[ABDOLLAHI, L. – SCHJØNNING, P. – ELMHOLT, S. – MUNKHOLM, L. J. 2014. The effects of organic matter application and intensive tillage and traffic on soil structure formation and stability. In Soil and Tillage Research, vol. 136, pp. 28–37.]Search in Google Scholar
[ALLIAUME, F. – ROSSING, W. A. H. – TITTONELL, P. – JORGE, G. – DOGLIOTTI, S. 2014. Reduced tillage and cover crops improve water capture and reduce erosion of fine textured soils in raised bed tomato systems. In Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, vol. 183, pp. 127–137.]Search in Google Scholar
[BATEY, T. 2009. Soil compaction and soil management – A review. In Soil Use and Management, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 335–345.]Search in Google Scholar
[BEARD, F. R. – MCCLENDON, R. W. – MANOR, G. 1995. Comparing widespan equipment with conventional machinery systems for soybean production. In Applied Engineering in Agriculture, vol. 11, no. 6., pp. 795–800.]Search in Google Scholar
[BENNIE, A. T. P. – TAYLOR, H. M. – GEORGEN, P. G. 1987. An assessment of the core-break method for estimating rooting density of different crops in the field. In Soil and Tillage Research, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 347–353.]Search in Google Scholar
[BERNAERTS, S. 2014. Pfluglos ohne Glyphosat. In LOP – Landwirtsschaft ohne Pflüg, pp. 32–37. Retrieved from: http://www.naturim.nl/sites/default/files/Artikel%20LOP%20januarifebruari%202014.pdf]Search in Google Scholar
[BOTTA, G. F. – JORAJURIA, D. – BALBUENA, R. – RESSIA, M. – FERRERO, C. – ROSATTO, H. – TOURN, M. 2006. Deep tillage and traffic effects on subsoil compaction and sunflower (Helianthus annus L.) yields. In Soil and Tillage Research, vol. 91, no. 1–2, pp. 164–172.]Search in Google Scholar
[BURNS, I. G. 1980. Influence of the spatial distribution of nitrate on the uptake of N by plants: A review and a model for rooting depth. In Journal of Soil Science, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 155–173.]Search in Google Scholar
[CAMPIGLIA, E. – MANCINELLI, R. – RADICETTI, E. 2011. Influence of no-tillage and organic mulching on tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) production and nitrogen use in the mediterranean environment of central Italy. In Scientia Horticulturae, vol. 130, no. 3, pp. 588–598.]Search in Google Scholar
[CARTER, M. R. – SANDERSON, J. B. – PETERS, R. D. 2009. Long-term conservation tillage in potato rotations in Atlantic Canada: Potato productivity, tuber quality and nutrient content. In Canadian Journal of Plant Science, vol. 89, no. 2, pp. 273–280.]Search in Google Scholar
[CHAMEN, W. C. T. 2011. The effects of low and controlled traffic systems on soil physical properties, yields and the profitability of cereal crops on a range of soil types. (PhD), Cranfield University. Retrieved from: http://dspace.lib.cranfield.ac.uk/handle/1826/7009]Search in Google Scholar
[CHAMEN, W. C. T. 2014a. Survey of area under controlled traffic systems. CTF Europe. Retrieved from: http://www.controlledtrafficfarming.com/News/News.aspx]Search in Google Scholar
[CHAMEN, W. C. T. 2014b. Wide span CTF. CTF Europe. Retrieved from: http://ctfeurope.co.uk/WhatIs/Wide-Span-CTF.aspx]Search in Google Scholar
[CHAMEN, W. C. T. – VERMEULEN, G. D. – CAMPBELL, D. J. – SOMMER, C. 1992a. Reduction of traffic-induced soil compaction: a synthesis. In Soil and Tillage Research, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 303–318.]Search in Google Scholar
[CHAMEN, W. C. T. – WATTS, C. W. – LEEDE, P. R. – LONGSTAFF, D. J. 1992b. Assessment of a wide span vehicle (gantry), and soil and cereal crop responses to its use in a zero traffic regime. In Soil and Tillage Research, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 359–380.]Search in Google Scholar
