[2011/506/EU: Commission Implementing Decision of 16 August 2011 amending Decision 2005/240/ECauthorising methods for grading pig carcasses in Poland. Act of 15 September 2000 about agricultural producer groups and their associations and other laws. Warszawa, Poland, pp. 1-8.]Search in Google Scholar
[Anderson S. (2003). Animal genetic resources and sustainable livelihoods. Ecol. Econ., 45: 331-339.]Search in Google Scholar
[Antosik K., Ko ćwin- Podsiadło M. (2000). Pork market in Poland in the light of the data and the Standards of the European Union. In: Economic assessment of the quality of agricultural production against the standards of the European Union (in Polish). Akademia Podlaska, pp. 110-124.]Search in Google Scholar
[Boguta W., Siekierski C. (2001). Agricultural producer groups asafactor in improving the production and marketing of agricultural products (in Polish). Zesz. Nauk. SGGW, 43: 45-56.]Search in Google Scholar
[Borecka A. (2004). Integration of pig producers asafactor of profitability (in Polish). Zesz. Nauk. Prz. Hod., 72: 232.]Search in Google Scholar
[Defaix G. (1997). Producer organizations from protected agriculture to contract. Agricultural Information Service (in Polish). Ambasada Republiki Francuskiejw Polsce & BDPA. Warszawa.]Search in Google Scholar
[Donnellan T., Chantreuil F., Erjavec E., Esposti R., Hanrahan K.F.,van Leeu -wen M., Salamon P., Salputra G. (2012). EU Market Outlook. In: The Future of EU Agricultural Markets by AGMEMOD. Springer Netherlands, pp. 77-96.10.1007/978-94-007-2291-0_4]Search in Google Scholar
[Eurostat (2012). Agriculture, fishery and forestry statistics. Main results - 2010-2011.]Search in Google Scholar
[Games P.A., Howell J.F. (1976). Pairwise multiple comparison procedures with unequal N’s and/or variances:a Monte Carlo study. Journal of Statistics Education, 1: 113-125.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gibon A., Sibbald A.R., Flamant J.C., Lhoste P., Revilla R., Rubino R., S øren-sen J.T. (1999). Livestock farming systems research in Europe and its potential contribution for managing towards sustainability in livestock farming. Livest. Prod. Sci., 61: 121-137.]Search in Google Scholar
[Go ł ębiowski B. (2009). Partnership asamodel of vertical links farms to processing (in Polish). Rocz. Nauk Rol. Seria G, 94: 302-310.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gonet D. (1997). New forms of co-operative activities in terms of transformation of the food economy (in Polish). In: Rural cooperatives in the perspective of integration with the European Union. T. II. SIB. Zakopane, pp. 39-42.]Search in Google Scholar
[G órniak J., Wachnicki J. (2004). First step in data analysis - SPSSfor Windows (in Polish). SPSS Polska, Kraków.]Search in Google Scholar
[GUS - Central Statistical Office (2011). Statistical Yearbook of the Republic of Poland, GUS, Warszawa.]Search in Google Scholar
[Guzewicz W., Osuch D., Zdzieborska M. (2004). The results of the economic production of large-scale farms arising on the assets of the former state farms in 2000-2003 and plans for 2004 (in Polish). IERi GŻ, Warszawa.]Search in Google Scholar
[Jankowska- Dymet A., Piasecka J. (2005). Producer groups -achance for Polish farmers (in Polish). Pr. Kom. Nauk Rol. Biol., XLIII, Bydgoszcz, pp. 223-230.]Search in Google Scholar
[Jensen T.B., Baadsgaard N.P., Houe H., Toft N., Østergaard S. (2008). The association between disease and profitability in individual finishing boars atatest station. Livest. Sci., 117: 101-108.]Search in Google Scholar
[J ó źwiak W. (2000). Overview of the agribusiness sector output in Poland taking into account the trends in agricultural policy. In: Strategic options for the Polish agribusiness sector in the light of economic analysis. SGGW, Warszawa.]Search in Google Scholar
[Knecht D., Duzi ński K. (2014). The effect of parity and date of service on the reproductive performance of Polish Large White × Polish Landrace (PLW×PL) crossbred sows. Ann. Anim. Sci., 14: 69-79.]Search in Google Scholar
[Knecht D., Środo ń S. (2013). Analysis of activity in swine producers group based on agricultural producers association in Biała district. J. Agribus. Rural Dev., 1: 107-117.]Search in Google Scholar
[Knecht D., Janczak M., Bodkowski R. (2007). Improvement of slaughter material quality thanks to cooperation between producer groups and meat plants. Anim. Sci., 1: 66-67.]Search in Google Scholar
[Knecht D., Jankowska A., Zale śny G. (2012). The impact of gastrointestinal parasites infection on slaughter efficiency in pigs. Vet. Parasitol., 184: 291-297.]Search in Google Scholar
[Knoblauch L., Kisiel R. (2005). Integration processes in the pig meat sector using the example of producer groups from the area of north-eastern Polish (in Polish). UWM, Olsztyn.]Search in Google Scholar
