[1. Burtis CA, Ashwood ER, Bruns DE, editors. Tietz textbook of clinical chemistry and molecular diagnostics. 4th ed. St Louis Missouri USA: Elsevier Saunders; 2006.]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Tonyushkina K, Nichols JH. Glucose Meters: A review of technical challenges to obtaining accurate results. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2009; 3:971-8010.1177/193229680900300446]Search in Google Scholar
[3. D’Orazio P, Burnett RW, Fogh-Andersen N, Jacobs E, Kuwa K, Külpmann WR, Larsson L, et al. Approved IFCC recommendation on reporting results for blood glucose. Clin Chem. 2005; 51:1573-6.10.1373/clinchem.2005.051979]Search in Google Scholar
[4. International Organization for Standardization. In vitro diagnostic test systems-requirements for bloodglucose monitoring systems for self-testing in managing diabetes mellitus. ISO/TC 212/SC. Final draft International Standard ISO/FDIS 15197. Geneva, Switzerland, 2003.]Search in Google Scholar
[5. DCCT. The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin dependent diabetes mellitus. NEJM. 1993; 329:977-86.10.1056/NEJM199309303291401]Search in Google Scholar
[6. UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) group. Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). Lancet. 1998; 352:837-53.10.1016/S0140-6736(98)07019-6]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Draft guidance for industry and FDA staff-total product life cycle for portable invasive blood glucose monitoring systems. [Internet]. [cited 2010 Nov 29].Available from http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/oivd/guidance/1603.html]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Clarke WL, Cox D, Gonder-Frederick LA, et al. Evaluating clinical accuracy of systems for self monitoring of blood glucose. Diabetes Care. 1987; 10: 622-8.10.2337/diacare.10.5.6223677983]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Kost GJ. Louie R. Veerasamy N. Aleman K. Tran NK. Tang Z. Meeting the challenge of the International Standard ISO 15197 for capillary glucose accuracy. Clin Chem. 2005; 51:A255.]Search in Google Scholar
[10. Tang Z, Lee JH, Louie RF, Kost GJ. Effects of different hematocrit levels on glucose measurements with handheld meters for point-of-care testing. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2000; 124:1135-40.10.5858/2000-124-1135-EODHLO10923072]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Louie RF, Tang Z, Sutton DV, Lee JH, Kost GJ. Point of- care glucose testing: effects of critical care variables influence of reference instruments, and a modular glucose meter design. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2000; 124:257-66.10.5858/2000-124-0257-POCGT10656736]Search in Google Scholar
[12. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986; 1:307-10.]Search in Google Scholar
[13. Khan AI, Vasquez Y, Gray J, Wians FH Jr, Kroll MH. The variability of results between point-of-care testing glucose meters and the central laboratory analyzer. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2006; 130:15-32.10.5858/2006-130-1527-TVORBP17090196]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Kost GJ. Understanding and preventing medical errors in point-of-care testing (and the use of FAST-QC). In: Nichols JH, editor. Point-of-care testing: performance improvement and evidence-based outcomes. Chapter 4. New York: Marcel Dekker; 2003.10.1201/b14092-5]Search in Google Scholar
[15. Clarke WL, Cox D, Gonder-Frederick LA, Carter W, Pohl SL. Evaluation of clinical accuracy of systems for self-monitoring of blood glucose. Diabetes Care. 1987; 5:62210.2337/diacare.10.5.622]Search in Google Scholar