[
CIL – Corpus Inscriptionum Latinarum.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Coll. – ‘Collatio legum Mosaicarum et Romanarum’, in Riccobono, S., Baviera, J., Ferrini, C., Furlani, J. and Arangio-Ruiz, V. (1940–1943), Fontes iuris romani anteiustiniani in usum scholarum ediderunt, vol. I–III. Florentiae: BarbeÌra.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
D. – Digesta. Corpus Iuris civilis, vol. I. Mommsen, Th. and Krüger, P. (eds).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
G. – Gai Institutiones. Krüger, P. and Studemund G. (eds).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
I. – Institutiones Iustiniani. Corpus Iuris civilis, vol. I. Mommsen, Th. and Krüger, P. (eds).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
P.S. – Pauli Sententiae, in Riccobono, S., Baviera, J., Ferrini, C., Furlani, J. and Arangio-Ruiz, V. (1940) Fontes iuris romani anteiustiniani in usum scholarum ediderunt, vol. II. Florentiae.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cic., de nat deor. – Marcus Tullius Cicero, de natura deorum.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cic., Tusc. Disp. – Marcus Tullius Cicero, Tusculanae disputations.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cic., de senect. – Marcus Tullius Cicero, de senectute.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Colum., de re rust – Lucius Iunius Moderatus Columella, De re rustica.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mart., ep. – Marcus Valerius Martialis, Epigrammata.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Plin., Nat. hist. – Gaius Plinius Secundus, Naturalis historia.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Varro, rer. rust. – Marcus Terentius Varro, Rerum rusticarum libri tres.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Varro, Sat. Men. – Marcus Terentius Varro, Saturae Menippeae.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Amirante, L. (1983) ‘Review: G. Polara, Le venationes. Fenomeno economico e costruzione giuridica’, Rivista internazionale di diritto romano e antico, 34, pp. 255–262.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Anderson, J.K. (1985) Hunting in the Ancient World. Berkeley–Los Angeles–London: University of California Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ankum, H. (1998) ‘Litora maris et longi temporis praescriptio’, Index. 26, pp. 357–376.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Benincasa, Z. (2013) ‘Si vivariis inclusae ferae. Status prawny dzikich zwierząt żyjących w vi-varia i parkach myśliwskich w prawie rzymskim’, Zeszyty Prawnicze, 13(4), pp. 5–41.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Benincasa, Z. (2014) ‘Occupatio jako sposób nabycia własności dziko żyjących zwierząt w prawie rzymskim’, Studia Iuridica, 59, pp. 9–39.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Benincasa, Z. (2015) ‘Accessio ab alluvione i reditus venationis et aucupii jako fructus fundi’ (‘Accessio ab alluvione and reditus venationis et aucupii as fructus fundi’), Zeszyty Prawnicze, 15(2), pp. 135–159.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Benincasa, Z. (2016) ‘Alcune riflessioni sulla libertà di caccia nel diritto romano: vivai e riserve di caccia’, in Benincasa, Z. and Urbanik, J. (eds) Mater familias. Scritti romanistici per Maria Zabłocka. Warszawa: Faculty of Law and Administration of the University of Warsaw, pp. 39–62.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Benincasa, Z. (2017) ‘Illud quaesitum est, an fera bestia, quae ita vulnerata sit, ut capi possit, statim nostra esse intellegatur. Zagadnienie ustalenia momentu zawłaszczenia dzikiego zwierzęcia w rozważaniach rzymskich jurystów u schyłku republiki’, in Malec, D., Marzec, Ł. and Palmirski, T. (eds) Semper fidelis. Prace dedykowane pamięci Profesora Janusza Sondla legendzie krakowskiego fakultetu prawniczego. Kraków: Poligrafia Salezjańska, pp. 43–58.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Benincasa, Z. (2019) ‘„Co się tyczy stworzeń, które z nawyku zwykły oddalać się i powracać… – koncepcja animus revertendi a wolność polowania na dzikie zwierzęta w prawie rzymskim’, Studia i materiały Ośrodka Kultury Leśnej, 18, pp. 33–52.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Benincasa, Z. (2020a) ‘Między ‘fructus’ a ‘delectatio’. Kilka uwag o rzymskich vivaria u schyłku republiki’, in Korporowicz, Ł. and Skrzywanek-Jaworska, D. (eds) Cui bono? Księga jubileuszowa dedykowana Profesor Annie Pikulskiej-Radomskiej. Łódź: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, pp. 55–72.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Benincasa, Z. (2020b) ‘Od ‘res nullius’ do ‘fructus fundi’. Upolowana zwierzyna oraz zyski z polowania i połowu jako pożytek z gruntu w rozważaniach rzymskich jurystów’, Zeszyty Prawnicze, 20(4), pp. 23–51.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Berger, A. (1968) Encyclopedic Dictionary of Roman Law. Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cardilli, R. (2000) La nozione giuridica di fructus. Napoli: Edizioni Scientifiche Italiane.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Casanova, P. and Memoli, A. (2000) ‘La caccia: dal diritto popolare al diritto venatorio’, L’Italia forestale e montana V 55.5, pp. 340–341.