[Agres, K.R., Abdallah, S. and Pearce, M.T. (2018). Information-theoretic properties of auditory sequences dynamically influence expectation and memory, Cognitive Science42(1): 43–76.10.1111/cogs.1247728121017]Search in Google Scholar
[Arthur, C. (2018). A perceptual study of scale-degree qualia in context, Music Perception35(3): 295–314.10.1525/mp.2018.35.3.295]Search in Google Scholar
[Bader, M., Schröger, E. and Grimm, S. (2017). How regularity representations of short sound patterns that are based on relative or absolute pitch information establish over time: An EEG study, PlosONE12(5): e0176981.10.1371/journal.pone.0176981541761428472146]Search in Google Scholar
[Bendixen, A., Schröger, E. and Winkler, I. (2009). I heard that coming: Event-related potential evidence for stimulus-driven prediction in the auditory system, The Journal of Neuroscience29(26): 8447–8451.10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1493-09.2009666564919571135]Search in Google Scholar
[Benward, B. and Saker, M. (2008). Music in Theory and Practice, William Glass, New York, NY.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bharucha, J.J. (1987). Music cognition and perceptual facilitation: A connectionist frame-work, Music Perception5(1): 1–30.10.2307/40285384]Search in Google Scholar
[Boltz, M.G. (1999). The processing of melodic and temporal information: independent or unified dimensions?, Journal of New Music Research28: 67–79.10.1076/jnmr.28.1.67.3121]Search in Google Scholar
[Bouwer, F. and Honing, H. (2012). Rhythmic regularity revisited: Is beat induction indeed pre-attentive?, Proceedings of the 12th International Conference of the European Society for the Cognitive Sciences of Music, Thessaloniki, Greece, pp. 122–127.]Search in Google Scholar
[Burns, E.M. (1999). Intervals, scales, and tuning, in D. Deutsch (Ed.), The Psychology of Music, Academic Press, New York, NY, pp. 215–264.10.1016/B978-012213564-4/50008-1]Search in Google Scholar
[Busch, R. (1985). On the horizontal and vertical presentation of musical ideas and on musical space (I), Tempo (154): 2–10.10.1017/S0040298200021434]Search in Google Scholar
[Butler, D. and Brown, H. (1994). Describing the mental representation of tonality in music, in R. Aiello and J.A. Sloboda (Eds), Musical Perceptions, Oxford University Press, New York, NY, pp. 191–212.]Search in Google Scholar
[Cleary, J.G., Teahan, W.J. and Witten, I.H. (1995). Unbounded length contexts for PPM, Proceedings of the Data Compression Conference, DCC’95, Snowbird, UT, USA, pp. 52–61.]Search in Google Scholar
[Cleary, J.G. and Witten, I. (1984). Data compression using adaptive coding and partial string matching, IEEE Transactions on Communications32(4): 396–402.10.1109/TCOM.1984.1096090]Search in Google Scholar
[Dahlhaus, C. (2014). Studies on the Origin of Harmonic Tonality, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.]Search in Google Scholar
[Edmonds, B. (1995). What is complexity? The philosophy of complexity per se with application to some examples in evolution, The Evolution of Complexity, Brussels, Belgium.]Search in Google Scholar
[Feldman, J. (1997). Regularity-based perceptual grouping, Computational Intelligence13(4): 582–623.10.1111/0824-7935.00052]Search in Google Scholar
[Finnas, L. (1989). How can musical preferences be modified? A research review, Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education102: 1–58.]Search in Google Scholar
[Fritsch, S., Guenther, F. and Guenther, M.F. (2019). Package ‘neuralnet’, https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/neuralnet/neuralnet.pdf.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gold, B.P., Pearce, M.T., Mas-Herrero, E., Dagher, A. and Zatorre, R.J. (2019). Predictability and uncertainty in the pleasure of music: A reward for learning?, Journal of Neuroscience39(47): 9397–9409.10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0428-19.2019686781131636112]Search in Google Scholar
