[Avdikos, V. & Chardas, A. (2016), ‘European Union Cohesion Policy post 2014: more (place-based and conditional) growth – less redistribution and cohesion,’ Territory, Politics, Governance, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 97–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2014.99246010.1080/21622671.2014.992460]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Bachtler, J.; Mendez, C. & Wishlade, F. (2019), Reforming the MFF and Cohesion Policy 2021–27: Pragmatic Drift or Paradigmatic Shift? European Policy Research Paper, no. 107, Glasgow: University of Strathclyde Publishing.]Search in Google Scholar
[Baláž, V.; Frank, K.; Ojala, T. (2018), RIO Country Report 2017: Slovak Republic, EUR 29181 EN, Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.]Search in Google Scholar
[Barca, F. (2009), An Agenda for A Reformed Cohesion Policy: A Place-Based Approach to Meeting European Union Challenges and Expectations, Independent report, prepared at the request of the European Commissioner for Regional Policy, Danuta Hübner, Brussels: European Commission.]Search in Google Scholar
[Berkowitz, P. (2018), ‘EU Budget for the future smart specialization: future perspectives,’ Presentation held on 22 October 2018 in Vilnius for DG Regional and Urban Policy of the European Commission.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bohle, D. & Greskovits, B. (2012), Capitalist Diversity on Europe’s Periphery, Ithaca & London: Cornell University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Charron, N. & Lapuente, V. (2018), Quality of Government in EU Regions: Spatial and Temporal Patterns, QoG Working Paper Series 2018:1, Gothenburg.]Search in Google Scholar
[CORDIS (2018), Horizon 2020 e-CORDA database. Retrieved from https://cordis.europa.eu/projects/en [accessed 11 Dec 2018]]Search in Google Scholar
[Dabrowski, M. (2014), ‘EU cohesion policy, horizontal partnership and the patterns of sub-national governance: insights from Central and Eastern Europe,’ European Urban and Regional Studies, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 364–383. https://doi.org/10.1177/096977641348198310.1177/0969776413481983]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Ehrlich, K.; Kriszan, A. & Lang, T. (2012), ‘Urban development in Central and Eastern Europe – between peripheralization and centralization?’ disP – The Planning Review, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 77–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/02513625.2012.72161110.1080/02513625.2012.721611]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[ESI Funds Open Data Platform (2019). Retrieved from https://cohesiondata.ec.europa.eu/ [accessed 15 Feb 2019]]Search in Google Scholar
[Estonian Ministry of Economic Affairs and Communications (2014), Estonian Entrepreneurship Growth Strategy 2014–2020, September 2013, Tallinn.]Search in Google Scholar
[Estonian Ministry Of Education And Research (2014), Estonian Research and Development and Innovation Strategy ‘Knowledge-based Estonia 2014–2020’, Riigi Teataja, Part 3, no. 2, January 29, Tallinn.]Search in Google Scholar
[European Commission (2018a), Mutual Learning Exercise Widening Participation and Strengthening Synergies: Summary Report, Horizon 2020 Policy Support facility. Prepared by Leon, G.; Guy, K.; Acheson, H.; Nauwelaers, C. & L. Tsipouri, Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.]Search in Google Scholar
[European Commission (2018b), Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down common provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund Plus, the Cohesion Fund, and the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund and financial rules for those and for the Asylum and Migration Fund, the Internal Security Fund and the Border Management and Visa Instrument, COM/2018/375 final, 2018/0196 (COD).]Search in Google Scholar
[European Commission (2018c), European Innovation Scoreboard 2018, prepared by Hugo Hollanders and Nordine Es-Sadki, Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union]Search in Google Scholar
[European Commission (2018d), Country Report Slovakia 2018, Brussels.]Search in Google Scholar
[European Commission (2019a), Country Report Estonia 2019, Brussels.]Search in Google Scholar
[European Commission (2019b), Country Report Slovakia 2019, Brussels.]Search in Google Scholar
[Faragó, L. & Varró, K. (2016), ‘Shifts in EU Cohesion Policy and processes of peripheralization: a view from Central Eastern Europe,’ European Spatial Research and Policy, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 5–19. https://doi.org/10.1515/esrp-2016-000110.1515/esrp-2016-0001]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Ferry, M. & McMaster, I. (2013), ‘Cohesion policy and the evolution of regional policy in Central and Eastern Europe,’ Europe-Asia Studies, vol. 65, no. 8, pp. 1502–1528. https://doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2013.83296910.1080/09668136.2013.832969]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Foray, D.; David P. A. & Hall, B. (2009), ‘Smart specialisation – the concept,’ in Knowledge for Growth: Prospects for Science, Technology and Innovation, BrusselsÖ European Commission, pp. 20–24.]Search in Google Scholar
[Foray, D.; Goddard, J.; Goenaga Beldarrain, X.; Landabaso, M.; McCann, P.; Morgan, K.; Nauwelaers, C. & Ortega-Argiles, R. (2012), Guide to Research and Innovation Strategies for Smart Specialisation (RIS 3), Smart Specialisation Platform, Seville: IPTS.]Search in Google Scholar
[Friedmann, J. (1973), ‘A theory of polarized development,’ in J. Friedmann (ed.) Urbanization, Planning, and National Development, Beverly Hills, CAÖ Sage, pp. 41–67.]Search in Google Scholar
[Government of the Slovak Republic (2013), Through Knowledge Towards Prosperity. Research and Innovation Strategy of the Slovak Republic.]Search in Google Scholar
[Iammarino, S.; Rodríguez-Pose, A. & Storper, M. (2017), Why Regional Development Matters for Europe’s Economic Future, Working Paper, no. 07/2017, Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kah, S. (2014), Slovakia Case Study Report, GRINCOH Working Paper, no. 8.03.06.]Search in Google Scholar
[Karo, E. & Kattel, R. (2015), ‘Economic development and evolving state capacities in Central and Eastern Europe: can “smart specialization” make a difference?’ Journal of Economic Policy Reform, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 172–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/17487870.2015.100906810.1080/17487870.2015.1009068]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Kattel, R. & Stamenov, B. (2018), RIO Country Report 2017: Estonia, EUR 29153 EN, Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kroll, H. (2015), ‘Efforts to implement smart specialization in practice – leading unlike horses to the water,’ European Planning Studies, vol. 23, no. 10, pp. 2079–2098. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2014.100303610.1080/09654313.2014.1003036]Search in Google Scholar
