[Andersson, Anna; Höjgård, Sören; Rabinowicz Ewa. (2017). Evaluation of results and adaptation of EU Rural Development Programmes. Land Use Policy 67: 298–314.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bakos, Izabella Mária; Tamus, Antalné; Takács György, Katalin. (2014). A vidékfejlesztési támogatások területi eltérései Románia és Magyarország összevetésében [Spatial distribution of rural development funds in Romania and Hungary – A comparative study]. Erdélyi Múzeum 2014/4. Cluj-Napoca: EME Könyvkiadó. 118–129.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bakucs, Zoltán; Fertő, Imre. (2013). A vidékfejlesztési programok hatásezelmzésének problémái a nemzetközi tapasztalatok tükrében [Impact assessment of rural development programmes: An international perspective]. Erdélyi Múzeum 2013/3. Cluj-Napoca: EME Könyvkiadó. 70–82.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bolla, Marianna; Krámli, András; Nagy-György, Judit. Többváltozós statisztikai módszerek (elektronikus tananyag) [Multivariate statistical methods (online course material)]. At: http://math.bme.hu/~marib/tobbvalt/tananyagv.pdf.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bonfiglio, A.; Camaioni, B.; Coderoni, S.; Esposti, R.; Pagliacci, F.; Sotte, F. (2017). Are rural regions prioritizing knowledge transfer and innovation? Evidence from rural development policy expenditure across the EU. Journal of Rural Studies 53: 78–87.]Search in Google Scholar
[Blandford, D.; Boisvert, R. N.; Hill, B. (2010). Improving the evaluation of rural development policy. Eurochoices 9(1): 4–9.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bradley, D.; Dwyer, J.; Hill, B. (2010). The evaluation of rural policy in the EU. Eurochoices 9(1): 15–20.]Search in Google Scholar
[Caruso, Donatello; Contò, Francesco; Skulskis, Virgilijus (2015). The implementation of Measure 121 of the rural development program: Comparative analysis between Italy and Lithuania. Intellectual Economics 9: 102–107.]Search in Google Scholar
[Desjeux, Y.; Dupraz, P.; Kunhlman, T.; Paracchini, M. L.; Michels, R.; Maigné, E.; Reinhard, S. (2015). Evaluating the impact of rural development measures on nature value indicators at different spatial levels: Application to France and the Netherlands. Ecological Indicators 59: 41–61.]Search in Google Scholar
[European Commission. (2006). Rural development 2007–2013: Handbook on common monitoring and evaluation framework draft guidance document. Directorate General for Agricultural and Rural Development EC, Brussels.]Search in Google Scholar
[European Commission. (2011). Report from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on the implementation of the national strategy plans and the Community strategic guidelines for rural development (2007–2013) [A Bizottság jelentése az Európai Parlamentnek, a Tanácsnak és a régiók bizottságának a nemzeti stratégiai tervek és a vidékfejlesztésre vonatkozó (2007–2013 közötti időszakot érintő) közösségi stratégiai iránymutatások végrehajtásáró]. Brussels, 20.07.2011.]Search in Google Scholar
[Furmankiewicz, Marek; Janc, Krzysztof; Macken-Walsh, Áine. (2016). The impact of EU governance and rural development policy on the development of the third sector in rural Poland: A nation-wide analysis. Journal of Rural Studies 43: 225–234.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kerékgyártó, Györgyné; Mundruczó, György; Sugár, András. (2001). Statisztikai módszerek és alkalmazásuk a gazdasági, üzleti elemzésekben [Applying statistical methods to economic and business research analyses]. Budapest: Aula Kiadó.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kinsella, J.; Goetz, S. J.; Partridge, M. D.; Deller, S. C.; Fleming, D. (2010). Evaluating RD policies for social and human capital development. Eurochoices 9(1): 42–47.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kovács, Erzsébet. (2014). Többváltozós adatelemzés [Multivariate data analysis]. Budapesti Corvinus Egyetem: Typotex. Available at: http://etananyag.ttk.elte.hu/FiLeS/downloads/14_KOVACS_E_Tobbvalt_adatelemzes.pdf]Search in Google Scholar
[Lázár, Ede. (2009). Kutatásmódszertan a gyakorlatban az SPSS program használatával [Practical research methodology with the use of SPSS]. Cluj-Napoca: Scientia Publishing House.]Search in Google Scholar
[Michalek, J. (2012). Counterfactual impact evaluation of EU rural development programmes – Propensity Score Matching methodology applied to selected EU Member States. Volume 2: A regional approach. JRC Scientific and Policy Reports 2012: 1–79.]Search in Google Scholar
[Michalek, J.; Zarnekow, N. (2012). Application of Rural Development Index to analysis of rural regions in Poland and Slovakia. Social Indicators Research 105: 1–37.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pelucha, Martin; Kveton, Viktor; Safr, Karel. (2017). Theory and reality of the EU’s rural development policy application in the context of territorial cohesion perspective – The case of the Czech Republic in the long-term period of 2004–2013. Land Use Policy 62: 13–28.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sajtos, László; Mitev, Ariel. (2007). Practical guide to using SPSS in research and data analysis [SPSS kutatási és adatelemzési kézikönyv]. Budapest: Alinea Kiadó.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sarvašová, Zuzana; Ali, Tamás; Đorđević, Ilija; Lukmine, Diana; Quiroga, Sonia; Suárez, Cristina; Hrib, Michal; Rondeux, Jacques; Mantzanas, Konstantinos T.; Franz, Kristin. (2017). Natura 2000 payments for private forest owners in Rural Development Programmes 2007–2013 – A comparative view. Forest Policy and Economics. At: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2017.08.019.10.1016/j.forpol.2017.08.019]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Slee, Bill; Feliciano, Diana. (2015). Challenges in the design of indicators for assessing the impact of the Scotland Rural Development Programme 2007–2013 on climate change mitigation. Ecological Indicators 59: 94–103.]Search in Google Scholar
[Székelyi, Mária; Barna, Ildikó. (2005). Túlélőkészlet az SPSS-hez. Többváltozós elemzésitechnikákról a társadalomkutatók számára [Survival kit to SPSS. Techniques for multivariate data analysis in social sciences]. Budapest: Typotex.]Search in Google Scholar
[Terluin, I. J.; Roza, P. (2010). Evaluation methods for rural development policy. The Hague: LEI – Wageningen UR.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wakeford, Richard. (2010). Evaluation of rural development requires clarity on expected outcomes. Eurochoices 9(1): 37–41.]Search in Google Scholar
