Developing the Tissue Engineered Heart Valve – a Descriptive Hemodynamic and Ultrasound in Vitro Characterization Study of Heart Valves in a Bioreactor
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Falk V, Baumgartner H, Bax JJ, et al. ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease. European Heart Journal. 2017; 38(36): 2739–91.FalkVBaumgartnerHBaxJJESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease2017383627399110.1093/eurheartj/ehx391Search in Google Scholar
Falk V, Schwammenthal EE, Kempfert J, et al. New anatomically oriented transapical aortic valve implantation. Annals of Thoracic Surgery. 2009; 87(3):925–6.FalkVSchwammenthalEEKempfertJNew anatomically oriented transapical aortic valve implantation2009873925610.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.12.026Search in Google Scholar
Zannis K, Folliguet T, Laborde F. New sutureless aortic valve prosthesis: another tool in less invasive aortic valve replacement. Current Opinion In Cardiology. 2012; 27(2):125–9.ZannisKFolliguetTLabordeFNew sutureless aortic valve prosthesis: another tool in less invasive aortic valve replacement2012272125910.1097/HCO.0b013e3283501a11Search in Google Scholar
Sorajja P, Gössl M, Babaliaros V, et al. Novel Transcatheter Mitral Valve Prosthesis for Patients With Severe Mitral Annular Calcification. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2019; 74(11): 1431–40.SorajjaPGösslMBabaliarosVNovel Transcatheter Mitral Valve Prosthesis for Patients With Severe Mitral Annular Calcification2019741114314010.1016/j.jacc.2019.07.069Search in Google Scholar
Van Geldorp MW, Jamieson WE, Kappetein AP, et al. Patient outcome after aortic valve replacement with a mechanical or biological prosthesis: weighing lifetime anticoagulant-related event risk against reoperation risk. Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2009; 137(4): 881–6.Van GeldorpMWJamiesonWEKappeteinAPPatient outcome after aortic valve replacement with a mechanical or biological prosthesis: weighing lifetime anticoagulant-related event risk against reoperation risk20091374881610.1016/j.jtcvs.2008.09.028Search in Google Scholar
Cabalka AK, Asnes JD, Balzer DT, et al. Transcatheter pulmonary valve replacement using the melody valve for treatment of dysfunctional surgical bioprostheses: a multicenter study. Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2018; 155(4): 1712–24.CabalkaAKAsnesJDBalzerDTTranscatheter pulmonary valve replacement using the melody valve for treatment of dysfunctional surgical bioprostheses: a multicenter study2018155417122410.1016/j.jtcvs.2017.10.143Search in Google Scholar
Zhang J, Zhao X, Liang L, et al. A decade of progress in liver regenerative medicine. Biomaterials. 2018; 157:161–76.ZhangJZhaoXLiangLA decade of progress in liver regenerative medicine20181571617610.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.11.027Search in Google Scholar
Okuyama H, Ohnishi H, Nakamura R, et al. Transplantation of multiciliated airway cells derived from human iPS cells using an artificial tracheal patch into rat trachea. Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine. 2019; 13(6):1019–30.OkuyamaHOhnishiHNakamuraRTransplantation of multiciliated airway cells derived from human iPS cells using an artificial tracheal patch into rat trachea201913610193010.1002/term.2849Search in Google Scholar
Romano V, Di Meglio F, Nurzynska D, et al. Optimization Of Human Heart Decellularization Method For Cardiac Regenerative Medicine. Italian Journal of Anatomy and Embryology. 2017; 122(1):184.RomanoVDi MeglioFNurzynskaDOptimization Of Human Heart Decellularization Method For Cardiac Regenerative Medicine20171221184Search in Google Scholar
Petrosyan A, Zanusso I, Lavarreda-Pearce M, et al. Decellularized renal matrix and regenerative medicine of the kidney: a different point of view. Tissue Engineering Part B-Re. 2016; 22(3):183–92.PetrosyanAZanussoILavarreda-PearceMDecellularized renal matrix and regenerative medicine of the kidney: a different point of view20162231839210.1089/ten.teb.2015.0368Search in Google Scholar
Sodian R, Hoerstrup SP, Sperling JS, et al. Tissue engineering of heart valves: in vitro experiences. Annals of Thoracic Surgery. 2000; 70(1): 140–4.SodianRHoerstrupSPSperlingJSTissue engineering of heart valves: in vitro experiences2000701140410.1016/S0003-4975(00)01255-8Search in Google Scholar
Harpa M, Movileanu I, Sierad L, et al. In vivo testing of xenogeneic acellular aortic valves seeded with stem cells. Revista Romana de Medicina de Laborator. 2016; 24(3):343–346.HarpaMMovileanuISieradLIn vivo testing of xenogeneic acellular aortic valves seeded with stem cells201624334334610.1515/rrlm-2016-0031651653531098341Search in Google Scholar