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Castàn Pèrez-Gómez, A. (2000) ‘Nuevas observaciones sobre la condicíon jurídica del mar y sus litorales en el derecho romano’, in Villar, A.M. (ed.) Estudios de derecho Romano en memoria de Benito Ma Raimundo Yanes, I. Burgos: Universidad de Burgos, pp. 101–121.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Charbonnel, N. and Morabito, M. (1987) ‘Les rivages de la mer: droit Romain et glossateurs’, Revue Historique de Droit Français et Étranger, 65, pp. 23–32.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Crane, E. (1999) The World History of Beekeeping and Honey Hunting. New York: Routledge, pp. 203–209.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Daube, D. (1959) ‘Doves and Bees’, in Arangio-Ruiz, V. (ed.) Droits de l’antiquité et sociologie juridique. Meìlanges Henri Leìvy-Bruhl, Paris: Sirey, pp. 63–75.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Donahue Jr., C. (1986) ‘Animalia ferae naturae: Rome, Bologna, Leyden, Oxford and Queens County N.Y.’, in Schiller, A., Bagnall, R.S. and Harris, W.V. (eds) Studies in Roman Law in Memory of A. Arthur Schiller. Leiden: Brill, pp. 39–63.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dursi, D. (2017) ‘Res communes omnium’. Dalle necessità economiche alla disciplina giuridica. Napoli: Jovene.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Epstein, H.J. (1943) ‘The Origin and the Earliest History of Falconry’, Isis, 34(6), pp. 497–509.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Espí Forcén, C. (2020) ‘The Hound of the Falconer. Roman and Byzantine Hawking in the Venetian Cynegetica’, Estudios Byzantinos, 8, pp. 157–158.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Filip-Fröschl, J. (2002) ‘Cervi, qui in silvas ire et redire solent. Anmerkungen zu einem exemplum iuris’, in Schermaier, M.J., and Mayer-Maly, T. (eds) Iurisprudentia universalis. Festschrift für Theo Mayer-Maly zum 70. Geburtstag. Weimar: Köln, pp. 191–213.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fiorentini, M. (1996) ‘Sulla rilevanza economica e giuridica delle ville marittime durante la Repubblica e l’Impero’, Index, 24, pp. 143–198.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fiorentini, M. (2003) Fiumi e mari nell’esperienza giuridica romana. Profili di tutela processuale e di inquadramento sistematico. Milano: Giuffrè.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fraser, H.M. (1951) Beekeeping in Antiquity. London: University of London Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Frier, B.W. (1982–1983) ‘Bees and Lawyers’, Classical Journal, 78(2), pp. 105–114.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Frier, B.W. (1994) ‘Why did the Jurists change Roman Law? Bees and Lawyers revisited’, Index, 22, pp. 135–149.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Galloni, P. (2000) Storia e cultura della caccia. Roma: Laterza.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
García Garrido, M.J. (1956) ‘Derecho à la caza y ius prohibendi en Roma’, Annuario de Historia del Derecho Español, 26, pp. 269–336.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Giaro, T. (2007) ‘Römische Rechtswahrheiten. Ein Gedenkenexperiment’, Studien zur europäischen Rechtsgeschichte, 219, Frankfurt am Main.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Giomaro, A.M. (2011) ‘Dall’instruere all’instrumentum e vice versa nell’economia della Roma antica’, Studi Urbinati, 62(1), pp. 105–165.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Green, C.M.C. (1996) ‘Did the Romans hunt?’, Classical Antiquity, 15(2), pp. 222–260.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gutierrez-Masson, L. (1993) ‘Mare nostrum: imperium’ ou ‘dominium’, Revue internationale des droits de l’antiquité, 40, pp. 293–315.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hausmaninger, H. (1991) ‘Celsus gegen Proculus’, in Slapnicar, K. (ed.) Tradition und Fortentwicklung im Recht. Festschrift zum 90. Geburtstag von Ulrich von Lübtow am 21. August 1990. Rheinfelden–Berlin: Schäuble Verlag, pp. 53–62.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kehoe, D. (1997) Investment, Profit and Tenancy. The Jurists and the Roman Agrarian Economy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lambrini, P. (2017) ‘Alle origini dei beni comuni’, Iura, 65, pp. 394–418.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ligios, M.A. (1996) Interpretazione giuridica e realtà economica. dell’instrumentum fundi tra il I sec. a. C. e il III sec. d.C. Napoli: Jovene.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ligios, M.A. (2013) Nomen negotiationis. Profili di continuità e di autonomia della negotiatio nell’esperienza giuridica romana. Torino: Giappichelli.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lombardi, G. (1948) ‘Libertà di caccia e proprietà privata in diritto romano’, Bulletino dell’istituto di diritto romano, 12–13, pp. 272–343.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Longo, O. (1987) ‘Le regole della caccia nel mondo greco-Romano’, Aufidus, 1, pp. 59–91.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Malossini, F. (2011) ‘Gli allevamenti animali nel fondo rustico dell’antica Roma’, Atti Acc. Rov. Agiati, 9(1), pp. 145–215.