[Krugman, P. (1991), Geography and Trade, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, Cambridge and Leuven University Press]Search in Google Scholar
[Kühn, M. (2014), ‘Peripheralization: theoretical concepts explaining socio-spatial inequalities,’ European Planning Studies, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 367–378. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2013.86251810.1080/09654313.2013.862518]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Lang, T. (2011), ‘Regional development issues in Central and Eastern Europe: shifting research agendas from a focus on peripheries to peripheralisation?’ in A. Eröss & D. Karacsonyi (eds.) Geography in Visegrad and Neighbour Countries, Budapest: Hungarian Academy of Sciences Geographical Research Institute, pp. 57–64.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lang, T & Görmar, F., eds. (2019), Regional and Local Development in Times of Polarisation. New Geographies of Europe, Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1190-110.1007/978-981-13-1190-1]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Loewen, B. (2018), ‘From decentralization to re-centralization: Tendencies of regional policy and inequalities in Central and Eastern Europe,’ Halduskultuur – Administrative Culture, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 103–126. https://doi.org/10.32994/ac.v18i2.16210.32994/ac.v18i2.162]Search in Google Scholar
[Magone, J. M.; Laffan, B. & Schweiger, C., eds. (2016), Core-Periphery Relations in the European Union: Power and Conflict in a Dualist Political Economy, New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781315712994]Search in Google Scholar
[Matusiak, M. & Kleibrink, A., eds. (2018), Supporting an Innovation Agenda for the Western Balkans: Tools and Methodologies, Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.4324/978131571299410.4324/9781315712994]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[McCann, P. & Ortega-Argiles, R. (2016), ‘The early experience of smart specialization implementation in EU cohesion policy,’ European Planning Studies, vol. 24, no. 8, pp. 1407–1427. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2016.116617710.1080/09654313.2016.1166177]Search in Google Scholar
[Medve-Bálint, G. & Bohle, D. (2016), More Integrated but Also More Divided: Intended and Unintended Consequences of Foreign Direct Investment and the Cohesion Policy in Eastern Europe, MAXCAP Working Paper, no. 34 (September).]Search in Google Scholar
[Meliciani, V. (2015), Regional Disparities in the Enlarged European Union: Geography, Innovation and Structural Change, Abingdon: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/978131581513810.4324/9781315815138]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Mendez, C. (2013), ‘The post-2013 reform of EU cohesion policy and the place-based narrative,’ Journal of European Public Policy, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 639–659. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2012.73673310.1080/13501763.2012.736733]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Muscio, A.; Reid, A. & Rivera Leon, L. (2015), ‘An empirical test of the regional innovation paradox: can smart specialisation overcome the paradox in Central and Eastern Europe?’ Journal of Economic Policy Reform, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 153–171. https://doi.org/10.1080/17487870.2015.101354510.1080/17487870.2015.1013545]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[OECD (2018), OECD Regional Statistics (database). https://doi.org/10.1787/region-data-en10.1787/region-data-en]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Prause, G. (2014), ‘Smart specialization and EU Eastern Innovation Cooperation,’ Baltic Journal of European Studies, vol. 4, no. 1(16), pp. 3–19. https://doi.org/10.2478/bjes-2014-000110.2478/bjes-2014-0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Pugh, R. (2017), ‘Questioning the implementation of smart specialisation: regional innovation policy and semi-autonomous regions,’ Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space 2018, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 530–547. https://doi.org/10.1177/239965441771706910.1177/2399654417717069]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Raagmaa, G.; Kalvet, T. & Kasesalu, R. (2013), ‘Europeanization and de-Europeanization of Estonian regional policy,’ European Planning Studies, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 775–795. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2013.77275410.1080/09654313.2013.772754]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Radosevic, S. & Ciampi Stancova, K. (2018), ‘Internationalising smart specialisation: assessment and issues in the case of EU new Member States,’ Journal of the Knowledge Economy, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 263–293. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-015-0339-310.1007/s13132-015-0339-3]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Rodriguez-Pose, A. (2014), Leveraging Research, Science and Innovation to Strengthen Social and Regional Cohesion, Policy Paper by the Research, Innovation, and Science Policy Experts (RISE), Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.]Search in Google Scholar
[Smetkowski, M. (2018), ‘The role of exogenous and endogenous factors in the growth of regions in Central and Eastern Europe: the metropolitan/non-metropolitan divide in the pre- and post-crisis era,’ European Planning Studies, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 256–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2017.136158510.1080/09654313.2017.1361585]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Suurna, M. & Kattel, R. (2010), ‘Europeanization of innovation policy in Central and Eastern Europe,’ Science and Public Policy, vol. 37, no. 9, pp. 646–664. https://doi.org/10.3152/030234210X1277811826445910.3152/030234210X12778118264459]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Tiits, M.; Kalvet, T. & Mürk I. (2014), Reform of Higher Educational Systems in CEECs and the Effectiveness of Its Link with R&D Policy with the View to Smart Specialisation, GRINCOH Working Paper, no. 4.10.]Search in Google Scholar