[
Abrams, D., & Hogg, M. A. (2010). Social identity and self-categorisation. In J. F. Dovidio, M. Hewstone, P. Glick, & V. M. Esses (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of prejudice, stereotyping and discrimination (pp. 179–193). Sage.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Abrams, D., Marques, J. M., Randsley de Moura, G., Hutchison, P., & Bown, N. J. (2004). The maintenance of entitativity: A subjective group dynamics approach. In V. Y. Yzerbyt, C. M. Judd, & O. Corneille (Eds.), The psychology of group perception: Contributions to the study of homogeneity, entitativity, and essentialism (pp. 361–381). Psychology Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Abrams, D., Wetherell, M., Cochrane, S., Hogg, M. A., & Turner, J. C. (1990). Knowing what to think by knowing who you are: Self-categorization and the nature of norm formation, conformity and group polarization. British Journal of Social Psychology, 29(2), 97–119. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.1990.tb00892.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Aberson, C. (2019). pwr2ppl: Power analyses for common designs (power to the people). R package version 0.1.1. Retrieved from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=pwr2ppl
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Alvaro, E. M., & Crano, W. D. (1997). Indirect minority influence: Evidence for leniency in source evaluation and counterargumentation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(5), 949–964. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.72.5.949
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Aron, A., Aron, E. N., Smollan, D. (1992). Inclusion of other in the self scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 596–612. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.63.4.596
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Barbaro, M. (Host). (2022, April 22). The New York Times Daily [Audio Podcast]. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2022/04/22/podcasts/the-daily/macron-le-pen-french-election.html
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Castro-Schilo, L., & Grimm, K. J. (2018). Using residualized change versus difference scores for longitudinal research. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 35(1), 32–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407517718387
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Crano, W. D., & Alvaro, E. M. (1998). Indirect minority influence: The leniency contract revisited. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 1(2), 99–115. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430298012001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Crano, W. D., & Chen, X. (1998). The leniency contract and persistence of majority and minority influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(6), 1437–1450. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1437
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Crano, W. D., & Seyranian, V. (2009). How minorities prevail: The context/comparison-leniency contract model. Journal of Social Issues, 65(2), 335–363. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2009.01603.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
David, B., & Turner, J. C. (1999). Studies in self-categorization and minority conversion: The in-group minority in intragroup and intergroup contexts. British Journal of Social Psychology, 38(2), 115–134. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466699164086
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Falomir-Pichastor, J. M., Gabarrot, F., & Mugny, G. (2009). Conformity and identity threat: The role of ingroup identification. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 68(2), 79–87. https://doi.org/10.1024/1421-0185.68.2.79
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gaertner, S. L., Dovidio, J., Anastasio, P., Bachman, B., & Rust, M. (1993). The common ingroup identity model: Recategorization and the reduction of intergroup bias. European Review of Social Psychology, 4, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/14792779343000004
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gaffney, A. M., & Hogg, M. A. (2022). A social identity analysis of sociability: Making, breaking, and shaping groups and societies. In A. Gaffney & M. Hogg (Eds.), The psychology of sociability (pp. 140–161). Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gaffney, A. M., Rast, D. E., III, Hackett, J. D., & Hogg, M. A. (2014). Further to the right: Uncertainty, political polarization and the American “Tea Party” movement. Social Influence, 9(4), 272–288. https://doi.org/10.1080/15534510.2013.842495
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gasiorek, J. (2016). The “dark side” side of CAT: Nonaccommodation. In H. Giles (Ed.) Communication Accommodation Theory: Negotiating personal relationships and social identities across contexts (pp 85–104). Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Giles, H. (Ed.). (2016). Communication Accommodation Theory: Negotiating personal relationships and social identities across contexts. Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Giles, H., Coupland, N., & Coupland, J. (1991). Accommodation theory: Communication, context, and consequence. In H. Giles, J. Coupland, & N. Coupland (Eds.), Contexts of accommodation: Developments in applied sociolinguistics (pp. 1–68). Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Giles, H., & Ogay, T. (2007). Communication Accommodation Theory. In B. B. Whaley & W. Samter (Eds.), Explaining communication: Contemporary theories and exemplars (pp. 293–310). Lawrence Erlbaum.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Goldman, L., & Hogg, M. A. (2016). Going to extremes for one’s group: The role of prototypicality and group acceptance. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 46(9), 544–553. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12382
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gross, T. (Host). (2020, April 12). Fresh Air [Audio Podcast]. National Public Radio. https://www.npr.org/2020/08/12/901632573/black-power-scholar-illustrates-how-mlk-and-malcolm-x-influenced-each-other
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hayes, A. F. (2013). An introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hogg, M. A. (2005). All animals are equal but some animals are more equal than others: Social identity and marginal membership. In K. D. Williams, J. P. Forgas, & W. von Hippel (Eds.), The social out-cast: Ostracism, social exclusion, rejection and bullying (pp. 243–261). Psychology Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hogg, M. A., Cooper-Shaw, L., & Holzworth, D. W. (1993). Group prototypicality and depersonalized attraction in small interactive groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19(4), 452–465. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167293194010