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Manfredini, A.D. (2006) Chi caccia e chi è cacciato… Cacciatore e preda nella storia del diritto. Torino: Giappichelli.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Manfredini, A.D. (2008) ‘Un’iniuria che non c’è’, in Vacca, L. (ed.) Diritto romano, tradizione romanistica e formazione del diritto europeo. Milano: Wolters Kluwer Italia, pp. 181–202.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mantovani, D. (2007) ‘I giuristi, il retore e le api. Ius controversum e natura nella Declamatio Maior XII’, in Mantovani, D. and Schiavone, A. (eds) Testi e problemi del giusnaturalismo romano. Pavia: Pavia University Press, pp. 323–385.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Martini, R. (1986) ‘Sui frutti delle venationes’, Labeo, 32, pp. 215–218.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Masi, D.C. (2014) ‘‘Litus maris’: définition et controverses’, in Hermon E. and Watelet A. (eds) ‘Riparia’, un patromoine culturel. La gestion intégrée des bords de l’eau. Proceedings of the Sudbury Workshop, April 12–14. Oxford: BAR, pp. 233–242.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
McLeod, G. (1989) ‘Wild and Tame Animals and Birds in Roman Law’, in Birks, P. and Nicholas, B. (eds) New Perspectives in the Roman Law of Property: Essays for Barry Nicholas. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 169–176.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Miele, A. (1998) ‘Res publica, res communis omnium, res nullius: Grozio e le fonti romane sul diritto del mare’, Index, 26, pp. 383–387.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Modrzejewski, J. (1976) ‘Ulpien et la nature des animaux’, in La filosofia greca e il diritto romano, Atti del Colloquio italo-francese, Roma 14–17 aprile 1973, Roma: Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei, 221, pp. 177–199.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Montero, S. (2008) ‘Los jòvenes e la prática del aucupium (CIL II 2335)’, in Hernández Guerra, L. (ed.) El mundo religioso hispano bajo el imperio romano. Pervivencias y cambios. Valladolid: Ediciones Universidad de Valladolid, pp. 284–291.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Polojac, M. (2003) Actio de pauperie and Liability for Damage Caused by Animals in Roman Law. Belgrade: Dosije.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Polojac, M. (2014) ‘Gaius, Hadzic and occupatio of wild animals – classical Roman law in the Serbian Civil Code’, Fundamina. A Journal of Legal History, 20(2), pp. 738–747.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Polara, G. (1983) Le venationes. Fenomeno economico e struttura giuridica. Milano: Giuffrè.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Purpura, G. (2004) ‘‘Liberum mare’, acque territoriali e riserve di pesca nel mondo antico’, Annali del Seminario Giuridico della Università di Palermo, 49, pp. 165–206.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Purpura, G. (2019) ‘Varia de iure maris’, in D’Angelo, G., Varvaro, M., and di Simone, M. (eds) Scritti per il novantesimo compleanno di Matteo Marrone. Torino: Giappichelli, pp. 219–239.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Raga, E. (2011) ‘Réflexions sur le rapport ville/campagne dans l’Antiquité tardive au travers de quelques discours sur la chasse’, Revue Belge de Philologie et d’Histoire, 89(2), pp. 659–668.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schermaier, M.J. (2009) ‘‘Res Communes Omnium’: The History of an Idea from Greek Philosophy to Grotian Jurisprudence’, Grotiana, 30(1), pp. 20–48.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schermaier, M.J. (2012) ‘Private Rechte an ‘res communes’?’, in Chevreau, E., Kremer, D. and Laquerrière-Lacroix, A. (eds) ‘Carmina iuris’. Mélanges en l’honneur de M. H umbert. Paris: De Boccard, pp. 773–792.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sini, F. (2008) ‘Persone e cose: ‘res communes omnium’. Prospettive sistematiche tra diritto romano e tradizione romanistica’’, Diritto @ Storia, 7. https://dirittoestoria.it/7/Tradizione-Romana/Sini-Persone-cose-res-communes-omnium.htm. Accessed 10 April 2024.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Spanu, C. (2012) ‘Mare et per hoc litora maris’. I. 2.1.1: Gestione e tutela del litorale marittimo in diritto romano. https://www.academia.edu/2780343/_Mare_et_per_hoc_litora_maris_I._2.1.1_gestione_e_tutela_del_litorale_marittimo_nel_diritto_romano. Accessed 10 April 2024.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Terrazas Ponce, J.D. (2012) ‘El concepto de ‘res’ en los juristos romanos, in Las ‘res communes omnium’’, Revista de Estudios Històrico-Jurídica, 34, pp. 127–163.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Vendries, Ch. (2009) ‘L’auceps, les gluaux et l’appeau. A propos de la ruse et de l’habileté du chasseur d’oiseaux’, in Trinquier, J. and Vendries, Ch. (eds) Chasses antiques. Pratiques et représentations dans le monde gréco-romain (IIIe siècle av. – IVe siècle apr. J.-C.). Rennes: Presses Universitaires de Rennes, pp. 119–140.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zamorani, P. (1977) Possessio e animus. Milano: Giuffre.
]Search in Google Scholar