This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.
Cheng HD, Shi XJ, Min R, Hu LM, Cai XP, Du HN. Approaches for automated detection and classification of masses in mammograms. Pattern Recognition. 2006; 39:646-68.10.1016/j.patcog.2005.07.006ChengHDShiXJMinRHuLMCaiXPDuHNApproaches for automated detection and classification of masses in mammograms20063964668Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Wahid MI. Breast cancer. Kuala Lumpur: Malaysian Oncological Society. [online] 2007. [cited on 2008 Feb 06]. Available from: http://www.malaysiaoncology.orgWahidMIBreast cancercited2008Feb06Available fromhttp://www.malaysiaoncology.orgSearch in Google Scholar
Wilson M, Hargrave R, Mitra S, Shieh Y-Y, Roberson GH. Automated detection of microcalcifications in mammograms through application of image pixel remapping and statistical filter. 11th IEEE Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems; June 12-14, 1998.WilsonMHargraveRMitraSShiehYYRobersonGHAutomated detection of microcalcifications in mammograms through application of image pixel remapping and statistical filter199810.1109/CBMS.1998.701372Search in Google Scholar
Kang HK, Ro YM, Kim SM. A microcalcification detection using adaptive contrast enhancement on wavelet transform and neural network. IEICE Trans Inf Syst. March 1, 2006; E89-D:1280-7.10.1093/ietisy/e89-d.3.1280KangHKRoYMKimSMA microcalcification detection using adaptive contrast enhancement on wavelet transform and neural network2006E89-D12807Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Beam V, Sullivan D, Layde P. Effect of human variability on independent double reading in screening mammography. Acad Radiol. 1996; 3:891-7.895917810.1016/S1076-6332(96)80296-0BeamVSullivanDLaydePEffect of human variability on independent double reading in screening mammography199638917Search in Google Scholar
Thurfjell EL, Lernevall KA, Taube AAS. Benefit of independent double reading in a population-based mammography screening program. Radiology. 1994; 191:241-4.10.1148/radiology.191.1.8134580ThurfjellELLernevallKATaubeAASBenefit of independent double reading in a population-based mammography screening program19941912414Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Warren Burhenne LJ, Wood SA, D’Orsi CJ. Potential contribution of computer-aided detection to the sensitivity of screening mammography. Radiology. 2000; 215:554-62.1079693910.1148/radiology.215.2.r00ma15554Warren BurhenneLJWoodSAD’OrsiCJPotential contribution of computer-aided detection to the sensitivity of screening mammography200021555462Search in Google Scholar
Vomweg T, Buscema M, Kauczor H, Teifke A, Intraligi M, Terzi S, et al. Improved artificial neural networks in prediction of malignancy of lesions in contrastenhanced MR-mammography. Med Phys. 2003; 30: 2350-9.10.1118/1.1600871VomwegTBuscemaMKauczorHTeifkeAIntraligiMTerziSet alImproved artificial neural networks in prediction of malignancy of lesions in contrastenhanced MR-mammography20033023509Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Tyan SG. Median filtering, deterministic properties. In: Huang ITS, editor. Two dimensional digital signal processing. Berlin: Springer Verlag; 1981.TyanSGMedian filtering, deterministic propertiesHuangITSBerlinSpringer Verlag1981Search in Google Scholar
Umbaugh SE. Computer imaging: digital image analysis and processing. NewYork: CRC Press; 2005.UmbaughSENewYorkCRC Press2005Search in Google Scholar
Haralick RM. Statistical and structural approaches to texture. IEEE Trans Image Processing. 1979; 67: 786-804.HaralickRMStatistical and structural approaches to texture19796778680410.1109/PROC.1979.11328Search in Google Scholar
Pedrycz W. Fuzzy sets in pattern recognition: methodology and methods. Pattern Recognition. 1990; 23:121-46.10.1016/0031-3203(90)90054-OPedryczWFuzzy sets in pattern recognition:methodology and methods19902312146Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Wang WJ, Luoh L. Simple computation for the defuzzification of center of sum and center of gravity. Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems. 2000; 9:53-9.WangWJLuohLSimple computation for the defuzzification of center of sum and center of gravity20009539Search in Google Scholar
Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977; 33: 159-74.84357110.2307/2529310LandisJRKochGGThe measurement of observer agreement for categorical data19773315974Search in Google Scholar
Li H, Wang Y, Liu KJR, Lo SCB, Freedman MT. Computerized radiographic mass detection. II. Decision support by featured database visualization and modular neural networks. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging. 2001; 20:302-13.10.1109/42.92147911370897LiHWangYLiuKJRLoSCBFreedmanMTComputerized radiographic mass detection. II. Decision support by featured database visualization and modular neural networks2001203021311370897Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Bovis K, Singh S, Fieldsend J, Pinder C, editors. Identification of masses in digital mammograms with MLP and RBF nets. Neural Networks 2000, IJCNN 2000, Proceedings of the IEEE-INNS-ENNS International Joint Conference; 2000.BovisKSinghSFieldsendJPinderCIdentification of masses in digital mammograms with MLP and RBF nets200010.1109/IJCNN.2000.857859Search in Google Scholar
Bovis K, Singh S, editors. Detection of masses in mammograms using texture features. 15th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR’00) 2000.BovisKSinghSDetection of masses in mammograms using texture features200010.1109/ICPR.2000.906064Search in Google Scholar
Chen W, Giger M, Bick U, Newstead G. Automatic identification and classification of characteristic kinetic curves of breast lesions on DCE-MRI. Med Phys. 2006; 33:2878-87.1696486410.1118/1.2210568ChenWGigerMBickUNewsteadGAutomatic identification and classification of characteristic kinetic curves of breast lesions on DCE-MRI20063328788716964864Search in Google Scholar