[
Alonso-Almeida, Francisco & Inés Lareo. 2016. The status of seem in the nineteenth-century Corpus of English Philosophy Texts (CEPhiT). In Isabel Moskowich, Gonzalo Camiña, Inés Lareo & Begoña Crespo (eds.), ‘The conditioned and the unconditioned’: Late Modern English texts on philosophy, John Benjamins. 145–165. DOI: 10.1075/z.198.08alo
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Atkinson, Dwight. 1999. Scientific discourse in sociohistorical context: The Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 1675–1975. Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Benjamin, Jessica. 1988. The bonds of love: Psychoanalysis, feminism, and the problem of domination. Pantheon.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bennett, Karen. 2009. English academic style manuals: A survey. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 8(1). 43–54. DOI: 10.1016/j.jeap.2008.12.003
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Benveniste, Emile. 1971. Problemas de lingüística general. Siglo Veinitiuno.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Closs Traugott, Elisabeth. 2002. From etymology to historical pragmatics. In Donka Minkova & Robert Stockwell (eds.), Studies in the history of the English language: Millennial perspectives, Mouton de Gruyter. 19–49. DOI: 10.1515/9783110197143.1.19
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Closs Traugott, Elisabeth. 2010. (Inter)subjectivity and (inter)subjectification: A reassessment. In Kristin Davidse, Lieven Vandelanotte & Hubert Cuyckens (eds.), Subjectification, intersubjectification and grammaticalization, De Gruyter Mouton. 29–70. DOI: 10.1515/9783110226102.1.29
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Coates, Jennifer. 2015. Women, men and language. A sociolinguistic account of gender differences in language (3rd edn.). Routledge.10.4324/9781315835778
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Crespo, Begoña. 2015. Women writing science in the eighteenth century: A preliminary approach to their language in use. Anglica. An International Journal of English Studies. 24(2). 103–127.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Crespo, Begoña. 2017. Creating an identity of persuasion in history texts. In Francisco Alonso-Almeida (ed.), Stancetaking in Late Modern English scientific writing. Evidence from the Coruña Corpus. Essays in honour of Santiago González y Fernández-Corugedo, Universitat Politècnica de Valéncia. 41–55.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Crespo, Begoña. 2018. Women’s presence in scientific texts and prefatory material: keeping track of persuasion. Unpublished paper presented at the 10th CILC Conference, University of Cáceres, Spain.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Crespo, Begoña, 2019. How intimate was the tone of female history writing in the Modern period? Evidence from the Corpus of History English Texts. In Isabel Moskowich, Begoña Crespo, Luis Puente-Castelo & Leida Maria Monaco (eds.), Writing history in Late Modern English: Explorations of the Coruña Corpus, John Benjamins. 186–213. DOI: 10.1075/z.225.10cre
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Dossena, Marina. 2017. A matter of opinion: Stancetaking in Late Modern English historiography. In Francisco Alonso-Almeida (ed.), Stancetaking in Late Modern English scientific writing. Evidence from the Coruña Corpus. Essays in honour of Santiago González y Fernández-Corugedo, Universitat Politècnica de Valéncia. 27–39.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ferrari, Lilian & Paloma de Almeida. 2015. Subjectivity and intersubjectivity in conditionals: Temporal backshifting strategies in Brazilian Portuguese. Alfa: Revista de Linguística 59(1). 91–112. DOI: 10.1590/1981-5794-1502-4
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Habermas, Jürgen. 1970. Towards a theory of communicative competence. Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 13(1–4). 360–375. DOI: 10.1080/00201747008601597
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Hyland, Ken. 1998. Hedging in scientific research articles. John Benjamins. DOI: 10.1075/pbns.54
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Hyland, Ken. 2002. Authority and invisibility: Authorial identity in academic writing. Journal of Pragmatics 34(8). 1091–1112. DOI: 10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00035-8
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Hyland, Ken. 2010. Metadiscourse: Mapping interactions in academic writing. Nordic journal of English Studies 9(2). 125–143. DOI: 10.35360/njes.220
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Hyland, Ken. 2012. Disciplinary identities: Individuality and community in academic writing. Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781009406512
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hyland, Ken. 2015. Genre, discipline and identity. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 19. 32–43. DOI: 10.1016/j.jeap.2015.02.005