[COPAS, M. E. – BUSSAN, A. J. – DRILIAS, M. J. – WOLKOWSKI, R. P. 2009. Potato yield and quality response to subsoil tillage and compaction. In Agronomy Journal, vol. 101, no. 1, pp. 82–90.]Search in Google Scholar
[DICKSON, J. W. – CAMPBELL, D. J. – RITCHIE, R. M. 1992. Zero and conventional traffic systems for potatoes in Scotland, 1987–1989. In Soil and Tillage Research, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 397–419.]Search in Google Scholar
[DICKSON, J. W. – RITCHIE, R. M. 1996. Zero and reduced ground pressure traffic systems in an arable rotation 2. Soil and crop responses. In Soil and Tillage Research, vol. 38, no. 1–2, pp. 89–113.]Search in Google Scholar
[DREW, M. C. – SAKER, L. R. 1980. Assessment of a rapid method, using soil cores, for estimating the amount and distribution of crop roots in the field. In Plant and Soil, vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 297–305.]Search in Google Scholar
[EHLERS, W. – KOPKE, U. – HESSE, F. – BOHM, W. 1983. Penetration resistance and root growth of oats in tilled and untilled loess soil. In Soil and Tillage Research, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 261–275.]Search in Google Scholar
[EKEBERG, E. – RILEY, H. C. F. 1997. Tillage intensity effects on soil properties and crop yields in a long-term trial on morainic loam soil in southeast Norway. In Soil and Tillage Research, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 277–293.]Search in Google Scholar
[ELLIS, T. – SEDEGHATPOUR, S. – HIGNETT, C. 2011. Soil and yield improvements from Controlled Traffic Farming CTF on a Red Chromosol were similar to CTF on a swelling Black Vertosol. Paper presented at the 5th World Congress of Conservation Agriculture incorporating 3rd Farming Systems Design Conference, September 2011, Brisbane : ACIAR, Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research.]Search in Google Scholar
[ETANA, A. – LARSBO, M. – KELLER, T. – ARVIDSSON, J. – SCHJØNNING, P. – FORKMAN, J. – JARVIS, N. 2013. Persistent subsoil compaction and its effects on preferential flow patterns in a loamy till soil. In Geoderma, vol. 192, no. 1, pp. 430–436.]Search in Google Scholar
[GODWIN, R. J. 1975. An extended octagonal ring transducer for use in tillage studies. In Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 347–352.]Search in Google Scholar
[HADAS, A. – SHMULEVICH, I. – HADAS, O. – WOLF, D. 1990. Forage wheat yields as affected by compaction and conventional vs. wideframe tractor traffic patterns. In Transactions of the ASABE, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 79–85.]Search in Google Scholar
[HALKETT, P. A. 1858. On guideway agriculture: Being a system enabling all the operations of the farm to be performed by steampower. In The Journal of the Society of Arts, vol. 7, no. 316, pp. 41–58.]Search in Google Scholar
[HAMILTON-MANNS, M. – ROSS, C. W. – HORNE, D. J. – BAKER, C. J. 2002. Subsoil loosening does little to enhance the transition to no-tillage on a structurally degraded soil. In Soil and Tillage Research, vol. 68, no. 2, pp. 109–119.]Search in Google Scholar
[HENRIKSEN, K. 1986. Jordløsning ved dyrkning af frilandsgrønsager (In Danish). In Håkansson, I. – von Polgar, J. – Rask, K. (Eds), Rapporter fran Jordbearbetningsavdelingen. Skördepåverkan – Motåtgärder – Ekonomi, Rapport från NJ F – seminarium i Sigtuna, 28–30 October 1986, Uppsala : Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Soil Sciences, Reports from the Division of Soil Management, vol. 71, pp. 149–156.]Search in Google Scholar