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hogg, M. A., & Gaffney, A. M. (2014). Prototype-based social comparisons within groups: Constructing social identity to reduce self-uncertainty. In Z. Križan & F. X. Gibbons (Eds.). Communal functions of social comparison (pp. 145–174). Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hogg, M. A., & Turner, J. C. (1987). Social identity and conformity: A theory of referent informational influence. In W. Doise & S. Moscovici (Eds.), Current issues in European social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 139–182). Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hogg, M. A., Turner, J. C., & Davidson, B. (1990). Polarized norms and social frames of reference: A test of the self-categorization theory of group polarization. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 11(1), 77–100. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324834basp1101_6
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hohman, Z. P., Gaffney, A. M., & Hogg, M. A. (2017). Who am I if I am not like my group? Self-uncertainty and feeling peripheral in a group. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 72, 125–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2017.05.002
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jetten, J., Branscombe, N. R., Spears, R., & McKimmie, B. M. (2003). Predicting the paths of peripherals: The interaction of identification and future possibilities. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(1), 130–140. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167202238378
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Joseph, P. E. (2020). The sword and the shield: the revolutionary lives of Malcolm X and Martin Luther King Jr. (First edition.). Basic Books.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mackie, D. M., Worth, L. T., & Asuncion, A. G. (1990). Processing of persuasive in-group messages. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(5), 812–822. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.58.5.812
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Martin, R. (1988). Ingroup and outgroup minorities: Differential impact upon public and private responses. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18(1), 39–52. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420180104
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Martin, R., & Hewstone, M. (2008). Majority versus minority influence, message processing and attitude change: The source-context-elaboration model. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 40, pp. 237–326). Elsevier Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(07)00005-6
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Moscovici, S. (1980). Towards a theory of conversion behaviour. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 13, pp. 209–239). Academic Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Moscovici, S. (1976). Social influence and social change. Academic Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Noel, J. G., Wann, D. L., & Branscombe, N. R. (1995). Peripheral ingroup membership status and public negativity toward outgroups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(1), 127–137. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.68.1.127
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Palomares, N. A., Giles, H., Soliz, J., Gallois, C. (2016). Intergroup accommodation, social categories and identities. In H. Giles (Ed.), Communication accommodation theory: Negotiating personal relationships and social identities across contexts. Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Papastamou, S., Gardikiotis, A., & Prodromitis, G. (2017). Majority and minority influence: Societal meaning and cognitive elaboration. Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315666648-5
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pérez, J. A., & Mugny, G. (1996). The conflict elaboration theory of social influence. In E.H. Witte, J. Davis (Eds.), Understanding group behaviour (Vol. 2, pp. 191-210). Laurence Erlbaum Associates.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
R Core Team (2021). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schmitt, M. T., & Branscombe, N. R. (2001). The good, the bad, and the manly: Threats to one’s prototypicality and evaluations of fellow in-group members. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37(6), 510–517. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.2001.1476
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Soliz, J., Giles, H., & Gasiorek, J. (2022). Communication accommodation theory: Converging toward an understanding of communication adaptation in interpersonal relationships. In D. Braithewaite & P. Schrodt (Eds.), Engaging theories in interpersonal communication: Multiple perspectives (3rd. ed., pp. 130–142). Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Soliz, J., Thorson, A. R., & Rittenour, C. E. (2009). Communicative correlates of satisfaction, family identity, and group salience in multiracial/ethnic families. Journal of Marriage and Family, 71(4), 819–832. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2009.00637.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behaviour. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (2nd ed., pp. 7–24). Nelson-Hall.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tropp, L. R., & Wright, S. C. (2001). Ingroup identification as the inclusion of ingroup in the self. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(5), 585–600.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Turner, J. C. (1991). Social influence. Open University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D. & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group. Basil Blackwell.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
van Knippenberg, B., & van Knippenberg, D. (2005). Leader self-sacrifice and leadership effectiveness: The moderating role of leader prototypicality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(1), 25–37. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.1.25
]Search in Google Scholar
[
van Knippenberg, D., & Wilke, H. (1992). Prototypicality of arguments and conformity to ingroup norms. European Journal of Social Psychology, 22(2), 141–155. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420220204
]Search in Google Scholar