[Grassberger, P. (2004). Problems in quantifying self-organized complexity, Helvetica Physica Acta62(5): 498–511.]Search in Google Scholar
[Griffiths, T.D., Johnsrude, I., Dean, J.L. and Green, G.G. (1999). A common neural substrate for the analysis of pitch and duration pattern in segmented sound?, NeuroRe-port10(18): 3825–3830.10.1097/00001756-199912160-0001910716217]Search in Google Scholar
[Herbert, R. (2012). Young people’s use and subjective experience of music outside school, Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Music Perception and Cognition and the 8th Triennial Conference of the European Society for the Cognitive Sciences of Music, Thessaloniki, Greece, pp. 423–430.]Search in Google Scholar
[Holleran, S., Jones, M.R. and Butler, D. (1995). Perceiving implied harmony: The influence of melodic and harmonic context, Journal of Experimental Psychology: LMC21(3): 737–753.10.1037/0278-7393.21.3.737]Search in Google Scholar
[Huron, D. (2001). Tone and voice: A derivation of the rules of voice-leading from perceptual principles, Music Perception11(1): 1–64.10.1525/mp.2001.19.1.1]Search in Google Scholar
[Jackendoff, R. (2009). Parallels and nonparallels between language and music, Music Perception26(3): 195–204.10.1525/mp.2009.26.3.195]Search in Google Scholar
[Jones, M.R. and Boltz, M. (1989). Dynamic attending and responses to time, Psychology Revue96(3): 459–491.10.1037/0033-295X.96.3.459]Search in Google Scholar
[Justus, T. and Bharucha, J. (2003). Music perception and cognition, in A. Yantis and H. Pasler (Eds), Stevens Handbook of Experimental Psychology, Volume I: Sensation and Perception, Wiley, New York, NY, pp. 453–492.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kotsiantis, S., Kanellopoulos, D. and Pintelas, P.E. (2006). Handling imbalanced datasets: A review, GESTS International Transactions on Computer Science and Engineering30(1): 25–36.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kramer, J.D. (1988). The Time of Music: New Meanings, New Temporalities, New Listening Strategies, Schirmer Books, New York, NY.]Search in Google Scholar
[Krawczyk, B. (2016). Learning from imbalanced data: Open challenges and future directions, Progress in Artificial Intelligence5(4): 221–232.10.1007/s13748-016-0094-0]Search in Google Scholar
[Krumhansl, C.L. (2000). Rhythm and pitch in music cognition, Psychological Bulletin126(1): 159–179.10.1037/0033-2909.126.1.15910668354]Search in Google Scholar
[Krumhansl, C.L. (2004). The cognition of tonality—As we know it today, Journal of New Music Research33(3): 253–268.10.1080/0929821042000317831]Search in Google Scholar
[Lerdahl, F. and Jackendoff, R. (1983). An overview of hierarchical structure in music, Music Perception1(2): 229–252.10.2307/40285257]Search in Google Scholar
[Loui, P. (2012). Learning and liking of melody and harmony: Further studies in artificial grammar learning, Topics in Cognitive Science4(4): 554–567.10.1111/j.1756-8765.2012.01208.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Manjunath, B.S., Wu, P., Newsam, S. and Shin, H.D. (2000). A texture descriptor for browsing and similarity retrieval, Signal Processing: Image Communication16(1–2): 33–43.10.1016/S0923-5965(00)00016-3]Search in Google Scholar
[Melara, R.D. and Algom, D. (2003). Driven by information: A tectonic theory of stroop effects, Psychological Review110(3): 422–471.10.1037/0033-295X.110.3.422]Search in Google Scholar
[Meyer, L.B. (1957). Meaning in music and information theory, Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism15(4): 412–424.10.1111/1540_6245.jaac15.4.0412]Search in Google Scholar
[Mihelač, L. (2017). Napovedovanje slušne sprejemljivosti na osnovi entropije harmonije, Master’s thesis, School Center, Novo Mesto.]Search in Google Scholar
[Mihelač, L. and Povh, J. (2017). Predicting the acceptability of music with entropy of harmony, 14th International Symposium on Operations Research in Slovenia, SOR’17, Bled, Slovenia, pp. 371–375.]Search in Google Scholar