Xue Y, Sant V, Phillippi J, et al. Biodegradable and biomimetic elastomeric scaffolds for tissue-engineered heart valves. Acta biomateralia. 2017; 48:2–19.XueYSantVPhillippiJBiodegradable and biomimetic elastomeric scaffolds for tissue-engineered heart valves20174821910.1016/j.actbio.2016.10.03227780764Search in Google Scholar
Harpa MM, Movileanu, I, Sierad LN, et al. Pulmonary heart valve replacement using stabilized acellular xenogeneic scaffolds; effects of seeding with autologous stem cells. Revista Romana de Medicina de Laborator. 2015; 23(4): 415–30.HarpaMMMovileanu,ISieradLNPulmonary heart valve replacement using stabilized acellular xenogeneic scaffolds; effects of seeding with autologous stem cells20152344153010.1515/rrlm-2015-0046Search in Google Scholar
Vismara R, Soncini M, Talò G. A bioreactor with compliance monitoring for heart valve grafts. Annals of Biomedical Engineering. 2010; 38(1):100–8.VismaraRSonciniMTalòGA bioreactor with compliance monitoring for heart valve grafts2010381100810.1007/s10439-009-9803-119784774Search in Google Scholar
Tefft BJ, Choe JA, Young MD, et al. Cardiac Valve Bioreactor for Physiological Conditioning and Hydrodynamic Performance Assessment. Cardiovascular Engineering and Technology. 2019; 10(1):80–94.TefftBJChoeJAYoungMDCardiac Valve Bioreactor for Physiological Conditioning and Hydrodynamic Performance Assessment2019101809410.1007/s13239-018-00382-2654140030311149Search in Google Scholar
Converse GL, Buse EE, Neill KR, et al. Design and efficacy of a single-use bioreactor for heart valve tissue engineering. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research B. 2017; 105(2):249–59.ConverseGLBuseEENeillKRDesign and efficacy of a single-use bioreactor for heart valve tissue engineering201710522495910.1002/jbm.b.3355226469196Search in Google Scholar
Butcher JT, Nerem RM. Valvular endothelial cells regulate the phenotype of interstitial cells in coculture: effects of steady shear stress. Tissue Engineering. 2006; 12:905–915.ButcherJTNeremRMValvular endothelial cells regulate the phenotype of interstitial cells in coculture: effects of steady shear stress20061290591510.1089/ten.2006.12.90516674302Search in Google Scholar
Engelmayr Jr GC, Sales VL, Mayer Jr JE, et al. Cyclic flexure and laminar flow synergistically accelerate mesenchymal stem cell-mediated engineered tissue formation: implications for engineered heart valve tissues. Biomaterials. 2006; 27:6083–95.EngelmayrGCJrSalesVLMayerJEJrCyclic flexure and laminar flow synergistically accelerate mesenchymal stem cell-mediated engineered tissue formation: implications for engineered heart valve tissues20062760839510.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.07.04516930686Search in Google Scholar
Van Kelle MAJ, Oomen PJA, Bulsink JA, et al. A bioreactor to identify the driving mechanical stimuli of tissue growth and remodeling. Tissue Engineering Part C: Methods. 2017; 23(6):377–87.Van KelleMAJOomenPJABulsinkJAA bioreactor to identify the driving mechanical stimuli of tissue growth and remodeling20172363778710.1089/ten.tec.2017.0141Search in Google Scholar
Van Haaften EE, Wissing TB, Rutten MCM, et al. Decoupling the effect of shear stress and stretch on tissue growth and remodeling in a vascular graft. Tissue Engineering Part C: Methods. 2018; 24:418–29.Van HaaftenEEWissingTBRuttenMCMDecoupling the effect of shear stress and stretch on tissue growth and remodeling in a vascular graft2018244182910.1089/ten.tec.2018.010429877143Search in Google Scholar
Dangas G, Gorlin R. Changing Concepts in the Determination of Valvular Stenosis. Prog Cardiovascular Disease. 1997; 40:55–64.DangasGGorlinRChanging Concepts in the Determination of Valvular Stenosis199740556410.1016/S0033-0620(97)80022-9Search in Google Scholar
Movileanu I, Harpa M, Branzaniuc K, et al. A Standardized Dissection Protocol to Generate Aortic Valvular Scaffolds from Porcine Hearts. Acta Medica Marisiensis. 2017; 63(3): 133–5.MovileanuIHarpaMBranzaniucKA Standardized Dissection Protocol to Generate Aortic Valvular Scaffolds from Porcine Hearts2017633133510.1515/amma-2017-0029Search in Google Scholar
Sierad LN, Shaw EL, Bina A, et al. Functional heart valve scaffolds obtained by complete decellularization of porcine aortic roots in a novel differential pressure gradient perfusion system. Tissue Engineering Part C- Methods. 2015; 21(12):1284–96.SieradLNShawELBinaAFunctional heart valve scaffolds obtained by complete decellularization of porcine aortic roots in a novel differential pressure gradient perfusion system2015211212849610.1089/ten.tec.2015.0170Search in Google Scholar