[JACKSON, L. E. – RAMIREZ, I. – YOKOTA, R. – FENNIMORE, S. A. – KOIKE, S. T. – HENDERSON, D. M. – CHANEY, W. E. – CALDERÓN, F. J. – KLONSKY, K. 2004. On-farm assessment of organic matter and tillage management on vegetable yield, soil, weeds, pests, and economics in California. In Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, vol. 103, no. 3, pp. 443–463.]Search in Google Scholar
[KĘSIK, T. – BŁAŻEWICZ-WOŹNIAK, M. 2009. Growth and yielding of onion under conservation tillage. In Vegetable Crops Research Bulletin, vol. 70, no. 1, pp. 111–123.]Search in Google Scholar
[LAMERS, J. G. – PERDOK, U. D. – LUMKES, L. M. – KLOOSTER, J. J. 1986. Controlled traffic farming systems in the Netherlands. In Soil and Tillage Research, vol. 8, no. 1–4, pp. 65–76.]Search in Google Scholar
[McPHEE, J. E. – AIRD, P. L. 2013. Controlled traffic for vegetable production: Part 1. Machinery challenges and options in a diversified vegetable industry. In Biosystems Engineering, vol. 116, no. 2, pp. 144–154.]Search in Google Scholar
[McPHEE, J. E. – AIRD, P. L. – HARDIE, M. A. – CORKREY, S. R. 2015. The effect of controlled traffic on soil physical properties and tillage requirements for vegetable production. In Soil and Tillage Research, vol. 149, pp. 33–45.]Search in Google Scholar
[MITCHELL, J. P. – KLONSKY, K. M. – MIYAO, E. M. – AEGERTER, B. J. – SHRESTHA, A. – MUNK, D. S. – HEMBREE, K. – MADDEN, N. M. – TURINI, T. A. 2012. Evolution of conservation tillage systems for processing tomato in California’s Central Valley. In HortTechnology, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 617–626.]Search in Google Scholar
[MONROE, G. – BURT, E. 1989. Wide frame tractive vehicle for controlled-traffic research. In Applied Engineering in Agriculture, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 40–43.]Search in Google Scholar
[MUNKHOLM, L. J. – SCHJØNNING, P. – RÜEGG, K. 2005. Mitigation of subsoil recompaction by light traffic and on-land ploughing: I. Soil response. In Soil and Tillage Research, vol. 80, no. 1–2, pp. 149–158.]Search in Google Scholar
[OLSEN, H. J. 1988. Technology showcase electronic penetrometer for field tests. In Journal of Terramechanics, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 287–293.]Search in Google Scholar
[PARKER, C. J. – CARR, M. K. V. – JARVIS, N. J. – EVANS, M. T. B. – LEE, V. H. 1989. Effects of subsoil loosening and irrigation on soil physical properties, root distribution and water uptake of potatoes (Solanum tuberosum). In Soil and Tillage Research, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 267–285.]Search in Google Scholar
[PEDERSEN, H. H. 2011. Harvest capacity model for a wide span onion bunker harvester. Paper presented at NJF Seminar 441, Automation and System Technology in Plant Production, 30 June 2011 – 2 July 2011, Herning, Denmark : NJF, Nordic Association of Agricultural Scientists, vol. 7, pp. 44–46. Retrieved from: http://www.njf.nu/filebank/files/20110905$201945$fil$WtY95l1bB8NA1OoY24Y7.pdf#page=47]Search in Google Scholar
[PEDERSEN, H. H. 2014. Wide span controlled traffic farming. ctfeurope.com. Retrieved from: http://ctfeurope.com/2013/ws/]Search in Google Scholar
[PIERCE, F. J. – BURPEE, C. G. 1995. Zone tillage effects on soil properties and yield and quality of potatoes (Solanum tuberosum L.). In Soil and Tillage Research, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 135–146.]Search in Google Scholar
[QUICK, G. R. 2007. Wide wheel tracks – controlled traffic farming. In Quick G. R. (Ed.). Remarkable Australian Farm Machines. Rosenberg Publishing, Kenthurst, NSW, Australia, pp. 22–28.]Search in Google Scholar
