[
Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), 216-224.10.1080/01944366908977225
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2012). The logic of connective action. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 739-768.10.1080/1369118X.2012.670661
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bruns, A. (2008). The Future Is User-Led: The Path towards Widespread Produsage. Fibreculture, 11.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Carpentier, N. (2011). The concept of participation. If they have access and interact, do they really participate? Communication Management Quarterly, 21, 13-16.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Carpentier, N. (2015). Differentiating between access, interaction and participation. Conjunctions: Transdisciplinary Journal of Cultural Participation, 2(2).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dijck, J. v., Poell, T., & Waal, T. d. (2018). The Platform Society. Public Values in a Connective World. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780190889760.001.0001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Eeckman, E. (2015). Power to the patient? Studying the balance of power between patient and GP in relation to Web health information. In F. M. e. a. Murru (Ed.), Communication as the intersection of the old and the new. London: Lumière.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fuchs, C. (2014). Social media. A critical introduction. London: Sage.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gerlitz, C. (2016). What Counts? Reflections on the Multivalence of Social Media Data. Digital Culture and Society, 2(2), 19-38.10.14361/dcs-2016-0203
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gerlitz, C., & Helmond, A. (2013). The like economy. New Media and Society, 15(8), 1348-1365.10.1177/1461444812472322
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gerlitz, C., & Lury, C. (2014). Social media and self-evaluating assemblages. Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory, 15(2), 174-188.10.1080/1600910X.2014.920267
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hardey, M. (2001). Doctor in the house: the Internet as a source of lay health knowledge and the challenge to expertise. Sociology of Health and Illness, 21(6), 820-835.10.1111/1467-9566.00185
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Høybye, M. T., Dalton, S. O., Christensen, J., Ross, L., Kuhn, K. G., & Johansen, C. (2010). Social and psychological determinants of participation in internet-based cancer support groups. Support Care Cancer, 18, 553-560.10.1007/s00520-009-0683-6
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ishii, K., Lyons, M. M., & Carr, S. A. (2019). Revisiting media richness theory for today and future. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 1(2), 124-131.10.1002/hbe2.138
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence culture. Where old and new media collide. New York: New York University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kingod, N., Cleal, B., Wahlberg, A., & Husted, G. R. (2017). Online Peer-to-Peer Communities in the Daily Lives of People With Chronic Illness: A Qualitative Systematic Review. Qualitative Health Research(1), 89-99.10.1177/1049732316680203
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lagerkvist, A. (2017). Existential media: Toward a theorization of digital thrownness. New Media and Society, 19(1), 96-110.10.1177/1461444816649921
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lupton, D. (2013). The digitally engaged patient: Self-monitoring and self-care in the digital health era. Social Theory and Health, 11(3), 256-270.10.1057/sth.2013.10
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lupton, D. (2016). The Quantified Self. Cambridge: Polity.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
McCosker, A. (2013). Intensive Media: Aversive Affects and Visual Culture. Basingstoke: Palgrave.10.1057/9781137273512
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mol, A. (2008). The logic of care. Health and the problem of patient choice. London, New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203927076
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Morden, A., Jinks, C., & Ong, B. N. (2012). Rethinking “risk” and self-management for chronic illness. Social Theory & Health, 11(3), 78-99.10.1057/sth.2011.20
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nettleton, S. (2004). The emergence of e-scaped medicine? Sociology, 38(4), 661-679.10.1177/0038038504045857
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Orgad, S. (2005). Storytelling Online. Talking Breast Cancer on the Internet. New York: Peter Lang.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Papacharissi, Z. (2015). Affective publics: Sentiment, technology, and politics. New York: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pateman, C. (1970). Participation and democratic theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511720444
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rose, N. (2006). The Politics of Life Itself. Biomedicine, Power, and Subjectivity in the Twenty-First Century. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Stacey, J. (1997). Teratologies. A cultural study of cancer. London: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Stage, C. (2017). Networked cancer. Affect, narrative and measurement. Basingstoke: Palgrave.10.1007/978-3-319-51418-5
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Stage, C. (2019). The participatory patient. Exploring the platformed multivalence and public value of cancer storytelling on social media. In B. Eriksson, B. Valtysson, & C. Stage (Eds.), Cultures of Participation. New York: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Stage, C., Hvidtfeldt, K., & Klastrup, L. (2020). Vital media. The affective and temporal dynamics of young cancer patients’ social media practices. Social Media + Society, April-June, 1-13.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Swan, M. (2012). Health 2050: The realization of personalized medicine through crowdsourcing, the quantified self, the participatory biocitizen. Journal of Personalized Medicine, 2(3), 93-118.10.3390/jpm2030093
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Terranova, T. (2000). Free Labor: Producing Culture for the Digital Economy. Social Text, 18(2), 33-58.10.1215/01642472-18-2_63-33
]Search in Google Scholar
