This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Aiello V., Reverberi P.M., Brasili C., 2019. European identity and citizens’ support for the EU: Testing the utilitarian approach. Regional Science Policy and Practice 11(4): 673–693. DOI 10.1111/rsp3.12242.AielloV.ReverberiP.M.BrasiliC., 2019. European identity and citizens’ support for the EU: Testing the utilitarian approach. Regional Science Policy and Practice11(4): 673–693. DOI 10.1111/rsp3.12242.Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Aykac B., Metin H., 2012. The future of public organizations. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 62: 468–472. DOI 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.077.AykacB.MetinH., 2012. The future of public organizations. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences62: 468–472. DOI 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.077.Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Babbie E., 2004. Badania społeczne w praktyce (Social research in practice). Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warsaw.BabbieE., 2004. Badania społeczne w praktyce (Social research in practice). Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warsaw.Search in Google Scholar
Bachtler J., Mendez C., Oraže H., 2014. From conditionality to Europeanization in Central and Eastern Europe: Administrative performance and capacity in Cohesion Policy. European Planning Studies 22(4): 735–757. DOI 10.1080/09654313.2013.772744.BachtlerJ.MendezC.OražeH., 2014. From conditionality to Europeanization in Central and Eastern Europe: Administrative performance and capacity in Cohesion Policy. European Planning Studies22(4): 735–757. DOI 10.1080/09654313.2013.772744.Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Bachtrögler J., Fratesi U., Perucca G., 2020. The influence of the local context on the implementation and impact of EU Cohesion Policy. Regional Studies 54(1): 21–34. DOI 10.1080/00343404.2018.1551615.BachtröglerJ.FratesiU.PeruccaG., 2020. The influence of the local context on the implementation and impact of EU Cohesion Policy. Regional Studies54(1): 21–34. DOI 10.1080/00343404.2018.1551615.Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Bartniczak B., 2010. Zagraniczna pomoc ekologiczna jako przykład międzynarodowej współpracy w dziedzinie ochrony środowiska (Foreign ecological aid as an example of international co-operation in the field of environmental protection). Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu. Ekonomia 7(132): 11–20.BartniczakB., 2010. Zagraniczna pomoc ekologiczna jako przykład międzynarodowej współpracy w dziedzinie ochrony środowiska (Foreign ecological aid as an example of international co-operation in the field of environmental protection). Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu. Ekonomia7(132): 11–20.Search in Google Scholar
Becker P., 2019. The reform of European Cohesion Policy or how to couple the streams successfully. Journal of European Integration 41(2): 147–168. DOI 10.1080/07036337.2018.1553964.BeckerP., 2019. The reform of European Cohesion Policy or how to couple the streams successfully. Journal of European Integration41(2): 147–168. DOI 10.1080/07036337.2018.1553964.Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Boin A., Christensen T., 2008. The development of public institutions: Reconsidering the role of leadership. Administration and Society 40(3): 271–297. DOI 10.1177/0095399707313700.BoinA.ChristensenT., 2008. The development of public institutions: Reconsidering the role of leadership. Administration and Society40(3): 271–297. DOI 10.1177/0095399707313700.Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Boyne G.A., Meier J.M., O’Toole L. Jr., Walker R.M., 2005. Where next? Research directions on performance in public organizations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 15(4): 633–639. DOI 10.1093/jopart/mui037.BoyneG.A.MeierJ.M.O’TooleL.Jr.WalkerR.M., 2005. Where next? Research directions on performance in public organizations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory15(4): 633–639. DOI 10.1093/jopart/mui037.Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Capello R., Perucca G., 2018. Understanding citizen perception of European Union Cohesion Policy: The role of the local context. Regional Studies 52(11): 1451–1463. DOI 10.1080/00343404.2017.1397273.CapelloR.PeruccaG., 2018. Understanding citizen perception of European Union Cohesion Policy: The role of the local context. Regional Studies52(11): 1451–1463. DOI 10.1080/00343404.2017.1397273.Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Casson M.C., Giusta M.D., Kambhampati U.S., 2010. Formal and informal institutions and development. World Development 38(2): 137–141. DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2009.10.008.CassonM.C.GiustaM.D.KambhampatiU.S., 2010. Formal and informal institutions and development. World Development38(2): 137–141. DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2009.10.008.Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Chaumba J., 2013. The use and value of mixed methods research in social work. Advances in Social Work 14(2): 307–333.ChaumbaJ., 2013. The use and value of mixed methods research in social work. Advances in Social Work14(2): 307–333.Search in Google Scholar
Churski P., 2008. Czynniki rozwoju regionalnego i polityka regionalna w Polsce w okresie integracji z Unią Europejską (Factors of regional development and regional policy in Poland in the period of integration with the European Union). Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM, Poznań.ChurskiP., 2008. Czynniki rozwoju regionalnego i polityka regionalna w Polsce w okresie integracji z Unią Europejską (Factors of regional development and regional policy in Poland in the period of integration with the European Union). Wydawnictwo Naukowe uAm, Poznań.Search in Google Scholar
Churski P., Perdał R., 2016. Where do Cohesion Policy funds flow and do they have any impact? The Polish lesson. Barometr Regionalny 14(3): 7–24.ChurskiP.PerdałR., 2016. Where do Cohesion Policy funds flow and do they have any impact? The Polish lesson. Barometr Regionalny14(3): 7–24.Search in Google Scholar
Cichocki P., 2011. Polish attitudes towards the European Union. Przegląd Zachodni 3: 265–277.CichockiP., 2011. Polish attitudes towards the European Union. Przegląd Zachodni3: 265–277.Search in Google Scholar
Conyers D., 1983. Decentralization: The latest fashion in development administration? Public Administration and Development 3(2): 97–109. DOI 10.1002/pad.4230030202.ConyersD., 1983. Decentralization: The latest fashion in development administration?Public Administration and Development3(2): 97–109. DOI 10.1002/pad.4230030202.Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Crescenzi R., Giua M., 2020. One or many Cohesion Policies of the European Union? On the differential economic impacts of Cohesion Policy across member states. Regional Studies 54(1): 10–20. DOI 10.1080/00343404.2019.1665174.CrescenziR.GiuaM., 2020. One or many Cohesion Policies of the European Union? On the differential economic impacts of Cohesion Policy across member states. Regional Studies54(1): 10–20. DOI 10.1080/00343404.2019.1665174.Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Czyż T., 2016. Metoda wskaźnikowa w geografii społeczno-ekonomicznej (The concept of indicator in socio-economic geography). Rozwój Regionalny i Polityka Regionalna 34: 9–19.CzyżT., 2016. Metoda wskaźnikowa w geografii społeczno-ekonomicznej (The concept of indicator in socio-economic geography). Rozwój Regionalny i Polityka Regionalna34: 9–19.Search in Google Scholar
Dąbrowski M., Spaans M., Fernandez-Maldonado A.M., Rocco R., 2021. Cohesion Policy and the citizens’ perceptions of the EU: The role of communication and implementation. European Planning Studies 29(5): 827–843. DOI 10.1080/09654313.2020.1805413.DąbrowskiM.SpaansM.Fernandez-MaldonadoA.M.RoccoR., 2021. Cohesion Policy and the citizens’ perceptions of the EU: The role of communication and implementation. European Planning Studies29(5): 827–843. DOI 10.1080/09654313.2020.1805413.Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Faludi A., Peyrony J., 2011. Cohesion policy contributing to territorial cohesion – Future scenarios. European Journal of Spatial Development 9(2): 2–21. DOI 10.5281/zenodo.5139322.FaludiA.PeyronyJ., 2011. Cohesion policy contributing to territorial cohesion – Future scenarios. European Journal of Spatial Development9(2): 2–21. DOI 10.5281/zenodo.5139322.Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Farole T., Rodríguez-Pose A., Storper M., 2011. Cohesion Policy in the European Union: Growth, geography, institutions. Journal of Common Market Studies 49(5): 1089–1111. DOI 10.1111/j.1468-5965.2010.02161.x.FaroleT.Rodríguez-PoseA.StorperM., 2011. Cohesion Policy in the European Union: Growth, geography, institutions. Journal of Common Market Studies49(5): 1089–1111. DOI 10.1111/j.1468-5965.2010.02161.x.Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Fiedor B., 2015. Instytucje formalne i nieformalne w kształtowaniu trwałego rozwoju (Formal and informal institutions in shaping sustainable development). Studia i Prace WNEiZ US (Studies and research of the Faculty of Economics and Management of the University of Szczecin) 40(2): 83–107.FiedorB., 2015. Instytucje formalne i nieformalne w kształtowaniu trwałego rozwoju (Formal and informal institutions in shaping sustainable development). Studia i Prace WNEiZ US (Studies and research of the Faculty of Economics and Management of the University of Szczecin)40(2): 83–107.Search in Google Scholar
Fratesi U., Wishlade F.G., 2017. The impact of European Cohesion Policy in different contexts. Regional Studies 51(6): 817–821. DOI 10.1080/00343404.2017.1326673.FratesiU.WishladeF.G., 2017. The impact of European Cohesion Policy in different contexts. Regional Studies51(6): 817–821. DOI 10.1080/00343404.2017.1326673.Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Gruszewska E., 2017. Instytucje formalne i nieformalne. Skutki antynomii (Formal and informal institutions. Results of antinomy). Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu 493: 36–50. DOI 10.15611/pn.2017.493.03.GruszewskaE., 2017. Instytucje formalne i nieformalne. Skutki antynomii (Formal and informal institutions. Results of antinomy). Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu493: 36–50. DOI 10.15611/pn.2017.493.03.Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Hawrysz L., Foltys J., 2016. Environmental aspects of social responsibility of public sector organizations. Sustainability 8(1): 19. DOI 10.3390/su8010019.HawryszL.FoltysJ., 2016. Environmental aspects of social responsibility of public sector organizations. Sustainability8(1): 19. DOI10.3390/su8010019.Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Herodowicz T., 2016. Interwencja środowiskowa polityki spójności w Polsce – merytoryczne ukierunkowanie i regionalne zróżnicowanie (Environmental intervention of cohesion policy in Poland – the substantive orientation and regional diversity). Rozwój Regionalny i Polityka Regionalna 33: 95–116.HerodowiczT., 2016. Interwencja środowiskowa polityki spójności w Polsce – merytoryczne ukierunkowanie i regionalne zróżnicowanie (Environmental intervention of cohesion policy in Poland – the substantive orientation and regional diversity). Rozwój Regionalny i Polityka Regionalna33: 95–116.Search in Google Scholar
Herodowicz T., 2020. Znaczenie polityki regionalnej Unii Europejskiej w kształtowaniu środowiskowego wymiaru rozwoju zrównoważonego w Polsce (The importance of the European Union regional policy in shaping the environmental dimension of sustainable development in Poland). Bogucki Wydawnictwo Naukowe, Poznań.HerodowiczT., 2020. Znaczenie polityki regionalnej Unii Europejskiej w kształtowaniu środowiskowego wymiaru rozwoju zrównoważonego w Polsce (The importance of the European Union regional policy in shaping the environmental dimension of sustainable development in Poland). Bogucki Wydawnictwo Naukowe, Poznań.Search in Google Scholar
Hooghe L., 1996. Introduction: Reconciling EU-wide policy and national diversity. In: Hooghe L. (ed.), Cohesion policy and European integration: Building multi-level governance. Oxford University Press, Oxford: 1–24.HoogheL., 1996. Introduction: Reconciling EU-wide policy and national diversity. In: HoogheL. (ed.), Cohesion policy and European integration: Building multi-level governance. Oxford University Press, Oxford: 1–24.Search in Google Scholar
