This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Anderson, N. 2010. US could learn from Brazilian penalty for hindering fair use, Ars Technica. Available at:https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2010/07/us-could-learn-from-brazilian-penalty-for-hindering-fair-use/ (Accessed 23 November 2018).AndersonN.2010US could learn from Brazilian penalty for hindering fair use, Ars TechnicaAvailable athttps://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2010/07/us-could-learn-from-brazilian-penalty-for-hindering-fair-use/(Accessed 23 November 2018)Search in Google Scholar
Arewa, O. 2006. From J.C. Bach to Hip Hop: Musical Borrowing, Copyright and Cultural Context. North Carolina Law Review, 84: 547–645.ArewaO.2006From J.CBach to Hip Hop: Musical Borrowing, Copyright and Cultural Context. North Carolina Law Review84547645Search in Google Scholar
Aufderheide, P and Jaszi, P. 2018. Reclaiming fair use: how to put balance back in copyright (Second edition. ed.). Chicago; London: The University of Chicago Press. DOI:10.7208/chi-cago/9780226374222.001.0001AufderheidePJasziP.2018Reclaiming fair use: how to put balance back in copyright (Second edition. ed.)Chicago; LondonThe University of Chicago Press10.7208/chi-cago/9780226374222.001.0001Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Aufderheide, P, Jaszi, P, Milosevic, T and Bello, B. 2014. Copyright, Permissions, and Fair Use among Visual Artists and the Academic and Museum Visual Arts Communities: An Issue Report. Retrieved from Washington, D.C.:https://cmsimpact.org/resource/copyright-permissions-fair-use-visual-arts-communities-issues-report/AufderheidePJasziPMilosevicTBelloB.2014Copyright, Permissions, and Fair Use among Visual Artists and the Academic and Museum Visual Arts Communities: An Issue ReportRetrieved from Washington, D.Chttps://cmsimpact.org/resource/copyright-permissions-fair-use-visual-arts-communities-issues-report/Search in Google Scholar
Aufderheide, P, Pappalardo, K, Suzor, N and Stevens, J. 2018. Calculating the consequences of narrow Australian copyright exceptions: Measurable, hidden and incalculable costs to creators. Poetics, (69): 15–26. DOI:10.1016/j.poetic.2018.05.005AufderheidePPappalardoKSuzorNStevensJ.2018Calculating the consequences of narrow Australian copyright exceptions: Measurable, hidden and incalculable costs to creatorsPoetics6915–2610.1016/j.poetic.2018.05.005Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Aufderheide, P and Sinnreich, A. 2015. Documentarians, fair use, and free expression: changes in copyright attitudes and actions with access to best practices. Information, Communication & Society, 1–10. DOI:10.1080/1369118X.2015.1050050AufderheidePSinnreichA.2015Documentarians, fair use, and free expression: changes in copyright attitudes and actions with access to best practicesInformation, Communication & Society1–1010.1080/1369118X.2015.1050050Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Australian Law Reform Commission (ALRC). 2013. Copyright and the digital economy (ALRC Report 122). Available at:https://www.alrc.gov.au/sites/default/files/pdfs/publications/summary_report_alrc_122.pdf (Accessed 30 November 2013).Australian Law Reform Commission (ALRC)2013Copyright and the digital economy (ALRC Report 122)Available athttps://www.alrc.gov.au/sites/default/files/pdfs/publications/summary_report_alrc_122.pdf(Accessed 30 November 2013)Search in Google Scholar
Band, J and Gerafi, J. 2013. Fair use. Fair Dealing Handbook. Available at SSRN:https://ssrn.com/abstract=2333863. DOI:10.2139/ssrn.2333863BandJGerafiJ.2013Fair useFair Dealing HandbookAvailable at SSRNhttps://ssrn.com/abstract=233386310.2139/ssrn.2333863Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Benkler, Y. 2006. The wealth of networks: how social production transforms markets and freedom. Yale University Press.BenklerY.2006The wealth of networks: how social production transforms markets and freedomYale University PressSearch in Google Scholar
Bently, L. 1994. Copyright and the death of the author in law and literature. Modern Law Review, 57: 973– 986. DOI:10.1111/j.1468-2230.1994.tb01989.xBentlyL.1994Copyright and the death of the author in law and literatureModern Law Review57973–98610.1111/j.1468-2230.1994.tb01989.xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
Bollier, D. 2008. Viral spiral: how the commoners built a digital republic of their own. New York: New Press.BollierD.2008Viral spiral: how the commoners built a digital republic of their ownNew YorkNew PressSearch in Google Scholar
Bowrey, K. 2002. Who’s painting copyright’s history? In: McClean, C and Schubert, K (eds.), Dear Images: Art, Copyright & Culture. London: Ridinghouse Press.BowreyK.2002Who’s painting copyright’s history?InMcCleanCSchubertK(eds.)Dear Images: Art, Copyright & CultureLondonRidinghouse PressSearch in Google Scholar
