[Besiki, S.; Jörgensen, C.; Wu, S. 2012. ‘Establishing the value of socially-created metadata to image indexing’. - Library & Information Science Research, 34, 99-109.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bron, M.; Nack, F.; van Gorp, J.; de Rijke, M. 2011. ‘Exploratory search in an audio-visual archive: Evaluating a professional search tool for nonprofessional users’. - Proceedings of the 1st European Workshop on Human-Computer Interaction and Information Retrieval (EuroHCIR 2011), Newcastle, UK, 4 July.]Search in Google Scholar
[Enser, P. 2008. ‘The evolution of visual information retrieval’. - Journal of Information Science, 34, 4, 531-546.]Search in Google Scholar
[Herzum, M. 2003. ‘Requests for information from a film archive: a case study of multimedia retrieval’. - Journal of Documentation, 59, 2, 168-186.]Search in Google Scholar
[JISC Digital Media 2013. Approaches to Describing Images. http://www.jiscdigitalmedia.ac.uk/guide/approaches-to-describing-images (1 June 2013).]Search in Google Scholar
[Joassoone, D.; Peterson, E. 2011. Video ja televisioon lõimitud keele- ja aineõppe toetajana. Tartu: AS Atlex.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hixson, C. 2003. Analyzing the Subject of a Picture: Guidelines. University of Oregon Libraries, http://library.uoregon.edu/sites/default/files/data/diglib/meta/Image_Subj_Analysis.pdf (28 September 2013).]Search in Google Scholar
[Internet Movie Database (IMDb) sisu märksõnastik. http://www.imdb.com/Sections/Keywords/ (1 June 2013).]Search in Google Scholar
[Jaimes, A.; Chang, S.-F. 2000. ‘A conceptual framework for indexing visual information at multiple levels’. - IS&T/SPIE Internet Imaging, 3964. http://www.ee.columbia.edu/ln/dvmm/publications/00/ajaimes-spie00_internet.pdf (1 June 2013).]Search in Google Scholar
[Nilbe, S. 1994. Liigitamine ja märksõnastamine arvutikataloogis. Tartu Ülikooli raamatukogu. http://www.utlib.ee/ee/konverentsid/1994/black.html (1 June 2013).]Search in Google Scholar
[Ménard, E. 2007. ‘Image indexing: How can I find a nice pair of Italian shoes?’ - Bulletin of the American Society of Information Science and Technology, October/November, 22-25.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ménard, E. 2009. ‘Images: Indexing for accessibility in a multi-lingual environment - challenges and perspectives’. - The Indexer, 27, 2, 70-76.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ménard, E. 2010. ‘Image indexing and retrieval: Challenges and new perspectives’. - The Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science, 34, 3, 245-248.]Search in Google Scholar
[Neugebauer, T. 2010. ‘Image indexing’. - The Indexer, 28, 3, 98-103.]Search in Google Scholar
[Rafferty, P. 2011. ‘Informative tagging of images: The importance of modality in interpretation’. - Knowledge Organization, 38, 4, 283-298.]Search in Google Scholar
[Rasmussen, E. M. 1997. ‘Indexing images’. - Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 32, 169-196.]Search in Google Scholar
[Reser, G. 2012. ‘What not to embed: Is it better not to embed certain cultural heritage metadata in images?’ - Visual Resources Association Bulletin, 39, 1, 5.]Search in Google Scholar
[Rorissa, A.; Iyer, H. 2008. ‘Theories of cognition and image categorization: What category labels reveal about basic level theory’. - Journal of the American Society of Information Science and Technology, 59, 9, 1383-1392.]Search in Google Scholar
[Shatford, S. 1986. ‘Analyzing the subject of a picture: A theoretical approach’. - Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 6, 3, 39-62.]Search in Google Scholar
[Shatford Layne, S. 1994. ‘Some issues in the indexing of images’. - Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 45, 583-588.]Search in Google Scholar
[Stewart, B. 2010. ‘Getting the picture: An exploratory study of current indexing practices in providing subject access to historic photographs’. - The Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science (La Revue canadienne des sciences del’information et de bibliothéconomie), 34, 3, 297-327.]Search in Google Scholar
[Svenonius, E. 1994. ‘Access to nonbook materials: The limits of subject indexing for visual and aural languages’. - Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 45, 8, 600-606.]Search in Google Scholar
[Stockinger, P. 2007. ‘The PCI ontology: Presentation and discussion of an ontology for the description and indexing of audiovisual resources in the field of cultural heritage of minorities and indigenous people’. - Proceeding of Specific Rargeted Research Project IST Call 4 - FP6-2004-IST-4. LOGOS: Knowledge-on- Demand for Ubiquitous Learning.]Search in Google Scholar
[Terris, O. 2000. ‘‘What you don’t see and don’t hear’: Subject indexing moving images’. - Multimedia Information and Technology, 26, 1, 57-60.]Search in Google Scholar
[The Movie Genome. http://www.jinni.com/movie-genome.html (1 July 2013).]Search in Google Scholar
[Turner, J. M. 1997. ‘Indexing pictures: some considerations’. - Annual Meeting Council on Botanical and Horticultural Libraries, Jardin botanique de Montréal. http://turner.ebsi.umontreal.ca/english/texts/cbhl97.htm (1 June 2013).]Search in Google Scholar
[Sam, H. 2009. ‘Cataloging and preservation of moving images: A survey of organisations and initiatives’. - PNLA Quaterly, 73, 4.]Search in Google Scholar
[Šein, H. 2012. Filmiandmebaaside annoteeritud kogu.Tallinn: Eesti Filmi Andmebaas. http://www.efa.ee (27 September 2013). ]Search in Google Scholar
