[1. Jaffray DA, Siewerdsen JH, Wong JW, Martinez AA. Flat-panel cone-beam computed tomography for image- guided radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2002; 53: 1337-49.10.1016/S0360-3016(02)02884-5]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[2. Gong Y, Wang J, Bai S, Jaing X, XU F. Conventionallyfractionated image-guided intensity modulated radiotherapy (IG-IMRT): a safe and effective treatment for cancer spinal metastasis. Radiat Oncol. 2008; 3:11.10.1186/1748-717X-3-11237379218426607]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[3. Meyer J, Wilbert J, Baier K, Guckenberger M,Richter A, Sauer O. Positioning accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography in combination with a Hexa- POD robot treatment table. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007; 67:1220-8.10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.11.01017336222]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[4. Oldham M, Letourneau D, Watt L, Hugo G, Yan D, Lockman D, et al. Cone-beam CT guided radiation therapy. A model for on-line application. Radiat Oncol. 2005; 75:271-8.]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Paskalev K, Ma CM, Jacob R, Price R, McNeeley S, Wang L, et al. Daily target localization for prostate patients based on 3D image correlation. Phys Med Biol. 2004; 49:931-9.10.1088/0031-9155/49/6/00515104317]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[6. Morin O, Chen J, Aubin M, Gillis A, Aubry JF, Bose S, et al. Dose calculation using megavoltage cone-beam CT. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007; 67:1201-10.10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.10.04817336221]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[7. Tanyi JA, Fuss MH. Volumetric image-guidance: Dose routine usage prompt adaptive replanning. An institutional review. Acta Oncol. 2008; 47:1444-53.10.1080/0284186080227974118661434]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[8. Letourneau D, Wong R, Moseley D, Sharpe MB, Ansell S, Gospodarowicz M, et al. Online planning and delivery technique for radiotherapy of spinal metastasis using cone-beam CT: image quality and system performance. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007; 67:1229-37.10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.09.05817336223]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[9. Smitsmans MHP, de Bois J, Sonke JJ, Betgen A, Zijp L, Jaffray DA, et al. Automatic prostate localization on cone-beam CT scans for high precision image-guided radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005; 63: 975-84.10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.07.97316253772]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[10. Mageras GS, Mechalakos. Planning in the IGRT context: closing the loop. Semin Radiat Oncol. 2007; 17:268-77.10.1016/j.semradonc.2007.06.00217903704]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[11. Melancon AD, O’Daniel JC, Zhang L, Kudchadker RJ, Kuban DA, Lee AK, et al. Is a 3-mm intrafractional margin sufficient for daily image-guided intensitymodulated radiation therapy of prostate cancer? Radiather Oncol. 2007; 85:251-9.]Search in Google Scholar
[12. Van Herk M. Different styles of image-guided radiotherapy. Semin Radiat Oncol. 2007; 17: 258-67.10.1016/j.semradonc.2007.07.00317903703]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[13. Glover G, Pelc N. Nonlinear partial volume artifacts in x-ray computed tomography. Med Phys. 1980; 7: 238-48.10.1118/1.594678]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[14. Siewerdsen J, Jaffray D. Cone-beam computed tomography with a flat-panel imager: Magnitude and effect of x-ray scatter. Med Phys. 2001; 28:220-31.10.1118/1.1339879]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[15. Mail N, Moseley DJ, Siewerdsen J, Jaffray D. The influence of bowtie filtration on CBCT image quality. Med Phys. 2009; 36:22-32.10.1118/1.3017470]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[16. Yang Y, Schreibmann E, Li T, Wang C, Xing L. Evaluation of on-board kV cone beam CT (CBCT)-based dose calculation. Phys Med Biol. 2007; 52:685-705.10.1088/0031-9155/52/3/011]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[17. Junell S, DeWerd L. Determination of energy correction factor for TLD-100 in 6 and 10 MV beams relative to 60Co. Med Phys. 2008; 35:2780-1.10.1118/1.2961993]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[18. Craig T, Brochu D, Van Dyk J. A quality assurance phantom for three-dimensional radiation treatment planning. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1999; 44:955-66.10.1016/S0360-3016(99)00070-X]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[19. Chao M, et al. Auto-propagation of contours for adaptive prostate radiation therapy. Phys Med Biol. 2008; 53:4533-42.10.1088/0031-9155/53/17/00518677041]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[20. Nuver TT, Hoogeman MS, Remeijer P, van Herk M, Lebesque JV. An adaptive off-line procedure for radiotherapy of prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007; 65:1559-67.10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.12.01017306934]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[21. Nijkamp J, Pos FJ, Nuver TT, de Jong R, Remeijer P, Sonke JJ, et al. Adaptive radiotherapy for prostate cancer using kilovoltalge cone-beam computed tomography: first clinical results. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008; 70:75-82.10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.05.04617869445]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[22. Depuydt T, Hrbacek J, Slagmolen P, Van den Heuvel F. Cone-beam CT Hounsfield unit correction method and application on images of the pelvic region. Radiother Oncol 2006; 81(Suppl1):29.]Search in Google Scholar
[23. Hatton J, McCurdy B, Greer B P. Cone beam computerized tomography: the effect of calibration of the Hounsfield unit number to electron density on dose calculation accuracy for adaptive radiation therapy. Phys Med Biol. 2009; 54:N329-46.10.1088/0031-9155/54/15/N0119590116]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[24. Seco J, Evans PM. Assessing the effect of electron density in photon dose calculations. Med Phys. 2006; 33:540-52.10.1118/1.216140716532961]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[25. Houser C, Nawaz AO, Galvin J, Xiao Y. Quantitative evaluation of cone beam CT used for treatment planning. Med Phys. 2006; 33:2285-6.10.1118/1.2241926]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[26. Yoo S, Yin FF. Dosimetric feasibility of cone-beam CTbased treatment planning compared to CT-based treatment planning. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006; 66: 1553-61.10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.08.03117056197]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[27. Esch AV, Tillikainen L, Pyykkonen J, Paiusco M. Testing of the analytical anisotropic algorithm for photon dose calculation. Med Phys. 2006; 33:4130-48.10.1118/1.235833317153392]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar