Accès libre

Progress in Arctic Coastal Geomorphological Research in Times of Rapid Climate Warming

Zofia Owczarek

Zofia Owczarek

Alfred Jahn Cold Regions Research Centre, University of WrocławWrocław, Poland
Profil Orcid
Recherchez cet auteur sur
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Owczarek, Zofia
, 
Zofia Stachowska-Kamińska

Zofia Stachowska-Kamińska

Institute of Marine and Environmental Sciences, Doctoral School, University of SzczecinSzczecin, Poland
Profil Orcid
Recherchez cet auteur sur
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Stachowska-Kamińska, Zofia
, 
Oskar Kostrzewa

Oskar Kostrzewa

Alfred Jahn Cold Regions Research Centre, University of WrocławWrocław, Poland
Profil Orcid
Recherchez cet auteur sur
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Kostrzewa, Oskar
 et 
Małgorzata Szczypińska

Małgorzata Szczypińska

Alfred Jahn Cold Regions Research Centre, University of WrocławWrocław, Poland
Profil Orcid
Recherchez cet auteur sur
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Szczypińska, Małgorzata
  
07 mars 2024
Progress in Arctic Coastal Geomorphological Research in Times of Rapid Climate Warming's Cover Image
À propos de cet article
Article précédent
Article suivant
Citez
Télécharger la couverture
Publié en ligne: 07 mars 2024
Pages: 127 - 156
Reçu: 21 sept. 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14746/quageo-2024-0008
Mots clés
© 2024 Zofia Owczarek et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Fig. 1.

Schematic division of the Arctic corresponding to the chapters in the work and relevant publications on the Arctic coastal change research mentioned in this study.
Schematic division of the Arctic corresponding to the chapters in the work and relevant publications on the Arctic coastal change research mentioned in this study.

Fig. 2.

Schemes of the Arctic coasts: A – Coast of the still-glaciated part of the Arctic; B – Coast dominated by permafrost (non-glaciated domain).
Schemes of the Arctic coasts: A – Coast of the still-glaciated part of the Arctic; B – Coast dominated by permafrost (non-glaciated domain).

Fig. 3.

Cliff coasts: A – Unconsolidated sedimentary cliff formed in glaciofluvial sediments, southwest Disco Island coast (west Greenland); B – Cliff made of deposits from Paatuut landslide which entered the strait in 2000 and caused a tsunami wave, view from the Vaigat Strait (west Greenland); C – Bedrock cliffs covered with marine deposits, Kongsfjorden (northwest Spitsbergen) views to the southwest; D – Low rocky cliff skerry coast formed in marble, Wilczekodden in Hornsund (Svalbard), view from the west. Photo by M.Kasprzak (A), M.Szczypińska (B), A.Wołoszyn (C), Z.Owczarek (D).
Cliff coasts: A – Unconsolidated sedimentary cliff formed in glaciofluvial sediments, southwest Disco Island coast (west Greenland); B – Cliff made of deposits from Paatuut landslide which entered the strait in 2000 and caused a tsunami wave, view from the Vaigat Strait (west Greenland); C – Bedrock cliffs covered with marine deposits, Kongsfjorden (northwest Spitsbergen) views to the southwest; D – Low rocky cliff skerry coast formed in marble, Wilczekodden in Hornsund (Svalbard), view from the west. Photo by M.Kasprzak (A), M.Szczypińska (B), A.Wołoszyn (C), Z.Owczarek (D).

Fig. 4.

Coastal residential buildings in Greenland are exposed to the destructive activity of the sea: A – Ilulissat; B – Oqaatsut. Buildings of Qullissat were destroyed by the tsunami in 2000; C – Damaged residential building; D – Damaged mining infrastructure. Photo by M.Szczypińska (A, B, C), M.Kasprzak (D).
Coastal residential buildings in Greenland are exposed to the destructive activity of the sea: A – Ilulissat; B – Oqaatsut. Buildings of Qullissat were destroyed by the tsunami in 2000; C – Damaged residential building; D – Damaged mining infrastructure. Photo by M.Szczypińska (A, B, C), M.Kasprzak (D).

Fig. 5.

Examples of accumulation coastal landforms in the Arctic: A – View of the glacial river delta and marine-terminating glacier Eqip Sermia in the background; B – Lateral moraine of retreating glacier Eqip Sermia separating the lake (previous lagoon) from the open sea; C – Extramarginal outwash of the Scott River with visible sediment fluxes (Calypsostranda, Svalbard); D – Josephbukta Bay with fluvioglacial sediments and Renardbreen Glacier in the background. Photo by M.Szczypińska (A, B), O.Kostrzewa (C, D).
Examples of accumulation coastal landforms in the Arctic: A – View of the glacial river delta and marine-terminating glacier Eqip Sermia in the background; B – Lateral moraine of retreating glacier Eqip Sermia separating the lake (previous lagoon) from the open sea; C – Extramarginal outwash of the Scott River with visible sediment fluxes (Calypsostranda, Svalbard); D – Josephbukta Bay with fluvioglacial sediments and Renardbreen Glacier in the background. Photo by M.Szczypińska (A, B), O.Kostrzewa (C, D).