Carbaugh, D. 2007. Cultural discourse analysis: communication practices and intercultural encounters. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 36(3): 167–182. DOI:10.1080/17475750701737090CarbaughD.2007Cultural discourse analysis: communication practices and intercultural encountersJournal of Intercultural Communication Research36316718210.1080/17475750701737090Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Chon, M. 2012. The romantic collective author. Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment and Technology Law, 14: 829–849.ChonM.2012The romantic collective authorVanderbilt Journal of Entertainment and Technology Law14829849Search in Google Scholar
Cohen, J. 2007. Creativity and culture in copyright theory. University of California Davis Law Review, 40: 1151–1205.CohenJ.2007Creativity and culture in copyright theoryUniversity of California Davis Law Review401151120510.4324/9781315095400-17Search in Google Scholar
Cohen, J. 2011. Configuring the networked self: law, code and the play of everyday practice. Yale University Press.CohenJ.2011Configuring the networked self: law, code and the play of everyday practiceYale University PressSearch in Google Scholar
College Art Association. 2015. Code of best practices in fair use in the visual arts. Available at:http://www.collegeart.org/programs/caa-fair-use/best-practices (accessed 8 September 2018).CollegeArt Association.2015Code of best practices in fair use in the visual artsAvailable athttp://www.collegeart.org/programs/caa-fair-use/best-practices(accessed 8 September 2018)Search in Google Scholar
Coombe, R. 1998. Cultural Life of Intellectual Properties: Authorship, Appropriation and the Law. Duke University Press. DOI:10.1215/9780822382492CoombeR.1998Cultural Life of Intellectual Properties: Authorship, Appropriation and the LawDuke University Press10.1215/9780822382492Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Csikszentmihalyi, M. 1996. Creativity: flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York: Harper Collins Publisher.CsikszentmihalyiM.1996Creativity: flow and the psychology of discovery and inventionNew YorkHarper Collins PublisherSearch in Google Scholar
Cunningham, S and Turner, G. 2009. The media and communications in Australia. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.CunninghamSTurnerG.2009The media and communications in AustraliaSydneyAllen & UnwinSearch in Google Scholar
Demers, J. 2006. Steal this music: how intellectual property law affects musical creativity. University of Georgia Press.DemersJ.2006Steal this music: how intellectual property law affects musical creativityUniversity of Georgia PressSearch in Google Scholar
European Commission. 2016. Proposal for a directive of the European parliament and of the council on copyright in the digital single market, Brussels 2016/0280 (COD).EuropeanCommission.2016Proposal for a directive of the European parliament and of the council on copyright in the digital single market, Brussels 2016/0280 (COD)Search in Google Scholar
Foucault, M. 1979. What is an Author? In: Harari, J (ed.), Textual Strategies: Perspectives in Post-Structuralist Criticism. Cornell University Press.FoucaultM.1979What is an Author?InHarariJedTextual Strategies: Perspectives in Post-Structuralist CriticismCornell University PressSearch in Google Scholar
Fromer, J. 2010. A psychology of intellectual property. Northwestern University Law Review, 1441–1509.FromerJ.2010A psychology of intellectual propertyNorthwestern University Law Review1441–1509Search in Google Scholar
Gillespie, T. 2007. Wired shut: copyright and the shape of digital culture. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI:10.7551/mitpress/7253.001.0001GillespieT.2007Wired shut: copyright and the shape of digital cultureCambridge, MAMIT Press10.7551/mitpress/7253.001.0001Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Glaser, BG and Strauss, AL. 1968. The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson. DOI:10.1097/00006199-196807000-00014GlaserBGStraussAL.1968The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative researchLondonWeidenfeld and Nicolson10.1097/00006199-196807000-00014Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
International Documentary Association et al. 2005. Documentary filmmakers’ statement of best practices in fair use. Available at:http://cmsimpact.org/code/documentary-filmmakers-statement-of-best-practices-in-fair-use/InternationalDocumentary Associationet al2005Documentary filmmakers’ statement of best practices in fair useAvailable athttp://cmsimpact.org/code/documentary-filmmakers-statement-of-best-practices-in-fair-use/Search in Google Scholar
Jaszi, P. 1992. On the Author Effect: Contemporary Copyright and Collective Creativity. Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal, 10: 293–320.JasziP.1992On the Author Effect: Contemporary Copyright and Collective CreativityCardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal10293320Search in Google Scholar
Jenkins, H, Ford, S and Green, J. 2013. Spreadable media: creating value and meaning in a networked culture. New York: NYU Press.JenkinsHFordSGreenJ.2013Spreadable media: creating value and meaning in a networked cultureNew YorkNYU PressSearch in Google Scholar