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Kärkkäinen, Elise. 2007. Stance taking in conversation: From subjectivity to intersubjectivity. Text & Talk. An Interdisciplinary Journal of Language, Discourse & Communication Studies 26(6). 699–731. DOI: 10.1515/TEXT.2006.029
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Lakoff, Robin, 1973. Language and woman’s place. Language in Society 2(1). 45–79. DOI: 10.1017/S0047404500000051
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Langacker, Ronald W. 1990. Subjectification. Cognitive Linguistics 1(1). 5–38. DOI: 10.1515/cogl.1990.1.1.5
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Langacker, Ronald. 2008. Cognitive grammar: A basic introduction. Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
López-Couso, María José. 2010. Subjectification and intersubjectification. In Andreas H. Jucker & Irma Taavitsainen (eds.), Historical pragmatics, De Gruyter Mouton. 127–163. DOI: 10.1515/9783110214284.3.127
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Lyons, John. 1982. Deixis and subjectivity: Loquor, ergo sum? In Robert J. Jarvella & Wolfgang Klein (eds.), Speech, place, and action: Studies in deixis and related topics, John Wiley & Sons. 101–124.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Moskowich, Isabel. 2013 Eighteenth century female authors: Women and science in the Coruña Corpus of English Scientific Writing. Australian Journal of Linguistics 33(4). 467–487. DOI: 10.1080/07268602.2013.857570
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Moskowich, Isabel. 2017. Genre and change in the Corpus of History English Texts. Nordic Journal of English Studies 16(3). 84–106. DOI: 10.35360/njes.413
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Moskowich, Isabel. 2018. A corpus-based approach to female involvement in the Coruña Corpus of English Scientific Writing. Unpublished paper presented at the 10th CILC Conference, University of Cáceres, Spain.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Moskowich, Isabel. 2019. An Introduction to CHET, the Corpus of History English Texts. In Isabel Moskowich, Begoña Crespo, Luís Puente-Castelo & Leida Maria Monaco (eds.), Writing history in Late Modern English: Explorations of the Coruña Corpus, John Benjamins, 42–56. DOI: 10.1075/z.225.03mos
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Moskowich, Isabel & Begoña Crespo. 2014. Stance is present in scientific writing, indeed. Evidence from the Coruña Corpus of English Scientific Writing. Token: A Journal of English Linguistics 3. 91–114.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nuyts, Jan. 2015. Subjectivity: Between discourse and conceptualization. Journal of Pragmatics 86. 106–110. DOI: 10.1016/j.pragma.2015.05.015
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Ochs, Elinor & Bambi Schieffelin. 1989. Language has a heart. Text 9(1). 7–25. DOI: 10.1515/text.1.1989.9.1.7
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Oxford English Dictionary Online. 2009. Oxford University Press. (accessed on 28/11/2017)
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pearce, Celia. 2011. Communities of play: Emergent cultures in multiplayer games and virtual worlds. MIT Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Puente-Castelo, Luís. 2017. On conditionality: A corpus-based study of conditional structures in Late Modern English scientific texts. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Universidade da Coruña.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Puente-Castelo, Luis & Leida Maria Monaco. 2016. ʽit is proper ſubſerviently, to inquire into the nature of experimental chemiſtry’: Difficulties in reconciling discipline-based characteristics and compilation criteria in the selection of samples for CECheT. In Antonio Moreno Ortiz & Chantal Pérez-Hernández (eds.), CILC2016. 8th International Conference on Corpus Linguistics, EPiC. 1.351–360. DOI: 10.29007/tk5m
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Scheibman, Joanne. 2001. Local patterns of subjectivity in person and verb type in American English conversation. In Joan L. Bybee & Paul J. Hopper, (eds.), Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure, John Benjamins. 61–89. DOI: 10.1075/tsl.45.04sch
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Seale, Clive (ed.). 2004. Researching society and culture (2nd edn.). Sage Publications.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Suzuki, Daisuke. 2018. The semantics and pragmatics of modal adverbs: Grammaticalization and (inter)subjectification of perhaps. Lingua 205. 40–53. DOI: 10.1016/j.lingua.2017.12.014
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Verhagen, Arie. 2006. Constructions of intersubjectivity. Discourse, syntax, and cognition. Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199226702.001.0001
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
