[1. Ammirati M, Gross JD, Ammirati G, Dugan S. Compariosn of registration accuracy of skin- and bone-implanted fiducials for frameless stereotaxis of the brain: a prospective study. Skul Base. 2002; 12: 125-30.10.1055/s-2002-33458-1165693817167664]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Armsby HP. The principles of animal nutrition. J. Wiley and Sons, New York; 1908.]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Barnden L, Kwiatek R, Lau Y, Hutton B, Thurfjell L, Pile K, et al. Validation of fully automatic brain SPET to MR co-registration. Eur J Nucl Med. 2000; 27: 147-54.10.1007/s00259005002010755719]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[4. Choi Y, Ahn SH, Lee HS, Hur WJ, Yoon JH, Kim TH, et al. Clinical usefulness of implanted fiducial markers for hypofractionated radiotherapy of prostate cancer. J Korean Soc Ther Radiol Oncol. 2011; 29:91-8.10.3857/jkstro.2011.29.2.91]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[5. Cloutier G, Soulez G, Quanadli SD, Allard L, Qin Z, Cloutier F, et al. A multimodality vascular imaging phatom with fiducial markers visible in DSA, CTA, MRI, and ultrasound. Med Phys. 2004; 31:1424-33.10.1118/1.173930015259645]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[6. Dennis DA, Komistek RD, and Mahfouz MR. In vivo fluoroscopic analysis of fixed-bearing total knee replacements. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003; 410:114-30.10.1097/01.blo.0000062385.79828.7212771822]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Gendrin C, Markelj P, Pawiro SA, Spoerk J, Bloch C, Weber C, et al. Validation for 2D/3D registration I: The comparison of intensity- and gradient-based merit functions using a new gold standard data set. Med Phys. 2011; 38:1491-502.10.1118/1.3553403308976721520861]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[8. Grayeli AB, Esquia-Medina G, Nguyen Y, Mazalaigue S, Vellin J-F, Lombard B, et al. Use of anatomical or invasive markers in association with skin surface registration in image-guided surgery of the temporal bone. Acta Oto-Laryngologica. 2009; 129:405-10.10.1080/0001648080257902519153848]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Hendee WR, and Morgan CJ. Magnetic resonance imaging. Part I-physical principles. West J Med. 1984; 141:491-500.]Search in Google Scholar
[10. Ho JU, Chen MF, Chen WC. The feasibility study of customized fiducial markers in image fusion and position markers for radiation therapy. Proceedings of Korean Radio Therapiest Association Conference. 2008; 43:99-100.]Search in Google Scholar
[11. King DM, Fagan AJ, Moran CM, Browne JE. Comparative imaging study in ultrasound, MRI, CT, and DSA using a multimodality renal artery phantom. Med Phys. 2011; 38:565-73.10.1118/1.353367421452693]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[12. Kolind SH, Mackay AL, Munk PL, Xiang QS. Quantitative evaluation of metal artifact reduction techniques. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2004; 20:487-95.10.1002/jmri.2014415332257]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[13. Komistek RD, Dennis DA, Mahfouz M. In vivo fluoroscopic analysis of the normal human knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003; 410:69-81.10.1097/01.blo.0000062384.79828.3b12771818]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Lee YS, Seon JK, Shin VI, Kim GH, Jeon M. Anatomical evaluation of CT-MRI combined femoral model. Biomed Eng Online. 2008; 7:6.10.1186/1475-925X-7-6]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[15. Li G, Defrate LE, Rubash HE, Gill TJ. In vivo kinematics of the ACL during weight-bearing knee flexion. J Orthop Res. 2005; 23:340-4.10.1016/j.orthres.2004.08.006]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[16. Li G, Wuerz TH, Defrate LE. Feasibility of using orthogonal fluoroscopic images to measure in vivo joint kinematics. J Biomech Eng. 2004; 126:314-8.10.1115/1.1691448]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[17. Parker CC, Damyanovich A, Haycocks T, Haider M, Bayley A, Catton CN. Magnetic resonance imaging in the radiation treatment planning of localized prostate cancer using intra-prostatic fiducial markers for computed tommography co-registration. Radiother Oncol. 2003; 66:217-24.10.1016/S0167-8140(02)00407-3]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[18. Pawiro SA, Markelj P, Pernus F, Gendrin C, Figl M, Weber C, et al. Validation for 2D/3D registration I: A new gold standard data set. Med Phys. 2011; 38: 1481-90.10.1118/1.3553402309101721520860]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[19. Takao M, Nishii T, Sakai T, Sugano N. Application of a CT-3D fluoroscopy matching navigation system to the pelvic and femoral regions. Comput Aided Surg. 2012; 17:69-76.10.3109/10929088.2012.65482322348659]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[20. Vikhoff-Baaz B, Bergh AC, Starck G, Ekholm S, Wikkelso C. A new set of fiducial markers for MRI, CT and SPET alignment. Nucl Med Commun. 1997; 18:1148-54.10.1097/00006231-199712000-000069481761]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[21. West JJ, Patel AR, Kramer CM, Helms AS, Olson ES, Rangavajhala V, et al. Dynamic registration of preablation imaging with a catheter geometry to guide ablation in a Swine model: validation of image integration and assessment of catheter navigation accuracy. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2010; 21:81-7.10.1111/j.1540-8167.2009.01572.x19682169]Search in Google Scholar