[Mihelač, L. and Povh, J. (2020). The impact of the complexity of harmony on the acceptability of music, ACM Transactions on Applied Perception17(1): 1–27.10.1145/3375014]Search in Google Scholar
[Mihelač, L. and Povh, J. (2019). The impact of harmony on the perception of music, 15th International Symposium on Operations Research in Slovenia SOR’19, Bled, Slovenia, pp. 360–365.]Search in Google Scholar
[Mihelač, L., Wiggins, A.G., Lavrač, N. and Povh, J. (2018). Entropy and acceptability: Information dynamics and music acceptance, Proceedings of ICMPC15/ESCOM10, Graz, Austria, pp. 313–317.]Search in Google Scholar
[Näätänen, R., Paavilainen, P., Rinne, T. and Alho, K. (2007). The mismatch negativity (MMN) in basic research of central auditory processing: A review, Clinical Neurophysiology118(12): 2544–2590.10.1016/j.clinph.2007.04.02617931964]Search in Google Scholar
[Narmour, E. (1990). The Analysis and Cognition of Basic Melodic Structures: The Implication–Realisation Model, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.]Search in Google Scholar
[Parncutt, R. (1989). Harmony: A Psychoacoustical Approach, Springer, Berlin.10.1007/978-3-642-74831-8]Search in Google Scholar
[Pauly, M., Mitra, N.J., Wallner, J., Pottmann, H. and Guibas, L.J. (2008). Discovering structural regularity in 3D geometry, ACM Transactions on Graphics27(3), Article no. 43.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pearce, M.T. (2005). The Construction and Evaluation of Statistical Models of Melodic Structure in Music Perception and Composition, PhD thesis, City University, London.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pearce, M.T. (2018). Statistical learning and probabilistic prediction in music cognition: Mechanisms of stylistic enculturation, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences1423(1): 378–395.10.1111/nyas.13654684974929749625]Search in Google Scholar
[Pearce, M.T., Müllensiefen, D. and Wiggins, G.A. (2010a). Melodic grouping in music information retrieval: New methods and applications, in Z.W. Raś and A.A. Wieczorkowska (Eds), Advances in Music Information Retrieval, Springer, Berlin, pp. 364–388.10.1007/978-3-642-11674-2_16]Search in Google Scholar
[Pearce, M.T., Müllensiefen, D. and Wiggins, G.A. (2010b). The role of expectation and probabilistic learning in auditory boundary perception: A model comparison, Perception39(10): 1365–1389.10.1068/p650721180358]Search in Google Scholar
[Pearce, M.T., Ruiz, M.H., Kapasi, S., Wiggins, G.A. and Bhattacharya, J. (2010). Unsupervised statistical learning underpins computational, behavioural, and neural manifestations of musical expectation, NeuroImage50(1): 302–313.10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.12.01920005297]Search in Google Scholar
[Pearce, M.T. and Wiggins, G.A. (2012). Auditory expectation: The information dynamics of music perception and cognition, Topics in Cognitive Science4(4): 625–652.10.1111/j.1756-8765.2012.01214.x22847872]Search in Google Scholar
[Pearce, M. and Wiggins, G. (2006). The information dynamics of melodic boundary detection, Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Music Perception and Cognition, Bologna, Italy, pp. 860–865.]Search in Google Scholar
[Peretz, I. and Zatorre, R.J. (2005). Brain organization for music processing, Annual Review of Psychology56: 89–114.10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.07022515709930]Search in Google Scholar
[Piotrowska, M., Korvel, G., Kostek, B., Ciszewski, T. and Czy˙zewski, A. (2019). Machine learning-based analysis of English lateral allophones, International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science29(2): 393–405, DOI: 10.2478/amcs-2019-0029.10.2478/amcs-2019-0029]Search in Google Scholar
[Platt, J.R. and Racine, R.J. (1994). Detection of implied harmony changes in triadic melodies, Music Perception11(3): 243–264.10.2307/40285622]Search in Google Scholar
