M. & Milgram, N. A. (1976). Creative thinking and creative performance in Israeli students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 255-259.10.1037/0022-0663.68.3.255]Search in Google Scholar
[Miller, H. B. & Sawyers, J. K. (1989). A comparison of self and teachers ratings of creativity in fifth grade children. Creative Child and Adult Quarterly, 14, 179‑185.]Search in Google Scholar
[Muthén, L. K. & Muthén, B. O. (1998-2012). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.]Search in Google Scholar
[Noble, E. P., Runco, M. A. & Ozkaragoz, T. Z. (1993). Creativity in alcoholic and nonalcoholic families. Alcohol, 10, 317-322.10.1016/0741-8329(93)90012-D]Search in Google Scholar
[Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.]Search in Google Scholar
[Plucker, J. A., Runco, M. A. & Woong, L. (2006). Predicting ideational behavior from divergent thinking and discretionary time on task. Creativity Research Journal, 18, 55-63.10.1207/s15326934crj1801_7]Search in Google Scholar
[Rhodes, M. (1961). An analysis of creativity. Phi Delta Kappan, 42, 305-310.]Search in Google Scholar
[Richards, R. (1999). Everyday creativity. In: M. A. Runco & S. R. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity(1st ed.) (pp. 683-687). San Diego: Academic Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Runco, M. A. (1985). Reliability and convergent validity of ideational flexibility as a function of academic achievement. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 61, 1075-1081.10.2466/pms.1985.61.3f.1075]Search in Google Scholar
[Runco, M. A. (1987). Interrater agreement on a socially valid measure of students’ creativity. Psychological Reports, 61, 1009-1010. 10.2466/pr0.1987.61.3.1009]Search in Google Scholar
[Runco, M. A. (1999). Divergent and creative thinking. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Runco, M. A. (2007). Creativity. Theories and themes: Research, development, and practice. Burlington, MA: Elsevier Academic Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Runco, M. A. (2008). Commentary: Divergent thinking is not synonymous with creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 2, 93-96.10.1037/1931-3896.2.2.93]Search in Google Scholar
[Runco, M. A. (2013, October). The real creativity crisis. Keynote address to the Mississippi Association for Gifted Children, Hattiesburg, MS.10.1037/e574802013-336]Search in Google Scholar
[Runco, M. A. & Albert, R. S. (1985). The originality and convergent validity of ideational originality in academically gifted and nongifted children. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 45, 483-501.10.1177/001316448504500306]Search in Google Scholar
[Runco, M. A. & Albert, R. S. (2005). Parents' personality and the creative potential of exceptionally gifted boys. Creativity Research Journal, 17, 355-368.10.1207/s15326934crj1704_7]Search in Google Scholar
[Runco, M. A. & Charles, R. (1993). Judgments of originality and appropriateness as predictors of creativity. Personality and Individual Differences, 15, 537-546.10.1016/0191-8869(93)90337-3]Search in Google Scholar
[Runco, M. A. & Jaeger, G. J. (2012). The standard definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 24, 92-9610.1080/10400419.2012.650092]Search in Google Scholar
[Runco, M. A. & Plucker, J. A. & Lim, W. (2000-2001). Development and psychometric integrity of a measure of ideational behavior. Creativity Research Journal, 13, 393-400.10.1207/S15326934CRJ1334_16]Search in Google Scholar
[Runco, M. A., Johnson, D. & Bear, P. (1993). Parents' and teachers' implicit theories of children's creativity. Child Study Journal, 23, 91-113.]Search in Google Scholar
[Runco, M. A., Okuda, S. M. & Thurston, B. J. (1991). Environmental cues and divergent thinking. In M. A. Runco (Ed.), Divergent thinking (pp. 79-85). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.]Search in Google Scholar
[Runco, M. A., Walczyk, J. J., Acar, S., Cowger, E. L., Simundson, M. & Tripp, S. (2013). The incremental validity of a Short Form of the Ideational Behavior Scale and usefulness of distractor, contraindicative, and lie scales. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 48, 185-197.10.1002/jocb.47]Search in Google Scholar
[Runco, M. & Richards, R. (1998). Eminent creativity, everyday creativity, and health. Stamford, CT: Ablex.]Search in Google Scholar
[Schwartz, G. (1978). Estimating the dimension of a model. Annals of Statistics, 6, 461-464.10.1214/aos/1176344136]Search in Google Scholar
[Shapiro, A. K. (1960). A contribution to a history of the placebo effect. Behavioral Science, 5, 109-135.10.1002/bs.3830050202]Search in Google Scholar
[Steenkamp, J. E. M. & Baumgartner, H. (1998). Assessing measurement invariance in crossnational consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 25, 78-90.10.1086/209528]Search in Google Scholar
[Torrance, E. P. (1974). The Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking: Norms - Technical manual. Bensenville, IL: Scholastic Testing Service. ]Search in Google Scholar
[Torrance, E. P. (1995). Why fly? Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Vandenberg, R. J. & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3, 4-70.10.1177/109442810031002]Search in Google Scholar
[Vartanian, O., Bouak, F., Caldwell, J. L., Cheung, B., Cupchik, G., Jobidon, M. E., Lam, Q., Nakashima, A., Paul, M., Peng, H., Silvia, P. J. & Smith, I. (2014). The effects of a single night of sleep deprivation on fluency and prefrontal cortex function during divergent thinking. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 1-12.10.3389/fnhum.2014.00214]Search in Google Scholar
[Wallach, M. A. (1970). Creativity. In P. H. Mussen (ed.), Manual of child psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 1211-1272). New York: Wiley.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wallach, M. A. & Kogan, N. (1965). Modes of thinking in young children: A study of the creativity-intelligence distinction. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wallach, M. A. & Wing, C. (1969). The talented student. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.]Search in Google Scholar