Movileanu I, Brinzaniuc K, Harpa M, et al. Pressurized Perfusion System for Obtaining Completely Acellular Pulmonary Valve Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering. ARS Medica Tomitana. 2019; 25(4):149–56.MovileanuIBrinzaniucKHarpaMPressurized Perfusion System for Obtaining Completely Acellular Pulmonary Valve Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering20192541495610.2478/arsm-2019-0030Search in Google Scholar
Sierad LN, Simionescu A, Albers C, et al. Design and testing of a pulsatile conditioning system for dynamic endothelialization of polyphenol-stabilized tissue engineered heart valves. Cardiovascular Engineering and Technology. 2010; 1(2):138–53.SieradLNSimionescuAAlbersCDesign and testing of a pulsatile conditioning system for dynamic endothelialization of polyphenol-stabilized tissue engineered heart valves2010121385310.1007/s13239-010-0014-6Search in Google Scholar
Abe H, Iguchi N, Utanohara, et al. Planimetry of the orifice area in aortic valve stenosis using phase-contrast cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. International Heart Journal. 2018; 59(1):77–80.AbeHIguchiNUtanoharaPlanimetry of the orifice area in aortic valve stenosis using phase-contrast cardiac magnetic resonance imaging2018591778010.1536/ihj.16-542Search in Google Scholar
Quien MM, Saric M. Ultrasound imaging artifacts: How to recognize them and how to avoid them. Echocardiography. 2018; 35(9):1388–401.QuienMMSaricMUltrasound imaging artifacts: How to recognize them and how to avoid them2018359138840110.1111/echo.14116Search in Google Scholar
Mahmood F, Fritsch M, Maslow A. Unanticipated Mild-to-Moderate Aortic Stenosis During Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: Scope of the Problem and Its Echocardiographic Evaluation. Journal of cardiothoracic and vascularanesthesia. 2009; 23: 869–77.MahmoodFFritschMMaslowAUnanticipated Mild-to-Moderate Aortic Stenosis During Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: Scope of the Problem and Its Echocardiographic Evaluation2009238697710.1053/j.jvca.2009.03.018Search in Google Scholar
Tardif JC, Rodrigues AG, Hardy JF. Simultaneous determination of aortic valve area by the Gorlin formula and by transesophageal echocardiography under different transvalvular flow conditions: evidence that anatomic aortic valve area does not change with variations in flow in aortic stenosis. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 1997; 29(6): 1296–302.TardifJCRodriguesAGHardyJFSimultaneous determination of aortic valve area by the Gorlin formula and by transesophageal echocardiography under different transvalvular flow conditions: evidence that anatomic aortic valve area does not change with variations in flow in aortic stenosis1997296129630210.1016/S0735-1097(97)00060-0Search in Google Scholar
Cannon SR, Richards KL, Crawford MH, et al. Inadequacy of the Gorlin formula for predicting prosthetic valve area. American Journal of Cardiology. 1988; 62(1):113–6.CannonSRRichardsKLCrawfordMHInadequacy of the Gorlin formula for predicting prosthetic valve area1988621113610.1016/0002-9149(88)91374-4Search in Google Scholar
Prosthetic valves (PrV). In The EACVI Echo Handbook. Eds: Lancellotti P, Cosyns B. Oxford University Press. Oxford. 2016; 320–37.Prosthetic valves (PrV)Eds:LancellottiPCosynsBOxford University PressOxford20163203710.1093/med/9780198713623.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Garcia D, Kadem L. What do you mean by aortic valve area: geometric orifice area, effective orifice area, or gorlinarea?. Journal of Heart Valve Disease. 2006; 15(5):601–8.GarciaDKademLWhat do you mean by aortic valve area: geometric orifice area, effective orifice area, or gorlinarea?20061556018Search in Google Scholar
Garcia D, Pibarot P, Landry C, et al. Estimation of aortic valve effective orifice area by Doppler echocardiography: effects of valve inflow shape and flow rate. Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography. 2004; 17(7):756–65.GarciaDPibarotPLandryCEstimation of aortic valve effective orifice area by Doppler echocardiography: effects of valve inflow shape and flow rate20041777566510.1016/j.echo.2004.03.03015220901Search in Google Scholar
Saikrishnan N, Kumar G, Sawaya FJ, et al. Accurate assessment of aortic stenosis: a review of diagnostic modalities and hemodynamics. Circulation. 2014; 129(2):244–53.SaikrishnanNKumarGSawayaFJAccurate assessment of aortic stenosis: a review of diagnostic modalities and hemodynamics201412922445310.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.00231024421359Search in Google Scholar