Hooghe L., Marks G., 2001. Multi-level governance and European integration. Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham, MD.HoogheL.MarksG., 2001. Multi-level governance and European integration. Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham, MD.Search in Google Scholar
Iacovino N.M., Barsanti S., Cinquini L., 2017. Public organizations between old public administration, new public management and public governance: The case of the Tuscany Region. Public Organization Review 17: 61–82. DOI 10.1007/s11115-015-0327-x.IacovinoN.M.BarsantiS.CinquiniL., 2017. Public organizations between old public administration, new public management and public governance: The case of the Tuscany Region. Public Organization Review17: 61–82. DOI 10.1007/s11115-015-0327-x.Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Komornicki T., Szejgiec-Kolenda B., Degórska B., Goch K., Śleszyński P., Bednarek-Szczepańska M., Siłka P., 2018. Spatial planning determinants of cohesion policy implementation in Polish regions. EUROPA XXI 35: 69–97. DOI 10.7163/Eu21.2018.35.5.KomornickiT.Szejgiec-KolendaB.DegórskaB.GochK.ŚleszyńskiP.Bednarek-SzczepańskaM.SiłkaP., 2018. Spatial planning determinants of cohesion policy implementation in Polish regions. EUROPA XXI35: 69–97. DOI 10.7163/Eu21.2018.35.5.Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Maciejewska-Mieszkowska K., 2017. Stosunek Polaków do Unii Europejskiej a ich udział w wyborach do parlamentu europejskiego (The attitude of Poles towards the European Union and their participation in the elections to the European Parliament). Studia Wyborcze 24: 7–18. DOI 10.26485/SW/2017/24/1.Maciejewska-MieszkowskaK., 2017. Stosunek Polaków do Unii Europejskiej a ich udział w wyborach do parlamentu europejskiego (The attitude of Poles towards the European Union and their participation in the elections to the European Parliament). Studia Wyborcze24: 7–18. DOI 10.26485/SW/2017/24/1.Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Medeiros E., 2014. Assessing territorial impacts of the EU Cohesion Policy: The Portuguese case. European Planning Studies 22(9): 1960–1988. DOI 10.1080/09654313.2013.813910.MedeirosE., 2014. Assessing territorial impacts of the EU Cohesion Policy: The Portuguese case. European Planning Studies22(9): 1960–1988. DOI 10.1080/09654313.2013.813910.Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Medeiros E., 2017. European Union Cohesion Policy and Spain: A territorial impact assessment. Regional Studies 51(8): 1259–1269. DOI 10.1080/00343404.2016.1187719.MedeirosE., 2017. European Union Cohesion Policy and Spain: A territorial impact assessment. Regional Studies51(8): 1259–1269. DOI 10.1080/00343404.2016.1187719.Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Niczyporuk J., 2009. Sfera publiczna (Public sphere). In: Blicharz J., Boć J. (eds), Prawna działalność instytucji społeczeństwa obywatelskiego (Legal activities of civil society institutions). Kolonia Ltd., Wrocław: 119–124.NiczyporukJ., 2009. Sfera publiczna (Public sphere). In: BlicharzJ.BoćJ. (eds), Prawna działalność instytucji społeczeństwa obywatelskiego (Legal activities of civil society institutions). Kolonia Ltd., Wrocław: 119–124.Search in Google Scholar
North D.C., 1990. Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.NorthD.C., 1990. Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Search in Google Scholar
Quality of Government Institute, 2010. Measuring the quality of government and subnational variation. Report for the European Commission Directorate-General Regional Policy Directorate Policy Development. University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg. Online: https://nicholascharron.files.wordpress.com/2010/04/final-report-parts-1-3.pdf (accessed 2 November 2022).Quality of Government Institute, 2010. Measuring the quality of government and subnational variation. Report for the European Commission Directorate-General Regional Policy Directorate Policy Development. University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg. Online: https://nicholascharron.files.wordpress.com/2010/04/final-report-parts-1-3.pdf (accessed 2 November 2022).Search in Google Scholar