Fig. 6.

The coast opposite the Eqip Sermia glacier affected by a tsunami, which happened due to a calving glacier, was observed on August 8th, 2023. Photo by M.Kasprzak.
The coast opposite the Eqip Sermia glacier affected by a tsunami, which happened due to a calving glacier, was observed on August 8th, 2023. Photo by M.Kasprzak.

Fig. 7.

Examples of coastal buildings and facilities in Svalbard vulnerable to damage due to their location: A – The Polish Polar Station buildings and facilities on the northern, eroding coast of Hornsund; B – The warehouse of the Polish Polar Station, as a result of long-term erosion of the Hornsund coast, is now on the edge of the land. Its southern wall has already been reinforced several times to prevent damage to the building; C – The remnants of 20th century mining activities are still visible in the landscape of Spitsbergen; D – Polish and Czech polar station buildings located ca. 25–30 m from the coastline at the bottom of Pyramiden Hill. The photo was taken from Petuniabukta Bay. Photo by Z.Owczarek (A, B, C), O.Kostrzewa (D).
Examples of coastal buildings and facilities in Svalbard vulnerable to damage due to their location: A – The Polish Polar Station buildings and facilities on the northern, eroding coast of Hornsund; B – The warehouse of the Polish Polar Station, as a result of long-term erosion of the Hornsund coast, is now on the edge of the land. Its southern wall has already been reinforced several times to prevent damage to the building; C – The remnants of 20th century mining activities are still visible in the landscape of Spitsbergen; D – Polish and Czech polar station buildings located ca. 25–30 m from the coastline at the bottom of Pyramiden Hill. The photo was taken from Petuniabukta Bay. Photo by Z.Owczarek (A, B, C), O.Kostrzewa (D).

Fig. 8.

Coasts with visible ice wedges and massive ice bodies: A – Alaska; B – Yukon. Photo by L.Farquharson (A), M.Lim (B).
Coasts with visible ice wedges and massive ice bodies: A – Alaska; B – Yukon. Photo by L.Farquharson (A), M.Lim (B).

Fig. 9.

Blocks failure caused by thawing permafrost: A – Alaska, B – Yukon. Coastal infrastructure threatened by coastal erosion: C – Alaska, D – Yukon. Nowadays, coastal strengthening can be encountered to slow down erosion processes. Photo by L.Farquharson (A, C), M.Lim (B, D).
Blocks failure caused by thawing permafrost: A – Alaska, B – Yukon. Coastal infrastructure threatened by coastal erosion: C – Alaska, D – Yukon. Nowadays, coastal strengthening can be encountered to slow down erosion processes. Photo by L.Farquharson (A, C), M.Lim (B, D).

The average rate of coastline changes in the Arctic since the end of the Little Ice Age, based on recent research_

Location Region Average rate of coastal changes [m a−1] Publication
Arctic coasts Arctic −0.50 Lantuit et al. (2011)
Arctic coasts Arctic from −1.00 to −2.00 Forbes (2011)
Siniffik Greenland −0.30 Luetzenburg et al. (2023)
Disko Island Greenland −1.50 Bourriquen et al. (2018)
Isbjørnhamna Svalbard −13.00 Zagórski et al. (2015)
Calypsostranda Svalbard −0.19 Zagórski et al. (2020)
Hornsund Svalbard −1.90 Lim et al. (2020)
Rekvedbukta Svalbard −2.22 Wołoszyn et al. (2022)
West Euroasian Siberia −4.00 Ogorodov et al. (2022)
East Asian Siberia from −2.00 to −7.00 Ogorodov et al. (2020)
Bykovsky Peninsula Siberia −0.59 Lantuit et al. (2011a)
Muostakh Island Siberia −20.00 Vonk et al. (2012)
Ozero Mogotoyevo Siberia −12.40 Wang et al. (2022)
Northen Alaska Alaska −1.40 Gibbs, Richmond (2017)
Drew Point Alaska −38.30 Wang et al. (2022)
Cape Krusenstern Alaska −0.13 Farquharson et al. (2018)
Cape Espenberg Alaska −1.53 Farquharson et al. (2018)
Yukon Canada −0.70 Irrgang et al. (2018)
Herschel Island Canada −0.68 Obu et al. (2016)
Langue:
Anglais
Périodicité:
4 fois par an
Sujets de la revue:
Géosciences, Géographie
RSS Feed de la revue