Accès libre

Dynamics of the Non-Contact Roundness Measurement with Air Gages

À propos de cet article

Citez

1. Adamczak S., Janecki D., Stępień K. (2010), Qualitative and quantitative evaluation of the accuracy of the V-block method of cylindricity measurements, Precision Engineering, 34, 619–626.10.1016/j.precisioneng.2010.03.004Search in Google Scholar

2. Cellary A., Jermak Cz. J. (2009), Pneumatic Method for Reference Out-Of-Roundness Measurement, Proceedings of the 4th International Conference Metrology in Production Engineering, Poznan – Zerkow, 59–64.Search in Google Scholar

3. Derezynski J., Jakubowicz M. (2016), Verification tests of the air gauges metrological characteristics, Mechanik, 3, 196–199.10.17814/mechanik.2016.3.20Search in Google Scholar

4. Dmitriev V.N., Chernyshev V.I. (1958), Calculation of the time domain characteristics of the pneumatic flow-through chambers, Avtomatika i telemehanika, 12, 1118–1125 (in Russian).Search in Google Scholar

5. Figliola R.S., Beasley D.E. (2006), Theory and Design for Mechanical Measurements, 4th ed., John Wiley& Sons Inc., Clemson.Search in Google Scholar

6. Gao R.D., Tang X., Gordon G., Kazmer D.O. (2014), Online product qualty monitoring through in-process measurement, CIRP Annals – Manufacturing Technology, 63(1), 493–496.10.1016/j.cirp.2014.03.041Search in Google Scholar

7. Grandy D., Koshy P., Klocke F. (2009), Pneumatic non-contact roughness assessment of moving surfaces, CIRP Annals – Manufacturing Technology, 58(1), 515–518.10.1016/j.cirp.2009.03.121Search in Google Scholar

8. Jermak Cz. J., Rucki M. (2012), Air Gauging: Static and Dynamic Characteristics, IFSA, Barcelona.Search in Google Scholar

9. Jermak Cz.J., Cellary A., Rucki M. (2010), Novel method of non-contact out-of-roundness measurement with air gauges, Proceedings of the euspen 10th International Conference, Delft, 71–74.Search in Google Scholar

10. Jun Liu et al. (2012), Design and accuracy analysis of pneumatic gauging for form error of spool valve inner hole, Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, 23, 26–32.10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2011.12.007Search in Google Scholar

11. Menzies I., Koshy P. (2009), In-process detection of surface porosity in machined castings, International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture, 49(6), 530–535.10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2008.12.008Search in Google Scholar

12. Milo M.W., Roan M., Harris B. (2015), A new statistical approach to automated quality control in manufacturing processes, Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 36, 159–167.10.1016/j.jmsy.2015.06.001Search in Google Scholar

13. O’Neill P., Sohal A., Teng Ch.W. (2016), Quality management approaches and their impact on firms’ financial performance – An Australian study, International Journal of Production Economics, 171, 381–393.10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.07.015Search in Google Scholar

14. Pollard J.H. (1977), A Handbook of Numerical and Statistical Techniques, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Search in Google Scholar

15. Rucki M. (2011), Dynamic properties of the back-pressure air gauges with small measuring chambers, Poznan University of Technology, Poznan (in Polish).Search in Google Scholar

16. Rucki M., Barisic B. (2009), Response Time of Air Gauges With Different Volumes of the Measuring Chambers, Metrology and Measurement Systems, 16(2), 289–298.Search in Google Scholar

17. Rucki M., Jermak Cz. J. (2012), Dynamic Properties of Small Chamber Air Gages, Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control, 134(1), p. 011001 (6 pages).10.1115/1.4005043Search in Google Scholar

18. Shiraishi M., Yamagiwa T., Ito A. (2002), Practical dimensional error control and surface roughness inspection in turning, Proceedings of ASME-2002 Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, New Orleans, 45–51.10.1115/IMECE2002-32036Search in Google Scholar

19. Stępień K. (2010), In situ measurement of cylindricity – Problems and solutions, Precision Engineering, 38, 697–701.10.1016/j.precisioneng.2014.02.007Search in Google Scholar

20. Tsidulko F.V. (1965), Dynamics of the pneumatic devices for the dimensional measurement, Mashinostroyeniye, Moskva (in Russian).Search in Google Scholar

21. Vacharanukul K., Mekid S. (2005), In-Process Dimensional Inspection Sensors, Measurement, 38, 204–218.10.1016/j.measurement.2005.07.009Search in Google Scholar

22. Valicek J. et al. (2007), An investigation of surfaces generated by abrasive waterjets using optical detection, Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 53(4), 224–232.Search in Google Scholar

23. Wang Y. H. et al. (2005), An Automatic Sorting System Based on Pneumatic Measurement, Key Engineering Materials, 295-296, 563–568.10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.295-296.563Search in Google Scholar

24. Wieczorkowski S. (1995), Automatic regulation of the rotational speed of the pneumatic misroturbines, Research Publication Series of Lodz University of Technology, No. 703, Lodz (in Polish).Search in Google Scholar

25. Yribarren R. (1955), The pneumatic method applied to dynamic measurement, Proceedings of the Symposium on Engineering dimensional metrology, London, 225–240.Search in Google Scholar