Internet Website as a Tool of Communication in Scientific Institutions

1. Antonowicz, D., Gorlewski, B. (2011). Demograficzne Tsunami: Raport Instytutu Sokratesa na temat wpływu zmian demograficznych na szkolnictwo wyższe do 2020 roku. Warszawa: Instytut Rozwoju Kapitału Intelektualnego im. Sokratesa.Search in Google Scholar

2. CBOS (2014). Internauci 2014. Komunikat z badań CBOS, nr 82/2014. Warszawa: CBOS.Search in Google Scholar

3. Gordon, J., Berhow, S. (2009). University websites and dialogic features for building relationships with potential students. Public Relations Review, 35, 150-152.10.1016/j.pubrev.2008.11.003Search in Google Scholar

4. Hill, L.N., White, C. (2000). Public Relations Practitioners’ Perception of the World Wide Web as a Communication Tool. Public Relations Review, 26(1), 31-51.10.1016/S0363-8111(00)00029-1Search in Google Scholar

5. Hjarvard, S. (2013). The Mediatization of Culture and Society. London - New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.10.4324/9780203155363Search in Google Scholar

6. Instytut Zachodni (2012). Badanie potrzeb wielkopolskich przedsiębiorców w zakresie współpracy ze sferą B+R. Poznań: Instytut Zachodni.Search in Google Scholar

7. Kang, S., Norton, H.E. (2006). Colleges and universities’ use of the World Wide Web: A public relations tool for the digital age. Public Relations Review, 32, 426-428.10.1016/j.pubrev.2006.08.003Search in Google Scholar

8. Kent, M., Taylor, M. (2002). Toward a dialogic theory of public relations. Public Relations Review, 28, 21-37.10.1016/S0363-8111(02)00108-XSearch in Google Scholar

9. Kohring, M., Marcinkowski, F., Linder, Ch., Karis, S. (2013). Media orientation of German university decision makers and the executive influence of public relations. Public Relations Review, 39, 171-177.10.1016/j.pubrev.2013.01.002Search in Google Scholar

10. Linvill, D.L., McGee, S.E., Hicks, L.K. (2012). Colleges’ and universities’ use of Twitter: A content analysis. Public Relations Review, 38, 636-638.10.1016/j.pubrev.2012.05.010Search in Google Scholar

11. Marcinkowski, F., Kohring, M., Fürst, S., Friedrichsmeier, A. (2014). Organizational Influence on Scientists’ Efforts to Go Public: An Empirical Investigation. Science Communication, 36(1), 56-80.10.1177/1075547013494022Search in Google Scholar

12. Molęda-Zdziech, M. (2013). Czas celebrytów: Mediatyzacja życia publicznego. Warszawa: Difin.Search in Google Scholar

13. Nie, K.S., Kee, Ch.P., Ahmad, A.L. (2014). Mediatization: A Grand Concept or Contemporary Approach? Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 155, 362-367.10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.10.306Search in Google Scholar

14. Rynkiewicz, M. (2014). Stagnacja to dobry sygnał. In: Interaktywnie.com, E-mail marketing.Raport. Wrocław: Interaktywnie.com, http://interaktywnie.com/biznes/-artykuly/raporty-interaktywnie-com/raport-interaktywnie-com-e-mail-marketing-2014-249054 (30.11.2015).Search in Google Scholar

15. Will, E.M., Callison, C. (2006). Web presence of universities: Is higher education sending the right message online? Public Relations Review, 32, 180-183.10.1016/j.pubrev.2006.02.014Search in Google Scholar