Accès libre

Transport-Related Social Exclusion Among Secondary School Students in Different Sub-Regions of Lower Silesia, Poland: An Activity-Based Approach

 et   
02 juil. 2025
À propos de cet article

Citez
Télécharger la couverture

Fig. 1.

Spatial location of the research area.
Spatial location of the research area.

Fig. 2.

(Independent) performance of particular activities by respondents with different levels of car use (independently) doing certain activities.
(Independent) performance of particular activities by respondents with different levels of car use (independently) doing certain activities.

Fig. 3.

(Independent) performance of particular activities by respondents from peripheral locations (more than 5 km from the centre of the commune) and with different levels of car use.
(Independent) performance of particular activities by respondents from peripheral locations (more than 5 km from the centre of the commune) and with different levels of car use.

Level of activity vs_ level of car utilisation_

No utilisation of private car Utilisation of private car – some destinations Utilisation of private car – all destinations In total
N % N % N % N %
Low level of activity 26 21.10% 94 23.20% 7 6.60% 127 20.00%
Moderate level of activity 77 62.60% 238 58.60% 73 68.90% 388 61.10%
High level of activity 20 16.30% 74 18.20% 26 24.50% 120 18.90%
In total 123 100.00% 406 100.00% 106 100.00% 635 100.00%

Ordinal regression coefficients for the level of respondents’ activity (Model I) and the level of car utilisation (Model II) (higher coefficient = higher level of activity or car utilisation)_

Coefficients
Model I Model II
Gender = woman 0.369* –0.121
Gender = man ref. ref.
Economic condition = bad –1.052*** –0.254
Economic condition = moderate 0.115 –0.578*
Economic condition = good ref. ref.
HH location = more than 5 km from commune centre –0.540** 0.717**
HH location = up to 5 km from commune centre 0.107 1.026***
HH location = commune centre ref. ref.
County = other counties –0.380 –1.016
County = Oleśnica 0.233 –0.98
County = Milicz 0.568 –0.512
County = Góra ref. ref.
Car utilisation = no –0.775**
Car utilisation = some destinations –0.784***
Car utilisation = all destinations ref.
Frequency of PT = bad assessment 0.686**
Frequency of PT = moderate assessment –0.114
Frequency of PT = good assessment ref.
Attitudes towards public transport = positive –0.465*
Attitudes towards public transport = neutral 0.149
Attitudes towards public transport = negative ref.
Model fitting (χ2) 48.081*** 80.697***
Goodness of fit (Pearson χ2) 232.438 421.882
Goodness of fit (Deviance χ2) 262.101 387.406
Pseudo-R2 Nagelkerke 0.09 0.16
Test of parallel lines (χ2) 16.116 17.436

Distribution of the basic variables_

Variable Category Size Share
Gender Woman 349 55%
Man 286 45%
Household location Commune centre 338 53%
Up to 5 km from commune centre 117 18%
More than 5 km from commune centre 180 23%
County Góra 52 8%
Oleśnica 406 64%
Milicz 135 21%
Other 42 7%
Household economic condition Bad 45 7%
Moderate 114 18%
Good 476 75%
Level of car utilisation No utilisation 123 19%
Some destinations 406 64%
All destinations 106 17%

Results of χ2 tests measuring differences in performance of particular activities by respondents from peripheral locations_

Name of activity χ2 p-value
Purchases of clothes 6.637 p=.036
Purchases of personal things 3.105 p=.212
Cinema visits 9.329 p=.009
Purchases of cosmetics 6.218 p=.045
Purchases of books 5.263 p=.072
Attending concerts 12.740 p=.002
Purchases of technical equipments 3.279 p=.194
Attending sport events 9.219 p=.010
Tutoring/private lessons 5.412 p=.067
Sport activities 10.134 p=.006
Courses 4.567 p=.102
Interest clubs 5.207 p=.074
Remedial classes 0.792 p=.673

Expected improvements in public transport in the household location_

Expected improvement Level of activity Level of car utilisation In total
Low Moderate High No utilisation 1–2 destinations All destinations
% in column*
Increased frequency of services 47% 56% 59% 63% 56% 51% 54%
New public transport connections 23% 31% 33% 33% 26% 31% 29%
Lower ticket prices 34% 28% 26% 30% 28% 30% 29%
Improved punctuality 15% 18% 13% 27% 19% 12% 16%
Increased comfort of journeys 8% 15% 18% 7% 15% 13% 13%
Upgraded bus stop infrastructure 5% 7% 5% 13% 5% 5% 6%
Increased feeling of security 3% 4% 3% 3% 5% 3% 4%
Upgraded fleet 3% 2% 0% 3% 1% 3% 2%
Other factors 3% 1% 3% 0% 2% 1% 1%
Nothing 23% 13% 13% 3% 14% 20% 16%

Results of χ2 tests measuring differences in performance of particular activities by respondents with different levels of car use_

Name of activity χ2 p-value
Purchases of clothes 7.193 p=.027
Purchases of personal things 5.171 p=.075
Cinema visits 5.148 p=.076
Purchases of cosmetics 1.263 p=.532
Purchases of books 3.513 p=.173
Attending concerts 8.479 p=.014
Purchases of technical equipments 7.89 p=.019
Attending sport events 10.997 p=.004
Tutoring/private lessons 1.642 p=.440
Sport activities 4.769 p=.092
Courses 4.433 p=.109
Interest clubs 12.105 p=.002
Remedial classes 1.405 p=.495
Langue:
Anglais
Périodicité:
4 fois par an
Sujets de la revue:
Géosciences, Géographie