[Krystallis A., Barcellos M.D., K ügler J.A., Verbeke W., Grunert K.G. (2009). Attitudes of European citizens towards pig production systems. Livest. Sci., 126: 46-56.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kuku ła K. (2007). On the issue of research on agrarian structure in Poland in spatial terms (in Polish). Acta Sci. Pol. Oeconomia, 6: 19-27.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lamarche H. (1994). Les logiques productives. L’agriculture familiale: comparaison internacional. II Du mythe à la réalité, Paris, L’Harmattan.]Search in Google Scholar
[Malarska A. (2005). Statistical analysis of the data supported by the program SPSS (in Polish). SPSS Polska, Kraków.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ordinance of the Minister of Agriculture and Rural Development, 15 February 2010 on the requirements and how to proceed while maintaining livestock species for which protection standards are provisions of the European Union.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ostasiewicz S., Rusnak Z., Siedlecka U. (1998). Statistics - elements of the theory and tasks (in Polish). AE Wrocław.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pepliński B. (2013). Impact of the profitability of pig production on changes in the pig population in Poland. Regional analysis. Rocz. Ekon. Rol. Rozwoju Wsi Obszarów Wiejskich, 100: 75-77.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pepliński B., Wajszczuk K. (2003). Vertical integration - way to correct yield of pork production (in Polish). Pr. Nauk. AE Wrocław, 980: 421-426.]Search in Google Scholar
[Polish Swine Nutrition Requirements. (1993). The Kielanowski Institute Animal Physiology and Nutrition.]Search in Google Scholar
[Polish Academy of Sciences, Omnitech-Press, Warsaw, Poland.]Search in Google Scholar
[Rekiel A., Wiecek J., Wojtasik M., Ptak J., Blicharski T., Mroczko L. (2012). Effect of sex ratio in the litter in which Polish Large White and Polish Landrace sows were born on the number of piglets born and reared. Ann. Anim. Sci., 12: 179-185.]Search in Google Scholar
[Roessler R., Drucker A.G., Scarpa R., Markemann A., Lemke E., Thuy L.E., Val-le - Z árate A. (2008). Using choice experiments to assess smallholder farmers’ preferences for pig breeding traits in different production systems in North-West Vietnam. Ecol. Econ., 66: 184-189. ]Search in Google Scholar
[Roessler R., Herold P., Willam A., Piepho H.P., Thuy L.T., Valle- Z árate A. (2009). Modelling ofarecording scheme for market-oriented smallholder pig producers in Northwest Vietnam. Livest. Sci., 123: 241-248.]Search in Google Scholar
[Skar żyńska A. (2011). The scale of production of agricultural production activities and their costeffectiveness (in Polish). Rocz. Nauk Rol. Seria G, 98: 7-21.]Search in Google Scholar
[Skar żyńska A., Augustyńska- Grzymek I. (2001). Unit costs and profitability of agricultural production on private farms in 2000 (in Polish). Zagad. Ekon. Rol., 4-5: 79-137.]Search in Google Scholar
[Skiba G., Raj S., Po ławska E., Pastuszewska B., Elminowska - Wenda G., Bogu -cka J., Knecht D. (2012). Profile of fatty acids, muscle structure and shear force of musculus longissimus dorsi (MLD) in growing pigs as affected by energy and protein or protein restriction followed by realimentation. Meat Sci., 91: 339-346.]Search in Google Scholar
[Szczebiot- Knoblauch L. (2005). The formation of producer groups asamanifestation of rural entrepreneurship, competiveness, labor market and its entity (in Polish). Katedra Mikroekonomii US, Szczecin, pp. 237-241.]Search in Google Scholar
[Šprysl M., Čitek J., Stupka R. (2010). Interaction of selected production indicators of the economics of pork production. Czech J. Anim. Sci., 55: 1-10.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tereszkiewicz K., Ruda M., Dungin - Mugler C. (2001). Meatiness and carcass weight of finishing pigs produced in different regions of Poland (in Polish). Trz. Chlewna, 39: 52-53.]Search in Google Scholar
[Udo H.M.J., Aklilu H.A., Phong L.T., Bosma R.H., Budisatria I.G.S., Patil B.R., Sam-dup T., Bebe B.O. (2011). Impact of intensification of different types of livestock production in smallholder crop-livestock system. Livest. Sci., 139: 22-29.]Search in Google Scholar
[Urban R. (2002). Analysis of comparative advantages at the level of agri-food industry (in Polish). IERi GŻ, Warszawa, p. 53.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wilcox R.R. (2003). Applying Contemporary Statistical Techniques. Academic Press, San Diego.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wysoki ńska A., Kondracki S. (2014). Assessment of sexual activity levels and their association with ejaculate parameters in two-breed hybrids and purebred Duroc and Pietrain boars. Ann. Anim. Sci., 14: 559-571.]Search in Google Scholar
[ZSRIR (2011). Integrated agricultural market information system. Minister of Agriculture and Rural Development, Warsaw, Poland. ]Search in Google Scholar