Rodríguez-Pose A., 2013. Do institutions matter for regional development? Regional Studies 47(7): 1034–1047. DOI 10.1080/00343404.2012.748978.Rodríguez-PoseA., 2013. Do institutions matter for regional development?Regional Studies47(7): 1034–1047. DOI 10.1080/00343404.2012.748978.Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Rodríguez-Pose A., Garcilazo E., 2015. Quality of government and the returns of investment: Examining the impact of cohesion expenditure in European regions. Regional Studies 49(8): 1274–1290. DOI 10.1080/00343404.2015.1007933.Rodríguez-PoseA.GarcilazoE., 2015. Quality of government and the returns of investment: Examining the impact of cohesion expenditure in European regions. Regional Studies49(8): 1274–1290. DOI 10.1080/00343404.2015.1007933.Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Romanelli M., 2017. Rethinking public organizations as knowledge-oriented and technology-driven organizations. Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy 5(4): 559–576. DOI 10.25019/MDKE/5.4.06.RomanelliM., 2017. Rethinking public organizations as knowledge-oriented and technology-driven organizations. Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy5(4): 559–576. DOI 10.25019/MDKE/5.4.06.Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Shorten A., Smith J., 2017. Mixed methods research: Expanding the evidence base. Evidence-Based Nursing 20: 74–75. DOI 10.1136/eb-2017-102699.ShortenA.SmithJ., 2017. Mixed methods research: Expanding the evidence base. Evidence-Based Nursing20: 74–75. DOI 10.1136/eb-2017-102699.Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Stachowiak K., Stryjakiewicz T., 2008. Institutional approach in economic geography and its relevance to regional studies. Quaestiones Geographicae 27B(1): 7–2.StachowiakK.StryjakiewiczT., 2008. Institutional approach in economic geography and its relevance to regional studies. Quaestiones Geographicae27B(1): 7–2.Search in Google Scholar
Surubaru N.C., 2017. Administrative and political embeddedness: How to improve the institutional environments dealing with the management and implementation of EU Structural and Investment Funds? The experience of new member states. In: Bachtler J., Berkowitz P., Hardy S., Muravska T. (eds), EU Cohesion Policy Reassessing performance and direction. Routledge, London and New York: 171–185.SurubaruN.C., 2017. Administrative and political embeddedness: How to improve the institutional environments dealing with the management and implementation of EU Structural and Investment Funds? The experience of new member states. In: BachtlerJ.BerkowitzP.HardyS.MuravskaT. (eds), EU Cohesion Policy Reassessing performance and direction. Routledge, London and New York: 171–185.Search in Google Scholar
Syssoeva N.M., 2010. Institutional problems of regional development in Russia. Quaestiones Geographicae 29(2): 19–25. DOI 10.2478/v10117-010-0011-8.SyssoevaN.M., 2010. Institutional problems of regional development in Russia. Quaestiones Geographicae29(2): 19–25. DOI 10.2478/v10117-010-0011-8.Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Wæraas A., Byrkjeflot H., 2012. Public sector organizations and reputation management: Five problems. International Public Management Journal 15(2): 186–206. DOI 10.1080/10967494.2012.702590.WæraasA.ByrkjeflotH., 2012. Public sector organizations and reputation management: Five problems. International Public Management Journal15(2): 186–206. DOI 10.1080/10967494.2012.702590.Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Wytrążek W., 2011. Podstawowe pojęcia teorii organizacji i zarządzania w instytucjach publicznych (The main terms of organisation and management in public institutions). In: Kawalec P., Wodzisz R., Lipski P. (eds), Podstawy naukoznawstwa, t. 2 (Fundamentals of science, vol. 2). Wydawnictwo KUL, Lublin: 315–337.WytrążekW., 2011. Podstawowe pojęcia teorii organizacji i zarządzania w instytucjach publicznych (The main terms of organisation and management in public institutions). In: KawalecP.WodziszR.LipskiP. (eds), Podstawy naukoznawstwa, t. 2 (Fundamentals of science, vol. 2). Wydawnictwo KUL, Lublin: 315–337.Search in Google Scholar
| 27 juin 2023