Accès libre

Revisiting the Systems Approach: Commentary on Glăveanu’s Paper “The Psychology of Creativity: A Critical Reading”

   | 26 mai 2015
À propos de cet article

Citez

Amabile, T. M. (1982). Social psychology of creativity: a consensual assessment technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 5, 997-1013.10.1037/0022-3514.43.5.997Search in Google Scholar

Amabile, T. M. (1983). Social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 357-377.10.1037/0022-3514.45.2.357Search in Google Scholar

Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context: Update to The Social Psychology of Creativity. Boulder, CO: Westview.Search in Google Scholar

Amabile, T., & Pillemer, J. (2012). Perspectives on the Social Psychology of Creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior 46, 1, 3–15.10.1002/jocb.001Search in Google Scholar

Cronbach, L. J., & Gleser, G. C. (1965). Psychological tests and personnel decisions (2nd ed.). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Search in Google Scholar

De Dreu, C. K. W., Baas, M., & Nijstad, B. A. (2008). Hedonic tone and activation level in the mood-creativity link: Toward a dual pathway to creativity model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 739-756.10.1037/0022-3514.94.5.739Search in Google Scholar

EMCI IP summer school 2013 and 2014: www.emci.fham.deSearch in Google Scholar

Friedman R. S., Forster, J., & Denzler, M. (2007). Interactive effects of mood and task framing on creative generation. Creativity Research Journal, 19, 141-162.10.1080/10400410701397206Search in Google Scholar

Glăveanu, V. P. (2014). The psychology of creativity: A critical reading. Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 1, 10-32; DOI: 10.15290/ctra.2014.01.01.02.10.15290/ctra.2014.01.01.02Search in Google Scholar

Gino, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2012). The dark side of creativity: Original thinkers can be more dishonest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 445-459.10.1037/a0026406Search in Google Scholar

Hennessey, B. A., & Amabile, T. (2010). Creativity. Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 569–598.10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100416Search in Google Scholar

Kaufman, J. C., & Beghetto, R. A. (2009). Beyond big and little: The Four C Model of Creativity. Review of General Psychology, 13, 1, 1-12.10.1037/a0013688Search in Google Scholar

Polzer, J., Milton, L. P., & Swann, B. (2002). Capitalizing on diversity: Interpersonal congruence in small work groups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47, 296-324.10.2307/3094807Search in Google Scholar

Moren, S. (2009). Creativity: A systems perspective. In T. Rickards, Runco M. A., & Moger, S. (Eds.), The Routledge Companion to Creativity (pp. 292-301). UK: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Miron-Spektor, E., Gino, F., & Argote, L. (2011). Paradoxical frames and creative sparks: Enhancing individual creativity through conflict and integration. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 116, 2, 229-240.10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.03.006Search in Google Scholar

Rhodes, M. (1961). An analysis of creativity. Phi Delta Kappan, 42, 305-310.Search in Google Scholar

Runco, M. A., & Pagnani, A. (2008). Psychological research on creativity. In J. Sefton-Green, P. Thomson, K. Jones, & L. Bresler (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of creative learning (pp. 63-71). London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Scott, G. M., Leritz, L. E., & Mumford, M. D. (2004). The effectiveness of creativity training: A quantitative review. Creativity Research Journal, 16, 36, 361-388.10.1080/10400410409534549Search in Google Scholar

Simonton, D. K. (1995). Exceptional personal influence. Creativity Research Journal, 8, 371-376.10.1207/s15326934crj0804_3Search in Google Scholar

Simonton, D. K. (2006). Historiometric methods. In A. Ericsson, N. Charness, P. J. Feltovich, & R. R. Hoffman (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 319-335). New York: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Tang, M. (2010). China’s young inventors: A systemic view of the individual and environmental factors. Dissertation of the Department of Psychology and Pedagogy, University of Munich, Germany. Retrievable under http://edoc.ub.uni-muenchen.de/14898/Search in Google Scholar

Werner, C., Tang, L. M., Schmidt, J., Mielke, A., Spörrle, M., Neber, H., Zhou, Z., Zhao, X., & Cao, G. (2011). Applied creativity across domains and cultures: Integrating Eastern and Western perspectives. Creative Personality, 9, 228–240.Search in Google Scholar

Westmeyer, H. (1998). The social construction and psychological assessment of creativity. High Ability Studies, 9, 1, 11-21.10.1080/1359813980090102Search in Google Scholar

eISSN:
2354-0036
Langue:
Anglais
Périodicité:
2 fois par an
Sujets de la revue:
Arts, general, Social Sciences, Psychology, Development Psychology, Applied Psychology, Education, other