[Plaut, D.C. (2000). Methodologies for the computer modeling of human cognitive processes, in F. Boller et al. (Eds), Handbook of Neuropsychology, Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 259–267.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pole, W. (2014). The Philosophy of Music, Routledge, Taylor & Francis, Milton Park, Abingdon.]Search in Google Scholar
[Povel, D.-J. and Jansen, E. (2002). Harmonic factors in the perception of tonal melodies, Music Perception20(1): 51–85.10.1525/mp.2002.20.1.51]Search in Google Scholar
[Prince, J.B. (2011). The integration of stimulus dimensions in the perception of music, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology64(11): 2125–2152.10.1080/17470218.2011.57308021598201]Search in Google Scholar
[Prince, J.B., Schmuckler, M.A. and Thompson, W.F. (2009a). The effect of task and pitch structure on pitch-time interactions in music, Memory and Cognition37(3): 368–381.10.3758/MC.37.3.36819246351]Search in Google Scholar
[Prince, J.B., Thompson, W.F. and Schmuckler, M.A. (2009b). Pitch and time, tonality and meter: How do musical dimensions combine?, Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance35(5): 1598–1617.10.1037/a001645619803659]Search in Google Scholar
[Rohrmeier, M. (2011). Towards a generative syntax of tonal harmony, Journal of Mathematics and Music5(1): 35–53.10.1080/17459737.2011.573676]Search in Google Scholar
[Rohrmeier, M. and Pearce, M.T. (2018). Musical syntax I: Theoretical perspectives, in R. Bader (Ed.), Springer Handbook of Systematic Musicology, Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp. 473–486.10.1007/978-3-662-55004-5_25]Search in Google Scholar
[Schröger, E. and Winkler, I. (1995). Presentation rate and magnitude of stimulus deviance effects on human pre-attentive change detection. viewpoint systems for music prediction, Neuroscience Letters193(3): 185–188.]Search in Google Scholar
[Shannon, C.E. (1948). A mathematical theory of communication, Bell System Technical Journal27(3): 379–423.10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Sloboda, J.A. and Parker, D.H.H. (1985). Immediate recall of melodies, in P. Howell et al. (Eds), Musical Structure and Cognition, Academic Press, London, pp. 143–167.]Search in Google Scholar
[Solomon, J.W. (2019). Music Theory Essentials—A Streamlined Approach to Fundamentals, Tonal Harmony, and Post-Tonal Materials, Taylor & Francis, Milton Park, Abingdon.10.4324/9781315167749]Search in Google Scholar
[Steinbeis, N., Koelsch, S. and Sloboda, J.A. (2006). The role of harmonic expectancy violations in musical emotions: Evidence from subjective, physiological, and neural responses, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience18(8): 1380–1393.10.1162/jocn.2006.18.8.138016859422]Search in Google Scholar
[Steinruecken, C., Ghahramani, Z. and MacKay, D. (2015). Improving ppm with dynamic parameter updates, Data Compression Conference 2015, Snowbrid, UT, USA, pp. 193–202.]Search in Google Scholar
[Thompson, W.F. and Cuddy, L.L. (1989). Sensitivity to key change in chorale sequences: A comparison of single voices and four-voice harmony, Music Perception7(2): 151–168.10.2307/40285455]Search in Google Scholar
[Tillmann, B., Bharucha, J.J. and Bigand, E. (2000). Implicit learning of tonality: A self-organizing approach, Psychological Review107(4): 885–913.10.1037/0033-295X.107.4.885]Search in Google Scholar
[Volk, A. (2016). Computational music structure analysis: A computational enterprise into time in music, in M. Müller et al. (Eds), Computational Music Structure Analysis, Vol. 6, Schloss Dagstuhl–Leibniz-Zentrum fuer Informatik, Leibniz, p. 159.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wiggins, G.A., Pearce, M.T. and Müllensiefen, D. (2009). Computational modeling of music cognition and musical creativity, in R.T. Dean (Ed.), Oxford Handbook of Computer Music and Digital Sound Culture, Oxford University Press, Oxford.]Search in Google Scholar
[Williams, L.R. (2005). Effect of music training and musical complexity on focus of attention to melody or harmony, Journal of Research in Music Education53(3): 210–221.10.1177/002242940505300303]Search in Google Scholar