[R CORE TEAM. 2014. A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. www.R-project.org]Search in Google Scholar
[SOJKA, R. E. – WESTERMANN, D. T. – BROWN, M. J. – MEEK, B. D. 1993. Zone-subsoiling effects on infiltration, runoff, erosion, and yields of furrow-irrigated potatoes. In Soil and Tillage Research, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 351–368.]Search in Google Scholar
[STALHAM, M. A. – ALLEN, E. J. – HERRY, F. X. 2005. Effect of soil compaction on potato growth and its removal by cultivation. Research Review. Vol. 261.]Search in Google Scholar
[TAYLOR, J. H. 1983. Benefits of permanent traffic lanes in a controlled traffic crop production system. In Soil and Tillage Research, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 385–395.]Search in Google Scholar
[TAYLOR, J. H. 1994. Development and benefits of vehicle gantries and controlled traffic systems. In Soane, B. D. – v. Ouwerkerk, C. (Eds). Developments in Agricultural Engineering 11, Soil Compaction in Crop Production. Amsterdam : Elsevier, pp. 521–537.]Search in Google Scholar
[THORUP-KRISTENSEN, K. 2006. Root growth and nitrogen uptake of carrot, early cabbage, onion and lettuce following a range of green manures. In Soil Use and Management, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 29–38.]Search in Google Scholar
[VAN DEN AKKER, J. J. H. – ARVIDSSON, J. – HORN, R. 2003. Introduction to the special issue on experiences with the impact and prevention of subsoil compaction in the European Union. In Soil and Tillage Research, vol. 73, no. 1–2, pp. 1–8.]Search in Google Scholar
[VERMEULEN, G. – TULLBERG, J. – CHAMEN, W. 2010. Controlled traffic farming. In Dedousis, A. P. – Bartzanas, T. (Eds). Soil Engineering. Berlin Heidelberg : Springer, vol. 20, Part 2, pp. 101–120.]Search in Google Scholar
[VERMEULEN, G. D. – MOSQUERA, J. 2009. Soil, crop and emission responses to seasonal-controlled traffic in organic vegetable farming on loam soil. In Soil and Tillage Research, vol. 102, no. 1, pp. 126–134.]Search in Google Scholar
[WELLS, A. T. – CHAN, K. Y. – CORNISH, P. S. 2000. Comparison of conventional and alternative vegetable farming systems on the properties of a yellow earth in New South Wales. In Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, vol. 80, no. 1–2, pp. 47–60.]Search in Google Scholar
[WHALLEY, W. R. – CLARK, L. J. – FINCH-SAVAGE, W. E. – COPE, R. E. 2004. The impact of mechanical impedance on the emergence of carrot and onion seedlings. In Plant and Soil, vol. 265, no. 1–2, pp. 315–323.]Search in Google Scholar
[WILLEKENS, K. – VANDECASTEELE, B. – BUCHAN, D. – DE NEVE, S. 2014. Soil quality is positively affected by reduced tillage and compost in an intensive vegetable cropping system. In Applied Soil Ecology, vol. 82, pp. 61–71.]Search in Google Scholar
[ÜBELHÖR, A. – SCHLAYER, M. – SAUER, L. – STEIN, A. – ZIKELI, S. – CLAUPEIN, W. 2013. Soil erosion in vegetable production – Solution approaches. In Proceedings, paper presented at NUTRIHORT, Nutrient management, innovative techniques and nutrient legislation in intensive horticulture for an improved water quality, 16–18 September 2013, Ghent, Belgium : ILVO, pp. 43–48. Retrieved from: http://www.ilvo.vlaanderen.be/Portals/69/Documents/Book_proceedings_NUTRIHORT.pdf#page=63]Search in Google Scholar
[YOUNG, I. M. – BENGOUGH, A. G. – MACKENZIE, C. J. – DICKSON, J. W. 1993. Differences in potato development (Solanum tuberosum cv. Maris Piper) in zero and conventional traffic treatments are related to soil physical conditions and radiation interception. In Soil and Tillage Research, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 341–359.]Search in Google Scholar