Kwall, RR. 2006. Inspiration and innovation: the intrinsic dimension of the artistic soul. Notre Dame Law Review, 81: 1945–2012.KwallRR.2006Inspiration and innovation: the intrinsic dimension of the artistic soulNotre Dame Law Review8119452012Search in Google Scholar
Lessig, L. 2004. Free culture: how big media uses technology and the law to lock down culture and control creativity. Penguin.LessigL.2004Free culture: how big media uses technology and the law to lock down culture and control creativityPenguinSearch in Google Scholar
Litman, J. 2006. Digital copyright. 2nd ed. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.LitmanJ.2006Digital copyright. 2nd edAmherst, NYPrometheus BooksSearch in Google Scholar
Macfarlane, R. 2007. Original copy: plagiarism and originality in nineteenth century literature. Oxford: University Press. DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199296507.003.0002MacfarlaneR.2007Original copy: plagiarism and originality in nineteenth century literatureOxfordUniversity Press10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199296507.003.0002Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
MacPherson, CB. 1962. The political theory of possessive individualism. 1st ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press.MacPhersonCB.1962The political theory of possessive individualism. 1st edOxfordClarendon PressSearch in Google Scholar
Malcolm, J. 2017. Brazil proposes new digital copyright rules for the WTO. Electronic Frontier FoundationMalcolmJ.2017Brazil proposes new digital copyright rules for the WTO. Electronic Frontier FoundationSearch in Google Scholar
Marshall, L. 2002. Metallica and morality: the rhetorical battleground of the Napster wars. Entertainment Law, 1(1): 1–19. DOI:10.1080/14730980210001730301MarshallL.2002Metallica and morality: the rhetorical battleground of the Napster warsEntertainment Law1111910.1080/14730980210001730301Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
McCutcheon, MA. 2012. The cento, Romanticism, and copyright. English Studies in Canada, 38(2): 71–101. DOI:10.1353/esc.2012.0012McCutcheonMA.2012The cento, Romanticism, and copyrightEnglish Studies in Canada3827110110.1353/esc.2012.0012Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
McLeod, K. 2007. Freedom of expression®: resistance and repression in the age of intellectual property (1st University of Minnesota Press ed.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.McLeodK.2007Freedom of expression®: resistance and repression in the age of intellectual property (1st University of Minnesota Press ed.)MinneapolisUniversity of Minnesota PressSearch in Google Scholar
McLeod, K and DiCola, P. 2011. Creative license: the law and culture of digital sampling. Duke University Press. DOI:10.1215/9780822393528McLeodKDiColaP.2011Creative license: the law and culture of digital samplingDuke University Press10.1215/9780822393528Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA). 2018. Who we are. Available at:https://www.mpaa.org/who-we-are/ (accessed 8 September 2018).Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA)2018Who we areAvailable athttps://www.mpaa.org/who-we-are/(accessed 8 September 2018)Search in Google Scholar
Nicholson, DR. 2018. Why ‘fair use’ is so important for South African copyright law. The ConversationNicholsonDR.2018Why ‘fair use’ is so important for South African copyright law. The ConversationSearch in Google Scholar
Pappalardo, K, Aufderheide, P, Stevens, J and Suzor, N. 2017. Imagination foregone: A qualitative study of the reuse practices of Australian creators. Report produced for the Australian Digital AlliancePappalardoKAufderheidePStevensJSuzorN.2017Imagination foregone: A qualitative study of the reuse practices of Australian creators. Report produced for the Australian Digital AllianceSearch in Google Scholar
Pappalardo, K and Meese, J. 2019. In support of tolerated use: Rethinking harms, moral rights and remedies in Australian copyright law. University of New South Wales Law Journal, 42(3): 928–952.PappalardoKMeeseJ.2019In support of tolerated use: Rethinking harms, moral rights and remedies in Australian copyright lawUniversity of New South Wales Law Journal42392895210.53637/WEHK9428Search in Google Scholar
Patry, W. 2009. Moral panics and the copyright wars. Oxford University Press.PatryW.2009Moral panics and the copyright warsOxford University PressSearch in Google Scholar
Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA). 2018. 89 artists add names to effort calling on Congress to pass the CLASSICS act. Available at:https://www.riaa.com/89-artists-add-names-effort-call-ing-congress-pass-classics-act/Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA)201889 artists add names to effort calling on Congress to pass the CLASSICS actAvailable athttps://www.riaa.com/89-artists-add-names-effort-call-ing-congress-pass-classics-act/Search in Google Scholar
Rimmer, M. 2012. An elegy for Greg Ham: copyright law, the kookaburra case, and remix culture. Deakin Law Review, 17(2): 385–423. DOI:10.21153/dlr2012vol17no2art85RimmerM.2012An elegy for Greg Ham: copyright law, the kookaburra case, and remix cultureDeakin Law Review17238542310.21153/dlr2012vol17no2art85Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Rose, M. 1988. The author as proprietor: Donaldson v. Becket and the genealogy of modern authorship. Representations, 23: 51–85. DOI:10.2307/2928566RoseM.1988The author as proprietor: Donaldson vBecket and the genealogy of modern authorship. Representations23518510.2307/2928566Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Rose, M. 1993. Authors and owners: the invention of copyright. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.RoseM.1993Authors and owners: the invention of copyrightCambridgeHarvard University PressSearch in Google Scholar
Saint-Amour, P. 2003. The copyrights: intellectual property and the literary imagination. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Saint-AmourP.2003The copyrights: intellectual property and the literary imaginationIthacaCornell University PressSearch in Google Scholar
Schloss, J. 2004. Making beats: the art of sample-based hip-hop. Wesleyan University Press.SchlossJ.2004Making beats: the art of sample-based hip-hopWesleyan University PressSearch in Google Scholar
Silbey, J. 2008. The mythical beginnings of intellectual property. George Mason Law Review, 15: 319–379.SilbeyJ.2008The mythical beginnings of intellectual propertyGeorge Mason Law Review15319379Search in Google Scholar
Silbey, J. 2011. Harvesting intellectual property: inspired beginnings and “Work-Makes-Work”, two stages in the creative processes of artists and innovators. Notre Dame Law Review, 86(5): 2091–2132.SilbeyJ.2011Harvesting intellectual property: inspired beginnings and “Work-Makes-Work”, two stages in the creative processes of artists and innovatorsNotre Dame Law Review86520912132Search in Google Scholar
Sinnreich, A. 2010. Mashed up: music, technology, and the rise of configurable culture. University of Massachusetts Press.SinnreichA.2010Mashed up: music, technology, and the rise of configurable cultureUniversity of Massachusetts PressSearch in Google Scholar
Sinnreich, A. 2013. The piracy crusade: how the music industry’s war on sharing destroys markets and erodes civil liberties. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.SinnreichA.2013The piracy crusade: how the music industry’s war on sharing destroys markets and erodes civil libertiesAmherstUniversity of Massachusetts PressSearch in Google Scholar
Sprigman, CJ. 2018. Copyright and creative incentives: what we know (and don’t). Houston Law Review, 55(2): 451–478. DOI:10.1017/9781316471647.003SprigmanCJ.2018Copyright and creative incentives: what we know (and don’t)Houston Law Review55245147810.1017/9781316471647.003Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Streeter, T. 2010. The net effect: Romanticism, capitalism and the internet. New York: NYU Press. DOI:https:// doi.org/10.18574/nyu/9780814741153.001.0001StreeterT.2010The net effect: Romanticism, capitalism and the internetNew YorkNYU Press/10.18574/nyu/9780814741153.001.0001Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Suzor, N. 2014. Free-riding, cooperation and ‘peaceful revolutions’ in copyright. Harvard Journal of Law and Technology, 28(1): 137–193.SuzorN.2014Free-riding, cooperation and ‘peaceful revolutions’ in copyrightHarvard Journal of Law and Technology281137193Search in Google Scholar
Throsby, D and Petetskaya, K. 2017. Making art work: an economic study of professional artists in Australia. Report prepared for the Australia Council for the ArtsThrosbyDPetetskayaK.2017Making art work: an economic study of professional artists in Australia. Report prepared for the Australia Council for the ArtsSearch in Google Scholar
Towse, R. 2017. Economics of music publishing: copyright and the market. Journal of Cultural Economics 41(4): 403–420. DOI:10.1007/s10824-016-9268-7TowseR.2017Economics of music publishing: copyright and the marketJournal of Cultural Economics41440342010.1007/s10824-016-9268-7Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Tushnet, R. 2009. Economies of desire: fair use and marketplace assumptions. William & Mary Law Review 51: 513–546.TushnetR.2009Economies of desire: fair use and marketplace assumptionsWilliam & Mary Law Review51513546Search in Google Scholar
Vaidhyanathan, S. 2001. Copyrights and copywrongs: the rise of intellectual property and how it threatens creativity. New York: New York University Press.VaidhyanathanS.2001Copyrights and copywrongs: the rise of intellectual property and how it threatens creativityNew YorkNew York University PressSearch in Google Scholar
Woodmansee, M. 1992. On the Author Effect: Recovering Collectivity. Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal, 10: 279–292.WoodmanseeM.1992On the Author Effect: Recovering CollectivityCardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal10279292Search in Google Scholar
Woodmansee, M and Jaszi, P. 1994. The construction of authorship: textual appropriation in law and literature (post-contemporary interventions). Duke University Press Books.WoodmanseeMJasziP.1994The construction of authorship: textual appropriation in law and literature (post-contemporary interventions)Duke University Press BooksSearch in Google Scholar